Miliband’s Economy speech sounds routine – but there are signs it could be major after all…

February 14, 2013 9:26 am

As I wrote yesterday, today is a big day for the Labour Party.

Ed Miliband is giving a speech in Bedford (or as it seems obligatory to call it “a major speech on the economy”) and Jon Cruddas is speaking in East London at the launch of IPPR’s “Condition of Britain”. Both will be well worth watching – but it’s the interplay between the two men, and how these speeches will dovetail, that could be particularly interesting.

Especially as Cruddas may have already pulled Miliband’s rabbit out of his hat for him…

From the pre-briefing and the media coverage (especially Miliband’s Guardian interview), it would seem like today’s economy speech is fairly routine. There’s some good imagery around being in Bedford (where Macmillan once told Britain “you’ve never had it so good”) and some fleshing out of existing policy (such as a commitment to capping interest on payday lenders). But on the whole the speech looks largely like a consolidation of Miliband’s existing statements on growing the economy, with a top line straight off the back of the membership card – the many, not the few – and the Obama-esque phrasing of “middle out”. We’ll be hearing more of that between now and the budget – and it dovetails nicely with “Squeezed Middle” – but I’m not sure it’s big enough to justify the tag of “major speech”.

But like Sunny Hundal, I have a sneaking suspicion that Miliband is holding something significant back for the speech itself. There are a few clues that this might be the case.

Firstly – the speech is being labelled as “major”. Miliband’s team are aware that they are sometimes accused – as Steve Richards did today - or giving thoughtful speeches with no major policy. I’d be surprised if that was the case today, as it would be a huge failure of expectation management that should have been easy to spot.

Secondly – Miliband and his team are very keen on this speech going ahead. Despite trains being cancelled between Bedford and London, the speech is going ahead, with help being provided for intrepid hacks who can make it to Stevenage. They very much want people to be there – this was never going to be cancelled. If this were a routine speech, then surely they’d move it or cancel it?

Thirdly – Cruddas may just have given away the big reveal. On Newsnight last night he suggested that Labour could reintroduce the 10p tax rate (which isn’t so much middle out as bottom up). I spoke to a source close to Miliband last night who said simply “Cruddas is Cruddas” (reminiscent of Blair’s famous John is John), but Labour’s policy chief surely isn’t just throwing out ideas at random on national TV? At the same time Miliband’s consigliere Stewart Wood wrote for the Huffington Post this morning, noting the importance of “a commitment to find new ways in which the tax system can more fairly distribute the burden of support, both in lean and better times”, which sounds awfully like a fairer tax system. That could be a reference to the 50p tax rate. But could it be something more?

That’s the big question today. Miliband needs to say something that will cut through and make the speech go ‘pop’. A rehash of old ideas – even a really good one – won’t be enough after such build up.

We wait with baited breath…

  • IAS2011

    If Milliband wants to appear different, be different and show some REAL strength, ambition and determination… he needs to start having an audience of ‘real’ ordinary folk, who want progress in their lives, but who is serious about upholding democratic rules – “Fairness and Justice” for ALL.

    The fact is, politicians are only interested in being SAFE! Thus, they are not here to strengthen amongst the diversity of experience and opinion that is our communities. Instead, like Cameron, he seems only willing to Win and establish Power.

    Come on Milliband, unlike Cameron, be BOLD! Start addressing what is difficult. That how we strengthen and gain respect! That is what the people are crying out for. Don’t you hear them? Or, is it only Power that is sought by You and others?

  • Amber_Star

    The speech is getting heavy coverage & analysis on the mainstream news; so it seems that the media are treating it as a major speech.

Latest

  • News Video Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters appear to be losing their patience with David Cameron’s attempts to get out of appearing the pre-election TV debates. It is widely understood that Cameron has been advised by strategist Lynton Crosby not to take part in the leaders’ debates and has been dragging his feet during negotiations, making more debates each time broadcasters make new proposals. Following the initial invitation of UKIP to appear, Cameron claimed that the Green Party should also take part. Now the Greens, SNP […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    So Compass holds a debate about the relevance, or not, of tactical voting in the run up May and straight away John Spellar MP and then Luke Akehurst are on to us. John accused us of calling on people ‘not to vote Labour”, Luke says we are ‘naïve’. Well first lets be clear: we have set up the space on our website for a debate; we have one article for tactical voting and one against. We wanted to see what […]

    Read more →
  • News Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Yvette Cooper has accused Nigel Farage of attempting to exploit concerns about immigration rather than attempting to come up with practical policies. The Shadow Home Secretary also derided UKIP for getting themselves in a “ridiculous tangle” on the issue – last week a spokesperson for the party said they would introduce a net migration target of 50,000, while Farage today claims that it is not party policy. This follows Ed Miliband attacking David Cameron for missing his 2010 immigration promises […]

    Read more →
  • Featured PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    There are only three PMQs left until the election. Three more of these turgid, unattractive, unedifying and borderline pointless sessions to sit through before May. If this is the highlight of the Parliamentary week then Parliament can’t prorogue quick enough, frankly. Evidently many MPs feel the same, judging by the wide open spaces on the green benches this lunchtime. After a few minutes MPs had all spaced themselves out a little bit to make the place look a bit less […]

    Read more →
  • News Burnham announces charities should be “preferred provider” for NHS services

    Burnham announces charities should be “preferred provider” for NHS services

    Andy Burnham, Shadow Health Secretary, has said that charities should be the “preferred provider” of NHS services. He has said that Labour would introduce legislation, to get rid of parts of the contentious 2012 Health and Social Care Act, that would mean not-for-profit organisations would be seen as the “preferred provider” for the NHS. Contracts would be five or ten year agreements. This is part of Labour’s plan for health and social care. Speaking at the Association of Chief Executives […]

    Read more →