The Lib Dems might win in Eastleigh – but if they don’t, Clegg is a goner

28th February, 2013 8:20 am

It’s polling day in Eastleigh. I have no idea who’s going to win. I’d like it to be John O’Farrell, naturally, but that possibility could exist only in the plot-lines of one his excellent novels. Some, including veteran observer Michael Crick, have raised the possibility of a shock win by UKIP, as recipients of the ultimate protest vote. We’ll see. More likely is that it will be either the Tory or the Lib Dem.

Up to a few days ago, I was convinced it would be the Lib Dem (sorry, I haven’t bothered to learn his name.) If there’s one thing the Lib Dems are good at, it is isolating their local candidates from national events. A local candidate is encouraged to strike whatever local stance will help them win votes, regardless of their own views, votes, or what their putative colleagues are doing in Westminster. The Lib Dem (is it Bryan something?) has stuck below the radar, banging on about potholes and such like, in the hope that no-one would notice his close association with the soon-to-be jailed Chris Huhne. The Lib Dems also enjoy the advantage of a raft of councillors in the seat, giving them a ready-made army of activists, before the legendary Lib Dem coach-loads of by-election campaigners arrived.

The sudden squall over Chris Rennard’s alleged wandering hands threatens to send the Lib Dem candidate to the bottom of the Southampton Water. The Lib Dem response to the re-emergence of the allegations that Rennard used his position of power and influence to take liberties with aspiring Lib Dem candidates is a case study in what not to do. The sophistry of Clegg’s statements, the emergence of new information which undermines his claims, and the apparent lack of concern that a prominent party figure was accused of regularly feeling up women all add up to a presentational disaster. We expect it from the sexist, workerist SWP, but the Lib Dems? They’re supposed to be progressive on women’s issues.

The various attempts at a defence – we didn’t know about it (yes you did), it was a long time ago (no it wasn’t), it’s been blown out of proportion (no it hasn’t) – have become unravelled one after the other. The least creditable defence is that it’s all been got up by the Tories and the right-wing press. That may well be true. It may well be part of a dastardly plot by the Tories to win the by-election. I wonder where they learned that one? But so what? It doesn’t undermine the central charge.

It’s not as though Rennard was some random inadequate. He held power over the careers of the women he’s accused of touching. He could make or break their hopes and dreams. And if they complained, little or nothing would be done about it. If a definition of the abuse of patriarchal power exists, that would be it.

It’s hard to tell if the Rennard allegations have had an impact on those voting today. Most people haven’t heard of Nick Clegg, never mind Chris Rennard. It’s a beltway issue, to be sure, but maybe it’s reached beyond. Again, we’ll know in a few hours.

That leaves the Tory candidate Maria Hutchings. I described her as ‘loop-da-loop’ on Twitter the other day, and someone picked me up for using a pejorative term about mental health. Fair point. I’m not professionally qualified to comment on the state of Maria Hutchings’ mental health. All I know about her is that she came to the attention of the political class by attacking Tony Blair on live daytime television, until the television company’s paid bouncers intervened. Seeing the incident Michael Howard, then leader of the Tory Party, thought ‘that’s the kind of woman we need in the modern Conservative Party’. Since then, she has touted herself around various parliamentary seats, spouting views so odious that the Conservative Party’s own brand of paid bouncer has prevented her from voicing them on radio and television debates.

If Hutchings wins, it will give David Cameron a spectacular boost. It will secure his support on the backbenches, and drive forward his economic and social policy agenda, untroubled by any hint of a Labour revival. In the zero sum game of coalition politics, it will secure Cameron’s leadership just as surely as it will destroy Nick Clegg’s. To lose a seat with a 4,000 majority and all the councillors is a disaster for Clegg.

The moment of crisis for Clegg will come at the Lib Dem’s conference in Glasgow  in the Autumn, and he will be gone within the year.

  • AlanGiles

    ” The Lib Dem (is it Bryan something?) has stuck below the radar, banging on about potholes and such like,”

    So I take it, Mr…er Whatsyourname, that you don’t approve of the articles on LL recently about localism?. There was one only the other day from, I think, the woman who used to be Home Secretary, Mrs. er….. which actually mentioned domestic affairs of this sort.

    This is a petulant article, but it promises to be a very interesting night: one or other of the two leaders of the Coalition, will, I should think, be in danger of a vote of confidence this time tomorrow. At least you have the comfort of knowing, win or lose, your leader faces no such problems.

  • Charlie_Mansell

    The current ‘Wisdom of Crowds’ view from people who like predicting elections is here:

    It is inevitable that the Lib Dems would have focused on local issues, but that reflects the nature of their core vote. Some voters are more interested in the tangibility of local issues and also like to have a good case-working public representative close to them. For them the ‘local’ is important and I am glad Labour now recognises this with its community organising agenda.

    As can be seen from the Ashcroft polling Tory and Lib Dem voters tend more to this local position (they are probably more affluent and want to protect what they have achieved in this uncertain world) whereas Labour voters do tend to look to national political action (ie government is good) and want to ‘send a message’ The good thing for Labour in this campaign is the level of contact (see page 15 of the Poll) it achieved. It would now be very interesting to see what level of contact UKIP had with voters.

  • aracataca

    Anyone who reads my posts here will know that I am a resolute defender of the Labour Party but even I found this piece unpleasantly and unnecessarily sectarian.IMHO we need to focus on how we are going to media manage our defeat in Eastleigh over the coming days and weeks.
    We can and should leave the post-mortems which will be engaged in by the shower of sh1te currently known as Her Majesty’s Government to themselves. Whatever the result for them tonight one of the governing parties will embark on an incompetent fiasco euphemistically known as an ‘internal party inquiry’ we should sit back, enjoy it and laugh- we owe ourselves some light relief.

    • Gabrielle

      LOL – well said.

      It’s also worth noting that in 1997, 2001 and 2005 Labour came third in Eastleigh. Remind me again which party won the general elections?

  • Gabrielle

    Seeing the incident [Maria Hutchings haranguing Blair over a school closure that never was] Michael Howard, then leader of the Tory Party, thought ‘that’s the kind of woman we need in the modern Conservative Party’.

    That says much about Howard’s judgement. Miss Hustings (as she’s now known due to her many no-shows for debates) has certainly done little to enhance the Tories’ already poor reputation.

    I had thought at one point she was going to win by a whisker, not because she isn’t useless, but simply because of the hard core Tory vote in Eastleigh, plus the damage to the LibDems’ reputation.

    But as aracataca says, whether it’s Hutchings or Mike (looks like a ‘Bryan’) Thornton who loses, it will provide a bit of light relief to us to see one of the ConDem parties going off on one.

  • Michael Murray

    The Tories have more chance of winning in Barnsley than Labour have of coming first in Eastleigh. We couldn’t even do it in 1997. Oh, but if only we could! And why not? If UKIP do to the Tories what the SDP/Liberal Alliance did to us and enough disenchanted Liberals use us as a protest vote we might just inch in through the door.


  • Comment Featured 5 reasons Theresa May is wrong about “mass migration”

    5 reasons Theresa May is wrong about “mass migration”

    Theresa May yesterday took to the podium at Tory party conference and channelled her inner Enoch Powell. In a bid to prove her leadership credentials she made a virulently anti-immigration speech, but it was riddled with inaccuracies. She somewhat confusingly tore apart her own record on immigration as Home Secretary and warned that “mass migration” makes social cohesion impossible. The subtext of this: if you’ve got problems, blame migrants. Here’s why she is so sorely wrong. 1. Migrants aren’t responsible […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Osborne’s Northern Powerhouse risks being all fur coat

    Osborne’s Northern Powerhouse risks being all fur coat

    It’s a movement that shows no sign of slowing down. As cities and counties line up for devolution, the Chancellor is casting himself in the role of Commander in Chief. It took the Labour Party too long to recognise that after years of debate about Scottish independence and Welsh devolved government those of us who remain might rightly ask as well, what about us? Whatever your political view it is hard not to credit Mr Osborne and the many local leaders […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The Tories aren’t evil – and it’s not helpful to think of them so

    The Tories aren’t evil – and it’s not helpful to think of them so

    I am a Labour voter.  I am in fact a Labour member as of about 6 weeks ago.  Despite the best attempts of the triumphant ideologues of the far left who are have taken over the party, I have as much right to be in this party as they do (and potentially more given that so many of them have supported far-left anti-Labour parties such as the Greens and Trade Union and Socialist Coalition). As such, I’m not particularly fond […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Dinner snatchers: Are cuts to infant school dinners the dish of the day?

    Dinner snatchers: Are cuts to infant school dinners the dish of the day?

    With November’s Comprehensive Spending Review fast approaching, what is and isn’t mentioned in ministerial speeches at Conservative Party Conference should be taken as an indication of what is and isn’t up for grabs. Having been a general election commitment is no guarantee. The media coverage of Nicky Morgan’s speech today is likely to touch on her newly acquired status as an ‘outsider’ for next Tory leader. She is speaking on the same day as other higher profile pretenders to the […]

    Read more →
  • News Video “I never want to be remembered particularly” – Denis Healey’s final interview

    “I never want to be remembered particularly” – Denis Healey’s final interview

    Last night Newsnight aired the final broadcast interview that Denis Healey took part in before his death at the age of 98 this weekend. Filmed just a few weeks ago, the former Chancellor is asked how he would like to be remembered, replying modestly that “I never want to be remembered particularly.” He also says that he had entered politics in the 1940s because he wanted “to change the world”, but would probably not do so anymore “because the class […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends