The Lib Dems might win in Eastleigh – but if they don’t, Clegg is a goner

February 28, 2013 8:20 am

It’s polling day in Eastleigh. I have no idea who’s going to win. I’d like it to be John O’Farrell, naturally, but that possibility could exist only in the plot-lines of one his excellent novels. Some, including veteran observer Michael Crick, have raised the possibility of a shock win by UKIP, as recipients of the ultimate protest vote. We’ll see. More likely is that it will be either the Tory or the Lib Dem.

Up to a few days ago, I was convinced it would be the Lib Dem (sorry, I haven’t bothered to learn his name.) If there’s one thing the Lib Dems are good at, it is isolating their local candidates from national events. A local candidate is encouraged to strike whatever local stance will help them win votes, regardless of their own views, votes, or what their putative colleagues are doing in Westminster. The Lib Dem (is it Bryan something?) has stuck below the radar, banging on about potholes and such like, in the hope that no-one would notice his close association with the soon-to-be jailed Chris Huhne. The Lib Dems also enjoy the advantage of a raft of councillors in the seat, giving them a ready-made army of activists, before the legendary Lib Dem coach-loads of by-election campaigners arrived.

The sudden squall over Chris Rennard’s alleged wandering hands threatens to send the Lib Dem candidate to the bottom of the Southampton Water. The Lib Dem response to the re-emergence of the allegations that Rennard used his position of power and influence to take liberties with aspiring Lib Dem candidates is a case study in what not to do. The sophistry of Clegg’s statements, the emergence of new information which undermines his claims, and the apparent lack of concern that a prominent party figure was accused of regularly feeling up women all add up to a presentational disaster. We expect it from the sexist, workerist SWP, but the Lib Dems? They’re supposed to be progressive on women’s issues.

The various attempts at a defence – we didn’t know about it (yes you did), it was a long time ago (no it wasn’t), it’s been blown out of proportion (no it hasn’t) – have become unravelled one after the other. The least creditable defence is that it’s all been got up by the Tories and the right-wing press. That may well be true. It may well be part of a dastardly plot by the Tories to win the by-election. I wonder where they learned that one? But so what? It doesn’t undermine the central charge.

It’s not as though Rennard was some random inadequate. He held power over the careers of the women he’s accused of touching. He could make or break their hopes and dreams. And if they complained, little or nothing would be done about it. If a definition of the abuse of patriarchal power exists, that would be it.

It’s hard to tell if the Rennard allegations have had an impact on those voting today. Most people haven’t heard of Nick Clegg, never mind Chris Rennard. It’s a beltway issue, to be sure, but maybe it’s reached beyond. Again, we’ll know in a few hours.

That leaves the Tory candidate Maria Hutchings. I described her as ‘loop-da-loop’ on Twitter the other day, and someone picked me up for using a pejorative term about mental health. Fair point. I’m not professionally qualified to comment on the state of Maria Hutchings’ mental health. All I know about her is that she came to the attention of the political class by attacking Tony Blair on live daytime television, until the television company’s paid bouncers intervened. Seeing the incident Michael Howard, then leader of the Tory Party, thought ‘that’s the kind of woman we need in the modern Conservative Party’. Since then, she has touted herself around various parliamentary seats, spouting views so odious that the Conservative Party’s own brand of paid bouncer has prevented her from voicing them on radio and television debates.

If Hutchings wins, it will give David Cameron a spectacular boost. It will secure his support on the backbenches, and drive forward his economic and social policy agenda, untroubled by any hint of a Labour revival. In the zero sum game of coalition politics, it will secure Cameron’s leadership just as surely as it will destroy Nick Clegg’s. To lose a seat with a 4,000 majority and all the councillors is a disaster for Clegg.

The moment of crisis for Clegg will come at the Lib Dem’s conference in Glasgow  in the Autumn, and he will be gone within the year.

  • AlanGiles

    ” The Lib Dem (is it Bryan something?) has stuck below the radar, banging on about potholes and such like,”

    So I take it, Mr…er Whatsyourname, that you don’t approve of the articles on LL recently about localism?. There was one only the other day from, I think, the woman who used to be Home Secretary, Mrs. er….. which actually mentioned domestic affairs of this sort.

    This is a petulant article, but it promises to be a very interesting night: one or other of the two leaders of the Coalition, will, I should think, be in danger of a vote of confidence this time tomorrow. At least you have the comfort of knowing, win or lose, your leader faces no such problems.

  • Charlie_Mansell

    The current ‘Wisdom of Crowds’ view from people who like predicting elections is here: http://www.electiongame.co.uk/

    It is inevitable that the Lib Dems would have focused on local issues, but that reflects the nature of their core vote. Some voters are more interested in the tangibility of local issues and also like to have a good case-working public representative close to them. For them the ‘local’ is important and I am glad Labour now recognises this with its community organising agenda.

    As can be seen from the Ashcroft polling Tory and Lib Dem voters tend more to this local position (they are probably more affluent and want to protect what they have achieved in this uncertain world) whereas Labour voters do tend to look to national political action (ie government is good) and want to ‘send a message’ http://lordashcroftpolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Eastleigh-25thFeb-30Realloc-BPC1-copy.pdf The good thing for Labour in this campaign is the level of contact (see page 15 of the Poll) it achieved. It would now be very interesting to see what level of contact UKIP had with voters.

  • aracataca

    Anyone who reads my posts here will know that I am a resolute defender of the Labour Party but even I found this piece unpleasantly and unnecessarily sectarian.IMHO we need to focus on how we are going to media manage our defeat in Eastleigh over the coming days and weeks.
    We can and should leave the post-mortems which will be engaged in by the shower of sh1te currently known as Her Majesty’s Government to themselves. Whatever the result for them tonight one of the governing parties will embark on an incompetent fiasco euphemistically known as an ‘internal party inquiry’ we should sit back, enjoy it and laugh- we owe ourselves some light relief.

    • Gabrielle

      LOL – well said.

      It’s also worth noting that in 1997, 2001 and 2005 Labour came third in Eastleigh. Remind me again which party won the general elections?

  • Gabrielle

    Seeing the incident [Maria Hutchings haranguing Blair over a school closure that never was] Michael Howard, then leader of the Tory Party, thought ‘that’s the kind of woman we need in the modern Conservative Party’.

    That says much about Howard’s judgement. Miss Hustings (as she’s now known due to her many no-shows for debates) has certainly done little to enhance the Tories’ already poor reputation.

    I had thought at one point she was going to win by a whisker, not because she isn’t useless, but simply because of the hard core Tory vote in Eastleigh, plus the damage to the LibDems’ reputation.

    But as aracataca says, whether it’s Hutchings or Mike (looks like a ‘Bryan’) Thornton who loses, it will provide a bit of light relief to us to see one of the ConDem parties going off on one.

  • Michael Murray

    The Tories have more chance of winning in Barnsley than Labour have of coming first in Eastleigh. We couldn’t even do it in 1997. Oh, but if only we could! And why not? If UKIP do to the Tories what the SDP/Liberal Alliance did to us and enough disenchanted Liberals use us as a protest vote we might just inch in through the door.

Latest

  • News Blair says the West must be prepared to work with Putin and the Egyptian military

    Blair says the West must be prepared to work with Putin and the Egyptian military

    Tony Blair may not have been Prime Minister for nearly seven years now, but his views – particularly on foreign policy – are always newsworthy. This morning he gave a wide-ranging and controversial speech at Bloomberg’s London HQ on the Middle East, urging the West not to pull back from the Middle East as an unsolvable problem, but to engage. Although despite the billing, this was as much a speech about faith as it was about geo-politics. At the roots of Blair’s […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour set up rapid rebuttal unit for election campaign

    Labour set up rapid rebuttal unit for election campaign

    Labour plan to step up their media monitoring process in the run up to the 2015 general election, according to The Independent. A team will be in charge of rebutting negative media to avoid a re-run of the 1992 election, where an onslaught of attacks from the press played their part in a unexpected Conservative victory. Michael Dugher, the MP in charge of Labour’s communications, is this week in the US discussing strategy with new appointment David Axelrod and other political […]

    Read more →
  • Featured UKIP, England and St George

    UKIP, England and St George

    Labour tends to view UKIP like Nelson viewed the signal at the Battle of Copenhagen. He held the telescope to his blind eye and said, ‘I really do not see the signal’.  Our image of  UKIP is a protest vehicle for disaffected, older, right wing Tories in the South. But UKIP represents more significant trends than this caricature suggests. UKIP is a symptom of the deep social and economic changes that have taken place over the last thirty years. Its […]

    Read more →
  • News Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Regular readers will know that we’re always keeping an eye on Lib Dems leaflets. Their local propaganda sheets are always good for a questionable bar chart, or forgetting the name of the generic place their text is for – but they can also be quite shy about their party affiliation too. For example, take the “Islington Chronicle”. Sounds like a local paper, and there’s no Lib Dem logo and barely a splash of their trademark yellow. But it is, in […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Seats and Selections Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    This morning we noted that the Tories haven’t selected candidates in nearly half of the most marginal Labour and Lib Dem seats. But what’s particularly telling is that in over 60% of target seats in the Midlands and the North they have so far failed to select a candidate, while the Independent claims that in Scotland there are no Tory parliamentary candidates at all. However, Mark Wallace over at ConHome notes that the Tories have in fact selected a total of two […]

    Read more →