The secret world of Labour Party “special measures”

February 7, 2013 2:01 pm

Jon Cruddas’s speech last night – especially the part about the remoteness of the Labour Party – has got Sandwell Labour Councillor Bob Piper thinking about his local party which has been placed in “special measures’ for a number of years now. Bob explains:

Our Constituency Labour Party was placed in special measures by some nameless person for some unspecified reason about three years ago. No-one from Jon Cruddas’ ‘remote authority’ ever had the courtesy to explain to branches why they were in special measures, what it meant for them, and what they could possibly do to get out of them. The first branches knew about it was when applicants to join Labour’s campaign against an uncaring coalition received a letter from said centralist bureaucracy explaining that they couldn’t join the Party because the CLP was in ‘special measures’ – although they weren’t offered an explanation either.

Over the last two years our branch – an active and lively bunch – has recruited just four new members. Two transferred from other CLPs, one who worked for the Labour Party, and another chap who somehow crawled under the barbed wire, and was therefore suspiciously regarded as a double agent of some kind.

We have raised our concerns everywhere we can. Our MP John Spellar tells us he thinks it is mad. Our CLP officers, the Leader of the local Council, the Regional Secretary, two NEC members I contacted, and Tom Watson who is forever writing to us to remind us of the need for recruitment to the struggle, all say it is madness and nothing to do with them. Meanwhile, applicants continue to give up their attempts to join in frustration. One, a local community activist who has lived in the Ward for years, and went to school with the CLP Secretary, has been told after 14 months of trying to join, that he cannot confirm his identity (he’s pictured in the newspapers twice a week) and anyway, he’s not on the electoral register.

No-one seems to know why this CLP is in special measures, how long with will be under special measures, or how they can get out of it?

Can anyone explain this to Bob and his fellow local party members? And if not – what kind of ridiculous Kafkaesque farce is the Labour Party running here? There may – perhaps – be legitimate reasons for a party being placed under such measures. But at the very least they should know why.

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    They probably haven’t achieved the spotty SpAd/Oxbridge quota.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrea-Parma/578831001 Andrea Parma

    how many CLPs are under “special measures”?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Fiona White

    How can anyone be put in special measures without knowing what they’ve done? Or have the Labour Party already adopted Secret Courts?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

  • Jeremy_Preece

    Sounds bonkers!
    Also sounds self defeating.

    Any part of a modern democratic party should know if they are in special measures and why. Preventing new members joining – what a great idea.

    Someone knows what this is about and and should either lift this now unless there is a good reason. If there is they must explain exactly why it is so and how it can be resolved.

  • http://twitter.com/Ultra_Fox Colin Hall

    A scandal and a disgrace, but by no means the first time the party has moved to close down a previously-active CLP. I know of at least one CLP that has been the subject of similar action during the past decade and beyond.

    The NEC need to publish a full list of all CLPs who are currently in “special measures” and the reasons why.

  • $51144918

    it has happened before in wards.all around ‘memberships’.so why has it been ‘known’
    now? whose ‘spinning’ this one?

Latest

  • News “What would you call it?” Nigel Farage defends use of racist term by UKIP candidate

    “What would you call it?” Nigel Farage defends use of racist term by UKIP candidate

    Nigel Farage has defended the use of a racist term used by a UKIP candidate – who had to resign after his bigoted comments were uncovered. Kerry Smith, the party’s candidate in target seat South Basildon and East Thurrock, had been caught using homophobic and racist language in a phone call, and resigned as PPC on Sunday night. In a statement, he said that he wanted “to see the real issues discussed that touch the lives of people” – but […]

    Read more →
  • Featured An election pledge card of two halves?

    An election pledge card of two halves?

    So far Ed Miliband has revealed two of Labour’s General Election pledges – first was a commitment to eliminating the deficit, which was quickly followed by a second on immigration. These pledge have been broadly supported by LabourList readers in our weekly survey this week, and that’ll be good news for Miliband and his team as they begin go think about their Christmas break, as these pledges were always likely to be the most contentious and hardest to sell to Labour […]

    Read more →
  • News Salmond hints at giving support to a minority Labour government

    Salmond hints at giving support to a minority Labour government

    The SNP’s convention says that it’s MP will not vote on English laws. However, former SNP leader, Alex Salmond has said they might be willing to put this to one side, to support a minority Labour government if no party wins an outright majority next year. In an interview with the Independent, Salmond explained “I would lay odds on a balanced parliament. “That’s an opportunity to have delivered to Scotland what we have been promised.” Giving the example of two […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News LabourList readers back Miliband’s pledges

    LabourList readers back Miliband’s pledges

    Last Thursday, Ed Miliband made Labour’s first election pledge, Conor Pope gave us the low-down of what this meant.  Effectively, Miliband said Labour would reduce the deficit but noted that a next Labour government would do so while securing the future of the NHS. Labour is long portrayed as the fiscally irresponsible party, and this speech saw Miliband try to rectify this mischaracterisation. So we wanted to know what LabourList readers thought about this pledge. The news looks good for the Labour […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There’s more to Higher Education than the REF

    There’s more to Higher Education than the REF

    Yesterday, British universities were in a spin. The result of six years of stress and anxiety, management pressure and absurdly bureaucratic language is out. We know the REF scores. We know, in other words, the numbers that every university department in Britain have been given for the quality and impact of their research over the last six years. The REF dominates university life. It decides appointments and shapes the way university managers treat staff – many hire research ‘stars’ at […]

    Read more →