The secret world of Labour Party “special measures”

February 7, 2013 2:01 pm

Jon Cruddas’s speech last night – especially the part about the remoteness of the Labour Party – has got Sandwell Labour Councillor Bob Piper thinking about his local party which has been placed in “special measures’ for a number of years now. Bob explains:

Our Constituency Labour Party was placed in special measures by some nameless person for some unspecified reason about three years ago. No-one from Jon Cruddas’ ‘remote authority’ ever had the courtesy to explain to branches why they were in special measures, what it meant for them, and what they could possibly do to get out of them. The first branches knew about it was when applicants to join Labour’s campaign against an uncaring coalition received a letter from said centralist bureaucracy explaining that they couldn’t join the Party because the CLP was in ‘special measures’ – although they weren’t offered an explanation either.

Over the last two years our branch – an active and lively bunch – has recruited just four new members. Two transferred from other CLPs, one who worked for the Labour Party, and another chap who somehow crawled under the barbed wire, and was therefore suspiciously regarded as a double agent of some kind.

We have raised our concerns everywhere we can. Our MP John Spellar tells us he thinks it is mad. Our CLP officers, the Leader of the local Council, the Regional Secretary, two NEC members I contacted, and Tom Watson who is forever writing to us to remind us of the need for recruitment to the struggle, all say it is madness and nothing to do with them. Meanwhile, applicants continue to give up their attempts to join in frustration. One, a local community activist who has lived in the Ward for years, and went to school with the CLP Secretary, has been told after 14 months of trying to join, that he cannot confirm his identity (he’s pictured in the newspapers twice a week) and anyway, he’s not on the electoral register.

No-one seems to know why this CLP is in special measures, how long with will be under special measures, or how they can get out of it?

Can anyone explain this to Bob and his fellow local party members? And if not – what kind of ridiculous Kafkaesque farce is the Labour Party running here? There may – perhaps – be legitimate reasons for a party being placed under such measures. But at the very least they should know why.

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    They probably haven’t achieved the spotty SpAd/Oxbridge quota.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrea-Parma/578831001 Andrea Parma

    how many CLPs are under “special measures”?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Fiona White

    How can anyone be put in special measures without knowing what they’ve done? Or have the Labour Party already adopted Secret Courts?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

  • Jeremy_Preece

    Sounds bonkers!
    Also sounds self defeating.

    Any part of a modern democratic party should know if they are in special measures and why. Preventing new members joining – what a great idea.

    Someone knows what this is about and and should either lift this now unless there is a good reason. If there is they must explain exactly why it is so and how it can be resolved.

  • http://twitter.com/Ultra_Fox Colin Hall

    A scandal and a disgrace, but by no means the first time the party has moved to close down a previously-active CLP. I know of at least one CLP that has been the subject of similar action during the past decade and beyond.

    The NEC need to publish a full list of all CLPs who are currently in “special measures” and the reasons why.

  • $51144918

    it has happened before in wards.all around ‘memberships’.so why has it been ‘known’
    now? whose ‘spinning’ this one?

Latest

  • News Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Labour have spoken out about complaints that Fiona Woolf QC, head of the public inquiry into historical sex abuse, has links with Leon Brittan. Brittan was the home secretary at the time when the dossier about alleged pedophiles went missing. And Woolf, who is also Lord Mayor of London, admitted yesterday that since 2008 she had dinner with Brittan and his family on five separate occasions but she has said she has “no close association” with him. A number of Labour MPs […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    Here we are again. Another week, another Wednesday, and another wrangle between Cameron and Miliband about the NHS. This is getting a bit old. Cameron attempted to get Miliband on the back foot – he kicked off PMQs by posing questions to the Labour leader about the Welsh NHS. Rather predictably, the rest of PMQs descended into the two party leaders arguing about who can be more trusted with the NHS. But, there was something a little more sinister about […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    A couple of weeks ago saw the UK elect for the first time a UKIP MP – Douglas Carswell, with a huge majority of 12,000 votes. UKIP made enormous strides in the safe Labour seat of Heywood & Middleton as well, reducing the Labour majority from 5,971 to 617. This rise in the ‘acceptable’ far right should be a cause of concern not just to the Tories but also to us. It is clear from these results there is no […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    The result in Heywood and Middleton may have shocked some people, but not all. Some warned this could happen after UKIP took or seriously challenged safe council seats in the north, topped the national vote at the Euros, and polled strongly in Labour areas. Their highest average share of the vote in the 2014 elections came in Labour areas like Rotherham, Mansfield and Hartlepool. We’re told if we campaign on the “issues” people will come back to Labour. This fails […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Last night Young Labour voted on whether or not to come out in support of the free education demonstration set to take place on the 19th November. Reports suggest, they voted against the motion. This result could easily be interpreted as another sign that the argument against tuition fees is dead in the water. In reality, it tells us that opposite is true. The very fact that this was a topic for discussion at Young Labour’s national committee, that there […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y