The secret world of Labour Party “special measures”

February 7, 2013 2:01 pm

Jon Cruddas’s speech last night – especially the part about the remoteness of the Labour Party – has got Sandwell Labour Councillor Bob Piper thinking about his local party which has been placed in “special measures’ for a number of years now. Bob explains:

Our Constituency Labour Party was placed in special measures by some nameless person for some unspecified reason about three years ago. No-one from Jon Cruddas’ ‘remote authority’ ever had the courtesy to explain to branches why they were in special measures, what it meant for them, and what they could possibly do to get out of them. The first branches knew about it was when applicants to join Labour’s campaign against an uncaring coalition received a letter from said centralist bureaucracy explaining that they couldn’t join the Party because the CLP was in ‘special measures’ – although they weren’t offered an explanation either.

Over the last two years our branch – an active and lively bunch – has recruited just four new members. Two transferred from other CLPs, one who worked for the Labour Party, and another chap who somehow crawled under the barbed wire, and was therefore suspiciously regarded as a double agent of some kind.

We have raised our concerns everywhere we can. Our MP John Spellar tells us he thinks it is mad. Our CLP officers, the Leader of the local Council, the Regional Secretary, two NEC members I contacted, and Tom Watson who is forever writing to us to remind us of the need for recruitment to the struggle, all say it is madness and nothing to do with them. Meanwhile, applicants continue to give up their attempts to join in frustration. One, a local community activist who has lived in the Ward for years, and went to school with the CLP Secretary, has been told after 14 months of trying to join, that he cannot confirm his identity (he’s pictured in the newspapers twice a week) and anyway, he’s not on the electoral register.

No-one seems to know why this CLP is in special measures, how long with will be under special measures, or how they can get out of it?

Can anyone explain this to Bob and his fellow local party members? And if not – what kind of ridiculous Kafkaesque farce is the Labour Party running here? There may – perhaps – be legitimate reasons for a party being placed under such measures. But at the very least they should know why.

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    They probably haven’t achieved the spotty SpAd/Oxbridge quota.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrea-Parma/578831001 Andrea Parma

    how many CLPs are under “special measures”?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Fiona White

    How can anyone be put in special measures without knowing what they’ve done? Or have the Labour Party already adopted Secret Courts?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

  • Jeremy_Preece

    Sounds bonkers!
    Also sounds self defeating.

    Any part of a modern democratic party should know if they are in special measures and why. Preventing new members joining – what a great idea.

    Someone knows what this is about and and should either lift this now unless there is a good reason. If there is they must explain exactly why it is so and how it can be resolved.

  • http://twitter.com/Ultra_Fox Colin Hall

    A scandal and a disgrace, but by no means the first time the party has moved to close down a previously-active CLP. I know of at least one CLP that has been the subject of similar action during the past decade and beyond.

    The NEC need to publish a full list of all CLPs who are currently in “special measures” and the reasons why.

  • $51144918

    it has happened before in wards.all around ‘memberships’.so why has it been ‘known’
    now? whose ‘spinning’ this one?

Latest

  • Comment Do the media fear their grip on mass communications is failing?

    Do the media fear their grip on mass communications is failing?

    A twitterstorm – actually it was more of a sonic boom – over the weekend saw more than 260,000 actively participate in #CameronMustGo. And four days on, it was still trending. It’s a great campaign. It demonstrates that Cameron is out of touch – he says he’s fixed the economy but a recent poll shows eight in ten people have felt little or no impact on their standard of living. When I first tweeted the hashtag, I was immediately told […]

    Read more →
  • News Brown was a better chancellor than Osborne is now, poll finds

    Brown was a better chancellor than Osborne is now, poll finds

    As we reported over the weekend, there are rumours circulating that Gordon Brown is going to step down as an MP. In light of this, The Times Red Box, in collaboration with YouGov, have done a poll to find out what the public thinks about the former chancellor – particularly in relation to the current one, George Osborne. When respondents were asked whether they thought Gordon Brown was a better or worse chancellor of the Exchequer than George Osborne is […]

    Read more →
  • Featured “Tory Welfare Waste” – why Reeves’ new attack line will cut through with voters

    “Tory Welfare Waste” – why Reeves’ new attack line will cut through with voters

    Rachel Reeves will make a speech today slamming the Tories’ handling of the welfare system, and will trial what looks like could potentially become a recurring line for Labour in the election run-up. “Tory Welfare Waste” is the takeaway line from today’s speech, and is likely to stick in the craw of the Tories, who have spent years trying to paint Labour as the party of profligate welfare spending. But annoying your opponents is not the only effective attack line. Fortunately, this […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured 8 questions Iain Duncan-Smith must now answer

    8 questions Iain Duncan-Smith must now answer

    In November 2011 Iain Duncan Smith promised – one million people would be on Universal Credit by April 2014. Three years on fewer than 18,000 people are receiving Universal Credit. Despite over £600million being spent on the new benefit the programme is beset by chaos, waste and delays. This afternoon Iain Duncan Smith was forced to appear before the House of Commons to answer questions about this failing programme. But once again he refused to answer the simplest of questions about his […]

    Read more →
  • Comment They left us wanting more – Gordon Brown is only the latest big beast to depart

    They left us wanting more – Gordon Brown is only the latest big beast to depart

    “Always leave them wanting more.” It’s not entirely clear who said it first, but this has become one of the more popular, if rarely achieved, political clichés. Of all the recent political leaders we might have expected to stand aside with a clamour for more ringing in his ears, Gordon Brown would not have featured prominently in discussions. Brown’s Labour leadership culminated in the party’s second worst General Election performance in the post-war era. Although he opted to remain in […]

    Read more →