The secret world of Labour Party “special measures”

February 7, 2013 2:01 pm

Jon Cruddas’s speech last night – especially the part about the remoteness of the Labour Party – has got Sandwell Labour Councillor Bob Piper thinking about his local party which has been placed in “special measures’ for a number of years now. Bob explains:

Our Constituency Labour Party was placed in special measures by some nameless person for some unspecified reason about three years ago. No-one from Jon Cruddas’ ‘remote authority’ ever had the courtesy to explain to branches why they were in special measures, what it meant for them, and what they could possibly do to get out of them. The first branches knew about it was when applicants to join Labour’s campaign against an uncaring coalition received a letter from said centralist bureaucracy explaining that they couldn’t join the Party because the CLP was in ‘special measures’ – although they weren’t offered an explanation either.

Over the last two years our branch – an active and lively bunch – has recruited just four new members. Two transferred from other CLPs, one who worked for the Labour Party, and another chap who somehow crawled under the barbed wire, and was therefore suspiciously regarded as a double agent of some kind.

We have raised our concerns everywhere we can. Our MP John Spellar tells us he thinks it is mad. Our CLP officers, the Leader of the local Council, the Regional Secretary, two NEC members I contacted, and Tom Watson who is forever writing to us to remind us of the need for recruitment to the struggle, all say it is madness and nothing to do with them. Meanwhile, applicants continue to give up their attempts to join in frustration. One, a local community activist who has lived in the Ward for years, and went to school with the CLP Secretary, has been told after 14 months of trying to join, that he cannot confirm his identity (he’s pictured in the newspapers twice a week) and anyway, he’s not on the electoral register.

No-one seems to know why this CLP is in special measures, how long with will be under special measures, or how they can get out of it?

Can anyone explain this to Bob and his fellow local party members? And if not – what kind of ridiculous Kafkaesque farce is the Labour Party running here? There may – perhaps – be legitimate reasons for a party being placed under such measures. But at the very least they should know why.

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    They probably haven’t achieved the spotty SpAd/Oxbridge quota.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrea-Parma/578831001 Andrea Parma

    how many CLPs are under “special measures”?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Fiona White

    How can anyone be put in special measures without knowing what they’ve done? Or have the Labour Party already adopted Secret Courts?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

  • Jeremy_Preece

    Sounds bonkers!
    Also sounds self defeating.

    Any part of a modern democratic party should know if they are in special measures and why. Preventing new members joining – what a great idea.

    Someone knows what this is about and and should either lift this now unless there is a good reason. If there is they must explain exactly why it is so and how it can be resolved.

  • http://twitter.com/Ultra_Fox Colin Hall

    A scandal and a disgrace, but by no means the first time the party has moved to close down a previously-active CLP. I know of at least one CLP that has been the subject of similar action during the past decade and beyond.

    The NEC need to publish a full list of all CLPs who are currently in “special measures” and the reasons why.

  • $51144918

    it has happened before in wards.all around ‘memberships’.so why has it been ‘known’
    now? whose ‘spinning’ this one?

Latest

  • News Scotland have voted No to independence, say LabourList readers

    Scotland have voted No to independence, say LabourList readers

    In a few hours time, we will find out that Scotland has voted against independence – according to LabourList readers, anyway. 77% of those who took our survey this week said they thought that the outcome of today’s referendum would be a No vote. Despite polls have closed in over the past fortnight, our readers are confident that Scots will have chosen to preserve the Union. 23% think that the result will be in favour of Yes. Only two polls in […]

    Read more →
  • News Lift cap on borrowing so councils can build – say Labour PPCs, councillors and AMs

    Lift cap on borrowing so councils can build – say Labour PPCs, councillors and AMs

    A group of London-based Prospective Parliamentary Candidates, councillors and London Assembly Members have written an open letter (published in the Guardian), calling on party leadership to go further in their policy commitments when it comes to building houses. Although the letter praises Ed’s pledge that the next Labour government “will build 200,000 homes a year by 2020″, the cohort which include urge leadership to commit to lifting what they deem the “arbitrary cap [placed on councils] on borrowing to build”. […]

    Read more →
  • News Are Labour going to make the NHS the focal point of the 2015 campaign?

    Are Labour going to make the NHS the focal point of the 2015 campaign?

    Earlier this week, a poll found that Labour hold an 18-point lead over the Tories as the most trusted party on the NHS – the only topic voters consider a “major issue” that sees a Labour lead. The NHS being a crucial issue of the Scottish referendum, with both sides accusing the other of lying. Many of today’s votes rest on whether they trust Yes Scotland or Better Together’s claims about the health service. Now reports say that Labour are considering […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We stand up for human value – we proudly defend the Human Rights Act

    We stand up for human value – we proudly defend the Human Rights Act

    If you’re part of the Labour Party, or hold any similar values, you will certainly share the absolute belief in respect and dignity for everyone. I don’t think anyone in our movement, with our principles, would disagree. And so, with those common values, we are entirely right to stand up, loud and proud, for the Human Rights Act. The publication this week of Human Rights: Reflections on the 1998 Act by Jonathan Cooper in Stephen Hockman’s Law Reform 2015 (with […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland Friendship and solidarity must prevail, as the fog clears

    Friendship and solidarity must prevail, as the fog clears

    The air hangs thick this morning with the referendum. Last night a deep fog rolled down across Edinburgh, but in reality it is the campaign which has blotted the vision and stopped even the keenest of observers from seeing what lies just a few footsteps ahead. The final days has provided one crucial clarification though – the No campaign is capable of great passion and powerful rhetoric. Mocked, endlessly criticised, a reputation dragged through the muck. Despite it all – […]

    Read more →