The secret world of Labour Party “special measures”

February 7, 2013 2:01 pm

Jon Cruddas’s speech last night – especially the part about the remoteness of the Labour Party – has got Sandwell Labour Councillor Bob Piper thinking about his local party which has been placed in “special measures’ for a number of years now. Bob explains:

Our Constituency Labour Party was placed in special measures by some nameless person for some unspecified reason about three years ago. No-one from Jon Cruddas’ ‘remote authority’ ever had the courtesy to explain to branches why they were in special measures, what it meant for them, and what they could possibly do to get out of them. The first branches knew about it was when applicants to join Labour’s campaign against an uncaring coalition received a letter from said centralist bureaucracy explaining that they couldn’t join the Party because the CLP was in ‘special measures’ – although they weren’t offered an explanation either.

Over the last two years our branch – an active and lively bunch – has recruited just four new members. Two transferred from other CLPs, one who worked for the Labour Party, and another chap who somehow crawled under the barbed wire, and was therefore suspiciously regarded as a double agent of some kind.

We have raised our concerns everywhere we can. Our MP John Spellar tells us he thinks it is mad. Our CLP officers, the Leader of the local Council, the Regional Secretary, two NEC members I contacted, and Tom Watson who is forever writing to us to remind us of the need for recruitment to the struggle, all say it is madness and nothing to do with them. Meanwhile, applicants continue to give up their attempts to join in frustration. One, a local community activist who has lived in the Ward for years, and went to school with the CLP Secretary, has been told after 14 months of trying to join, that he cannot confirm his identity (he’s pictured in the newspapers twice a week) and anyway, he’s not on the electoral register.

No-one seems to know why this CLP is in special measures, how long with will be under special measures, or how they can get out of it?

Can anyone explain this to Bob and his fellow local party members? And if not – what kind of ridiculous Kafkaesque farce is the Labour Party running here? There may – perhaps – be legitimate reasons for a party being placed under such measures. But at the very least they should know why.

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    They probably haven’t achieved the spotty SpAd/Oxbridge quota.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrea-Parma/578831001 Andrea Parma

    how many CLPs are under “special measures”?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    There should be an explanation. In London a number of places face additional oversight for selections because of past problems over accuracy of membership lists. People are aware of this. Presumably the West Midlands Regional Director will respond and explain what the specific issue is in the case of this CLP?

  • Fiona White

    How can anyone be put in special measures without knowing what they’ve done? Or have the Labour Party already adopted Secret Courts?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

    • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I’ve been a party member for 5 years, and this article was the first time I learnt such a thing ever existed. Reading around, I gather it’s for if there’s been abuse in selection procedures, was that perhaps a problem in Sandwell perhaps?

  • Jeremy_Preece

    Sounds bonkers!
    Also sounds self defeating.

    Any part of a modern democratic party should know if they are in special measures and why. Preventing new members joining – what a great idea.

    Someone knows what this is about and and should either lift this now unless there is a good reason. If there is they must explain exactly why it is so and how it can be resolved.

  • http://twitter.com/Ultra_Fox Colin Hall

    A scandal and a disgrace, but by no means the first time the party has moved to close down a previously-active CLP. I know of at least one CLP that has been the subject of similar action during the past decade and beyond.

    The NEC need to publish a full list of all CLPs who are currently in “special measures” and the reasons why.

  • $51144918

    it has happened before in wards.all around ‘memberships’.so why has it been ‘known’
    now? whose ‘spinning’ this one?

Latest

  • Featured Latest Ashcroft poll shows Labour making ground in England – but facing wipeout in Scotland

    Latest Ashcroft poll shows Labour making ground in England – but facing wipeout in Scotland

    After the Ashcroft constituency poll of Scottish seats exactly a month ago I said that Scottish Labour is going down in flames, and taking Miliband’s chances of a majority with it. Today’s latest Ashcroft poll has done nothing to put out those flames, or suggest Scottish Labour is performing anything other than a catastrophic nosedive. Except now it almost feels like everyone has adjusted to the “new normal” whereby a Labour heartland is now a Labour wasteland. We’ll get back […]

    Read more →
  • News Video Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters appear to be losing their patience with David Cameron’s attempts to get out of appearing the pre-election TV debates. It is widely understood that Cameron has been advised by strategist Lynton Crosby not to take part in the leaders’ debates and has been dragging his feet during negotiations, making more debates each time broadcasters make new proposals. Following the initial invitation of UKIP to appear, Cameron claimed that the Green Party should also take part. Now the Greens, SNP […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    So Compass holds a debate about the relevance, or not, of tactical voting in the run up May and straight away John Spellar MP and then Luke Akehurst are on to us. John accused us of calling on people ‘not to vote Labour”, Luke says we are ‘naïve’. Well first lets be clear: we have set up the space on our website for a debate; we have one article for tactical voting and one against. We wanted to see what […]

    Read more →
  • News Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Yvette Cooper has accused Nigel Farage of attempting to exploit concerns about immigration rather than attempting to come up with practical policies. The Shadow Home Secretary also derided UKIP for getting themselves in a “ridiculous tangle” on the issue – last week a spokesperson for the party said they would introduce a net migration target of 50,000, while Farage today claims that it is not party policy. This follows Ed Miliband attacking David Cameron for missing his 2010 immigration promises […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    There are only three PMQs left until the election. Three more of these turgid, unattractive, unedifying and borderline pointless sessions to sit through before May. If this is the highlight of the Parliamentary week then Parliament can’t prorogue quick enough, frankly. Evidently many MPs feel the same, judging by the wide open spaces on the green benches this lunchtime. After a few minutes MPs had all spaced themselves out a little bit to make the place look a bit less […]

    Read more →