Twigg reports Gove Spads to Cabinet Secretary over “smear” allegations

February 3, 2013 10:39 am

This morning’s Observer has led on allegations that Michael Gove’s Special Advisers may be linked to “smears” posted on the @ToryEducation Twitter account. The Observer reports:

“Education secretary Michael Gove has been plunged into a potentially toxic row over allegations that members of his department have used the social networking site Twitter to launch highly personal attacks on journalists and political opponents and to conduct a Tory propaganda campaign paid for by the taxpayer.

The allegations raise questions about senior members of Gove’s team and have prompted concerns in the Tory party about the role of ministerial special advisers.

An anonymous Twitter account called @toryeducation is regularly used to attack critical stories about both Gove and his department. It is often abreast of imminent Tory policies, suggesting it is coming from close to the centre of government. However, it is also used to rubbish journalists and Labour politicians while promoting Gove’s policies and career. Issuing party political material and indulging in personal attacks are both clear breaches of the special advisers’ code and the civil service code.”

As a result of the Observer report, Stephen Twigg has written the following letter to the Cabinet Secretary asking him to investigate the allegations. The letter is reprroduced below:

 

Stephen Twigg MP

Shadow Secretary of State for Education

House of Commons

London

SW1A 0AA

Sir Jeremy Heywood
Cabinet Secretary

2 February 2013

Dear Sir Jeremy,

I write to ask you to launch an investigation into the conduct of the Special Advisers to the Secretary of State for Education, namely Dominic Cummings and Henry de Zoete.

As you will be aware, the Code Conduct for Special Advisers specifies that personal attacks are prohibited:

“The highest standards of conduct are expected of special advisers and, specifically, the preparation or dissemination of inappropriate material or personal attacks has no part to play in the job of being a special adviser as it has no part to play in the conduct of public life. Any special adviser ever found to be disseminating inappropriate material will automatically be dismissed by their appointing Minister.”

There are serious allegations that the code may have been breached on several occasions. You will be aware that ministers have responsibility for the actions of their Special Advisers.

Tim Loughton MP, the former Children’s Minister gave evidence at the Education Select Committee where he described the children and families agenda as being a “declining priority” of the Department for Education.

Following this, a senior Department of Education source was quoted on the Spectator website as follows: “Loughton was a lazy incompetent narcissist obsessed only with self-promotion.”

(http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/01/loughton-vs-dfe/)

In addition, the Twitter feed @toryeducation has made a number of personal attacks on journalists and other public figures.

The feed has attacked The Observer journalist Toby Helm as “an activist, not a professional hack” and a “Labour stooge” and just today accused him of “an emotional meltdown”.

It has retweeted allegations about the personal life of Financial Times journalist Christopher Cook from the Twitter feed @SteveHiltonGuru.

An article in The Observer has alleged that the feed is being run by Dominic Cummings and Henry de Zoete, who were asked by Henry Macrory, the Conservative head of press to tone down the comments.

I would be grateful if you could investigate the source of the smears on this Twitter feed and the attacks on Tim Loughton.

I would also ask you to investigate if official Departmental resources have been used, such as official computers, blackberries or phones, to conduct a smear campaign against those who question or criticise the Education Secretary.

I look forward to your reply. Yours sincerely,

Stephen Twigg MP

Shadow Education Secretary 

  • Dave Postles

    DfE seems to be dysfunctional. Gove has apparently previously used a personal e-mail account to bypass civil servants and public disclosure. Funds have been awarded apparently without due process. The same appears to be happening in other departments of state, which are apparently being run as private feoffs. The question there is: what can Heywood effectively do? The answer is: probably nothing. The only recourse seems to be the SCs.

    • Daniel Speight

      Funds have been awarded apparently without due process.

      Yes Dave, the name to follow is Rachel Wolf and the funds were given to her at the very beginning of Gove’s reign. For some reason Guido Fawkes, Paul Staines, avoids any criticism of Gove. I wonder what that is about?

Latest

  • News Blair says the West must be prepared to work with Putin and the Egyptian military

    Blair says the West must be prepared to work with Putin and the Egyptian military

    Tony Blair may not have been Prime Minister for nearly seven years now, but his views – particularly on foreign policy – are always newsworthy. This morning he gave a wide-ranging and controversial speech at Bloomberg’s London HQ on the Middle East, urging the West not to pull back from the Middle East as an unsolvable problem, but to engage. Although despite the billing, this was as much a speech about faith as it was about geo-politics. At the roots of Blair’s […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour set up rapid rebuttal unit for election campaign

    Labour set up rapid rebuttal unit for election campaign

    Labour plan to step up their media monitoring process in the run up to the 2015 general election, according to The Independent. A team will be in charge of rebutting negative media to avoid a re-run of the 1992 election, where an onslaught of attacks from the press played their part in a unexpected Conservative victory. Michael Dugher, the MP in charge of Labour’s communications, is this week in the US discussing strategy with new appointment David Axelrod and other political […]

    Read more →
  • Featured UKIP, England and St George

    UKIP, England and St George

    Labour tends to view UKIP like Nelson viewed the signal at the Battle of Copenhagen. He held the telescope to his blind eye and said, ‘I really do not see the signal’.  Our image of  UKIP is a protest vehicle for disaffected, older, right wing Tories in the South. But UKIP represents more significant trends than this caricature suggests. UKIP is a symptom of the deep social and economic changes that have taken place over the last thirty years. Its […]

    Read more →
  • News Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Regular readers will know that we’re always keeping an eye on Lib Dems leaflets. Their local propaganda sheets are always good for a questionable bar chart, or forgetting the name of the generic place their text is for – but they can also be quite shy about their party affiliation too. For example, take the “Islington Chronicle”. Sounds like a local paper, and there’s no Lib Dem logo and barely a splash of their trademark yellow. But it is, in […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Seats and Selections Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    This morning we noted that the Tories haven’t selected candidates in nearly half of the most marginal Labour and Lib Dem seats. But what’s particularly telling is that in over 60% of target seats in the Midlands and the North they have so far failed to select a candidate, while the Independent claims that in Scotland there are no Tory parliamentary candidates at all. However, Mark Wallace over at ConHome notes that the Tories have in fact selected a total of two […]

    Read more →