Unity is Strength – what Labour can learn from Harold Wilson

February 18, 2013 6:14 pm

Harold Wilson was a political giant in my formative years. His battles with Edward Heath are my first political memory and I, therefore, enjoyed “Harold Wilson Night”, BBC Parliament’s retrospective.

Interesting parallels with today abound. The most obvious is that of the under pressure Party Leader reaching for the short-term solution of the referendum on Europe with seismic, damaging long-term consequences.

However, what struck me most was the huge scale of division within the Labour Party which Wilson was forced to manage. The shadow of the Bevanite/ Gaitskellite split remained and Wilson’s Cabinet certainly contained big beasts: Callaghan, Jenkins and Healey above all but also the declining George Brown and the ambitious Tony Benn.

When Wilson was asked about his achievements, his first response was that he “kept the Party” together, before swiftly adding that he had done the same for the country. It struck me watching the interviews and perspectives from the 1960s and 1970s that far too much of Harold Wilson’s energy was devoted to holding his Cabinet and the Labour Party together and too little to the huge challenges of a Britain facing decline of traditional industries and managing the withdrawal from Empire.

When this happens to a Government, it fails. It defeated John Major, who went as far as to resign the leadership of the Conservative Party in order to maintain his position as Prime Minister. We now see David Cameron formulating a policy on Europe to try to hold the same Conservative Party, not the country, together.

We undervalue unity in today’s Labour Party. Ed Miliband’s progress as Leader has been built upon support from across the full breadth of the Labour Party. Following a protracted and very close leadership election, there were many predictions of division and conflict within Labour. The Party has, however, shown a maturity, discipline and unity following General Election defeat which was absent in 1970 and 1979.

As Britain hovers on the edge of recession once more and as Labour builds its programme for the next General Election, it is crucial that this unity endures. We must devote our energies to working together to formulate and present policies to the electorate, based on the premise of One Nation working together which Ed has identified, to secure power in 2015.

For me, the disappointment of Harold Wilson was that he was right in identifying the problems Britain faced but failed to address those problems adequately in power: we did need the white heat of technology and we did need to withdraw from Empire. But too much of the then Prime Minister’s time was spent resolving internal tensions in the Labour Party and too little to managing needed change in Britain. The huge steps that Britain needed to take then – from declining to innovative industry, from Empire to Europe – were not taken firmly enough for Wilson to be remembered as a Prime Minister of the stature of, for example, Clement Attlee.

Wilson, all agreed, had a formidable intellect and an engaging ability to appear comfortable in any company. He was able to use television successfully in a way his great rival, Heath, never managed. These qualities enabled him to win power four times but were not sufficient to enable him to use that power effectively. He was defeated by the personal ambitions of some of his Cabinet and doctrinaire divisions in the Labour Party.

Ed Miliband, by contrast, has worked with a stable team in his Shadow Cabinet and leads a united Labour Party. We must build on this foundation in the vital two years ahead. If we are distracted by division, whether it is over the legacy of the Iraq War or over internal Party issues which do not interest the voters, we risk losing the momentum we now have. In all our work up to 2015, we must remember that unity is strength. Unity was a blessing which Harold Wilson never had. If he had led a united Labour Party, who knows what he might have achieved?

Ian Lucas is the Labour MP for Wrexham

  • John Reid

    I’ll give Wlison Credit the 6 great private members bill of the 64-70 Gov’ts, Abortion legalising Homosexuality, censorship, Making divorce easier, Getting rid of the death penalty, Plus the 3 race relation acts passed under his time, and the equal pay act, the Health and safety at work act, And His dedication to Women, Barbara Castle, Shirley Williams, His work in Northern Ireland, Keeping us out Of Vietnam, But Wilson’s claim he united the party, Was ridiculous, For a start although Bevan Had passed away by 1957 He was united with Gatiskell In the Shadow cabinet as A multilateralist And Dick Crossman, was even a supporter of the reforms that Gaitskell tried to put through after the 1959 Defeat, due to You’ve never had it so good,and the Hard left of Michael foot, Eric Heffer were either no bodies or had the party whip withdrawn from them,

    Remember just before Wilson resigned George brown Resigned from the party backing the Tories due to his dislike of the Closed shop and Labour reversing it’s policy of limited sales of Council Homes, within weeks of Wilson’s resignation Both reg Underwood and reg Prentice went, Followed by Richard marsh, and 3 others, within 4 years of Wilson’s resignation the SDP left taking 4 million votes with them, And Wilson Begged Shirley Williams not to leave (both Her and Roy Jenkins were originally of just thinking of Joining the Liberals in 1979)As pointed out apart from Unilateralism and Leaving Europe, nationalising the 25 biggest industries (which the NEC had voted to do in 1973 and Wilson had just rejected it),Plus getting rid of Riot police, there wasn’t that much difference between the 74 manifesto and the 83 one, and that was a disaster, such as getting rid of the 1971 Industrial relations act, which seems odd as Wilson actually supported Barbara Castles in place of strife, by letting the hard left infultrate the party and having the polices of the 74 manifesto,it put us out of power for a generation and the party wasn’t as split as he made out when he took over, In that case by Ed miliband not addressing the slanderous attacks on Progress and the call for their purging, It could be said that ed milband is like Wilson in claiming to unite the party while watching the hard left try to oust the right of the party,

Latest

  • Comment UKIP, England and St George

    UKIP, England and St George

    Labour tends to view UKIP like Nelson viewed the signal at the Battle of Copenhagen. He held the telescope to his blind eye and said, ‘I really do not see the signal’.  Our image of  UKIP is a protest vehicle for disaffected, older, right wing Tories in the South. But UKIP represents more significant trends than this caricature suggests. UKIP is a symptom of the deep social and economic changes that have taken place over the last thirty years. Its […]

    Read more →
  • Featured England has a radical tradition Labour can embrace

    England has a radical tradition Labour can embrace

    St George’s Day seldom goes by without some features editor asking me to compile a list of things that define Englishness. It’s a pointless task. Top of my list of would be a love of Marmite, yet such a choice would immediately rule out half the population of England. The simple truth is that nations cannot be defined by character alone. It’s those things that we possess that other nations do not that truly define us: our society, our geography, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Is Labour ready to appeal unashamedly to England?

    Is Labour ready to appeal unashamedly to England?

    Is Labour ready to appeal unashamedly to England? Whilst many party members feel (as I do) more British than English, that actually makes it more important to answer the question. Because whilst the Labour Party has in the past decade been more than comfortable in speaking directly to Scotland (something which is obviously in focus at the moment) and Wales (somewhere that is obviously under fire from the Tories at the moment), the same can’t be said about England. Sure, we’ve […]

    Read more →
  • News Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Regular readers will know that we’re always keeping an eye on Lib Dems leaflets. Their local propaganda sheets are always good for a questionable bar chart, or forgetting the name of the generic place their text is for – but they can also be quite shy about their party affiliation too. For example, take the “Islington Chronicle”. Sounds like a local paper, and there’s no Lib Dem logo and barely a splash of their trademark yellow. But it is, in […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Seats and Selections Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    This morning we noted that the Tories haven’t selected candidates in nearly half of the most marginal Labour and Lib Dem seats. But what’s particularly telling is that in over 60% of target seats in the Midlands and the North they have so far failed to select a candidate, while the Independent claims that in Scotland there are no Tory parliamentary candidates at all. However, Mark Wallace over at ConHome notes that the Tories have in fact selected a total of two […]

    Read more →