We live in a political age of muscular membership

7th March, 2013 8:38 am

Last weekend, Labour Students passed a motion at their conference stating that they would not campaign for any MP who voted against equal marriage. Anyone who has ever campaigned alongside Labour Students will know that’s a formidable loss. They are an organisational and electoral force to be reckoned with; one that some MPs will no longer be able to blithely rely on. Decisions have consequences.

Some greeted this with consternation and sneering derision.” Would you rather have a Tory?” was an all too frequent response. But Labour Students understand that to ask their members to actively campaign for someone who had voted against equality is too much to ask. Individual members are – of course – free to do as they choose, but what they won’t have is the power of Labour Students and the numbers of door-knockers that they bring when they organise in your seat. Labour Students were given a chance to demonstrate where the real power in a political party lies and they have done: They are with the members, and the members are flexing their muscles.

What the Lib Dems have known for years (and demonstrated once again in Eastleigh) is that it is members who win elections. Jim Murphy is right that it is essential that we do get out there – in every constituency in the country. We can’t assume victory is in our grasp –we must strain at it with every sinew. It is far from assured. But there are other things we can’t take for granted. Things that those responding to the Labour Students decision with such mindless banality have forgotten: We can’t take our activists for granted either.

Nobody owes you their free time. Nobody owes you their labour. The membership of our Party got our MPs elected and keep them that way. Our MPs are standing on the shoulders of the unknown giants who get out there every weekend (and I can’t claim to be one of them – though I try to do my bit). Good MPs – from every part of the Party – know and recognise this. My MP Tessa Jowell is just such an MP. She and I are from different Labour traditions, but I bow to no one in my admiration for her appreciation of the work of her members. She knows that activists deserve respect and need inspiring. It is not enough to just expect us to turn out. We need something to turn out for.

A young LGBT member in Ealing North or Inverclyde might not feel very inspired to campaign locally. It is their right not to. MPs and candidates don’t have a God given right to support. They are there to represent the Labour activists and their constituents. If one of their Labour activists constituents doesn’t feel represented, that’s their right.

Knowing the force of nature that is Labour Students, I don’t imagine for a moment, that they will be doing 22 Constituencies worth less work. They will just be working harder in those constituencies where there is an MP or candidate they feel share their fundamental commitment to equality.

As it is usually through constituencies that activism is organised and nurtured, a young person who might previously have dropped out of campaigning with no one noticing may now have second avenue to campaigning for someone elsewhere that they do feel better represents their values.

As political parties run lower and lower on funds, they rely more and more on volunteers. As that happens, Parties are waking up to how much they need members and members are waking up to what that means to their ability to influence and affect the behaviour of parties and MPs. The rebelliousness of the 2010 Tory intake shows that this is a lesson they have long since learned. We may not like what it is they rebel on, but as Labour members we are hardly supposed to. But they do have a real sense that it is they are far more beholden to their constituency Parties than they are to their leader.  The Lib Dems have practiced “constituency first” politics for years – only to seemingly lose their heads in Government. They will be punished for this at their Spring conference. And if the still fail to listen, eventually their doorstep hoards will dissipate.

Labour has shown signs of really understanding the needs of this newly empowered membership. The work of Arnie Graf and the Your Britain website are real proof of this. The aim is the same: A Labour Government – in power and doing good. But the dynamics have shifted. Never again will that government be so far removed from its members. Never again will anyone think that could ever be a good thing. The ground game keeps us grounded. Not everyone has got it yet, but the more high profile organisations like Labour Students start to flex theirs, the more everyone will come to realise and respect quite how much muscle the members have.

  • NT86

    I support same sex marriage, but the vote was a free one in Parliament. For Labour students to announce a boycott shows their own illiberal and myopic streak. I thought the party was a broad church. Aren’t there any other economic issues (e.g. the cut, public spending) where they share common ground with the 22 MP’s who voted against the bill?

  • Pingback: Should Liberal Youth campaigning for MPs who voted against gay marriage? | Digital Politico()

  • Pingback: Should Liberal Youth campaign for MPs who voted against equal marriage? | Digital Politico()

  • http://twitter.com/lbutcheruk Lee Butcher

    “Muscular Membership”. I’m sure that is one way that Militant could have been described back in the day..

  • http://twitter.com/lbutcheruk Lee Butcher

    “Muscular Membership”. I’m sure that is one way that Militant could have been described back in the day..

  • Chilbaldi

    Really petty and childish from Labour Students – sorry but I have to disagree with you Emma.
    I supported equal marriage, but my MP voted against. Despite my disappointment in him I will still campaign for him at the GE. I want an extra vote on the Labour benches for those occasions when there is a whip, after all.

  • Brumanuensis

    I can’t stand Labour Students ordinarily, but this was the right decision. If you don’t support equality, your values aren’t those of the Labour.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Good for them. Absolutely right decision

  • Pingback: ‘Politics’ from Political Party Members? | Rowan Draper.com()

Latest

  • Comment Featured Cameron is trying to rewrite the constitution to become a Downing Street Squatter

    Cameron is trying to rewrite the constitution to become a Downing Street Squatter

    In 2010, the Sun printed a piece attacking a man “squatting in a luxury home near the Houses of Parliament”. They went on to say that the “squatter” was “refusing to budge from the Georgian townhouse in Downing Street”. That man was Gordon Brown. Yet on Friday, David Cameron is preparing to try and rewrite the constitution to do exactly the same – if not worse. As I wrote at the weekend, all that anyone needs to do come May 8th […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Richard Littlejohn’s latest column: the sickest propaganda yet

    Richard Littlejohn’s latest column: the sickest propaganda yet

    This election has seen an increasingly marginalised print press plumb new depths to try and prove their relevance. From the Times this morning screaming about UNIONS!!! (Or to be more accurate – Labour National Executive Committee will have an emergency meeting following the election) to the Sun vilifying/glorifying the SNP (delete as most appropriate to harm Labour where you live). But this morning one columnist has topped them all. And of course it’s Richard Littlejohn in the Daily Mail. He […]

    Read more →
  • Comment If Labour has the chance to form a government, we will have a constitutional duty to accept

    If Labour has the chance to form a government, we will have a constitutional duty to accept

    We are getting near to the end of what, because the fixed-term Parliament has meant we have always known the Polling Day, feels like a very long election campaign. If a big slice of public opinion Scotland hadn’t decided to prioritise a debate about national identity over one about social justice, the result would be in no doubt – Labour would very clearly be the largest party and might be within touching distance of a majority, particularly as all the […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Times reveals shocking news that Labour may call an NEC meeting

    Times reveals shocking news that Labour may call an NEC meeting

    This morning The Times screams out from its front page that “Miliband asks unions to save his number 10 bid”. Sounds interesting, but you’d have to read the second paragraph(£) to notice that what they’re talking about is: “an emergency meeting of the national executive committee (NEC)” So that would be the NEC where two thirds of the representatives are MPs, elected members representatives and local councillors then? So this “secret plan” to “ask the unions” to “save his number 10 […]

    Read more →
  • News 2 out of 3 hospitals face potentially huge cuts this year, leaked analysis reveals

    2 out of 3 hospitals face potentially huge cuts this year, leaked analysis reveals

    Labour will tomorrow release a leaked analysis from NHS Providers which shows that two-thirds of Trusts expect to be in deficit in 2015/16 – up from just one in five in 13/14. Analysis of 98 trusts’ financial forecasts shows a projected deficit this year of £759 million – the equivalent of £1.86 billion across all England’s 240 trusts. This is three times higher than just one year earlier in 2014/15.  In order to get out of deficit, hospitals now face having […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit