Giving communities a future: why Labour needs to learn to let go

29th June, 2013 11:00 am

After the Tory-led government’s attempts to define localism as being whatever Mr Pickles says it is, you might be forgiven for assuming that the Labour Party, as the party of the people would be the party of devolution. The reality has been however a little mixed.

Devolving power to local authorities was never a massive part of New Labour’s agenda with its emphasis on centrally defined targets and plans. I recall being told by a senior Labour politician that devolution was fine as long as local government was implementing the policies of a Labour Government. There was an understandable belief that councils were bastions of old Labour beliefs and practices. This gave rise to the idea that councils could somehow be bypassed in an attempt to get to the “real” community and that tinkering with the structure of local government might produce more modern leaders.

Before dealing with the difficulties that lie in the way of a fresh start it might be worthwhile to make the case for creativity in local government. One Nation Localism published by the LGA Labour Group is stuffed full of examples of Labour councils finding new and innovative ways of delivering services at a local level. They range from personalised support to get people back to work to integrating children’s services across different agencies, but they share a number of characteristics:

1)      They are tailored to local circumstances. They build on local knowledge of geographical circumstances personal relationships and strengths of local communities.

2)      They allow for a greater degree of local accountability and control. They help to counteract feelings of helplessness and lack of involvement that many people feel when faced with strictures from central government of whatever political party.

3)      For our party it’s about using the talent and creative ability of more than just those in Parliament. It allows local politicians to test out new ideas in a locality and to encourage members to feel they are more than just doorstep fodder.

Given the enormous strength and robustness of localism why then has Labour not yet fully embraced it?

Firstly there is the uncomfortable fact that freedom for Labour councils to implement policies we approve of also means freedom for Tory councils to implement policies we disapprove of. For Labour councils to campaign to provide more libraries in more imaginative ways there would be a corresponding ability for Tory councils to provide less libraries, the argument goes. Time and time again for perfectly understandable reasons the Labour Government would be asked to intervene to stop opposition-controlled councils making decisions that many local people disliked. Rather than central intervention the answer in many cases has to be the election of a Labour council.

I am not suggesting we give up on “Tory” areas but rather it is about supporting those who are fighting locally. There is no getting round the fact that local lemocracy means choices. As a party we have to value local campaigning, not look to central government to shield us. Otherwise we reduce all councillors to being agents of central government rather than representatives of our communities.

Secondly localism for all its strengths flies in the face of a party belief that there should be no barriers to achieving what a Labour government wants to do. That leaving matters to the discretion of local government leaves too much to chance. This is when arguments about “postcode lotteries “are most often deployed.

Yet the opportunity to allow us all a degree of autonomy could genuinely involve more than just councillors. It could lead to new vibrant debates which our party could lead but not dictate. Whether it was new forms of social housing or the development of mutuals as a means of providing care, local priorities could shape services rather than memos from Whitehall. It would also mean that local elections would matter. The electorate would have to choose between competing visions of how their area would develop.  I believe inevitably this would lead to higher turnout and participation in the process.

Those who write policy papers for the party of course want to see their ideas adopted. This means too often the argument is couched in terms of what a Labour government will do rather than what local administrations can do. This is a process that whilst in office civil servants inevitably reinforce. Ask a civil servant how a policy can be implemented and he will put forward a convincing case for the Minister to take more power to achieve it. Ask them to consider devolution of budgets and responsibility and there will be a well-argued paper as to why that would be a mistake.

The best way I believe to create a new mood of localism and empowering communities is to have a new constitutional settlement. We need to clearly define spheres of responsibility between local and national government into areas in which each takes the lead whist the other can influence but not prescribe. The previous Labour Government started with such good intent by promising devolution to the regions but we simply got a mayor and assembly for London and more national plans and targets. In Scotland and Wales on the other hand the work across parties had created cross-party agreement on the division of powers. That is exactly what is required now. We will never agree on how local councils should approach their responsibilities but can we not at least agree on the division of powers. The rules of the game need to be in place for a genuine battle for the hearts and minds of the local community.

At the heart of my belief in the importance of localism is a vision of where power needs to lie. Local government is not simply about emptying the bins or repairing the roads. Rather it is about giving a community a future. That can only be done if local leaders are given the opportunity to work with their communities and shape their future together. That is why Westminster and Labour need to let go.

John Merry is a Labour Councillor in Salford.

To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]

  • Andy

    Parachuting candidates in to accommodate AWS goes against every concept of localism

Latest

  • Featured News Campaign round-up: Two days to go

    Campaign round-up: Two days to go

    It’s two days until voters go to the polls – here’s a quick look at how the elections are shaping up across the country. Quote of the Day “Only a Tory Government with as warped a sense of priorities as this one could issue a statement lauding the roll-out [of Universal Credit] on the same day an independent expert report from the Resolution Foundation shows Tory cuts will completely undermine work incentives in the programme.” – Owen Smith, on the warped […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Local Government News Corbyn: We will not lose any seats

    Corbyn: We will not lose any seats

    Jeremy Corbyn has issued a defiant message to his internal critics as he vowed Labour would defy predictions and not lose any seats on Thursday. The under-fire Labour leader confirmed he would “of course” stand in any future leadership election as he told activists to look for electoral gains around the country. Corbyn was speaking in London as he unveiled a new election poster saying: “Elections are about taking sides. Labour is on yours”. “We are not going to lose […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour’s EU campaign will not hit core vote, survey results say

    Labour’s EU campaign will not hit core vote, survey results say

    Labour’s campaign to remain in the EU will not distance the the party from its electoral base, LabourList readers have said. Last week, Labour Out campaigner Frank Field claimed Labour’s campaign to stay in the EU would distance the party from working class voters, with him estimating 40 per cent of Labour supporters would back leaving the EU. However, almost 65 per cent of readers disagree, saying the party’s pro-European stance would not damage the party. Only 19 per cent […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Local Government Uncategorized Unions Your safety in fires is on the ballot paper on Thursday, writes the FBU

    Your safety in fires is on the ballot paper on Thursday, writes the FBU

    The Tory government doesn’t care about the fire and rescue service. If it did, it wouldn’t have slashed 7,000 frontline firefighter posts, closed around 40 fire stations and scrapped scores of fire engines since 2010. The last recorded year saw a reduction of 1,200 in the number of firefighters – the biggest drop in a single year in the history of the modern fire and rescue service. All of this comes despite the fact that the role of firefighters is wider than ever. It […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News “Elections are about taking sides” – Corbyn launches new election poster

    “Elections are about taking sides” – Corbyn launches new election poster

    Jeremy Corbyn has today launched a new election poster with the message “Elections are about taking sides. Labour is on yours.” It also bears the party’s broader election slogan – “Stand up, don’t stand by” – which has been used in the campaign until now.

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit