Labour needs more than a few warm words on the environment, energy security and climate change

June 18, 2013 12:09 pm

It seems that with the announcements of their intention to end universality in social security and accept the Coalition’s spending envelopes, Labour are gradually beginning to articulate what the Labour Party’s 2015 manifesto will look like.

While much has been said on social security, general economic direction and housing shortages; there has been little said on the environment, energy security and climate change. Other than a few warm words from Mary Creagh MP in LabourList’s ‘One Nation Labour: Debating the Future’ pamphlet, the Labour Party have said very little on this incredibly important topic.

The idea of a genuinely transformative environmental policy is often dismissed as unimportant when the economy is in such a parlous state requiring ‘laser-focus’ and ‘tough choices’. However, those who disregard the power of a radical green manufacturing policy in a 2015 Labour manifesto ignore the fact that such radical policies could hold the greatest solution to our economic woes.

Much like our economy shows no signs of recovery under an agenda of austerity, the planet shows no signs of a long-term cool down in the absence of a radical preventative and sustainable alternative.

Of course, the irony in all this is that countries that have invested in large scale green infrastructure projects have weathered the economic downturn better than we have. Furthermore, they’re future proofing their energy security from increasingly volatile world energy markets; investing in green growth and highly skilled green jobs. The Coalition are not.

Economically speaking, radical investment in the green economy makes sense. It is estimated to be worth around £122bn to the UK and currently accounts for around 8% of GDP. To put that in perspective, that’s a greater share of GDP than telecoms, aerospace or car manufacturing. The Coalition likes to visit car factories for photo opportunities, but when did you last see any of the front bench at a wind turbine manufacturer?

The CBI have said that “over a third of the UK’s economic growth in 2011-12 is likely to have come from green business” so why aren’t Labour putting two and two together? If green business is such a rich seam of income to the economy, why isn’t Labour prioritising it as a source of revenue with radical investment? It’s win-win: the economy will recover faster and the UK will become cleaner and greener.

Fundamentally, we must re-prioritise the issue of sustainability in our policy agenda. We face higher cereal prices because of failing crops that in turn leads to a rising cost of living. We’re enduring longer, colder winters that not only effect our natural environment but our food prices and our sense of wellbeing.

In addition to this, we have coal-fired power stations and nuclear power stations going offline and the Government – many of whose members despise state subsidies – are pinning all their hopes on new nuclear power which requires astronomical state subsidies!

In the next year or so, Labour should be articulating ambitious plans to protect our environment, halt the effects of climate change and diversify our energy sources. We should be engaging our world class Universities in researching and developing underused forms of renewable energy such as tidal and geothermal as well as ensuring continuous investment in wind and solar power.

It is evident that the Coalition’s environmental agenda is in tatters. Now is the time for Labour to present a radical environmental agenda to boost jobs and growth; ensure our future energy security and put sustainability at the heart of everything we do.

  • AlanGiles

    The Green economy has a great deal of potential, and the possibilities are endless and exciting, but sadly, it doesn’t really fit the modern idea in politics where you need an immediate “solution”, or at least the appearance of one.

    The main parties are constrained by their need to win the next election and will always have one eye firmly on the polls and popular opinion, and, certainly at the moment, environmental issues come quite low down on the list of priorities, for large swathes of the public, so of course, the “big two” (three?) will pay lip service, but do little else.

    It is only, sadly, when there is some natural disaster the public start to think of the environment and it is only when, as in 1989’s European elections, Green politics became more prominent that the main political parties pretend an interest – the reason for Mrs Thatcher’s temporary conversion in 1989 was more to do with the Ecology Party, as it then was doing well in the UK, than it was conviction.

    But I like this article.

    AG 18/6/13 1514BST

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    Tom Greatrex made some announcement about Labour committing to a target to decarbonise the UK’s electricity supply by 2030 so there’s evidently some plans in progress.

    Delivering it will be another matter, I don’t think many in politics actually appreciate the enormity of achieving that goal and enormity really doesn’t do justice to the scale of project we are talking about.

    Decarbonising, what say 30-40GW of existing fossil fired generating plant, probably having to rebuild a significant proportion of it in the process, replacing 8GW of life-expired nuclear plant and probably building more, more renewables is a given.
    The scale of what we’re talking about is huge yet with just 17 years we’ve barely started and the key technologies we’ll need – new nuclear and large scale CCS are still in the planning stages.

Latest

  • Featured Labour must embrace Proportional Representation

    Labour must embrace Proportional Representation

    Britain no longer has a natural party of government. Yesterdays Ashcroft poll giving Labour and the Tories a combined vote share of 59% is an all time record low for the two main parties. In 1951 they secured 98% of the vote between them. Its been downhill ever since. Why and what does it mean for Labour and the future of our politics? Two earthquakes have transformed the political landscape since the era in which only two tribes went to […]

    Read more →
  • News Video The racist European party who will save UKIP £1m a year

    The racist European party who will save UKIP £1m a year

    Last week, UKIP’s grouping in the European Parliament was forced to dissolve after an MEP from Latvia decided to leave, meaning they no longer had members from enough countries to continue. This would have cost UKIP around £1 million a year in public funding. Fortunately, a Polish MEP has agreed to join Farage’s Europe for Free and Direct Democracy group (EFDD), and restore UKIP’s lucrative funding. Unfortunately, it appears he is absolutely awful. New EFDD recruit Robert Iwaszkiewicz has praised […]

    Read more →
  • Comment What will Labour do about this deadly epidemic?

    What will Labour do about this deadly epidemic?

    There’s an epidemic sweeping the world. It destroys families, snuffs out hope and opportunity and hurts those who least deserve a painful death. I’m not talking about Ebola (though that’s an unspeakably horrifying plague), nor am I talking about Malaria or TB (both of which cause a death toll that dwarves Ebola every single year). I’m talking about something that kills every five minutes. Violence against children. Unicef UK have a new report out today (“Children in Danger”) that highlights […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The UKIP Calypso should be number one

    The UKIP Calypso should be number one

    On the 1st March 1945, a reggae legend was born. Two years later, on the 1st March 1947, Mike Read was born. Unfortunately, a birthday is no longer the only thing that connects Mike Read and multiple Grammy-winner Burning Spear. They are now both purveyors of politically charged Afro-Carribean songs about independence. By now, you should all be aware of the new UKIP single. Sung by former Radio One disc jockey Mike Read, it is a rare foray by the […]

    Read more →
  • News What does the new Shadow Europe Minister mean for Labour’s position on free movement

    What does the new Shadow Europe Minister mean for Labour’s position on free movement

    The biggest story of last night’s mini-reshuffle was the return of Pat McFadden to Labour’s frontbenches, as Shadow Europe Minister, four years after he left his post at Shadow Business, Innovation and Skills. While much has been made of his Blairite credentials, what may be more interesting is his position on free movement within the EU. The Labour Party has been talking a lot about “fair movement, not free movement” in the EU – most recently Shadow Immigration minister Dave […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y