Majority of voters back borrowing over the next year to build council homes

June 5, 2013 9:57 pm

More than half of the population are in favour of borrowing more in the next year to build more council houses and create jobs in the construction sector, according to the latest LabourList/Survation polling. 55.4% of the public would support such a plan, with only 22.5% opposed.

Such an investment in housing infrastructure to alleviate Britain’s housing crisis and provide jobs is the favoured option of voters from all major parties, across all age groups, genders, social and economic classes and regions/nations of the UK. 73.9% of Labour supporters would back such a course of action, as would 47.7% of Tories, 55% of Lib Dems and 43.2% of UKIPers.

This is the penultimate question in a set of polling data which we’ve been revealing each day this week on LabourList, as we seek to find a way towards “Securing Economic Credibility” for the party in a way that is also true to Labour values and electorally viable.

securing economic recovery housing

What is particularly interesting about this polling is the difference with what we revealed yesterday. Whilst nearly half of the population told us that they favoured higher borrowing in exchange for investment in growth and jobs, far more people supported such a plan when the kind of spending – in this case on housing – was made clear. In government Labour were able to make the case for higher National Insurance to fund the NHS, and this form of hypothecated spending pledge could be a template for how Labour acts in government – including people in the debate about how their money should be spent.

Whilst yesterday the majority of Tory supporters were against borrowing more money to fund jobs and growth, today a plan to borrow for investment in housing has a lead of nearly 17 points amongst Tory voters over the alternative (keeping borrowing down) – suggesting that this is a plan that shouldn’t be limited to Labour’s policy thinking, it could work for the Tories too, if they were minded to borrow for homes and growth, rather than borrowing as a result of strategic failure…

One final point – normally when questions are asked about housing, they revolve either around house-building as a whole or “affordable” housing. We wanted to be very clear that what we were talking about in this survey is “council housing” – built, owned and run by local authorities to serve the needs of local people. This may have depressed the numbers supporting it somewhat, but there’s still a clear plurality of voters in favour of building more council homes – and it’s a policy that resonates across the country, and across party lines.

What are you waiting for Mr Cameron? Build more homes. And if you won’t – Mr Miliband will need to…

Survation interviewed 1,121 adults aged 18 and over via online panel on May 24th 2013. The results have been weighted to the profile of all adults, and the data for the question referred to in this post can be found here

  • Hiran C Patel

    To keep with demand you’d need to build the equivalent of a city like Wolverhampton every year. How is that sustainable? Would you still be able to sell the idea of more homes to the public then?

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

    I have no issue with this and cannot understand why Labour wasn’t saying this twelve months ago. And unlike 2far2fast voters clearly understand what this means.

  • AlanGiles

    No man is a prophet in his own country, but many of us have been calling for the building of council housing for DECADES. Like others, I was concerned when the late Mrs Thatcher started to sell of the public stock and not allow councils to rebuild, back in 1980/81.

    With a landslide majority and a healthy economy in both 1997 and 2001 many of us hoped and expected Blair to institute such a policy (a legacy of housing would have been far preferable to a legacy of wars), but as Hazel Blears revealed in a rare moment of truth nobody in New Labour “was interested” in social housing – probably because they were too busy flipping their second homes and buying expensive silk furnishings at our expense.

    It makes every sort of sense, both economic and morally to build homes for people who will never be able to afford to buy one of their own, and who are currently fleeced by private landlords.

    However – the big question today – and today as I write this it is 0520BST on 6th June 2013, so I hope it appears before the summer solstice, the “Eds” are so busy with their “iron discipline” financial soundbite, will they use this as yet another excuse not to do the right thing?

    • leslie48

      I think you will find from recent speeches that the Labour leaders have both advocated capital spending on building more homes to help jobs, economic growth and supply more homes to lessen the shortage of houses which puts money in Landlord’s pockets & means the state pays housing benefits. You seem to be inventing a straw man. This is basic Labour policy.

      • AlanGiles

        “Straw man” seems to be the expression of the month on LL. One is always accused of it if you don’t toe the line.

        I find it advisable to adopt and “wait and see” policy where all politicians are concerned, because what they say this week might not be what they say next month, or if the next set of polls don’t look so good.

        Until Cruddas delivers his tablets of stone – who knows?

  • JoeDM

    I bet they’d also support the “Right to Buy” as well, if you asked them !!!

    • AlanGiles

      I don’t doubt it, Joe, but right from the start it should have been a condition that for every home sold, another for social renting should have been built to replace it with the receipts from the sales.

      It is somewhat analogous to the situation the public library service (in my area at anyrate) found itself in: in order to start to offer CDs, DVDs etc, they sold off the book stock at derisory prices (typically 20p a book). In the event the CD scheme tottered into disuse in a very short space of time, and by selling the stock – irreplaceable, out of print and valuable material in many cases at such a low price, the service lost money and restocked their shelves with cheap books, TV tie-ins etc ( many of which are so cheap they can be bought for a penny on the “Big River” website).

      They lost a vast resource virtually for nothing, and now in straightend times, textbooks and reference books which still have practical value are not there (I know you can look up facts on the internet, but sometimes a particular text book needs to be studied for some time).

      Of course, people can’t live in books, but Mrs Thatcher and Blair, not to mention Major Brown and Miliband, should have had the commonsense, or an adviser with a certain amount of grey matter to know what the result would be in constantly selling off public stock and not replenishing it.

      The current coalition’s “Help to buy” scheme, will merely cause another artificial boom in house prices, but the people at the bottom of the ladder, who are on low wages (or no wages or zero hours conbtracts) will not be helped one iota by this scheme, which has even be condemned by right-wingers.

  • david kirkup

    labour have been on about spending during this period since the coalition came about. there’s never been a better time as money credit, is at an all time low. we could have been building 1000s of private housing but more important social housing. only the party with the majority of tory mps would bring in a bedroom tax to move people with larger homes with spare bedrooms to smaller houses, but theres very few on the rental market

  • Pingback: Destined to Fail | John Rentoul | Independent Eagle Eye Blogs

  • leslie48

    Ed Milliband said the Government had “no answers to Britain’s housing crisis” and criticised the lack of house building, claiming housing completions are at their lowest level since the 1920s. Reported by the press during the Queens speech debate 16th May. Balls discussed the same issue at last years conference. Looks to me like a no brainer if we can’t promise to build more homes we may as well fold up out tents( no pun intended)

Latest

  • Comment Fairness dictates that we show concern for both sides

    Fairness dictates that we show concern for both sides

    We have all been shocked to see the surge in violence between Israel and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip. This conflict is causing enormous hardship on both sides. Particularly distressing is the sight of civilian casualties. The scale of human suffering in the current escalation is immense and every civilian casualty is a tragedy. The people of Gaza have the right to live in peace and freedom, just as Israelis have the right not to fear for […]

    Read more →
  • News Are Osborne’s spinners block journalists from asking questions they don’t like?

    Are Osborne’s spinners block journalists from asking questions they don’t like?

    An intriguing story emerged from a copy of the Express and Star last week, the regional newspaper that covers the West Midlands and Staffordshire. Daniel Wainwright reports that during a recent visit from the Chancellor, a radio journalist said she wanted to ask George Osborne about food banks, and was told that he simply wouldn’t answer it. Here’s the story: “Talking of George Osborne, here’s a little insight into what goes on in the run up to getting an interview. These […]

    Read more →
  • News Alexander intervenes on Gaza escalation that “shames our shared humanity”

    Alexander intervenes on Gaza escalation that “shames our shared humanity”

    Douglas Alexander, Labour Shadow Foreign Secretary, has made another intervention on the Gaza conflict as the crisis in the Middle East continues to escalate. Alexander condemns the attack on a UN school in Gaza, describing the deaths of children there as “[shaming] our shared humanity”. His latest comments seem to be aimed largely at lobbying Israel to stand down the level of the force, and to recognise that as a democracy with “vastly superior technological and military capabilities, comes particular responsibilities”. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour changes track – and now it can win

    Labour changes track – and now it can win

    Labour has not generated many headlines this week. There haven’t been game-changers. David Cameron wasn’t trounced in Prime Minister’s Questions. The polls haven’t shifted. The meeting with a post-stardust Obama passed by without significant benefit or incident. Yet, this has been Labour’s best week for some considerable time – certainly in this Parliament. Heading into the final furlong of the election race, Labour has three strategic weaknesses: its perceived weaknesses on leadership, an absence of a strong governing story and a […]

    Read more →
  • News This is just one of the reasons why the Tories will never do well in the North East

    This is just one of the reasons why the Tories will never do well in the North East

    David Cameron has been on BBC Radio Tees – that’s the radio station for the Middlesbrough area, and the Tees is the name of the river there. Except this happened (via Buzzfeed): Presenter: “You keep mentioning the River Tyne. That’s not our region prime minister. I’m sorry, we are the River Tees.” Cameron: “I’m sorry, I thought I was doing….” Tyneside is of course around 50 miles North of Middlesbrough – it’s home to Newcastle, and Gateshead, and those of us who are […]

    Read more →