Why our communities are paying the price for George Osborne’s failure

June 29, 2013 9:30 am

Communities discovered this week that once again their local council – and the services it provides – are to be hardest hit by the Coalition government’s latest cuts. Let’s be straight; it is because of the Chancellor’s economic failure nationally that we will be seeing further, deeper cuts locally, and it is families and businesses in local communities that will pay the price for George Osborne and David Cameron’s mistakes nationally on growth and the deficit.

On top of the 33% reduction in government grant that councils have already been told they’d have to face in this parliament, local government learnt this week that there will now be an additional 10% cut in 2015/16. It is the largest reduction in any part of the public sector, even though local government is more efficient than Whitehall.

The Labour Leader on the LGA, and LGA Vice-Chair, Cllr David Sparks said:

“People will wake up in two or three years’ time and in many cases their local council will not be there as they know it.”

 Sir Merrick Cockell, the Conservative Leader of the Local Government Association, echoed this concern:

“Services on which people rely will have to be significantly reduced as a result… some services will be wound down entirely.” He warned his Tory colleagues in central government that “some councils will simply not have enough money to meet all their statutory responsibilities”.

 All this means that local authority leaders will now have to make unenviable choices between keeping streetlights on and libraries open, maintaining roads and Sure Start centres, and supporting schools. The way the Government is devolving the biggest cuts and the toughest decisions to councils is running away from its responsibilities.

And the way it is doing it is fundamentally unfair. On Wednesday, the Chancellor had the nerve to say:

“It is not possible to reduce a deficit of this size without asking all sections of the population to play their parts – but those with the broadest shoulders should bear the greatest burden.”

This will raise a hollow laugh in the most deprived communities and councils which have already been hardest hit by the cuts. One statistic tells the story; between 2010/11 and 2014/15 the ten most deprived local authorities in England will lose six times the amount in spending per head of population compared to the ten least deprived local authorities.

The Prime Minister says “we’re all in this together”, and yet in this financial year councils in some of the most deprived parts of the country like Burnley and Hastings are facing the maximum cut of 8.8% in spending power per head, while his own local authority of West Oxfordshire – one of the least deprived areas is the country – is actually getting an increase of 3.1%.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Instead of planning 10% cuts to local government, two years ahead, the Government should be boosting growth now. If they took action, there would be more money around and council services would not face such deep cuts. Boosting growth and living standards this year and next year would bring in more tax revenues and reduce the scale of the cuts to local government in 2015.

But they haven’t done that. Nor have they done anything on housing. After all the hype, the Government has announced no new investment in affordable home building for this year or next year despite the advice of the IMF. And as for Michael Heseltine’s radical recommendations to devolve funding to local areas, what was actually announced was a damp squib

Labour would act now to boost growth so that future cuts would not be so deep, and we would build homes. But if David Cameron and George Osborne fail to act, we will have to deal with a difficult inheritance in 2015. Ed Miliband and Ed Balls have said these spending totals for 2015/16 will have to be our starting point, but we will make different choices.

For example, we would not be paying for new free schools in areas where there are enough school places, while parents in other areas struggle to get their children into a local school. And there is no justification for the way in which the coalition has imposed the biggest reductions in local government grant on the poorest and most deprived communities. A Labour Government would ensure that the funding that is available is distributed much more fairly.

But even more importantly, we are going to change the way we do things in government. Ed Miliband announced at Labour’s National Policy Forum last weekend that he has asked Sir Richard Leese, Leader of Manchester council, Sharon Taylor, Leader of Stevenage council and Jules Pipe, Mayor of Hackney to lead a new Task Force to advise us on how we can make a difference even when there is less money around.

The case for bringing central and local government funding together – building on Total Place and community budgets – to get the best outcome in terms of services is now overwhelming. In many respects, the current system has reached the limit of its capacity to cope with less funding without radical change. Too much power in England is still wielded in Westminster, and change must involve moving away from the past when central government told local government what to do, to letting local government get on with it.

Hilary Benn MP is Shadow Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.

  • Ben Cobley

    I’ve always liked Hilary Benn as a relatively intelligent, sensible and human sort of politician, but then I read the first sentence to this article:

    “Communities discovered this week that once again their local council –
    and the services it provides – are to be hardest hit by the Coalition
    government’s latest cuts.”

    Erm, no they didn’t. That message is most definitely not getting through.

    This is but a latest example of how Labour’s communications are all over the shop (though that might be to infer that they are interesting, which wouldn’t be correct). We talk to ourselves within the assumptions we share in our cosy little club, and the general public are left blissfully (or not so blissfully) in ignorance.

  • Daniel Speight

    Hilary, so how much leeway do we have on these cuts after the two Eds tell us we will stick to Tory spending plans?

Latest

  • Comment The Tories don’t have any solutions to London’s cost of living problems

    The Tories don’t have any solutions to London’s cost of living problems

    London needs a plan for growth. By 2022 a city the size of Birmingham will be added to London’s population. No city can afford to expand so quickly and do it in a haphazard fashion. It demands careful consideration and investment to avoid an unplanned mess. But in planning for growth we need to take all Londoners with us. This is a once in a lifetime chance to deliver an inclusive city. In which we hardwire tackling inequality into everything […]

    Read more →
  • News Are Burnham and council leaders at loggerheads over NHS devolution deal?

    Are Burnham and council leaders at loggerheads over NHS devolution deal?

    Last night we reported that Andy Burnham, Shadow Health Secretary and MP for Leith, was opposed to plans to devolve the £6bn NHS budget to Greater Manchester. It has now been reported that local politicians didn’t consult him prior to agreeing this with the government. The Manchester Evening News have reported that Burnham was “furious” with local leaders –  particularly Burnham’s local town hall chief Lord Peter Smith – who had not informed him of the devolution deal. However, other sources told the paper […]

    Read more →
  • News New figures show rough sleeping has risen by 55% since Labour left office

    New figures show rough sleeping has risen by 55% since Labour left office

    The number of homeless people sleeping on the streets has risen by almost a thousand since David Cameron became Prime Minister. Latest figures show that there were 2,744 people rough sleeping in Autumn of last year, compared to 1,768 in 2010. Shadow Housing Minister Emma Reynolds said the rise recorded in these figures was “shocking” and condemned the policies that has led to the worsening situation. “Rising housing costs and low pay have made it more and more difficult for […]

    Read more →
  • News Video Labour candidate launches new website to highlight Tory opponent’s record

    Labour candidate launches new website to highlight Tory opponent’s record

    It’s no longer unusual to see political parties set up websites to highlight weaknesses in their opponents: we first saw it at the last election, most famously with the Tories’ expensive ‘Cash Gordon’ mistake. Until now however, we have not before seen it on a localised scale. But today sees the launch of #reesmoggrecord, a new website from Todd Foreman, Labour’s candidate in North East Somerset. Rather than attacking sitting MP Jacob Rees-Mogg, Foreman’s innovative website simply collects some of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The triumph of the pink bus

    The triumph of the pink bus

    “Labour women will have the last laugh,” Harriet Harman declares as we ride the pink bus from Bedford to Cambridge. The bus has been mocked as patronising in the national media and even described in this way LabourList. But Harman is undaunted. “When we did the women’s conference in Manchester the media took no notice,” she says. “We talked about issues like childcare, domestic violence, jobs, equal pay but there was no discussion nationally. The pink bus is making people come […]

    Read more →