Being an MP is a huge privilege and a full time job

10th July, 2013 6:28 pm

Ed Miliband is right to crack down on the MPs with highly paid second- and all too often third and fourth- jobs.

In his speech yesterday, Ed Miliband called for an end to MPs having lucrative second jobs for third party commercial operators. As a first step, Labour has challenged the other party leaders on the matter, but let’s be clear, whatever happens, we are committed to regulating second jobs in our manifesto at the next General Election.

In my view we should say that some commercial activities should not only be declared on the register of interests but ought also to be regulated after the next election. For example, no MP ought to be a lobbyist after 2015.  We should say we will not permit MP’s who are elected in 2015 to arrange any remunerated contracts to be directors of commercial companies or consultancies.

There may be some cases where earned income does not come into the same category.  An obvious case could be where an MP is remunerated for a piece of journalism (although I personally have never accepted any such payment). But in such examples there should be a clear cap on the amount which you can receive as an MP.  In America for example you can’t earn more than 15% of your salary if you are a member of Congress.

The British people rightly expect their MPs to be representing them and the country not anyone else. That is what we are here for and that should be the purpose of all MPs elected to this place. Constituents deserve our full attention.

MPs are public servants, a position that comes with an unparalleled level of faith and trust which must not be misused and abused. It is therefore essential that MPs must not seek to gain financially from such this position of trust.

From the current Members’ Register of Interest, it is clear that in just the last year over 60 Conservative MPs were being paid for work for third party commercial interests. More than 50 MPs had directorships of at least one company. Of course they are not breaking any rules at the moment.  But it is clear that we must change the rules.

We are facing a crisis of democracy in Britain. People are not at all comfortable with the way things are going; already far too many are disaffected and increasingly disengaged. The current situation does not just risk damaging public perceptions of MPs and Parliament, it risks adding to the growing gulf between the political elite- what Ed Miliband has described as the ‘closed circle’- and the vast majority of people.

This is highly dangerous to our democracy and feeds the right wing demagogues in UKIP and elsewhere.

For those wanting to find information on MPs’ current declared interests, the information available in the Register of Members’ Interests is difficult to interpret and even harder to compare. It is not released in a structured format and contains no restrictions on how much can be earned by an MP through second, third and even fourth jobs (or how many additional jobs they can squeeze in). Clearly our current system is under-regulated.

A recent YouGov poll for the Sunday Times showed that of those polled here in Britain, 57% support a ban on MPs from holding second jobs. Just 25% oppose a ban. I would be interested to hear the views of LabourList readers on the subject.

Ed Miliband has instructed the Policy Review to draw up new rules. If the Government fails to introduce political reform of this type, we ought in my view to have such proposals in our manifesto at the next General Election.

The Tories cannot tackle this crisis – they are part of the problem, not the solution. One Tory MP currently earns over £700,000 a year as a barrister on top of his MPs salary- a salary three times the national average. And at least two Tory MPs also currently sit as highly paid Judges, their additional earnings paid for out of the public purse.

The Tories represent a narrow section of vested interests often at odds with the concerns of the vast majority of Britain. Their policies have simply reinforced the perception of ‘us and them’, excluding the many to the advantage of the few. And the Lib Dems are no better- Nick Clegg has already rejected Ed Miliband’s call for new restrictions on what MPs can earn from second jobs.

At a time when the Coalition Government is viewed by an overwhelming majority as the “party of the rich”, the importance of One Nation Britain has never been greater. We must defend the principle that public service supersedes other paid roles; otherwise we will struggle to rebuild public confidence in the integrity of our elected representatives.

Working as an MP is the highest honour in a democracy and there should be no doubt in the public’s mind that we are here to serve the common good and not be diverted into defending private interests. But it is more than this; it is a public service that must not be misused. Imposing limits on paid second jobs will prevent conflict of interests and abuse of privilege and go some way to restoring public trust in our political representatives.

Jon Trickett is Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office

To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]
  • DaveAboard

    I would go further and say that no MP should be allowed to work for any company which benefitted from taxpayer funded contracts whilst that MP’s party was in government for a period of 10 years.

    • Alex Otley

      Simon Danczuk klaxon!

      • DaveAboard

        Yes, the man is an absolute disgrace and the type of character who the right wing media will focus on as an example of “typical Labour”. It doesn’t matter what the party leadership says, all the time there are people like Danczuk holding seats Cameron will be presented with open goal after open goal and the press will lap it up.

  • MonkeyBot5000

    You allow them one salary. If they don’t like it, they can bugger off and find another job.

  • JC

    Why should there be any other income at all? No “sponsorship” either as it could easily be abused by lobbyists.

  • ColinAdkins

    I agree Jon. Funny those who support the idea that democracy benefits from people maintaining outside interests are always non-exec directors, legal professionals, journalists etc but never anyone doing a shift on a ward, in a call-centre or on an assembly line.

Latest

  • Europe Featured News McDonnell seizes on IFS report to warn Brexit would spell “disaster” of more austerity

    McDonnell seizes on IFS report to warn Brexit would spell “disaster” of more austerity

    A vote to leave the EU would be a “disaster”, John McDonnell has said today as the independent Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warns that Brexit would lead to two more years of austerity. A report published today by Britain’s leading tax and spending think tank says that leaving the EU would cost the country between £20 billion and £40 billion in 2019/20, as the UK’s economic growth falls. McDonnell, the shadow Chancellor, said such losses would be the inevitable […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Uncategorized Why Diane Abbott was right to put a coup in the world’s fourth largest democracy back on the British progressive political agenda

    Why Diane Abbott was right to put a coup in the world’s fourth largest democracy back on the British progressive political agenda

    The shocking overthrow of democracy a fortnight ago in the world’s fourth largest democratic nation has been placed full square on the British progressive political agenda – thanks to the very necessary intervention of both the TUC and Diane Abbott. For it is crucial, from any democratic perspective, that the world begins to speak out more forcefully against the political coup d’état which is now robbing Brazilians of their democracy and threatening their human rights. Over the past 13 years, […]

    Read more →
  • Europe Featured News Brexit would be a “gift to Putin”, Dan Jarvis warns

    Brexit would be a “gift to Putin”, Dan Jarvis warns

    A vote to leave the EU would prompt fresh uncertainty over Britain’s security, Dan Jarvis will warn on Wednesday. In a speech in South London the former paratrooper will spell out how he believes an Out vote would be seen by Britain’s enemies as a sign the nation does not take seriously its global alliances against emerging threats. Jarvis will lay out a stark message that “Britain leaving the EU would undermine vital efforts for peace and stability”, and would be […]

    Read more →
  • News Weekly survey: English patriotism and devolved mayor selections

    Weekly survey: English patriotism and devolved mayor selections

    This week Tristram Hunt and Jon Cruddas have both called on Labour to embrace ideas of community and to develop a progressive idea of English patriotism. Do you think this is an effective way for Labour to win over voters in England? There are now three people in the race to become Labour’s candidate for Greater Manchester Mayor: Andy Burnham, Ivan Lewis and Tony Lloyd. Who do you think should be the Labour candidate for next year’s election? There are two people, […]

    Read more →
  • Europe Featured News Momentum swings behind vote to stay in EU

    Momentum swings behind vote to stay in EU

    Momentum has vowed to throw its weight behind the campaign for an In vote in next month’s EU referendum after it held a consultation with supporters. The pro-Corbyn group surprised many people earlier this year when it confirmed they had not taken a position on the referendum, despite the Labour leader and the party adopting a firm stance in favour of Remain. It was seen as the first time that Momentum had not automatically supported Jeremy Corbyn’s position, and led to […]

    Read more →
x

LabourList Daily Email

Everything Labour. Every weekday morning

Share with your friends










Submit