Does your family fit the Tories outdated agenda?

July 1, 2013 11:30 am

After threats of backbench rebellion, government assurances, and further threats, David Cameron has finally succumbed to his backbenchers and promised them a marriage tax allowance “soon”. This demonstrates the worrying increase in power the so-called “Tea Party Tories” have over the leadership: only two years ago, Edward Leigh proposed an amendment to introduce the marriage tax allowance which was defeated overwhelmingly by 473 to 23. Now, despite the Chancellor and PM’s reservations, the weight of the rebellion is enough to force the PM’s hand. The “nasty party” is alive and well and its backwards looking social conservatism is increasing its grip on the leadership.

The infighting exposes the splits within the Conservative Party and undoubtedly destabilises David Cameron. But a marriage tax allowance is more than a sop to the right. It is a pernicious policy, and a waste of scarce public money. We should fight its reintroduction.

The marriage tax allowance proposed by Tim Loughton MP this week would see money specifically targeted at a minority of married couples where one person goes out to work whilst one stays at home. Only a third of married couples would be eligible. Only 35% of those who would receive it have children, and a paltry 17% have children under five. Single parent families, widows or widowers, couples where both need or choose to go to work, and couples who simply choose not to get married, would all miss out.  As Yvette Cooper has shown, the government’s cuts to benefits and tax credits have already hit women three times harder than men – handing a tax break to families in this way means yet more money in the pockets of men.

Families are already paying too high a price for the Conservatives’ economic failure. One million families have lost child benefit this year. Lone parent families are losing out more than any other family group. Four hundred SureStart centres have closed since the General Election. Low paid new mums will lose £1,300 during pregnancy and their baby’s first year from cuts to pregnancy support, tax credits and real terms cuts to maternity pay. Food poverty is increasing. Just last week the Tory-led coalition slashed budgets by £11.5 billion, which will impact services affecting families up and down the country. In this context, it is nothing less than an insult to struggling families of all shapes and sizes  that the Conservatives are prepared to find at least £500 million to prioritise “sending a signal” about marriage.

As the grassroots campaign Don’t Judge My Family says, the government has no right to use the tax system to promote its old fashioned view of how modern families should live. David Cameron promised that his government would be the “most family friendly ever”. But it’s clear that only applies if your family fits his narrow, privileged and backward looking view of what a family should look like.

Kate Green is MP for Stretford and Urmston, and  Labour spokesperson for Equalities.

  • JohnPReid

    Single parents get benefits, as do those who are with children in two parent families, so those who are married with no kids still fit into this new classification, have you forgot Gay marriage

  • Monkey_Bach

    How stupid to arbitrarily reward certain couples with a tax break based on whether or not they have undergone approved religious or civil ceremonies. Absolutely bonkers. Eeek.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t understand this antagonism to traditional families, granted this tax break isn’t well designed but the principle of supporting two parent families, supporting stable relationships is sound.

    We know that rates of poverty vary by family type; that child poverty rates for single parent families are twice that of two parent families. We have a welfare system there to step in to meet the cost of family breakdown, stepping in to provide income support as a form of substitute partner.

    Given the cost of family breakdown both social and financial I think money spent in supporting two-parent families is money well invested.

  • Angela Sullivan

    Married women have for a very long time been shafted by the UK tax and benefit system which presumes (I think) that their home-making skills enable them to survive on less money than any other type of adult. More recently there has been a focus on “working” women and helping them with childcare costs. If “working” women are earning decent wages why do they need so much more financial help than stay-at-home housewives who earn less than a dollar a day?

  • http://www.muondo.org muondo

    excellent blog, j’adore cette petite liste.

Latest

  • Comment This government has a lot to answer for when it comes to food poverty

    This government has a lot to answer for when it comes to food poverty

    Nothing quite characterises the levels of poverty in austerity Britain better than the dramatic growth in the use of food banks in recent years. With record numbers visiting local food banks in many areas over Christmas – and January looking set to be their busiest month yet – it is clear that they remain a much needed resource for many working people as the Coalition Government’s cuts, poverty pay and harsh benefit sanctions take their toll on household incomes. In […]

    Read more →
  • Comment In 100 days we can vote for the change Scotland badly needs

    In 100 days we can vote for the change Scotland badly needs

    Scotland badly needs change. We can’t wait any longer for it. In 100 days we will have the opportunity to vote for that change. Scottish Labour will fight the General Election promising change that only we can deliver. A mansion tax on properties worth more than £2 million, the vast majority of which are in the South East of England, to provide funds for a thousand more nurses in the Scottish NHS. Re-regulation of the energy market. A rising minimum […]

    Read more →
  • News Miliband remembers his grandfather 70 years after Auschwitz was liberated

    Miliband remembers his grandfather 70 years after Auschwitz was liberated

    Ed Miliband will today attend a ceremony to commemorate the liberation of Auschwitz 70 years ago. Ahead of this, he spoke to Radio 5 live about his grandfather, who died in a Nazi labour camp. He explained: “It’s 70 years since my grandfather died in one of the camps and I marked that about 10 days ago… It’s a Jewish thing, you light a candle and I know this sounds almost unbelievable, but it’s only about six months ago that […]

    Read more →
  • News “The future of our NHS is at stake in this general election” – read the full text of Miliband’s speech on the NHS

    “The future of our NHS is at stake in this general election” – read the full text of Miliband’s speech on the NHS

    In just 100 days’ time, you, your friends and neighbours will join with people all over Britain to decide our future as a country. Will we be a country in which everyday working people can get ahead and have real hope for their children and the future? Will we build a prosperity that extends from the City of London to kitchen tables across our country? Or will we continue down the Conservative  path, in which an ever-shrinking circle of people […]

    Read more →
  • Featured 100 days until the election – and 5 challenges for Ed Miliband

    100 days until the election – and 5 challenges for Ed Miliband

    There’s a countdown clock on my desk. I bought it when I was a Labour Party organiser, and remember the impending panic as the number of days ticked towards double digits, then single digits, then hours. Unlike in 2010 though, we’ve known the date of the general election for years. That’s had a profound impact on the way politics has been conducted in Britain and may – in part – have even played into the general sense of malaise amongst […]

    Read more →