Does your family fit the Tories outdated agenda?

1st July, 2013 11:30 am

After threats of backbench rebellion, government assurances, and further threats, David Cameron has finally succumbed to his backbenchers and promised them a marriage tax allowance “soon”. This demonstrates the worrying increase in power the so-called “Tea Party Tories” have over the leadership: only two years ago, Edward Leigh proposed an amendment to introduce the marriage tax allowance which was defeated overwhelmingly by 473 to 23. Now, despite the Chancellor and PM’s reservations, the weight of the rebellion is enough to force the PM’s hand. The “nasty party” is alive and well and its backwards looking social conservatism is increasing its grip on the leadership.

The infighting exposes the splits within the Conservative Party and undoubtedly destabilises David Cameron. But a marriage tax allowance is more than a sop to the right. It is a pernicious policy, and a waste of scarce public money. We should fight its reintroduction.

The marriage tax allowance proposed by Tim Loughton MP this week would see money specifically targeted at a minority of married couples where one person goes out to work whilst one stays at home. Only a third of married couples would be eligible. Only 35% of those who would receive it have children, and a paltry 17% have children under five. Single parent families, widows or widowers, couples where both need or choose to go to work, and couples who simply choose not to get married, would all miss out.  As Yvette Cooper has shown, the government’s cuts to benefits and tax credits have already hit women three times harder than men – handing a tax break to families in this way means yet more money in the pockets of men.

Families are already paying too high a price for the Conservatives’ economic failure. One million families have lost child benefit this year. Lone parent families are losing out more than any other family group. Four hundred SureStart centres have closed since the General Election. Low paid new mums will lose £1,300 during pregnancy and their baby’s first year from cuts to pregnancy support, tax credits and real terms cuts to maternity pay. Food poverty is increasing. Just last week the Tory-led coalition slashed budgets by £11.5 billion, which will impact services affecting families up and down the country. In this context, it is nothing less than an insult to struggling families of all shapes and sizes  that the Conservatives are prepared to find at least £500 million to prioritise “sending a signal” about marriage.

As the grassroots campaign Don’t Judge My Family says, the government has no right to use the tax system to promote its old fashioned view of how modern families should live. David Cameron promised that his government would be the “most family friendly ever”. But it’s clear that only applies if your family fits his narrow, privileged and backward looking view of what a family should look like.

Kate Green is MP for Stretford and Urmston, and  Labour spokesperson for Equalities.

  • JohnPReid

    Single parents get benefits, as do those who are with children in two parent families, so those who are married with no kids still fit into this new classification, have you forgot Gay marriage

  • Monkey_Bach

    How stupid to arbitrarily reward certain couples with a tax break based on whether or not they have undergone approved religious or civil ceremonies. Absolutely bonkers. Eeek.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t understand this antagonism to traditional families, granted this tax break isn’t well designed but the principle of supporting two parent families, supporting stable relationships is sound.

    We know that rates of poverty vary by family type; that child poverty rates for single parent families are twice that of two parent families. We have a welfare system there to step in to meet the cost of family breakdown, stepping in to provide income support as a form of substitute partner.

    Given the cost of family breakdown both social and financial I think money spent in supporting two-parent families is money well invested.

  • Angela Sullivan

    Married women have for a very long time been shafted by the UK tax and benefit system which presumes (I think) that their home-making skills enable them to survive on less money than any other type of adult. More recently there has been a focus on “working” women and helping them with childcare costs. If “working” women are earning decent wages why do they need so much more financial help than stay-at-home housewives who earn less than a dollar a day?

  • http://www.muondo.org muondo

    excellent blog, j’adore cette petite liste.

Latest

  • News Just over 48 hours to go – and the polls are still neck and neck

    Just over 48 hours to go – and the polls are still neck and neck

    If there’s going to be a significant crossover to the Tories – as Lynton Crosby has predicted – then it’s either already happened and the pollsters have missed it, or it’s going to happen in the final 48 hours of the campaign. Because so far, the polls are all telling a similar story – tied, or a narrow lead either way: YouGov CON 33%, LAB 33%, LDEM 10%, UKIP 12%, GRN 5% Populus CON 34%, LAB 34%, LDEM 10%, UKIP […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Miliband: Labour wouldn’t borrow more than the Tories

    Miliband: Labour wouldn’t borrow more than the Tories

    Today Ed Miliband was interviewed by the BBC’s James Landale, in which he gave a clear message to the public just two days before the election: “I’m ready to run this country for working people”. During this interview, Miliband also spoke about the economy and he told Landale that a Labour government wouldn’t borrow more than the Conservatives – because the Tories would miss their deficit targets, just as they have done during this parliament. Miliband also said that abolishing non-dom status […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Miliband: Labour will put “working people first”

    Miliband: Labour will put “working people first”

    Tomorrow Ed Miliband will lay out the choice for the electorate: between a Labour government that “puts working people first” or a Tory government that “works only for the privileged few”. To illustrate this difference he will reiterate the party’s pledge to abolish the non-dom status. Miliband will say that the non-dom rule currently allows very rich people to avoid paying tax and he will also point out that the Conservatives, UKIP and the Lib Dems have all defended this two hundred-year-old […]

    Read more →
  • News Why has this Labour candidate been the target of a “deeply divisive leaflet” which backs her Tory opponent?

    Why has this Labour candidate been the target of a “deeply divisive leaflet” which backs her Tory opponent?

    Uma Kumaran is the Labour PPC for Harrow East, she’s running a closely fought campaign against Tory Bob Blackman, but recently, these leaflets have been going out in the constituency, targeting her and the (in a poor third place) Lib Dem candidate over their party’s views on laws to outlaw caste discrimination. The leaflet goes on to back Blackman: The leaflet has been distributed by the organisation Dharma Sewa Purva Paksha (DSP) – based in Leicester – whose managing editor Mukesh […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Why I’m voting Labour

    Why I’m voting Labour

    I’m voting Labour. Obviously you’d hope that’s what I’d say in a column for LabourList, but I want to use my final column before Election Day to explain my decision. The usual purpose of this column is to write about what Class is up to, so I want to be clear that I am not setting out a position for Class, which is an independent think tank unaffiliated with any particular party or union. But I am voting Labour. And […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit