After Duggan

January 17, 2014 10:15 am

There are lessons for the Labour Party to learn in the wake of the shooting of Mark Duggan.  This week, in the aftermath of the coroner’s court verdict on the shooting , I called a meeting at the House of Commons. The community has talked of little else in the wake of a verdict that surprised many. So the meeting, which was called at just two working days notice, was packed. The speakers included: barrister Matthew Ryder QC;  Deborah Coles,  Co-Director of Inquest; Carole Duggan, Mark Duggan’s aunt and Claudia Webbe, ex-chairperson of New Scotland Yard’s Operation Trident Independent Advisory Group. The Duggan family’s lawyer, Martha Willis Stewart, was also present. In all the meeting was attended by over 150 people.

The meeting was the third in a sequence of meetings that I have called in Parliament since the riots in 2011. It seemed to me that the riots raised issues about the relationship between the police and the community which were long-standing and should not be swept under the carpet. In the immediate aftermath of the riots there was intense interest, but the media soon moved on. So I called a meeting on the first anniversary of the riots to discuss issues like police/community relations and the use of stop and search. I believe that this is a debate that the Labour Party should be at the heart of. The speakers included community activists and the policeman in charge at Tottenham police station the night the riots erupted.

police

Last year I called a meeting entirely about the question of stop and search. Disproportionate levels of stop and search are a totemic issue in the black community. Evidence based stops are one thing. But the unhappiness is focussed on non-evidence based stops. It was stop and search, or as it was known then “sus”, that triggered the original riots in Brixton in the nineteen eighties.

Amongst the speakers last year were barrister Courtney Griffiths QC, young victims of stop and search and the Home Secretary Theresa May MP.  The Home Office had launched a review of stop and search. As a result of concerns raised at my meeting they simplified the wording and extended the deadline for responses. Curiously the results of the review have still not been published.

At last week’s meeting there was general unhappiness at the Duggan verdict. Activists, who had been in the court day by day, insisted that they could not equate the evidence they heard with the ultimate findings of the coroner’s court. There was much discussion about stop and search and black deaths in police custody. Interestingly nobody raised the issue of the need for more black policemen. The emphasis was on the way the Metropolitan Police carries out its work, not on the colour of people doing it.

What steps the Duggan family take in the light of the coroner’s verdict is obviously a matter for them. But one of the most telling speeches at this week’s meeting was not from a lawyer or experienced activists. It was a young woman in the audience wearing school uniform who got up to protest at the use of “stop and search”. She said that she and her friends had been harassed by the police since the age of eleven. And she wanted to know what could be done. The key to fighting crime, particularly gang crime, in the inner city is for the police to enlist the trust and support of young people like her. So after the Duggan inquest the Labour Party needs to be mindful that the task of rebuilding trust in the police and the Independent Police Complaints Commission is more urgent than ever.

Diane Abbott is the Labour MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington

  • MrSauce

    Interesting.
    You completely avoid the fact that that this was a jury decision.
    A decision made by a jury having heard the evidence in court.

    • treborc1

      Yes but we all know the Jury has little choice because of the protection given to the police. You do not even have to suspect a person has a gun only that your life is at risk, not good enough

      • geedee0520

        So – weeks of evidence and witnesses is discounted because ‘we all know’. Abbott and others stood aside & said nothing when the jury was abused and threatened (alongside the police who ‘didn’t want to upset anyone’.

        I don’t know what the evidence was etc, but I trust the jury system above anything else i.e. Abbott or any other politician decides who is guilty.

      • Mr Arthur Cook

        Walk down Tottenham High Road and chat to “the community” as Diane calls them. Ask the women taking their kids to school what they fear. Ask the blokes openeing their shops what they fear. Ask the dads of teenage boys what they fear.
        Guess what. They are not affraid of their kids being shot at random by a policeman. They are scared of the gangs and the everyday touting of guns on the streets by people in designer labels NOT people in uniform.
        To try and make political capital out of this sorry episode really shows what “politics” can sink to.
        The “Community” are fed up. “The community” are affraid. BUT they are affraid of the ever present gang culture that they fear their kids will be drawn into and or become victims of.
        “The community” deserves better that politicians seeking to grab a few votes by clinging to the back of a band wagon they feel is trundling in their direction.

  • Mr Arthur Cook

    I am puzzled. Who is this “the community”? What “the riots” are we talking about …. the ones where people broke into shops to steal trainers and TVs? We are not seeking to turn looting into “civil protest” for political advantage are we?
    There are many cases where people have stood up to injustice BUT they didn’t “stand” in a pair of Nike trainers they’d just nicked from Footlocker!
    Must jury verdicts be underwritten by “the community” to make them valid?
    How many of “the community” want their children playing on streets where people routinely carry guns?
    Diane – please stop.

  • swatnan

    Dianne is taliking absolute rubbish. She and so-called ‘community leaders like Lammy are doing noing to help rid the black community of gang violence and gun crime. So, its left to the police to deal with very difficul situations created largely by the community themselves. Black on black violence is endemic. Reports and intelligence showed that Duggan a petty villan was supplied with a gun. The police were right to take action, and as the Jury surmised, right to shoot in the fear that they themselves might have been shot. The correct verdict was delivered.

Latest

  • Comment Rather than focusing on free schools, Labour should consider supporting home education

    Rather than focusing on free schools, Labour should consider supporting home education

    The Labour Party, since at least 2010 have gradually begun to present a coherent, cohesive education programme, to present to the electorate in time for the General Election in 2015. We’ve rightly focused on Michael Gove’s profligate waste of money on free schools. We’ve rightly focused on the Liberal Democrats’ breaking their pledge to vote against raising tuition fees. We’ve rightly focused on the other 50% of people who decide to not go to University and we’re now right to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Attracting the anti-UKIP vote – why Clacton matters for Labour

    Attracting the anti-UKIP vote – why Clacton matters for Labour

    Make yourself a cuppa, pull up a comfy chair, and watch. Since Douglas Carswell’s surprise/no-surprise defection to UKIP yesterday and the forcing of a by-election in Clacton, there will be some in the party tempted to adopt this attitude. And not without good reason. Consider the previous by-election outings over the last year or so. In Eastleigh, a Liberal Democrat/Tory marginal, from nowhere, became a LD/UKIP marginal. The Conservatives were dumped into third place and our vote stagnated at just […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Deprived families being left behind by Boris Johnson’s transport cuts

    Deprived families being left behind by Boris Johnson’s transport cuts

    Throughout his time at City Hall Boris Johnson has expended a vast amount of hot air trying to claim he represents all of London, for many people though this just doesn’t ring true. That’s why it will come as no surprise that a new report I have published today has found that Londoners in deprived areas face disproportionately poor access to the capital’s transport system, and with population growth the gap is worsening. The report, ‘Tackling Poverty: One Bus Ride Away’, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland A strong Union needs English voices

    A strong Union needs English voices

    As the TV debates made clear, the future of the Union hangs on perceptions of the self interests of the Scottish people. Britain’s future as a country, identity or constitutional reality has played little role in the arguments north of the border. English voices and interests have been excluded; not just from the start of the referendum campaign but for almost as long as people have campaigned for devolution or independence. Of course, the referendum must be decided by Scottish […]

    Read more →
  • Featured LabourList readers worried about Labour’s London-centric bias

    LabourList readers worried about Labour’s London-centric bias

    The start of the week saw Alistair Darling and Alex Salmond go head-to-head over the Scottish referendum for the second time. There’s been general agreement that Darling won the first round clash but that this time, Salmond triumphed. We asked LabourList readers what they thought about the debates – whether Better Together or Yes Scotland gained more from them. The figures aren’t too promising for either campaign. Better Together just pipped Yes Scotland to the post with 32% to the […]

    Read more →