Labour confirms plans to repeal NHS bill

September 29, 2012 6:17 pm

There has been much speculation this afternoon about whether or not Ed Miliband u-turned on plans to repeal the NHS and Social Care Bill. If Miliband did say that, it seems to have been a slip of the tongue, as a senior Labour source close to Miliband just told us:

“We will repeal the bill. We will return the NHS to its founding principles of care and cooperation. We will not go through a costly reorganisation.”

As you were…?

Update: This morning we went back and took a look at the transcript of Ed’s Q&A yesterday. Here’s what he said on NHS reform:

“I think what would not be sensible is for us to come along and say, “Well Andrew Lansley – now Jeremy Hunt – they are changing all the arrangements to have these new clinical commissioning groups and so on, and we are just going to reverse it all back and spend another £3 billion on another top-down bureaucratic reorganisation”. So…but I think I can make you this promise that you are looking for: we will put the right principles back at the heart of the NHS.”

  • http://twitter.com/willmill82 Will Millinship

    Alright, name names then. Who close to Ed Miliband said that?

  • http://twitter.com/DanielFurrUK Daniel Furr

    “However Miliband admitted that a Labour government would not “spend
    another” £3bn reversing the coalition’s controversial NHS reforms.” – http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/sep/29/ed-mliband-labour-vision-conference?CMP=twt_gu

  • http://twitter.com/Nico22a022 Nico

    Whose tongue slipped? Miliband’s The senior Labour source’s? Andy Burnham’s?
    Andy
    Burnham tweeted he’d publish his NHS position “in the autumn”. This is
    the time for the public (at least that part that knows what is going on)
    to make its position in defence of the NHS absolutely clear.

  • rekrab

    If it is, then we’re in the technocratic process of mixing red,blue and yellow and god help us all, politicians seem to spout out modernisation every time things go awry, for the last 40 years or more it’s been cited implemented and failed every time.We had Cameron saying the other day that elections don’t make democracies, we’ve got green conservatism, orange liberalism, and red, blue and black labourism a cocktail of mixtures that I’ll turn a turd purple.Leadership, strength of commitment is truly missing from politics and if Ed doesn’t repeal then those technocrats will lead us to the never again syndrome becoming a very real and disturbing reality.

    • AlanGiles

       We are back to that same old brick wall. They don’t know yet, because Cruddas will tell them in a couple of years time – till then – they didn’t say yes, they didn’t say no.

      This indecisiveness will chip away at the poll lead, and just makes the party look weak, and, frankly irrelevant.

      (I await “correction” from aratacas and Renie) :-)

      • aracataca

        Forcible break up of the banks, repeal of the Health and Social Care Act and restoration of the 50p rate and it’s only Sunday. Sounds pretty decisive to me.

        • Dave Postles

          That sort of response is fragmentary and just taking the easy pickings – the low-hanging fruit.  In any case, there is no commitment to repeal the HSCA, it seems.  Inserting the ‘right’ principles will, it would seem, still leave commissioning in the hands of GP practices – a fragmentation and effective privatization of the service.  I would love to be corrected on this issue, but I will not hold my breath.  There is no commitment to ‘break up’ the banks.  The promise is to implement Vickers on tight ring-fencing if the banks do not get their act together.  There’s an immense get-out clause there – about interpretation and resistance.  It would have been more concise to proclaim that: whatever the Coalition and the banks do, Labour will implement the full proposals of the Vickers commission. 
          Convince us that there is a big picture (‘vision’) which will moderate the excesses of the recent neo-liberal past and put working people, the unemployed, the underemployed, and the sick and disabled first; that will, without any ambiguity, announce that public services are more ethically delivered pro bono publico not for private profit.

          • AlanGiles

             According to the midday Radio 4 news bullitein, a Labour spokesperson was quoted as saying that GP commissioning would continue but in a spirit of “co-operation not competition”…….

          • aracataca

            Typical, absolutely typical. We issue some policy meat which you repeatedly (ad nauseum) say we’re not doing and then when we do, you instantly distort the policy and criticise it. Why don’t you check out what he really said about the HSCA? Alternatively see my remarks in response to Dave above.  

          • AlanGiles

             Bill, I was merely repeating what had been stated on the Radio 4 news bullitein at midday. I offered no comment on it whatsoever.

            If you want to start arguments I wish you would do it with somebody who gives a damn about what you “think”. Frankly, I don’t.

          • aracataca

            Any danger of you ceasing all the negative distortion Alan? See this from tonight’s Guardian:
            Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”
            Full stop from you too?

          • aracataca

            Any danger of you ceasing all the negative distortion Alan? See this from tonight’s Guardian:
            Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”
            Full stop from you too?

          • aracataca

            Any danger of you ceasing all the negative distortion Alan? See this from tonight’s Guardian:
            Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”
            Full stop from you too?

          • aracataca

            Sorry but EM has promised the forcible break up of the banks if they do not do this themselves which of course they won’t  (at least not before 2015). NB Vickers gave them until 2019 to ring fence so in this sense EM is speeding Vickers up.The problem with the HSCA is that in order to put the NHS all back together it will cost £3 billion- then the question becomes -’Why spend £3 billion on treating cancer patients or heart attack victims when you can spend it on another top down reorganisation of the NHS?’ I take it you’ve conceded my point on the top rate of tax.

          • Dave Postles

            No, please don’t take it that I have ‘conceded’ your point on the 50% rate – as I say, it’s easy pickings.  It will be a matter of interpretation as to whether the banks have sufficiently reformed themselves – which allows the ‘get out’.   Yes, I’m cynical, but I do not expect Labour to move on this one, but ultimately to use the ‘get out’ that the banks have done enough.  Leaving commissioning in the hands of the GP practices is horrendous.  It is the demise of the NHS.  Lansley’s reorganization might be costed at £3bn, but that doesn’t mean that reintroducing a democratic tier (such as Community Health Councils) would be as expensive. 

            It’s the ‘vision thing’.

          • aracataca

            The preamble to the Act states that GP commissioning must take place within a context of competition. Obviously EM wants to reintroduce co-operation back into the process.Policy in this area is not settled yet but I don’t see an incoming Labour government leaving this Act as it is.

          • aracataca

            The preamble to the Act states that GP commissioning must take place within a context of competition. Obviously EM wants to reintroduce co-operation back into the process.Policy in this area is not settled yet but I don’t see an incoming Labour government leaving this Act as it is.

          • Dave Postles

             It’s left again to people like Bernie Sanders to articulate a way forward.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/lets-fight-for-a-progress_b_1925069.html

          • Dave Postles

             It’s left again to people like Bernie Sanders to articulate a way forward.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/lets-fight-for-a-progress_b_1925069.html

          • Dave Postles

             It’s left again to people like Bernie Sanders to articulate a way forward.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/lets-fight-for-a-progress_b_1925069.html

          • Dave Postles

             It’s left again to people like Bernie Sanders to articulate a way forward.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/lets-fight-for-a-progress_b_1925069.html

          • Dave Postles

             It’s left again to people like Bernie Sanders to articulate a way forward.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/lets-fight-for-a-progress_b_1925069.html

          • Dave Postles

             It’s left again to people like Bernie Sanders to articulate a way forward.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/lets-fight-for-a-progress_b_1925069.html

          • aracataca

            From tonight’s Guardian: Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”

          • aracataca

            From tonight’s Guardian: Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”

          • Dave Postles

             Yes, well I voted for him in the leadership election before I resigned from the party at the prospect of the reintroduction of Blair.  He obviously doesn’t believe the cost will amount to £3bn.  Then again, Labour should get the narrative straight – conflicting and ambiguous signals.

          • AlanGiles

             The blind faith displayed by “aracataca” is truly touching, but when you have the party leader and the shadow minister most concerned saying slightly different things, it takes you back to the railways. Up until April 30th 1997, Labour were going to rentionalise the railway network. After May 1st, it was deemed “too  expensive” and as one Labour backbencher put it on “Today” (Radio 4) “well, its done now”

            I suspect a similar conclusion here too

          • aracataca

            Ah you’ve resigned that would explain things.

          • aracataca

            From tonight’s Guardian: Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”

          • Dave Postles

             It’s left again to people like Bernie Sanders to articulate a way forward.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/lets-fight-for-a-progress_b_1925069.html

          • Dave Postles

             It’s left again to people like Bernie Sanders to articulate a way forward.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/lets-fight-for-a-progress_b_1925069.html

  • Amber_Star

    I think Ed was challenged about the potential £3Bn cost of doing another top down reorganisation.
    That said, he needs to avoid any more ‘slips’ around the commitment to repeal the NHS bill. It is of huge importance to the activists which he will need in order to win.

  • aracataca

    Breaking up the zombie banks, restoring the 50p rate and repealing the Health and Social Care Bill (but trying to avoid an unnecessary £3 billion cost). 

    What shift to the right?  

  • aracataca

    Amber rest assured and see this from tonight’s Guardian:
    Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”

    • Jeremy_Preece

      So perhaps if AB is clear, and can actaully say what Labour would do, and without the contridictions and foggy answers of EM… maybe we should swap EM for AB!

      Am I missing the point here, or is it that we just need John Cruddas to actaully say what Labour is about?

    • Jeremy_Preece

      So perhaps if AB is clear, and can actaully say what Labour would do, and without the contridictions and foggy answers of EM… maybe we should swap EM for AB!

      Am I missing the point here, or is it that we just need John Cruddas to actaully say what Labour is about?

    • Jeremy_Preece

      So perhaps if AB is clear, and can actaully say what Labour would do, and without the contridictions and foggy answers of EM… maybe we should swap EM for AB!

      Am I missing the point here, or is it that we just need John Cruddas to actaully say what Labour is about?

      • aracataca

        Of course we must wait for the policy review to come out and we elected EM as leader 2 years ago – end of.

      • aracataca

        Of course we must wait for the policy review to come out and we elected EM as leader 2 years ago – end of.

        • Jeremy_Preece

          Can’t wait to deliver that message to the folks on the doorstep as I stand for our local county council elections next May.
          “Vote for us even though we can’t say what we are about or what we are going to do and we have a vision about what we are about … only it is a secret … but we will tell you later..sometime…”
          “And okay you can’t see the leader as a PM but you the electroate are wrong because we say so and we voted for him .. or some of the party did- so there…and we are determined to keep the leader until after we loose next time, by which time the Tories will have wrecked the country totally..”

          This policy review has been going on for over 2 years. A serious party cannot take itself off line for two years and still not be clear as to where it is going. It has already taken far too long. In case no one noticed, the Labour Party needs to win the next election, which means that we have to provide something for the electorate not just prat about for the benefit of some of the party members.

        • Jeremy_Preece

          Can’t wait to deliver that message to the folks on the doorstep as I stand for our local county council elections next May.
          “Vote for us even though we can’t say what we are about or what we are going to do and we have a vision about what we are about … only it is a secret … but we will tell you later..sometime…”
          “And okay you can’t see the leader as a PM but you the electroate are wrong because we say so and we voted for him .. or some of the party did- so there…and we are determined to keep the leader until after we loose next time, by which time the Tories will have wrecked the country totally..”

          This policy review has been going on for over 2 years. A serious party cannot take itself off line for two years and still not be clear as to where it is going. It has already taken far too long. In case no one noticed, the Labour Party needs to win the next election, which means that we have to provide something for the electorate not just prat about for the benefit of some of the party members.

        • Jeremy_Preece

          Can’t wait to deliver that message to the folks on the doorstep as I stand for our local county council elections next May.
          “Vote for us even though we can’t say what we are about or what we are going to do and we have a vision about what we are about … only it is a secret … but we will tell you later..sometime…”
          “And okay you can’t see the leader as a PM but you the electroate are wrong because we say so and we voted for him .. or some of the party did- so there…and we are determined to keep the leader until after we loose next time, by which time the Tories will have wrecked the country totally..”

          This policy review has been going on for over 2 years. A serious party cannot take itself off line for two years and still not be clear as to where it is going. It has already taken far too long. In case no one noticed, the Labour Party needs to win the next election, which means that we have to provide something for the electorate not just prat about for the benefit of some of the party members.

      • aracataca

        Of course we must wait for the policy review to come out and we elected EM as leader 2 years ago – end of.

  • aracataca

    Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”

  • aracataca

    Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”

  • aracataca

    Andy Burnham, issued a statement on Twitter which read: “I’ll repeal the bill. Full stop.”

  • Alexwilliamz

    Why would it cost 3 billion to reverse it? It might be more or less. Of course we might find that the reform is a car crash and even the coalition will have to make attempts to reverse this backward step.

  • Alexwilliamz

    Why would it cost 3 billion to reverse it? It might be more or less. Of course we might find that the reform is a car crash and even the coalition will have to make attempts to reverse this backward step.

  • Alexwilliamz

    Why would it cost 3 billion to reverse it? It might be more or less. Of course we might find that the reform is a car crash and even the coalition will have to make attempts to reverse this backward step.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Scott-Wigston/742282624 Scott Wigston

    The ending of universal healthcare in England (not the other three) is probably the worst offence that the coalition government has committed against the British people. Their refusal to publish the risk assessment leaves one to speculate as to whether or not criminal proceedings will take place if a tragedy happens as a result of this ignominious bill. One should support Lord Owen in his attempts to overturn this unconstitutional piece of legislation, and support the NHS Action Party and Labour too. It did not have any democratic mandate from this unelected government and Cameron said it would never happen and yet it has.

  • driver56

    When we are in power, let us learn the lessons of past when it comes to reorganising a national health service. Ask the people at the coal face and work up the tree and prune as you go. Ditch the bedroom tax and do not try to replace it with another tax.Give the country a vote on Europe. Remember we only joined a common market. Then get stuck into the banks and other tax avoiders.

Latest

  • Comment Londoners don’t want a staffless, soulless Tube system

    Londoners don’t want a staffless, soulless Tube system

    The London Underground is the single most important piece of public infrastructure in the capital. Over three million people use the Tube each day, to get to work, visit family or see friends. A healthy Underground network is at the heart of a healthy, vibrant London. It is a fantastic system that is the envy of the modern world, but we must ensure we do not neglect our crown jewel. Later  today, I will be addressing a conference on the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Fairness dictates that we show concern for both sides

    Fairness dictates that we show concern for both sides

    We have all been shocked to see the surge in violence between Israel and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip. This conflict is causing enormous hardship on both sides. Particularly distressing is the sight of civilian casualties. The scale of human suffering in the current escalation is immense and every civilian casualty is a tragedy. The people of Gaza have the right to live in peace and freedom, just as Israelis have the right not to fear for […]

    Read more →
  • News Are Osborne’s spinners block journalists from asking questions they don’t like?

    Are Osborne’s spinners block journalists from asking questions they don’t like?

    An intriguing story emerged from a copy of the Express and Star last week, the regional newspaper that covers the West Midlands and Staffordshire. Daniel Wainwright reports that during a recent visit from the Chancellor, a radio journalist said she wanted to ask George Osborne about food banks, and was told that he simply wouldn’t answer it. Here’s the story: “Talking of George Osborne, here’s a little insight into what goes on in the run up to getting an interview. These […]

    Read more →
  • News Alexander intervenes on Gaza escalation that “shames our shared humanity”

    Alexander intervenes on Gaza escalation that “shames our shared humanity”

    Douglas Alexander, Labour Shadow Foreign Secretary, has made another intervention on the Gaza conflict as the crisis in the Middle East continues to escalate. Alexander condemns the attack on a UN school in Gaza, describing the deaths of children there as “[shaming] our shared humanity”. His latest comments seem to be aimed largely at lobbying Israel to stand down the level of the force, and to recognise that as a democracy with “vastly superior technological and military capabilities, comes particular responsibilities”. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour changes track – and now it can win

    Labour changes track – and now it can win

    Labour has not generated many headlines this week. There haven’t been game-changers. David Cameron wasn’t trounced in Prime Minister’s Questions. The polls haven’t shifted. The meeting with a post-stardust Obama passed by without significant benefit or incident. Yet, this has been Labour’s best week for some considerable time – certainly in this Parliament. Heading into the final furlong of the election race, Labour has three strategic weaknesses: its perceived weaknesses on leadership, an absence of a strong governing story and a […]

    Read more →