Tom Watson’s statement on CMS select committee report

May 1, 2012 12:51 pm

Today the Culture, Media and Sport select committee released their much awaited report on phone hacking. Here’s Tom Watson’s statement on the report:

It’s been 10 years, 1 month and nine days since the News of the World hacked Milly Dowler’s phone.

Five days ago Rupert Murdoch admitted there was a cover up at News Corporation.

We found that News Corporation carried out an extensive cover-up of its rampant lawbreaking. It’s most senior executives repeatedly misled Parliament and the two men at the top, Rupert and James Murdoch – who were in charge of the company – must now answer for that.

In the view of the majority of committee members Rupert Murdoch is not fit to run and international company like BSkyB.

I’m disappointed that some members didn’t feel sufficiently convinced or confident to hold the most powerful to account. (They felt they couldn’t support sections 216-229 of the report)

Many hacking victims have still not been informed of what was done to them. And Rupert Murdoch has not said his last apology to the families of murdered children.

Let us also remember that this scandal cost many hundreds of hard working, innocent journalists their jobs. They’ve found it hard to find work. I know this because I’ve provided references for a number of them.

Parliament was misled, that we now know.

But there were four issues we couldn’t get to the bottom of because of time constraints, decisions of the committee not to proceed or because they fall outside our remit.

Former member of the Scottish Parliament Tommy Sheridan lost his liberty on a majority verdict of a jury which was not in full possession of the facts. He received a three year prison sentence. I believe the judgement is unsound.

If Rupert Murdoch really is sorry, he will order an urgent review of the information his company provided to the jury in the Sheridan case.

Now that we know that the former first minister in Scotland was also a target of hacking, I’m writing to Alex Salmond to recommend he sets up an inquiry by the Scottish Parliament into how and why MSPs were targeted.

Secondly, we asked the Murdochs about computer hacking but we didn’t get very far. I’m not certain but I have reason to believe that the Serious Organsied Crime Agency is in possession of seized hard drives that may show a list of victims who were the targets of computer hackers.

There may well be a Mulcaire 2 out there – where the authorities think it is right not to inform people who have had their privacy invaded by private investigators who have links with national newspapers.

I’m writing to the Chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee today, to raise my concerns and to ask that his committee do what it can to establish the facts.

Thirdly, we were not able to establish the extent to which committee members were the targets of private investigators or journalists trying to collect information in order to either smear or influence.

Last week former Chief Reporter of the News of the World, Neville Thurlbeck said “it was News International, not the News of the World, which ordered us to dig into the private lives of the MPs on the committee” which was investigating us.

He went on to say that “many News International executives were in the loop” The committee did not have the time to act on these new allegations but I think they are so serious they warrant an inquiry by the Committee of Standards and Privileges for a potential contempt of Parliament.

Fourthly, though we have not had time to discuss it in committee, it is my personal view that we should embark on an investigation into the relationship between ministers, special advisers and lobbyists working for News International and BSkyB.

I repeat my call that the PM should allow the Leveson inquiry to view the private emails and texts of Treasury advisers and Mr Fredric Michel of News International and Mr Graham McWilliam of BSkyB.

The truth is that, whatever we have said in our report, and however you choose to report it tomorrow, the public have made up their minds.

Powerful people were involved in a cover up and they still haven’t accepted responsibility.

And after all of this, the story is not yet over.

It was reported at the weekend that Rebekah Brooks was prepared to release her personal texts and emails to the Leveson inquiry. I think she should. But, as David Cameron said yesterday, the contacts between Rupert Murdoch and senior ministers crossed both sides of the House.

If we really want to see how News Corp in the UK operates, then the current PM and Chancellor, all former Prime Ministers – including Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, and former Chancellors might want to consider revealing their texts and emails to company executives.

These people corrupted our country. They brought shame on our police force and our Parliament. They lied and cheated, blackmailed and bullied. We should all be ashamed when we think how we cowered before them for so long.

But to really stop requires more than tokenistic retribution. It needs conclusive attribution. The very cornerstone of justice is that those really responsible are held to account – that the rich and the powerful are as low in the face of the law as the most humble and weak.

In the words of Bob Dylan, “that the ladder of law has no top and no bottom”.

And everybody in the world knows who is responsible for the wrongdoing of News Corp: Rupert Murdoch. More than any individual alive, he is to blame. Morally, the deeds are his. He paid the piper and he called the tune.

It is his company, his culture, his people, his business, his failures, his lies, his crimes. The price for his profits and his power.

  • treborc1

    Not  some members the bloody Tories , who may well think Murdoch is worth keeping on side, but we are hearing it was the party line, so Cameron  or the whips or somebody had told the members not to back the  description Murdock was unfit.

    Good old Tories.

    I did love watching him when asked do you remember this Mr Murdock his dementia  worked for him and he said no, when asked about MP’s or Ministers do you rember this Mr Murdoch he would say oh yes.

    Now then did Murdock lie to the committee contempt of Parliament , it will be interesting to see.

    I suspect Murdock will now tell us about all the meeting he has had with whom and what was the out come.

  • charles.ward

     I swear if Tom Watson gets any more pompous he’ll burst.

  • Chrissieoap

    Louise Menche Tory supporter of Murdochs for the sake of her party and her leader. She is a disgrace and insults those who have been affected by the hacking of phones and computers admitted by Rupert Murdoch himself at Leveson Inquiry.
    She is pointing finger at those who opposed her opinion she is to blame for split in select committee opinions re Murdoch being fit and proper person. She is the partisan one not the Labour and LibDem MPs.
    WELL DONE TOM, all your hard work and the stress you have been put under will be appreciated by all those who know what the Murdochs can do to destroy lives.

    • geedee0520

       Erm – the remit of the committee was not to decide who is, or is not, a fit and proper person to run an international company. This is pure grandstanding from Watson.

      • http://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee Kulgan of Crydee

        Who just so happens to have a book out!!!

        • geedee0520

           And on page 312 gives the outcome of the committee report IN ADVANCE. Fit person anyone?

      • charles.ward

         And if this “fit and proper” amendment had not been added Louise Menche said she would have voted for the report as a whole.  Who knows, we might have had a report with unanimous support from the committee if it weren’t for Watson’s posturing.

        Sadly the report now lacks credibility as the committee was split based on whether the Murdock papers supported the committee members’ party at the last election.

  • Rocki

    Clearly the Tories do not want want Andy Coulson to spill the beans so stay onside with Murcoch. When is someone going to expose Clarence Mitchell who clearly works for News Internation . Colin Myler took the fall for Mitchell on McCann diaries in return for promotion.

  • treborc1

    Nice to see the Tories trying to protect the Murdocks

  • Roger

    I have a feeling this will ultimately backfire on Watson. It wasn’t the Select Committee’s job to declare who and isn’t fit to run an international company. It also looks way beyond Watson’s paygrade to be making such claims.  A quick look at the comments on the BBC webpage to this story indicates that there is quite some scepticism that the committee has actually done its job rather than grandstanding.  

    If Murdoch is unfit to run an international company then what does that say about the judgements  of the governments (past and present) who did all they could to leap into bed with him and his family. Ok, perhaps that’s a slight exaggeration – I’m sure that the Brown-Murdoch pajama party was wholly innocent.  

    On another note, I see that many believe Brown’s denial of Murdoch’s allegation of a declaration of war. This is odd. There is a lot of first-hand evidence of Brown’s temper tantrums (and this sure sounded like one).    

  • AnotherOldBoy

    Having seen Mr Watson’s peformance I feel some sympathy for Mr Rupert Murdoch.  That is the first time in my life I have done so.  However loathsome Mr Murdoch may be (and he is very loathsome), somehow he seems attractive when Mr Watson speaks.

  • Hugh

    It’s depressing when you come over all Kevin Maguire.

    It’s a total nonsense that a parliamentary committee should pronounce on who is a fit and proper person to run a company. If they’ve broken the law, then prosecute them and have them disqualified as a director.

    As for Watson, my favourite observation so far is that he’s simultaneously claiming Murdoch must have had intimate knowledge of what was going on in every part of his media empire while claiming to have had no idea what Damien McBride was getting up to when he sat at the next desk.

  • Rocki

    Mensch [defends] Rupert Murdoch [who owns] HarperCollins [who publish] Tilly Bagshawe [whose sister is] Louise Mensch

    Mensch Murdoch connections and another reason why she supports her leader.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well done Tom Watson.

    • Mark

      Well done for driving up book sales! Just use every vehicle to line your pocket.

  • geedee0520

     This is from Helen Goodman (shadow minister for CMS)

    ‘Corporate practice in the United States is different from in this
    country. In the USA the same person can be both Chair of the Board and
    Chief Executive – this gives that person huge power. In the UK the roles
    are separated. At News Corp – the multibillion dollar corporation he
    has built up.’

    This is completely wrong as in the UK it is entirely legal to be Chair and CEO – Sir Stuart Rose at M&S is a good example. The rest of her article (on Liberal Conspiracy) is full of all sorts of errors.

    Bit much to expect a Shadow Minister to understand the law she is commenting on I suppose. 

  • Pingback: RUPERT MURDOCH NOT A FIT AND PROPER PERSON | Socialist Unity

  • Roger

    Ok, so this circus has largely consisted of  Tom Watson attacking not only NI but also its owner in a very public way. 

    Is this the same Tom Watson who is Labour’s Campaign Coordinator ? If so, perhaps he should be relieved of this position since alienating Murdoch is rarely a smart strategic move when it comes to winning elections as previous Labour leaders have found to their cost.

    Watson should be aware that the Tories are delighted at his performance. 

     

    • AlanGiles

      In other words Labour should give in to News International blackmail?

      If I were a Tory, I would be embarrassed by the ridiculous teenage fan-style of Louise Mensch, in defending Murdoch. Just because one of his companies publish her knickers and lipstick style novels.

      • Roger

        There is a world of difference between undertaking a critical review of NI and the vitriol shown by Watson. Attacking Murdoch personally was a mistake. It was also a little odd since its beyond the remit (and competence) of the committee to decide who is and isn’t a fit person to run an international media company.  

        Whether you like NI or not (and I’m no great fan of them) its a poor strategic decision (by the Labour Campaign Coordinator no less) to go to war with such a major media organisation.  Watson should have studied history before doing this – wars rarely turn out the way that those who start them intend which is why its usually best to avoid them. 

        Regarding Louise Mensch, I suspect nobody (Tory or Labour) cares about her. Unlike Watson she hasn’t made a significant unforced error with significant implications for the possible outcome of the next election.  

         Applaud Watson all you want but please don’t whinge when the vitriol comes back in your direction at the next election.  Just like there is a world of difference between a review and a witchhunt, there is similarly quite a difference between media giving lukewarm support to one party and tearing the other side apart. Your Campaign Coordinator seems to have forgotten this.

        • Roger

          And in other news it appears that the “unfit” comment wasn’t even properly discussed but was engineered in at the last minute by Watson and his acolytes.  This is gesture politics at its worst.

          Just remember when NI savages you at the next election that your Campaign Coordinator invited much of the negative coverage. Yes it will be “unfair”; then again so is sticking a controversial last minute addition into a report without adequate discussion, purely for a short-term political effect.  

            

          • Dave Postles

             Are you sure?  The ‘unfit’ motion was tendered on 20 March apparently.

            http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may/02/rupert-murdoch-not-fit-six-weeks

          • Roger

            Regarding the unfit motion, no I’m not sure, I based my argument on info earlier today.

            Regarding the argument about the merits of seeking to traduce a man who can reduce  the chances of a Labour government yes I’m very sure that Labour’s Campaign Coordinator ought not to be doing this.

          • Dave Postles

             The only point which I am making is that many people assumed that Mensch was uttering an unequivocal interpretation – your ‘earlier information’ – which is apparently not unequivocal – and I hope that some of the people who jumped to that conclusion will reconsider. 
            I’m agnostic about the rest.

          • Roger

            Sure but (a) I’ve zero sympathy for Watson if he’s unjustly accused of political machinations since he has a well documented history of doing just this (eg the Blair coup) and (b)  whether or not the amendment was slipped in  irrelevant for my argument that his behaviour is absurd given that he’s Campaign Coordinator. 

          • treborc1

            We are infested with Tories, and fans of the Murdock’s

          • Roger

            How is it supporting Murdoch or the Tories to point out that attacking the most significant media player in the UK  in a partisan and personal way is a daft thing for Labour’s Campaign Coordinator to do ?  Do you think you’ll gain more votes than lose them by declaring the owner of the Sun to be unfit for the task ? 
            Watson has started this war and, as mentioned a few times, wars rarely end in the way those that start them intend….

          • http://twitter.com/gonzozzz dave stone

            “Watson has started this war ”

            Nothing to do with the range of sordid practices which initiated Watson’s response?

          • Roger

            Nope, Watson started this particular war with Murdoch  and has gloried in it.  Bad move.

        • AlanGiles


          Applaud Watson all you want but please don’t whinge when the vitriol comes back in your direction at the next election”

          You really think the public will feel sorry for Rupert and James Murdoch? – a bit like the way the public have taken Aleksandr and Sergei (the meerkats) to their hearts?

          I don’t see that. I think most people see them for the devious guttersnipes that they are.

          Anybody watching the performance of old man Murdoch last summer could have been forgiven for thinking he was senile (this was plainly an act to get sympathy) and needed the help of his son.

          On his own, the old polecat reverted to type.

          But James “didn’t recall” and the old man “didn’t know” and RM now says that there was a cover-up to cover up the cover-up and he didn’t know about it.

          So they are either fools or liars and not in control of their own company, so can there be much doubt that they are unfit to run it?

  • GuyM

    How anybody can take anything someone as overweight, porky, and unhealthy looking as Tom Watson has to say is beyond me. 

    • BillLockheart

      I agree. Louise Mensch is much better looking and fitter and deserves to be listened to more than chubby Watson. Have you read any of her books, Guy. I really enjoyed her novel “When She Was Bad… “. Very racey. Recommended.

      • GuyM

        I don’t read books, William. My servants read them for me.

        • BillLockheart

          I don’t suppose there’ll be much bodice ripping and panting in Watson’s “Dial M for Murdoch”, Guy. Anyway I’m off to listen to some ABBA. Take care. Cheers.

          • Bill Lockhart

            What’s the medical name for someone who assumes multiple online personalities, all of them moronic?

          • James

            Cameronism?

Latest

  • Comment A call for action at the G8

    A call for action at the G8

    In less than a month’s time, the UK hosts the G8 Summit. With hunger, tax, trade and transparency all on the agenda, the UK has a unique opportunity to show global leadership on these issues. The scale of hunger is devastating. There is enough food in the world for everyone, yet 1 billion people still go hungry. 2.3 million children every year die from malnutrition – to put that in perspective, that is around 16,000 children every day. Or one [...]

    Read more →
  • News TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run “The TUC along with its international equivalent – the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) – is calling on UEFA to address the appalling treatment of workers and players in Qatar and [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    The Labour Party spends a great deal of time beating itself up over its performance in Southern England. We know it simply isn’t good enough, but we can’t seem to put our finger on why exactly that’s the case. Is it demographics? No. Culture? Perhaps. Lack of basic party organisation in some areas? It’s certainly a factor. But whilst we’re flagellating ourselves over our inability to perform south of the Watford gap (outside of London), we should remember that the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Why we love Woolwich

    Why we love Woolwich

    Woolwich is an amazing place. It’s where the Labour party was founded as a mass membership organization. The Woolwich Provident was one of Britain’s first building societies. The Royal Arsenal Coop one of our first cooperative societies. Woolwich had the second Polytechnic in the country, created with the aim of providing education for working adults. Woolwich is my nearest big town centre, where I shop and go to meet friends. In the last few days, for many people, its name [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Technology isn’t just something for geeks to worry about

    Technology isn’t just something for geeks to worry about

    If you Google ‘Ed Miliband,’ you quickly get the old stuff about him being a bit of geek. His appearance at Google’s big Tent on Wednesday almost begged the headline “Geek Goes Home”. But that assumes technology is just something for geeks to worry about, and that Ed is a techie. Neither are true. What we saw on Wednesday was a leader with the courage to tell Google straight that it should live up to its founding principles on the [...]

    Read more →