Mental Health and One Nation: Made in Many Communities

November 15, 2012 8:00 pm

By Steve Griffiths

Ed Miliband’s speech to the Royal College of Psychiatrists widened the reach of political debate about mental health in a way that suggests a coherent strategy that reaches, as Miliband says, ‘beyond the NHS itself’, ‘changing the way our wider society works’, starting in ‘our communities’. If we approach this right, we can create a sustainable flow of policy that integrates mental health, in the true sense of the term, with a project to reduce health inequalities through community empowerment. Miliband’s words, ‘Everybody has a part to play. Only a nation acting together can overcome the challenge we face. That is what One Nation is about’ are not just rhetoric. I start from the experience of a project (HELP – Health Empowerment Leverage Project) that builds resident-led neighbourhood partnerships involving local communities and staff of local public agencies, which can turn around some of the most deprived neighbourhoods. One key of that is the impact on mental well-being of an active, assertive community. The research base is immense: here are just a couple of relevant examples:

  • National surveys of psychiatric morbidity in adults aged 16-64 in the UK show that the most significant difference between this group and people without mental ill-health problems is social participation.   There is strong evidence that social relationships can also reduce the risk of depression.
  • Research also reports significant health benefits for individuals actively involved in community empowerment/engagement initiatives including improvements in physical and mental health, health related behaviour and quality of life.

Consistent with this is the idea that policy is not something that should be done to people.    Though this echoes some recent influential thinking about the nature of a ‘relational’ state, it is not new. Marmot and others have established the case for the association between poor mental health and deprivation, and extended it to make an evidence-based case for community empowerment.

An understanding has long been growing that a whole system that addresses the social determinants of health through an energised community can transform the functioning of both provider services, and the well-being of the communities they serve.   Its strong economic case  arises from a finding with profound implications: that lower levels of social trust are associated with higher rates of most major causes of death, including coronary heart disease, cancers, cerebrovascular disease, unintentional injury and suicide.

Cameron’s reality of a fragmented and marketised society has us running in precisely the opposite direction. Just as high unemployment increases suicides, the bipartisan model of profit-driven welfare reform  undermines the mental health of hundreds of thousands.

HELP have developed an outcomes and cost benefit model as a guide for resident-led community partnerships; and have recorded the narrative of such a partnership through the eloquent accounts of residents and service providers. The approach starts with people defining where they are – not having it defined for them – which can then lead to productive dialogue with agencies. The problem of inequality is a multi-dimensional one, but it is no more complex than the way individuals, families and communities people experience it day by day.

It follows that a case can be made for Clinical Commissioning Groups to invest, with local authorities through Health and Well-Being Boards, in whole-system preventive development which creates added value through extension of health pathways into an active community.  Inspired strands of such an approach are to be found – and there is an appetite for it, not least among many GPs suspicious of predatory capitalism in their field.

I believe that such partnerships have the potential to reduce some of the sharpest manifestations of inequality.   To take one example, small area analysis of the cost of emergency hospital admissions shows extremely high variations between neighbourhoods.      Reducing the peaks frees the resources to further enable a strategic shift to prevention and early intervention, to borrow a phrase archived by the Coalition.

I am convinced that if a future Labour Government puts a stop to the marketisation of health, Ed Miliband’s broader and more dynamic understanding of mental health might usefully harness this potential.  Why not apply this model to, say, the 1% of most deprived small areas and the neighbourhoods they are part of – 320 of them? The data are there.       Northern Ireland is moving in that direction by allocating a minimum percentage of health spend to community development, and Scotland is following a similar path.

Preventing ill health and improving confidence, resilience, and wellbeing through resident-led community partnerships brings together a lot of themes where it matters: it makes social, financial and moral sense.

Steve Griffiths is a writer, researcher and consultant in health and social policy, with a particular interest in reducing health inequalities by addressing the social determinants of health, and campaigning against the erosion of benefits for those who cannot work. 

  • Dave Postles

    8 December UKUncut

  • http://www.englishstandard.org/ Wyrdtimes

    Ed Miliband and UK Labour politicians can only vote on English mental health issues. Is the “one nation” the United Kingdom then? Or England?

    • Steve Griffiths

      Good point, Wyrdtimes. But I am writing about a wider conception of mental health, one that is not confined to health policy: the fact that our mental health is hugely affected by the social determinants of health and the quality of our communities. That individual and community living can be transformed by what i call resident-led community partnerships. That there’s a whole load of evidence for this, and it’s a cost-effective approach, and we might use data we’ve got to prioritise the most deprived neighbourhoods. That requires a cross-government vision, which reflects the way people live – they don’t experience life govt department by department. You can do that at a very local level. The smaller countries of the UK are ahead of England in this, as I point out in my article.

  • Pingback: ‘changing the way our wider society works’ - Manchester Users Network()

Latest

  • News Dear The Sun – we spotted Ed Balls for you…

    Dear The Sun – we spotted Ed Balls for you…

    There’s a story in The Sun(£) today that suggests Ed Balls has been “sidelined” by the party ahead of the election campaign. The Murdoch-owned red-top even went as far as asking people to “spot the Balls”. Now since we never knowingly shirking a challenge, we’ve set out to find out where Ed Balls has been this week. In truth, it wasn’t very hard, because even a quick scan of Twitter, the papers or blogs would suggest the Sun are talking cobblers about the Labour Party (for […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland David Hamilton MP announces he’s stepping down in May

    David Hamilton MP announces he’s stepping down in May

    David Hamilton MP for Midlothian has announced he’s stepping down in May. Hamilton, who was born in his constituency, and has been the MP there for 14 years is a former miner. He has spent his career campaigning to help ex-miners  get compensation for medical conditions caused by to their line of work. Prior to becoming an MP, Hamilton was also a councillor in Midlothian for six years. He currently serves as the Scottish Labour Whip in the House of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour and Oxfam are in total agreement about tackling inequality

    Labour and Oxfam are in total agreement about tackling inequality

    This year, Oxfam’s Winnie Byanyima was one of the six chairs of the World Economic Forum in Davos, where she raised inequality as among the biggest issues facing the world. In fact, Byanyima, representing a large, well-respected, independent organisation, is pushing the exact line that Ed Miliband has been making his own – and that David Cameron recently halfheartedly echoed. What’s more, when it comes to how to tackle inequality, Oxfam and Labour are in total agreement. Indeed, Oxfam’s seven-point […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Tory spending plans mean a “real risk” of widespread charges in the NHS, says Balls

    Tory spending plans mean a “real risk” of widespread charges in the NHS, says Balls

    Ed Balls, shadow chancellor, has said that the Tories’ economic plans, which would see public spending to reduced to 35% (a goal they said they’ll achieve by 2019-20) in the next Parliament, means there is a “real risk that a second Tory government will introduce charges” in the NHS. Balls has made this forecast off the back of figures from 34 countries, which shows that when state spending is reduced to 35% of GDP or below, there extensive charges are introduced […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The Mansion Tax: A stopgap, not a solution

    The Mansion Tax: A stopgap, not a solution

    It is easy to get on the bandwagon to oppose a new tax. The mansion tax may have flaws but it represents the restoration of some rationale to property taxation in the UK and therefore it is very important to get behind the principles underpinning the idea. Let’s first get the flaws out of the way. The very name ‘mansion tax’ is daft, implying that anyone in a £2m house lives in some kind of detached palace. Secondly, the cut […]

    Read more →