Mental Health and One Nation: Made in Many Communities

15th November, 2012 8:00 pm

By Steve Griffiths

Ed Miliband’s speech to the Royal College of Psychiatrists widened the reach of political debate about mental health in a way that suggests a coherent strategy that reaches, as Miliband says, ‘beyond the NHS itself’, ‘changing the way our wider society works’, starting in ‘our communities’. If we approach this right, we can create a sustainable flow of policy that integrates mental health, in the true sense of the term, with a project to reduce health inequalities through community empowerment. Miliband’s words, ‘Everybody has a part to play. Only a nation acting together can overcome the challenge we face. That is what One Nation is about’ are not just rhetoric. I start from the experience of a project (HELP – Health Empowerment Leverage Project) that builds resident-led neighbourhood partnerships involving local communities and staff of local public agencies, which can turn around some of the most deprived neighbourhoods. One key of that is the impact on mental well-being of an active, assertive community. The research base is immense: here are just a couple of relevant examples:

  • National surveys of psychiatric morbidity in adults aged 16-64 in the UK show that the most significant difference between this group and people without mental ill-health problems is social participation.   There is strong evidence that social relationships can also reduce the risk of depression.
  • Research also reports significant health benefits for individuals actively involved in community empowerment/engagement initiatives including improvements in physical and mental health, health related behaviour and quality of life.

Consistent with this is the idea that policy is not something that should be done to people.    Though this echoes some recent influential thinking about the nature of a ‘relational’ state, it is not new. Marmot and others have established the case for the association between poor mental health and deprivation, and extended it to make an evidence-based case for community empowerment.

An understanding has long been growing that a whole system that addresses the social determinants of health through an energised community can transform the functioning of both provider services, and the well-being of the communities they serve.   Its strong economic case  arises from a finding with profound implications: that lower levels of social trust are associated with higher rates of most major causes of death, including coronary heart disease, cancers, cerebrovascular disease, unintentional injury and suicide.

Cameron’s reality of a fragmented and marketised society has us running in precisely the opposite direction. Just as high unemployment increases suicides, the bipartisan model of profit-driven welfare reform  undermines the mental health of hundreds of thousands.

HELP have developed an outcomes and cost benefit model as a guide for resident-led community partnerships; and have recorded the narrative of such a partnership through the eloquent accounts of residents and service providers. The approach starts with people defining where they are – not having it defined for them – which can then lead to productive dialogue with agencies. The problem of inequality is a multi-dimensional one, but it is no more complex than the way individuals, families and communities people experience it day by day.

It follows that a case can be made for Clinical Commissioning Groups to invest, with local authorities through Health and Well-Being Boards, in whole-system preventive development which creates added value through extension of health pathways into an active community.  Inspired strands of such an approach are to be found – and there is an appetite for it, not least among many GPs suspicious of predatory capitalism in their field.

I believe that such partnerships have the potential to reduce some of the sharpest manifestations of inequality.   To take one example, small area analysis of the cost of emergency hospital admissions shows extremely high variations between neighbourhoods.      Reducing the peaks frees the resources to further enable a strategic shift to prevention and early intervention, to borrow a phrase archived by the Coalition.

I am convinced that if a future Labour Government puts a stop to the marketisation of health, Ed Miliband’s broader and more dynamic understanding of mental health might usefully harness this potential.  Why not apply this model to, say, the 1% of most deprived small areas and the neighbourhoods they are part of – 320 of them? The data are there.       Northern Ireland is moving in that direction by allocating a minimum percentage of health spend to community development, and Scotland is following a similar path.

Preventing ill health and improving confidence, resilience, and wellbeing through resident-led community partnerships brings together a lot of themes where it matters: it makes social, financial and moral sense.

Steve Griffiths is a writer, researcher and consultant in health and social policy, with a particular interest in reducing health inequalities by addressing the social determinants of health, and campaigning against the erosion of benefits for those who cannot work. 

  • Dave Postles

    8 December UKUncut

  • http://www.englishstandard.org/ Wyrdtimes

    Ed Miliband and UK Labour politicians can only vote on English mental health issues. Is the “one nation” the United Kingdom then? Or England?

    • Steve Griffiths

      Good point, Wyrdtimes. But I am writing about a wider conception of mental health, one that is not confined to health policy: the fact that our mental health is hugely affected by the social determinants of health and the quality of our communities. That individual and community living can be transformed by what i call resident-led community partnerships. That there’s a whole load of evidence for this, and it’s a cost-effective approach, and we might use data we’ve got to prioritise the most deprived neighbourhoods. That requires a cross-government vision, which reflects the way people live – they don’t experience life govt department by department. You can do that at a very local level. The smaller countries of the UK are ahead of England in this, as I point out in my article.

  • Pingback: ‘changing the way our wider society works’ - Manchester Users Network()

Latest

  • News Polling Labour have ‘best policies’ on NHS, education, immigration and benefits, poll suggests

    Labour have ‘best policies’ on NHS, education, immigration and benefits, poll suggests

    Labour lead on four of the six policy areas considered most important by voters, according to latest polling. Ipsos MORI research for the Evening Standard show that on the topics of healthcare/NHS/hospitals, education and schools, asylum and immigration, and benefits Labour are judged to have better policies than the Conservatives, UKIP or the Lib Dems. However, on managing the economy and taxation, the Tories still hold a lead. Health is by far the most important issue for voters, with 47% considering […]

    Read more →
  • News “David Cameron is now a mortal danger to the NHS” – read the full text of Miliband’s NHS speech

    “David Cameron is now a mortal danger to the NHS” – read the full text of Miliband’s NHS speech

    t is great to be here with you at Manchester Metropolitan University. What a fantastic turn-out. And I particularly want to thank you for having us on exam day. And I want to thank John Brookes the Vice Chancellor here at the University. John’s going to be retiring in May after 10 years, so let’s pay tribute to him today. And let’s also pay tribute to all of the brilliant student nurses here today who are training to work in […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Scotland Will The Sun just say anything to stop people voting Labour? Part Two

    Will The Sun just say anything to stop people voting Labour? Part Two

    We’ve already covered Murdoch’s reported orders that The Sun should do whatever they can to stop Miliband winning, but the gap between today’s Sun in Scotland and the one on sale in the rest of the UK is absolutely amazing. It’s like they’ve forgotten that the internet exist, and people can compare the two. Especially since we’ve seen this happen less than a month ago. Here’s the front page of today’s Scottish Sun – where they seem pretty positive about […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured This election campaign has raised questions about the Conservatives’ fitness to govern

    This election campaign has raised questions about the Conservatives’ fitness to govern

    Elections are about competence. And this one is no different. People want to know the ability of leaders and their parties to take reasonable and balanced decisions. In normal circumstances, this is to the benefit of the incumbent given that they have a track record and extreme events such as, say, a global financial crisis are relatively rare. This election takes place in an environment where there are a series of warning signs- on NHS performance, the benefits system, an […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Murdoch reportedly “berated Sun journalists for not doing enough to attack Ed Miliband”

    Murdoch reportedly “berated Sun journalists for not doing enough to attack Ed Miliband”

    The Sun have never been fans of Ed Miliband. This was only exacerbated by his decision to attack Rupert Murdoch over phone hacking (leading indirectly to the closure of the News of the World), backing the Leveson inquiry, announcing plans to restrict media ownership and apologising for posing with a copy of The Sun. But it’s fair to say that The Sun never liked Miliband anyway, and after viciously turning on Labour during the 2010 election campaign (anyone remember Gordon […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit