Mental Health and One Nation: Made in Many Communities

15th November, 2012 8:00 pm

By Steve Griffiths

Ed Miliband’s speech to the Royal College of Psychiatrists widened the reach of political debate about mental health in a way that suggests a coherent strategy that reaches, as Miliband says, ‘beyond the NHS itself’, ‘changing the way our wider society works’, starting in ‘our communities’. If we approach this right, we can create a sustainable flow of policy that integrates mental health, in the true sense of the term, with a project to reduce health inequalities through community empowerment. Miliband’s words, ‘Everybody has a part to play. Only a nation acting together can overcome the challenge we face. That is what One Nation is about’ are not just rhetoric. I start from the experience of a project (HELP – Health Empowerment Leverage Project) that builds resident-led neighbourhood partnerships involving local communities and staff of local public agencies, which can turn around some of the most deprived neighbourhoods. One key of that is the impact on mental well-being of an active, assertive community. The research base is immense: here are just a couple of relevant examples:

  • National surveys of psychiatric morbidity in adults aged 16-64 in the UK show that the most significant difference between this group and people without mental ill-health problems is social participation.   There is strong evidence that social relationships can also reduce the risk of depression.
  • Research also reports significant health benefits for individuals actively involved in community empowerment/engagement initiatives including improvements in physical and mental health, health related behaviour and quality of life.

Consistent with this is the idea that policy is not something that should be done to people.    Though this echoes some recent influential thinking about the nature of a ‘relational’ state, it is not new. Marmot and others have established the case for the association between poor mental health and deprivation, and extended it to make an evidence-based case for community empowerment.

An understanding has long been growing that a whole system that addresses the social determinants of health through an energised community can transform the functioning of both provider services, and the well-being of the communities they serve.   Its strong economic case  arises from a finding with profound implications: that lower levels of social trust are associated with higher rates of most major causes of death, including coronary heart disease, cancers, cerebrovascular disease, unintentional injury and suicide.

Cameron’s reality of a fragmented and marketised society has us running in precisely the opposite direction. Just as high unemployment increases suicides, the bipartisan model of profit-driven welfare reform  undermines the mental health of hundreds of thousands.

HELP have developed an outcomes and cost benefit model as a guide for resident-led community partnerships; and have recorded the narrative of such a partnership through the eloquent accounts of residents and service providers. The approach starts with people defining where they are – not having it defined for them – which can then lead to productive dialogue with agencies. The problem of inequality is a multi-dimensional one, but it is no more complex than the way individuals, families and communities people experience it day by day.

It follows that a case can be made for Clinical Commissioning Groups to invest, with local authorities through Health and Well-Being Boards, in whole-system preventive development which creates added value through extension of health pathways into an active community.  Inspired strands of such an approach are to be found – and there is an appetite for it, not least among many GPs suspicious of predatory capitalism in their field.

I believe that such partnerships have the potential to reduce some of the sharpest manifestations of inequality.   To take one example, small area analysis of the cost of emergency hospital admissions shows extremely high variations between neighbourhoods.      Reducing the peaks frees the resources to further enable a strategic shift to prevention and early intervention, to borrow a phrase archived by the Coalition.

I am convinced that if a future Labour Government puts a stop to the marketisation of health, Ed Miliband’s broader and more dynamic understanding of mental health might usefully harness this potential.  Why not apply this model to, say, the 1% of most deprived small areas and the neighbourhoods they are part of – 320 of them? The data are there.       Northern Ireland is moving in that direction by allocating a minimum percentage of health spend to community development, and Scotland is following a similar path.

Preventing ill health and improving confidence, resilience, and wellbeing through resident-led community partnerships brings together a lot of themes where it matters: it makes social, financial and moral sense.

Steve Griffiths is a writer, researcher and consultant in health and social policy, with a particular interest in reducing health inequalities by addressing the social determinants of health, and campaigning against the erosion of benefits for those who cannot work. 

  • Dave Postles

    8 December UKUncut

  • http://www.englishstandard.org/ Wyrdtimes

    Ed Miliband and UK Labour politicians can only vote on English mental health issues. Is the “one nation” the United Kingdom then? Or England?

    • Steve Griffiths

      Good point, Wyrdtimes. But I am writing about a wider conception of mental health, one that is not confined to health policy: the fact that our mental health is hugely affected by the social determinants of health and the quality of our communities. That individual and community living can be transformed by what i call resident-led community partnerships. That there’s a whole load of evidence for this, and it’s a cost-effective approach, and we might use data we’ve got to prioritise the most deprived neighbourhoods. That requires a cross-government vision, which reflects the way people live – they don’t experience life govt department by department. You can do that at a very local level. The smaller countries of the UK are ahead of England in this, as I point out in my article.

  • Pingback: ‘changing the way our wider society works’ - Manchester Users Network()

Latest

  • News Tony Blair to stand down as Middle East Quartet Special Envoy

    Tony Blair to stand down as Middle East Quartet Special Envoy

    Former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair will stand down as Special Envoy of the Middle East Quartet next month, he has confirmed. The Quartet is made up of Russia, the United States, the UN and the EU. Blair announced that he was accepting the role on the day he left Downing St in 2007, and the office focuses largely on the problems arising from the Isreal/Palestine conflict, including tackling the lack of economic development in Palestinian areas. Responding to the news, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Attention please: there’s too much politics in our leadership contest

    Attention please: there’s too much politics in our leadership contest

    This is going to sound like a weird thing to say but bear with me: There’s too much politics in our leadership contest. I don’t mean the rather unedifying way that supporters of one candidate or another are slagging off the others. I mean that’s unattractive, short sighted and downright dumb (exactly who do you think will sit in the Shadow Cabinet when your guy or gal wins? When they are implementing the policies set by your champion, how then […]

    Read more →
  • News Video “You can’t empower local government if you impoverish it” – Harriet Harman’s response to the Queen’s Speech

    “You can’t empower local government if you impoverish it” – Harriet Harman’s response to the Queen’s Speech

    Harriet Harman, who is the interim Labour leader, today gave her party’s response to the Government’s Queen’s Speech. In it, she directed a number of jibes to the Tories, saying to David Cameron “we are both, by our own admission, interim leaders” in reference to his announcement prior to the election that he wouldn’t serve the full five years as leader. She made it clear that Labour were intent on holding the Government to account and she argued that changes […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Ken Macintosh asks for changes to be made to Scottish Leadership contest rules

    Ken Macintosh asks for changes to be made to Scottish Leadership contest rules

    Ken Macintosh MSP, who is considering standing to be the next leader of the Scottish Labour Party, has written to the outgoing leader Jim Murphy, the Chair of the Scottish Executive Committee and to the General Secretary of the Scottish Labour Party to ask for changes to be made to the way a new party leader is elected. In an open letter, Macintosh he asks that Scottish Labour Party elect its new leader by using One Member One Vote system and […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Understanding the election result: we mustn’t overdramatise the facts or oversimplify the answers

    Understanding the election result: we mustn’t overdramatise the facts or oversimplify the answers

    “Labour’s era may now be over and perhaps it is time for something new”, wrote one commentator in last Sunday’s Observer.  Keen to gain a hearing for their views, academics and journalists have joined some of my Labour colleagues in talking up the implications of our defeat on 7 May, just as they did in 1992. Then, as now, we were told that Labour could never form a majority government again. Just five years later we secured our biggest victory […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit