Cameron’s Europe speech – Labour reactions

January 23, 2013 11:44 am

Following David Cameron’s Europe speech this morning, we’ll be bringing you a selection oft he Labour responses throughout the day to the speech.

Update: Tony Blair on a possible EU exit:

“There’s got to be a compelling reason to put that question on the agenda. I don’t see that compelling reason.”

Douglas Alexander, speaking to Sky News, doesn’t rule out Labour backing a referendum at some point:

“Labour doesn’t think that is a decision that we could or would sensibly make at the moment, the priority should be the stability, investment, jobs that we have been speaking about. We have never ruled out the possibility of a referendum in the future, because in international affairs you should never say never, on the other hand, given the changes that are being contemplated in Europe at the moment. We think the priority should be to get on and shape those changes but at the same time send a very clear signal to Business that Britain is looking for business. Alas, that wasn’t the signal that David Cameron was able to send today. 

“Rather than burning bridges and breaking up alliances, we will be building bridges and winning friends. For example, in just a couple of weeks time there are important negotiations in the European Union budget, we want to see both restraint and reform in the EU budget, but to achieve that you need to win allies. At the same time you want to see a greater priority placed on growth across the EU than has been the case to date. We want to see change, for example, in the Common Agricultural policy, in a speech last week I talked about some of the transitional controls for the new countries coming into the European Union. Of course, change is needed in European and of course change is coming, we just don’t think the Prime Minister has a very coherent strategy for achieving those changes.”

Peter Mandelson told Radio 5 that Cameron should be seeking a “better, stronger Europe”:

“My reaction is that what Mr Cameron should be seeking is a vision of a better, stronger Europe and a new settlement in Europe and for Europe, which we can sort out with our partners in Europe. Instead what he’s really seeking is an entirely different form of membership for Britain in Europe, it’s an ultimatum with a deadline without him saying at the end of the day whether he will recommend that Britain should stay in the European Union, and I think that were we to come out on that basis of the European Union it would have very serious negative economic consequences for our country.”

And Labour’s leader in the European Parliament Glenis Willmott said:

“If David Cameron is serious about reform in the EU, he should start by rebuilding the bridges he’s burnt down in the past. He says in his speech today that the European Union needs to change with the times, and that’s exactly why Labour MEPs have successfully worked hard to build alliances and work with colleagues to try and reform areas of the EU like the Budget and CAP,” she continued. Of course the EU isn’t perfect, but talking about referenda just creates uncertainty and costs British jobs – it doesn’t help reform the EU. All Mr. Cameron has achieved is to put the needs of the Tory party before British jobs and what is in the British interest.”

  • JoeDM

    I notice that you did not include Gisela Stuart’s views in the list above. Too “off message” for Ed ?

  • AlanGiles

    We were talking about Blairism and Blairites on LL yesterday, and Mark Ferguson said that Blair was now a historical figure.

    If that is so, why canvass the opinon of Peter Mandelson. Does anybody give a toss what he thinks about anything?

  • Hugh

    Should read: “Former EU commissioner Peter Mandelson, whose £31,000 a year pension (for four years work) when he reaches the age of 65 years is contingent on abiding by his continuing “duty of loyalty to the Communities”, said…

  • AlanGiles

    ” Tony Blair on a possible EU exit:

    “There’s got to be a compelling reason to put that question on the agenda. I don’t see that compelling reason.”

    Especially as he still harbours hopes of becoming the new King of the EU!.

  • Hugh

    Given the sovereign debt crisis, replacement of governments in the likes of Italy, riots in Greece and elsewhere, a new explicit commitment to fiscal and political union, and polls showing 40% wanting to leave what exactly would constitute a “compelling reason” for a referendum – war with France?

    • http://twitter.com/youngian67 Ian Young

      The latest YouGov poll now shows a six per cent lead for staying in the EU
      http://bit.ly/10fMTrG
      No anti Euro party has gained any traction in Italy, Spain, Greece or Ireland and it is none of the business of a UK referendum. By the way what happened to the Grexit that every Eurosceptic bore told us was imminent for the past three years.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Daniel-Smith/516168738 Daniel Smith

    I second Glenys, I heard her speak about Europe and was converted. We do need Europe, and we need to keep paying into Europe; this might sound niave but it is a lot more secure than Cameron running around trying to negotiate a sweetener for the UK.

  • Pingback: Spot the difference: Labour might back a referendum – Greens do back a referendum | Hynd's Blog()

Latest

  • Comment Politics after the Big Machine

    Politics after the Big Machine

    Jawarharlal Nehru, first Prime Minister of independent India was giving a speech in a bus factory. Nehru’s topic was ‘the place of the big machine’. It was 1955, the era of big industrial projects and the centralised state. Perhaps, his audience expected Nehru to celebrate massive mechanisation, to praise the beauty of the gigantic, but it was Gandhi’s birthday, and Gandhi’s argument had always that politics had start with the local and the individual. ‘Perhaps’, Nehru said, ‘the biggest scheme […]

    Read more →
  • Comment My bill to make work pay in Low Wage Britain

    My bill to make work pay in Low Wage Britain

    Today I will be speaking in Parliament on behalf of a woman called Catherine. She lives nearly 200 miles away, far from the Westminster bubble, and she doesn’t have time to take notice of polls or political pundits. But what happens in our politics and the type of government we choose in six months’ time will shape her life more than most. When my name was drawn out of a hat earlier this year, giving me the chance to introduce a […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Scotland Poor result in Rochester and Strood leaves LabourList readers unhappy

    Poor result in Rochester and Strood leaves LabourList readers unhappy

    Well over 1,000 LabourList readers voted in this week’s survey – but that doesn’t make the results any better for Labour. Despite the vast majority of readers correctly predicted a third-place finish in the Rochester and Strood by-election a fortnight ago, a similarly large proportion were disappointed with last week’s result. 52% of people felt that Labour’s performance in the by-election was quite bad, with a further 21% saying they felt it had gone very badly. 20% thought that we […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour should be proud of Tony Blair’s record in Africa – and we should say so

    Labour should be proud of Tony Blair’s record in Africa – and we should say so

    This weeks attacks on Tony Blair have been the most outrageous yet. Those who disagree with Mr Blair’s decision to go to war in 2003, now use every opportunity or headline to attack his foreign affairs record and discredit his Government. But on this, they’re wrong – and we should say so. Those who have signed the petition against Blair’s acceptance of the Save the Children award simply cannot do so based on his record for international development, which the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Will Lib Dem MPs vote for a policy that will help to close the gender pay gap?

    Will Lib Dem MPs vote for a policy that will help to close the gender pay gap?

    Today I asked Equalities Minister Jo Swinson in House of Commons whether she would vote with Labour on the 16th December on our proposal to require big companies to publish their gender pay gap. She refused to do so. Given that one of the first things the Lib Dems and Tories did after 2010 was ditch Section 78 of Labour’s Equality Act, which provided the power to require big companies to do this, this may not surprise you. But the […]

    Read more →