At last night’s GC we had a contested election for our vice chair campaigns (I know, but stay with me). Two bright, able and keen women stood for the position that had become vacant following a by-election win for the previous incumbent back in September.It’s significant because the previous month for various reasons only a man had stood, potentially upsetting the gender balance of our EC. An argument was made that women do well in our GC and locally. They’re right too. 14 of our 30 councillors are women and half our Cabinet are too. The previous incumbent was a woman who succeeded me as the post holder. So why bother?
Dogged on this issue I stuck with the fight – which wasn’t universally popular – and ensured that the party took it’s responsibility to equality seriously.
The point of recounting this is not to criticise my local comrades. There is a legitimate view that in our local area people come through the party from a variety of different backgrounds and are successful. And that can be demonstrated by the people who hold positions in the party and on the council.
But I firmly believe that complacency is an enemy of equality. When there were no all women shortlists in 2001 the number of women MPs fell. Women and ethnic minorities are less likely to be elected as both councillors and MPs. Bringing people through the party’s structure will help develop more viable candidates.
If we as a local area are good at this, we should take more responsibility and we can’t rest on our laurels – as the 2001 parliamentary experience demonstrates. It also shows with a bit of extra effort, asking around, and encouragement people will come forward – and that’s the point. Achieving proper representation at a local and national level doesn’t happen by accident we have to work at it and we have to take responsibility for delivering it. All of us.


More from LabourList
‘Raising taxes on the wealthy isn’t just about the money’
BREAKING: Labour whip restored to four ‘welfare rebel’ MPs
Why don’t Labour’s workers’ and renters’ rights reforms cut through to voters – and how should they?