‘Is Streeting changing Manchesterism — or is Manchesterism changing Streeting?’

When Wes Streeting abandoned his attempt to challenge Andy Burnham for the Labour leadership, he appeared to have surrendered the battle of ideas he had spent weeks demanding. However, his appointment as Defence Secretary suggests something rather more complicated.

Under Andy Burnham’s new “Manchesterism” settlement, the Ministry of Defence has been unexpectedly recast as the very cockpit of the “productive state”. Burnham’s economic mission is to drive domestic reindustrialisation through the state’s purchasing power, and defence spending is the chief instrument of that policy. If defence is to become Britain’s de facto industrial strategy, then the Defence Secretary is the minister tasked with building the physical foundations of national resilience.

Whether Burnham intended it as containment or opportunity, he has placed one of his most formidable former rivals in charge of a department central to his economic project. Streeting’s instincts are recognisably Blairite – pro-business, reformist, and focused on making public institutions deliver better outcomes rather than simply making them bigger. While he chose to park his leadership ambitions to fall in behind the new Prime Minister, his ideological instincts have not vanished; they have simply moved inside the cabinet.

READ MORE: ‘Making sure it’s worth it’

At the Farnborough Airshow, Streeting made his pitch clear, insisting he would apply the same mantra to defence that he had used in health: “maximising value for money and cutting waste”. By framing defence procurement as a generator of high-skilled domestic jobs, apprenticeships, and technological sovereignty, Streeting has positioned himself as the man who can turn Burnham’s warm words on reindustrialisation into material reality.

But this is where the ideological tension between the two men becomes interesting. Manchesterism demands that the state use its purchasing power to reshape markets and rebuild Britain’s industrial base. Streeting may be perfectly comfortable with intervention, provided that intervention can demonstrate results.

Because of this, Streeting’s primary clash will not just be an ideological dispute with Number 10, but a bureaucratic war against the institutional culture of the MoD itself. The MoD is a department notorious for denting political reputations. A black hole of defence procurement, tetchy relations with armed forces leadership, and an administrative lethargy that regularly leaves projects delayed and vastly over budget are all problems even the most effective ministers would rather avoid.

For a new Defence Secretary obsessed with cutting waste, managing this department won’t be a debate just about what headline number is being pledged for defence spending, but what that money is spent on and how it is managed. John Healey has encouraged a “buy British by design” approach to protect domestic manufacturing capacity, but what happens when the political imperative to preserve domestic industrial capacity collides with Streeting’s instinct to punish failure? A British supplier may be strategically valuable even when it is more expensive or less efficient than an overseas competitor. Streeting’s challenge will be deciding when paying that premium represents national resilience – and when it is simply a waste of taxpayers money.

In this role, Streeting enjoys an asset none of his predecessors possessed: a highly sympathetic Chancellor. John Healey won plaudits across the political spectrum when he resigned as Defence Secretary under Starmer, accusing the Treasury of being “unwilling” to commit the resources needed to keep the country safe. Now that Healey finds himself in charge of the Treasury, Streeting has a Chancellor who is a self-declared “firm friend of defence”. The traditional, adversarial friction between No. 11 and the MoD has been replaced by a powerful pro-defence axis at the heart of government.

Become a friend of LabourList and join our community. Our friends support our vital non-factional work and get access to exclusive content and events. 

Yet, speaking recently on LBC, Streeting refused to guarantee the 3% GDP target by 2030, calling it “a matter for the chancellor”. He has vowed to resign if the new government fails to properly fund the Defence Investment Plan. With Healey holding the purse strings, Streeting cannot blame Treasury bean-counting if procurement fails; the pressure is entirely on his ability to reform the MoD’s internal machinery.

Public investment can coexist with private enterprise, and defence procurement may be the place where Streeting’s Blairite instincts and Burnham’s interventionism find an unexpected point of convergence. In these first weeks, the two stood alongside one another in Barrow to sign an £8.4 billion contract for the Dreadnought nuclear submarine programme, supporting 22,000 apprenticeships.

Streeting may have lost the leadership contest without a shot being fired, but he has embedded himself within Burnham’s government and made himself partly responsible for its success. The question now is whether Manchesterism is changing Streeting, or whether Streeting is attempting to reshape Manchesterism in his own image.

Subscribe here to our daily newsletter roundup of Labour news, analysis and comment– and follow us on TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp, X and Facebook. You can also write to our editor to share your thoughts on our stories and share your own. The best letters are published every Sunday.

• • SHARE: If you have anything to share that we should be looking into or publishing about this story – or any other topic involving Labour– contact us (strictly anonymously if you wish) at [email protected].
  • SUBSCRIBE: Sign up to LabourList’s morning email here for the best briefing on everything Labour, every weekday morning.
  • BECOME A FRIEND: If you enjoyed this, why not consider becoming a Friend of LabourList? Help sustain our journalism, and of course Friends do get benefits…
  • PARTNER: If you or your organisation might be interested in partnering with us on sponsored events or projects, email [email protected].
  • ADVERTISE: If your organisation would like to advertise or run sponsored pieces on LabourList‘s daily newsletter or website, contact our exclusive ad partners Total Politics at [email protected].