The 50% tax rate: common sense not class war

April 27, 2009 11:19 am

By Ed MayneDarling Budget 09

The reaction of the right-wing media to the new top rate of income tax has been quite simply astonishing. Within hours of the announcement being made the whingeing began.

The Evening Standard started it. Their headline for the afternoon was simply, “50% TAX RATE”, written in a size so big it was probably visible from space. The edition was filled with stories of “alarm” in the city, biggest earners fleeing to “escape” the top rate, and Baroness Valentine, chief executive of London First, complaining that, “Two thirds of what it costs to employ a company director in London will go not to him or her but straight to the taxman”. Then Guido Fawkes had a go, “What is Labour saying to those who work hard and become successful? ‘We will punish you’”. As if to imply that only rich people work hard in this country!

And the next morning the right-wing papers really tried to stick the knife in. The Sun called it an “assault on wealth-creators”, the Daily Mail labelled it “the politics of envy” and The Times said it was “a terrific Budget for Switzerland”.

Yet each seems to have misjudged their readership. A Populus poll for the Times found an approval rating for the new top rate of 57%. The Torygraph, which had labelled the budget a return to “class war”, reported 68% support.

Why the right-wing press reacted quite as they did is puzzling. The Guardian suggests it is a reflection of the hostility of highly paid editors and proprietors to being “hit in the wallet”. This is possibly true. But could it be simpler? Is this a case of both politicians and the press misreading the feelings of the majority of the British public about the tax system for far too long?

A key part of New Labour philosophy is that income tax levels should not be raised. Such policies, it was thought, would distinguish the modern Labour Party from that of old, which famously presided over a top rate of 83% in the 1970s – enough to make even the most patriotic of high earners consider tax exile!

Crucially, it was thought that the majority of British voters would not tolerate an income tax increase. The right-wing press appears to have swallowed this line too. But what both seem to have misjudged is the inequality of our current tax system and the fact that a huge number of people resent it.

The gap between rich and poor has grown over the last decade. Recent research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation shows that the gap between the incomes of those at the very top and those at the bottom has widened since 1997. The tax system has undoubtedly played a role in this.

In the last tax year, the Institute of Fiscal Studies estimated that out of 30.6million taxpayers in the UK, 3.6million paid the top rate, specifically anything earned over £40,835. Yet even within this top bracket the gulf has widened, particularly in places like London where many top rate payers feel the pinch of the higher cost of living, not to mention the extortionate price of property.

The Chancellor estimates that just 1% of taxpayers earn over £150,000. This will inevitably include many city slickers who have accumulated huge personal fortunes during the boom years, enhanced by unregulated trading practices, tax loopholes and tax havens. John Bird and John Fortune recently quipped that in some private equity firms cleaners paid a higher proportion of tax on their income than company partners.

It is only fair that this system is now tightened with a new top rate of income tax. Those who benefitted from the boom should now pay a bit more tax to get us out of the recession. Bankers, company directors, town hall fat cats, and even the Prime Minister, who certainly benefited from the boom years, will all pay more for the time being. This is pure common sense, not class war.

This new top rate of income tax is fair on another level too. One of the things often said in defence of global capitalism is that the wealth generated at the top trickles down to those at the bottom. Try telling this to the people of places like Barking and Dagenham, which is located just a few miles away from Canary Wharf. Although this Labour Government has delivered better hospitals, schools and got more people into work during the boom, many people feel they have missed out. This is one of many reasons why the BNP are currently the second biggest party on Barking and Dagenham council, where they have 12 out of 51 councillors.

Sadly, a large proportion of the revenue raised from this tax increase will go to servicing public debt. However the economy will recover. When this happens we should remember the feelings of those who missed out during the last boom, when some got richer and many got poorer.

We should therefore think about keeping this top rate of income tax and making the tax system fairer as a whole. When economic prosperity returns to this country, we can therefore ensure that the wealth generated at the top really does trickle down to those at the bottom.

Related posts:

  1. Shock horror – the government has released a common sense document
  2. Will David Cameron support the 50% top rate tax?
  3. Tory grassroots are up in arms over 45p top rate tax pledge
  4. Cameron hints at reversing 50p tax rate
  5. Does class matter any more? Of course it does!

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →