The 50% tax rate: common sense not class war

April 27, 2009 11:19 am

By Ed MayneDarling Budget 09

The reaction of the right-wing media to the new top rate of income tax has been quite simply astonishing. Within hours of the announcement being made the whingeing began.

The Evening Standard started it. Their headline for the afternoon was simply, “50% TAX RATE”, written in a size so big it was probably visible from space. The edition was filled with stories of “alarm” in the city, biggest earners fleeing to “escape” the top rate, and Baroness Valentine, chief executive of London First, complaining that, “Two thirds of what it costs to employ a company director in London will go not to him or her but straight to the taxman”. Then Guido Fawkes had a go, “What is Labour saying to those who work hard and become successful? ‘We will punish you’”. As if to imply that only rich people work hard in this country!

And the next morning the right-wing papers really tried to stick the knife in. The Sun called it an “assault on wealth-creators”, the Daily Mail labelled it “the politics of envy” and The Times said it was “a terrific Budget for Switzerland”.

Yet each seems to have misjudged their readership. A Populus poll for the Times found an approval rating for the new top rate of 57%. The Torygraph, which had labelled the budget a return to “class war”, reported 68% support.

Why the right-wing press reacted quite as they did is puzzling. The Guardian suggests it is a reflection of the hostility of highly paid editors and proprietors to being “hit in the wallet”. This is possibly true. But could it be simpler? Is this a case of both politicians and the press misreading the feelings of the majority of the British public about the tax system for far too long?

A key part of New Labour philosophy is that income tax levels should not be raised. Such policies, it was thought, would distinguish the modern Labour Party from that of old, which famously presided over a top rate of 83% in the 1970s – enough to make even the most patriotic of high earners consider tax exile!

Crucially, it was thought that the majority of British voters would not tolerate an income tax increase. The right-wing press appears to have swallowed this line too. But what both seem to have misjudged is the inequality of our current tax system and the fact that a huge number of people resent it.

The gap between rich and poor has grown over the last decade. Recent research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation shows that the gap between the incomes of those at the very top and those at the bottom has widened since 1997. The tax system has undoubtedly played a role in this.

In the last tax year, the Institute of Fiscal Studies estimated that out of 30.6million taxpayers in the UK, 3.6million paid the top rate, specifically anything earned over £40,835. Yet even within this top bracket the gulf has widened, particularly in places like London where many top rate payers feel the pinch of the higher cost of living, not to mention the extortionate price of property.

The Chancellor estimates that just 1% of taxpayers earn over £150,000. This will inevitably include many city slickers who have accumulated huge personal fortunes during the boom years, enhanced by unregulated trading practices, tax loopholes and tax havens. John Bird and John Fortune recently quipped that in some private equity firms cleaners paid a higher proportion of tax on their income than company partners.

It is only fair that this system is now tightened with a new top rate of income tax. Those who benefitted from the boom should now pay a bit more tax to get us out of the recession. Bankers, company directors, town hall fat cats, and even the Prime Minister, who certainly benefited from the boom years, will all pay more for the time being. This is pure common sense, not class war.

This new top rate of income tax is fair on another level too. One of the things often said in defence of global capitalism is that the wealth generated at the top trickles down to those at the bottom. Try telling this to the people of places like Barking and Dagenham, which is located just a few miles away from Canary Wharf. Although this Labour Government has delivered better hospitals, schools and got more people into work during the boom, many people feel they have missed out. This is one of many reasons why the BNP are currently the second biggest party on Barking and Dagenham council, where they have 12 out of 51 councillors.

Sadly, a large proportion of the revenue raised from this tax increase will go to servicing public debt. However the economy will recover. When this happens we should remember the feelings of those who missed out during the last boom, when some got richer and many got poorer.

We should therefore think about keeping this top rate of income tax and making the tax system fairer as a whole. When economic prosperity returns to this country, we can therefore ensure that the wealth generated at the top really does trickle down to those at the bottom.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →