You are here: Home » Archives »

Is the Labour leadership contest democratic?

September 3, 2010 10:30 am

Author:

Robert Peaty

Share this Article

At the moment, I am eagerly awaiting my ballot paper so I can vote in the Labour leadership election. Or should I say ballot papers.

I get two votes; one through my membership of the Labour Party, another through my membership of Labour Students. If I wanted I could join LGBT Labour, the UNITE union (membership of which has been offered various times at work) and the Socialist Health Association, which would give me five votes in the contest. It seems a tad unfair that some members get more votes than others. It seems even more unfair that LGBT people and ethnic minorities are entitled (if they choose) to one more vote than white or heterosexual people.

However, it is my belief that the contest is still democratic (even if it needs a few tweaks).

Firstly the contest offers a broad range of candidates. This is in contrast to the Conservative leadership contest where the membership have the choice of two candidates selected by MPs. Secondly the Labour leadership contest uses the alternative vote method which means that cannot win with 26% of the vote. They must secure 50% with second, third and fourth preferences. Many would argue that the contest would be had a simple one-man-one-vote system. However, I believe something would be lost if we did that.

The MP and MEP vote makes up a third of the balance. I think this is right; these are the guys who have to work with the leader after all. Another third is made up by Trade Unions and socialist societies. It is this that allows people multiple votes. It could be argued that scrapping this would make the contest more democratic. However, by scrapping the Union and Society vote you are breaking the link between the party and its foundation. If we do this we are ending what makes the Labour Party a true ‘labour’ party. Instead it would be much more sensible to cap the amount of times one can vote in the contest at two. This would end people exercising multiple votes and encourage people to involve themselves in the grassroots to maximise there voting power. Our voting system could do with reform – but keep the balance of power as it is.

Comments are closed

Latest

Comment
Why I went from Blue to Red
By Russell Whiting
Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]
Read more →
Comment
Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms
By Robert Allen
Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]
Read more →
Comment Local Government
Why we’re raising council tax
By James Alexander
Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]
Read more →
Local Government News
Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”
By Mark Ferguson
Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]
Read more →
Featured
The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes
By Conor Pope
“Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]
Read more →