The beginning of Labour’s Shadow Defence Review

March 14, 2012 8:32 am

Labour’s Shadow Defence Team is committed to open policy-making. We want the work we conduct to be part of our party’s discussion on how to we can design a 21st Century defence policy and how we can win again in 2015.

Too often policy-making and party activism have been considered distinct from one another. Work in Whitehall or SW1 think tanks can seem like another world to life behind the doors our campaigners knock up and down the country.  Both should, however, be symbiotic. Labour policy should be reflective of the experiences of those we want to represent.  Our local campaigning should illustrate our Party’s positions and what they mean for families and local communities.

Defence alone is not the issue on which Labour will win a General Election, but it is one which can contribute to a second defeat. Defence policy is an area facing enormous challenges, whether the Arab Spring, serious spending restraint, nuclear proliferation, climate change or religiously-inspired terrorism, each of which demands new ideas and policy solutions.

Labour’s recently-launched Shadow Defence Review aims to meet the dual challenges of developing new ideas with open policy-making.  Our consultation document poses questions on the main issues we consider face defence policy today. The Government’s own review did not survive its first contact with world events because it did not match ends with means and failed to provide a flexible force fit for a changing security landscape.  Our review will be over a year long and we want all from industry, academia, the Forces, the public and party members to participate. In particular we want this process to be rooted in the party and the activists whose intuition and insights will be invaluable.

For that reason our review’s first event is a Pragmatic Radicalism ‘Top of the Policies’ event. I will Chair the event which will see speakers pitching two minute ideas for a new defence policy to an audience comprising Labour members and supporters.  Each presentation will be followed by two minutes of quick-fire questions from the audience.  For a chance to participate Pragmatic Radicalism is accepting submissions from any Labour member or supporter.

We have asked for ideas on where savings can be found, revenue neutral ideas or policies with minimal cost. Each idea will be considered as an official submission to the Shadow Defence Review. At the end of the event the audience will vote for their favourite policy.  The speakers whose policies are in the Top Five will have a chance to write for the Labour Friends of the Forces blog. Everyone will be able to follow and contribute to the event through twitter.  The event will, we hope, bring our work closer to the many ideas across our movement.

David Cameron often gives the impression of a man who fulfilled 85% of his ambition for the country the day he walked in to Downing Street. His lack of vision and world view shape all aspects of this government, including defence.

In recent months the UK has been involved in events using resources Ministers planned to scrap. The UK has significant capability gaps, notably no aircraft to fly from an aircraft carrier for a decade. Those who serve on the frontline are having their allowances cut. The families of the fallen suffer from spending cuts.  No meaningful reforms to defence procurement have been proposed.  Withdrawal from Afghanistan has become a contest around dates in the Government’s calendar. The Arab Spring has demonstrated the scale of potential unpredictable global change before us and yet the Government’s plans have ushered in an era of strategic shrinkage by stealth.

This is not the record of a government intent on prioritising the service community, putting Britain at the cutting edge of reform or maintaining Britain’s leadership role on security issues which was bequeathed to them.

But while we must challenge the Government we must also challenge ourselves. In recent weeks the Shadow Defence Team has published a review of defence procurement; proposed a review of force structures to eradicate the imbalance in favour of the top brass; proposed a £1m fund for research into policy solutions for the long-term mental health of our forces; challenged the Government on post-2014 stabilisation planning for Afghanistan; campaigned for greater help for orphaned service children; and called on David Cameron to show leadership on defence industrial policy.

This is necessary but not sufficient, which is why our review is so wide-ranging and important for longer-term policy-development.  The review will analyse the threat environment in which defence policy is being made and must respond to. We will seek to set out and test the values and principles that underpin our approach to defence, including how best to work with others on the international stage and how we can integrate defence with ‘soft power’ tools, notably development policy. This work will in turn inform future thinking on military structures.

There are so many great and fresh ideas around the country and we are keen to hear more of them.  We want to not just show that defence can be a natural Labour issue but also show how we all benefit from open policy-making. We hope you will get involved.

Jim Murphy MP is the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence.

  • http://twitter.com/sprogglie Sprogglechops

    And why were such savage cuts made?   A £38 billion hole in the MoD’s  budget that Cameron inherited. Funny how that wasn’t mentioned. You will get a LOT more respect  if  some responsibility was taken for the mess that the MoD was in.

  • Pingback: The beginning of Labour’s Shadow Defence Review | Labour Friends of the Forces

  • Bill Lockhart

    “I will Chair the event which will see speakers pitching two minute ideas for a new defence policy”

    Should there be a hyphen in there somewhere? Judging from Labour’s record on defence, probably not.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Collins/100000033820132 Stephen Collins

    By Shadow Defence Review what you actually mean is Shadow Cost Cutting and Bean Counting in Defence Review.

  • Madeleine Goddard

    Much of the current mess comes from Labour’s constant tinkering and prevarications with defence programmes for short term financial saving, its failure to implement the Defence Industrial Strategy, the complete strategic failure of Iraq and Afghanistan and then Gordon Brown’s last minute signing off of huge contracts that could not possibly be afforded, in the hope that would give the Tories a major headache. I am no Conservative supporter, but Labour spent 13 years exploiting and stripping the forces. The Party should be deeply ashamed of the fundamental damage it did to defence through its indifference and, all too often, open hostility to the men and women who risk their lives for the country. To now think that a session in a pub which gives people who actually know something about defence the whole of two minutes to put forward meaningful ideas is quite laughable. If you want to get ideas hold a conference and invite some experts to critique your ideas first. You cannot create a sensible defence policy by harvesting a few bright ideas around the bar and linking them together. The invitation to attend this event is one of the most depressing emails I have ever received, since it suggests a profound lack of knowledge and understanding of  the subject.

    • AlanGiles

      That ridiculous organisation Pragmatic Radicalism really does annoy me, too, Madeleine. They advertised one of their dismal pub events in January, and to me shows what is wrong with politics today, dumbed-down and glib, as banal as an ITV game show, a sort of “politics-is-fun”  entertainment – the problems facing this country are profound and such events seem as patronising as they are pointless.

Latest

  • News Video The 91 year old whose speech lit up Labour Conference

    The 91 year old whose speech lit up Labour Conference

    If you were at Labour Party Conference in Manchester this week, you probably already know about this speech – even if you didn’t see it. 91 year old Harry Smith disarmed delegates with his touching, personal and erudite defence of the NHS, and earned him two standing ovations in the process. Painting a picture of life before the welfare state, and the tragedies he encountered, he sent a stark warning to the room: “We must never ever let the NHS free […]

    Read more →
  • Comment It’s time to answer questions about the London Mayor primary

    It’s time to answer questions about the London Mayor primary

    For many Labour activists knocking on doors in Scotland in the last few weeks, it wasn’t political division that was most evident but rather the enthusiasm, the energy, and the engagement of the electorate. This was a vote that really got people talking, motivated them to learn about the key issues and inspired an authentic and serious political debate. It was a feat of unprecedented engagement, with people who had never even voted before donning rosettes, picking up a stack […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Recall of Parliament: MPs must redefine the art of the possible

    Recall of Parliament: MPs must redefine the art of the possible

    Bismarck said “diplomacy is the art of the possible”. The “possible” exists at the interface between what we should do and what could do. Politicians are not disembodied, disinterested actors. They can and should shape the “possible”. Miliband, Cameron and Clegg are showing the leadership needed. The recall of Parliament tomorrow gives MPs an opportunity to do likewise. The following counter-factual, or counter-“possible” might help them consider the dilemma of whether Britain should support airstrikes: what would the response be […]

    Read more →
  • News Weekly Survey: Airstrikes and ground troops in Iraq and Syria

    Weekly Survey: Airstrikes and ground troops in Iraq and Syria

    Parliament will reconvene tomorrow to discuss the UK Government’s decision to commit to airstrikes against ISIL in Iraq. These airstrikes come as response to a call from the Iraqi Government for international support in the fight against ISIL, and following a Shadow Cabinet meeting in Manchester yesterday, Labour have moved to support the intervention. We want to know whether you support the airstrikes. There are currently no plans to deploy ground troops in Iraq, but if the problem of ISIL […]

    Read more →
  • Comment At a time of cuts, why are we committed to spending money on Trident?

    At a time of cuts, why are we committed to spending money on Trident?

    Whoever wins the election, the next Parliament will be asked to vote on building a new fleet of submarines to carry a new generation of nuclear weapons. The warheads on these submarines, each of which could kill millions of people, are apparently ‘necessary’ for our security. When Parliament voted to renew the Trident system in 2007, both front benches gave strong support but with over 150 Labour, Lib Dems and Nationalist MPs voting against. Since then the long-lead orders and […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y