The beginning of Labour’s Shadow Defence Review

March 14, 2012 8:32 am

Labour’s Shadow Defence Team is committed to open policy-making. We want the work we conduct to be part of our party’s discussion on how to we can design a 21st Century defence policy and how we can win again in 2015.

Too often policy-making and party activism have been considered distinct from one another. Work in Whitehall or SW1 think tanks can seem like another world to life behind the doors our campaigners knock up and down the country.  Both should, however, be symbiotic. Labour policy should be reflective of the experiences of those we want to represent.  Our local campaigning should illustrate our Party’s positions and what they mean for families and local communities.

Defence alone is not the issue on which Labour will win a General Election, but it is one which can contribute to a second defeat. Defence policy is an area facing enormous challenges, whether the Arab Spring, serious spending restraint, nuclear proliferation, climate change or religiously-inspired terrorism, each of which demands new ideas and policy solutions.

Labour’s recently-launched Shadow Defence Review aims to meet the dual challenges of developing new ideas with open policy-making.  Our consultation document poses questions on the main issues we consider face defence policy today. The Government’s own review did not survive its first contact with world events because it did not match ends with means and failed to provide a flexible force fit for a changing security landscape.  Our review will be over a year long and we want all from industry, academia, the Forces, the public and party members to participate. In particular we want this process to be rooted in the party and the activists whose intuition and insights will be invaluable.

For that reason our review’s first event is a Pragmatic Radicalism ‘Top of the Policies’ event. I will Chair the event which will see speakers pitching two minute ideas for a new defence policy to an audience comprising Labour members and supporters.  Each presentation will be followed by two minutes of quick-fire questions from the audience.  For a chance to participate Pragmatic Radicalism is accepting submissions from any Labour member or supporter.

We have asked for ideas on where savings can be found, revenue neutral ideas or policies with minimal cost. Each idea will be considered as an official submission to the Shadow Defence Review. At the end of the event the audience will vote for their favourite policy.  The speakers whose policies are in the Top Five will have a chance to write for the Labour Friends of the Forces blog. Everyone will be able to follow and contribute to the event through twitter.  The event will, we hope, bring our work closer to the many ideas across our movement.

David Cameron often gives the impression of a man who fulfilled 85% of his ambition for the country the day he walked in to Downing Street. His lack of vision and world view shape all aspects of this government, including defence.

In recent months the UK has been involved in events using resources Ministers planned to scrap. The UK has significant capability gaps, notably no aircraft to fly from an aircraft carrier for a decade. Those who serve on the frontline are having their allowances cut. The families of the fallen suffer from spending cuts.  No meaningful reforms to defence procurement have been proposed.  Withdrawal from Afghanistan has become a contest around dates in the Government’s calendar. The Arab Spring has demonstrated the scale of potential unpredictable global change before us and yet the Government’s plans have ushered in an era of strategic shrinkage by stealth.

This is not the record of a government intent on prioritising the service community, putting Britain at the cutting edge of reform or maintaining Britain’s leadership role on security issues which was bequeathed to them.

But while we must challenge the Government we must also challenge ourselves. In recent weeks the Shadow Defence Team has published a review of defence procurement; proposed a review of force structures to eradicate the imbalance in favour of the top brass; proposed a £1m fund for research into policy solutions for the long-term mental health of our forces; challenged the Government on post-2014 stabilisation planning for Afghanistan; campaigned for greater help for orphaned service children; and called on David Cameron to show leadership on defence industrial policy.

This is necessary but not sufficient, which is why our review is so wide-ranging and important for longer-term policy-development.  The review will analyse the threat environment in which defence policy is being made and must respond to. We will seek to set out and test the values and principles that underpin our approach to defence, including how best to work with others on the international stage and how we can integrate defence with ‘soft power’ tools, notably development policy. This work will in turn inform future thinking on military structures.

There are so many great and fresh ideas around the country and we are keen to hear more of them.  We want to not just show that defence can be a natural Labour issue but also show how we all benefit from open policy-making. We hope you will get involved.

Jim Murphy MP is the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence.

  • http://twitter.com/sprogglie Sprogglechops

    And why were such savage cuts made?   A £38 billion hole in the MoD’s  budget that Cameron inherited. Funny how that wasn’t mentioned. You will get a LOT more respect  if  some responsibility was taken for the mess that the MoD was in.

  • Pingback: The beginning of Labour’s Shadow Defence Review | Labour Friends of the Forces

  • Bill Lockhart

    “I will Chair the event which will see speakers pitching two minute ideas for a new defence policy”

    Should there be a hyphen in there somewhere? Judging from Labour’s record on defence, probably not.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Collins/100000033820132 Stephen Collins

    By Shadow Defence Review what you actually mean is Shadow Cost Cutting and Bean Counting in Defence Review.

  • Madeleine Goddard

    Much of the current mess comes from Labour’s constant tinkering and prevarications with defence programmes for short term financial saving, its failure to implement the Defence Industrial Strategy, the complete strategic failure of Iraq and Afghanistan and then Gordon Brown’s last minute signing off of huge contracts that could not possibly be afforded, in the hope that would give the Tories a major headache. I am no Conservative supporter, but Labour spent 13 years exploiting and stripping the forces. The Party should be deeply ashamed of the fundamental damage it did to defence through its indifference and, all too often, open hostility to the men and women who risk their lives for the country. To now think that a session in a pub which gives people who actually know something about defence the whole of two minutes to put forward meaningful ideas is quite laughable. If you want to get ideas hold a conference and invite some experts to critique your ideas first. You cannot create a sensible defence policy by harvesting a few bright ideas around the bar and linking them together. The invitation to attend this event is one of the most depressing emails I have ever received, since it suggests a profound lack of knowledge and understanding of  the subject.

    • AlanGiles

      That ridiculous organisation Pragmatic Radicalism really does annoy me, too, Madeleine. They advertised one of their dismal pub events in January, and to me shows what is wrong with politics today, dumbed-down and glib, as banal as an ITV game show, a sort of “politics-is-fun”  entertainment – the problems facing this country are profound and such events seem as patronising as they are pointless.

Latest

  • News Scotland have voted No to independence, say LabourList readers

    Scotland have voted No to independence, say LabourList readers

    In a few hours time, we will find out that Scotland has voted against independence – according to LabourList readers, anyway. 77% of those who took our survey this week said they thought that the outcome of today’s referendum would be a No vote. Despite polls have closed in over the past fortnight, our readers are confident that Scots will have chosen to preserve the Union. 23% think that the result will be in favour of Yes. Only two polls in […]

    Read more →
  • News Lift cap on borrowing so councils can build – say Labour PPCs, councillors and AMs

    Lift cap on borrowing so councils can build – say Labour PPCs, councillors and AMs

    A group of London-based Prospective Parliamentary Candidates, councillors and London Assembly Members have written an open letter (published in the Guardian), calling on party leadership to go further in their policy commitments when it comes to building houses. Although the letter praises Ed’s pledge that the next Labour government “will build 200,000 homes a year by 2020″, the cohort which include urge leadership to commit to lifting what they deem the “arbitrary cap [placed on councils] on borrowing to build”. […]

    Read more →
  • News Are Labour going to make the NHS the focal point of the 2015 campaign?

    Are Labour going to make the NHS the focal point of the 2015 campaign?

    Earlier this week, a poll found that Labour hold an 18-point lead over the Tories as the most trusted party on the NHS – the only topic voters consider a “major issue” that sees a Labour lead. The NHS being a crucial issue of the Scottish referendum, with both sides accusing the other of lying. Many of today’s votes rest on whether they trust Yes Scotland or Better Together’s claims about the health service. Now reports say that Labour are considering […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We stand up for human value – we proudly defend the Human Rights Act

    We stand up for human value – we proudly defend the Human Rights Act

    If you’re part of the Labour Party, or hold any similar values, you will certainly share the absolute belief in respect and dignity for everyone. I don’t think anyone in our movement, with our principles, would disagree. And so, with those common values, we are entirely right to stand up, loud and proud, for the Human Rights Act. The publication this week of Human Rights: Reflections on the 1998 Act by Jonathan Cooper in Stephen Hockman’s Law Reform 2015 (with […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland Friendship and solidarity must prevail, as the fog clears

    Friendship and solidarity must prevail, as the fog clears

    The air hangs thick this morning with the referendum. Last night a deep fog rolled down across Edinburgh, but in reality it is the campaign which has blotted the vision and stopped even the keenest of observers from seeing what lies just a few footsteps ahead. The final days has provided one crucial clarification though – the No campaign is capable of great passion and powerful rhetoric. Mocked, endlessly criticised, a reputation dragged through the muck. Despite it all – […]

    Read more →