Pressure mounts on David Jones – now the bookies’ favourite to leave the Cabinet

February 16, 2013 1:59 pm

Several newspapers have today followed up on our story from yesterday morning, when we told you that Tory Cabinet Minister David Jones had said:

“I regard marriage as an institution that has developed over many centuries, essentially for the provision of a warm and safe environment for the upbringing of children, which is clearly something that two same sex partners can’t do.”

Those comments have now been covered by The Guardian, The Times, The Sun, The Mirror, Daily MailThe Independent, The FT, BBC News, Sky News, ITV and Pink News – and was the front page splash in the Guardian (below):

davidjonesguardian

As a result David Jones is now the bookies favourite to leave the cabinet at just 6/1. Yesterday morning you could have got 25/1.

Jones might not be a goner (yet) – but he’s certainly going to be coming under real scrutiny from now on…

  • TomFairfax

    Does he feel a bit of a Monkee now, or just Low, Under Pressure, and hiding from journalistic Scary Monsters.

  • Daniel Speight

    I am fearful in stepping into this subject, but I would remind readers that the same sex marriage debate did have a free vote allowing MPs, including cabinet ministers, to vote their conscience. Do you really want to take this idea of free votes away, because that is what will happen if you go after everyone you disagree with like a pack of fox hounds.

    Now I will admit I come from a generation and an upbringing when same sex marriage doesn’t make a lot of sense, and probably my children feel far different about many things than I do. Even with that background I think that on reflection allowing gay couples to marry is a good thing.

    At the same time I can understand this Welsh Tory’s fears of children being adopted and raised by gay parents. It may well be a false fear, but it does exist. I’m thinking of the safety of a 16 year old boy adopted as a child by gay male parents with no blood ties reaching the age of consent.

    Now of course in many ways that is a false fear in that the same boy or girl could find him or herself in this position even with a mixed sex adopting couple as Woody Allen proved. Also we know child abuse does happen in some fostering and even worse incest happens in perfectly ‘normally’ married families.

    I don’t have the answer, only the fear. I was interested in a Scandinavian (Swedish I think) study extolling the benefits and successes of good and well financed care homes for orphans rather than looking for adoptions or fostering. Having been raised a catholic I would be careful of listening to that church’s views after the way it has dealt with its own abuse scandals.

    Still getting back to the point I started with, unless the person is going out of their way to denigrate a section of the population, maybe a more cautious, better argued response would be better. For those that feel extremely angry at what I have said please calm down and remember my generation will probably die out sooner than yours.

    • JoeDM

      What’s with the Woody Allen and “…perfectly normal married families”?

      Woody Allen and Mia Farrow were never married. Throughout their releationship they kept their separate homes. Just read the biographies or Wikipedia. Their relationship was hardly normal in any sense of the word.

    • JoeDM

      What’s with the Woody Allen and “…perfectly normal married families”?

      Woody Allen and Mia Farrow were never married. Throughout their releationship they kept their separate homes. Just read the biographies or Wikipedia. Their relationship was hardly normal in any sense of the word.

      • Daniel Speight

        Then Joe I stand corrected on the specific, but I suspect not on the general point.

        I just noticed the gap in my original between the Woody Allen and “… the next bit didn’t include the perfectly normal married families in the Allen-Farrow marriage, but instead they were classed as mixed sex adopting couple. Were you being dishonest on purpose JoeDM? If so that’s a bit low and obvious isn’t it? I’m a little surprised at such. You don’t work for one of those Tory party twitter accounts do you Joe, one of those under Guido’s mate Gove maybe?

      • Daniel Speight

        Then Joe I stand corrected on the specific, but I suspect not on the general point.

        I just noticed the gap in my original between the Woody Allen and “… the next bit didn’t include the perfectly normal married families in the Allen-Farrow marriage, but instead they were classed as mixed sex adopting couple. Were you being dishonest on purpose JoeDM? If so that’s a bit low and obvious isn’t it? I’m a little surprised at such. You don’t work for one of those Tory party twitter accounts do you Joe, one of those under Guido’s mate Gove maybe?

  • NT86

    How many other seats in Wales do the Tories have? Not many by my count, so who would be the replacement Welsh Secretary?

    Or maybe they’ll bring back Cheryl Gillan to the cabinet.

  • NT86

    How many other seats in Wales do the Tories have? Not many by my count, so who would be the replacement Welsh Secretary?

    Or maybe they’ll bring back Cheryl Gillan to the cabinet.

Latest

  • News Lift cap on borrowing so councils can build – say Labour PPCs, councillors and AMs

    Lift cap on borrowing so councils can build – say Labour PPCs, councillors and AMs

    A group of London-based Prospective Parliamentary Candidates, councillors and London Assembly Members have written an open letter (published in the Guardian), calling on party leadership to go further in their policy commitments when it comes to building houses. Although the letter praises Ed’s pledge that the next Labour government “will build 200,000 homes a year by 2020″, the cohort which include urge leadership to commit to lifting what they deem the “arbitrary cap [placed on councils] on borrowing to build”. […]

    Read more →
  • News Are Labour going to make the NHS the focal point of the 2015 campaign?

    Are Labour going to make the NHS the focal point of the 2015 campaign?

    Earlier this week, a poll found that Labour hold an 18-point lead over the Tories as the most trusted party on the NHS – the only topic voters consider a “major issue” that sees a Labour lead. The NHS being a crucial issue of the Scottish referendum, with both sides accusing the other of lying. Many of today’s votes rest on whether they trust Yes Scotland or Better Together’s claims about the health service. Now reports say that Labour are considering […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We stand up for human value – we proudly defend the Human Rights Act

    We stand up for human value – we proudly defend the Human Rights Act

    If you’re part of the Labour Party, or hold any similar values, you will certainly share the absolute belief in respect and dignity for everyone. I don’t think anyone in our movement, with our principles, would disagree. And so, with those common values, we are entirely right to stand up, loud and proud, for the Human Rights Act. The publication this week of Human Rights: Reflections on the 1998 Act by Jonathan Cooper in Stephen Hockman’s Law Reform 2015 (with […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland Friendship and solidarity must prevail, as the fog clears

    Friendship and solidarity must prevail, as the fog clears

    The air hangs thick this morning with the referendum. Last night a deep fog rolled down across Edinburgh, but in reality it is the campaign which has blotted the vision and stopped even the keenest of observers from seeing what lies just a few footsteps ahead. The final days has provided one crucial clarification though – the No campaign is capable of great passion and powerful rhetoric. Mocked, endlessly criticised, a reputation dragged through the muck. Despite it all – […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Scottish Referendum – The Liveblog

    Scottish Referendum – The Liveblog

    Are you campaigning in Scotland today? Send us your stories (named or anonymous) to elections@labourlist.org – and we’ll run the pick of them on the liveblog. 20.26: As we approach the close of polls, it’s all gone very quiet – but No are confident, according to the Mirror’s Kevin Maguire: Disagree? You’ve still got half an hour to vote in our survey. 19.01: Just after noon yesterday, Gordon Brown gave a speech that lasted a little over ten minutes. A […]

    Read more →