Pressure mounts on David Jones – now the bookies’ favourite to leave the Cabinet

February 16, 2013 1:59 pm

Several newspapers have today followed up on our story from yesterday morning, when we told you that Tory Cabinet Minister David Jones had said:

“I regard marriage as an institution that has developed over many centuries, essentially for the provision of a warm and safe environment for the upbringing of children, which is clearly something that two same sex partners can’t do.”

Those comments have now been covered by The Guardian, The Times, The Sun, The Mirror, Daily MailThe Independent, The FT, BBC News, Sky News, ITV and Pink News – and was the front page splash in the Guardian (below):

davidjonesguardian

As a result David Jones is now the bookies favourite to leave the cabinet at just 6/1. Yesterday morning you could have got 25/1.

Jones might not be a goner (yet) – but he’s certainly going to be coming under real scrutiny from now on…

  • TomFairfax

    Does he feel a bit of a Monkee now, or just Low, Under Pressure, and hiding from journalistic Scary Monsters.

  • Daniel Speight

    I am fearful in stepping into this subject, but I would remind readers that the same sex marriage debate did have a free vote allowing MPs, including cabinet ministers, to vote their conscience. Do you really want to take this idea of free votes away, because that is what will happen if you go after everyone you disagree with like a pack of fox hounds.

    Now I will admit I come from a generation and an upbringing when same sex marriage doesn’t make a lot of sense, and probably my children feel far different about many things than I do. Even with that background I think that on reflection allowing gay couples to marry is a good thing.

    At the same time I can understand this Welsh Tory’s fears of children being adopted and raised by gay parents. It may well be a false fear, but it does exist. I’m thinking of the safety of a 16 year old boy adopted as a child by gay male parents with no blood ties reaching the age of consent.

    Now of course in many ways that is a false fear in that the same boy or girl could find him or herself in this position even with a mixed sex adopting couple as Woody Allen proved. Also we know child abuse does happen in some fostering and even worse incest happens in perfectly ‘normally’ married families.

    I don’t have the answer, only the fear. I was interested in a Scandinavian (Swedish I think) study extolling the benefits and successes of good and well financed care homes for orphans rather than looking for adoptions or fostering. Having been raised a catholic I would be careful of listening to that church’s views after the way it has dealt with its own abuse scandals.

    Still getting back to the point I started with, unless the person is going out of their way to denigrate a section of the population, maybe a more cautious, better argued response would be better. For those that feel extremely angry at what I have said please calm down and remember my generation will probably die out sooner than yours.

    • JoeDM

      What’s with the Woody Allen and “…perfectly normal married families”?

      Woody Allen and Mia Farrow were never married. Throughout their releationship they kept their separate homes. Just read the biographies or Wikipedia. Their relationship was hardly normal in any sense of the word.

    • JoeDM

      What’s with the Woody Allen and “…perfectly normal married families”?

      Woody Allen and Mia Farrow were never married. Throughout their releationship they kept their separate homes. Just read the biographies or Wikipedia. Their relationship was hardly normal in any sense of the word.

      • Daniel Speight

        Then Joe I stand corrected on the specific, but I suspect not on the general point.

        I just noticed the gap in my original between the Woody Allen and “… the next bit didn’t include the perfectly normal married families in the Allen-Farrow marriage, but instead they were classed as mixed sex adopting couple. Were you being dishonest on purpose JoeDM? If so that’s a bit low and obvious isn’t it? I’m a little surprised at such. You don’t work for one of those Tory party twitter accounts do you Joe, one of those under Guido’s mate Gove maybe?

      • Daniel Speight

        Then Joe I stand corrected on the specific, but I suspect not on the general point.

        I just noticed the gap in my original between the Woody Allen and “… the next bit didn’t include the perfectly normal married families in the Allen-Farrow marriage, but instead they were classed as mixed sex adopting couple. Were you being dishonest on purpose JoeDM? If so that’s a bit low and obvious isn’t it? I’m a little surprised at such. You don’t work for one of those Tory party twitter accounts do you Joe, one of those under Guido’s mate Gove maybe?

  • NT86

    How many other seats in Wales do the Tories have? Not many by my count, so who would be the replacement Welsh Secretary?

    Or maybe they’ll bring back Cheryl Gillan to the cabinet.

  • NT86

    How many other seats in Wales do the Tories have? Not many by my count, so who would be the replacement Welsh Secretary?

    Or maybe they’ll bring back Cheryl Gillan to the cabinet.

Latest

  • News Moving on from New Labour, not going back to old Labour – Miliband sets out programme for power at NPF

    Moving on from New Labour, not going back to old Labour – Miliband sets out programme for power at NPF

    Ed Miliband will make a speech to Labour’s National Policy Forum (NPF) in Milton Keynes today, setting out a “programme of Government” that would leave New Labour behind without going back to old Labour. He will say that his plan for power is “more radical and more ambitious”, by dealing with the specific challenges of the modern era. He will say: “We have moved on from New Labour. And we are not going back to old Labour. Instead, our programme for Government is more […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Charging migrants to use the NHS is unethical – Labour should say so

    Charging migrants to use the NHS is unethical – Labour should say so

    It’s been a busy news week in Westminster – with the furore over David Cameron’s cabinet reshuffle, the extremely worrying and invasive Data Retention and Investigative Powers Act (DRIP) passing through Parliament, today’s debate in the House of Lords over the Assisted Dying Bill debate and the tragic Malaysian Airlines crash. But, whenever there’s this much going on in UK politics, we should take a moment to think about what we’ve missed. One of the pieces of news that’s received […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour peer says assisted dying law is about “compassion and human dignity”

    Labour peer says assisted dying law is about “compassion and human dignity”

    Former Labour Lord-Chancellor, Lord Falconer, today opened the debate in the House of Lords over the Assisted Dying and urging his fellow peers to support the Bill. Lord Falconer, who is leading the campaign on the Bill, explained that it was time to “for a change in the law, but only a very limited and safeguarded change.” He said that the law would mean that those who are terminally ill – and only those with less than 6 months to live – and mentally […]

    Read more →
  • News Frank Dobson set to announce his retirement

    Frank Dobson set to announce his retirement

    Frank Dobson, the long-serving MP for Holborn & St Pancras, will next week announce his intention to stand down from Parliament, it is understood. He’ll announce his decision on Tuesday, at a meeting of his CLP. He has represented the seat in the  Commons since 1979. Dobson, who is retiring at the age of 74  began his career in politics at Camden London Borough Council, where he was elected as a councillor in 1971 before becoming leader of the council […]

    Read more →
  • News National Policy Forum – Liveblog

    National Policy Forum – Liveblog

    22.40: It’s nearly 11pm, but the behind the scenes NPF negotiations and deliberations are still ongoing. I spoke to TSSA General Secretary Manuel Cortes a little while ago, who was involved in the “pressure cooker negotiations” on rail. He told me “It’s hot, it’s fraught; but we are making progress on what could be the most fundamental paradigm shift in Labours direction on last 25 years”. And a London CLP delegate told me that they were “turning up the dial […]

    Read more →