A month ago, Mark Ferguson took to the pages of the Evening Standard to warn against contenders for the London Mayor Labour nomination throwing their hats in the ring before 2015:
“By announcing their candidacy before May 2015, Labour hopefuls could spend months grandstanding, peeling away from party policy and ingratiating themselves with the London establishment. Or they could spend the next year campaigning for the next election that matters. Labour members will surely reward those who put party — and country — first.”
Despite this, David Lammy declared his intention to stand last Thursday. Conor Pope ran through the reasons why “it makes a lot of sense for the Tottenham MP to get going sooner rather than later”. Lammy, he points out, has less name recognition with regular voters than his potential rivals for the selection. If he is selected as Labour’s candidate, we would need him to be in the best possible position to win in 2016: surely improving his profile now helps with that?
Maya Goodfellow posed the question: can the Labour Party continue to use that name unless it does more to increase working class representation in Parliament? While the name of the party is unlikely to change soon, do you feel there is a concerning lack of working class voices in the the House of Commons? Or are values more important than background?
LabourList will be hosting a debate on working class MPs at Labour Party Conference: find out more here.
LabourList will be hosting a debate on how we build the homes we need at Labour Party Conference: find out more here. See LabourList’s full conference schedule here.
Our weekly survey will be open until noon on Thursday. You can vote here.
More from LabourList
Labour ‘holding up strong’ with support for Budget among voters, claim MPs after national campaign weekend
‘This US election matters more than any in 80 years – the stakes could not be higher’
‘Labour has shown commitment to reach net zero, but must increase ambition’