The mayor of Greater Manchester, deputy mayors and all local leaders have issued a joint statement declaring their opposition to government plans to put the area under highest level ‘Tier 3’ restrictions.
Asserting that it is “wrong to place some of the poorest parts of England in a punishing lockdown”, the local representatives have described the proposal to put Greater Manchester in Tier 3 as “flawed and unfair”.
The leaders said they were “being set up as the canaries in the coal mine for an experimental regional lockdown strategy as an attempt to prevent the expense of what is truly needed” by the UK government.
In a joint statement with the city’s deputy mayors and ten other political leaders, Labour’s Andy Burnham said he could not support the measures unless the following “bare minimum” demands were met:
- “A full and fair 80% furlough for all affected workers;
- “80% income support for people who are self-employed;
- “A proper compensation scheme for businesses.”
The statement accused the government of “asking us to gamble our residents’ jobs, homes, and businesses, and a large chunk of our economy” and concluded: “We would never sign up to that.”
The Greater Manchester leaders said they have been told by Downing Street that the government is “unwilling” to impose a nation-wide lockdown due to the “damage it will do to the national economy”.
The local representatives added: “And yet that is what they want to impose on the North West… They are willing to sacrifice jobs and businesses here to try and save them elsewhere.”
'It's wrong to place some of the poorest parts of England in a punishing lockdown without proper support'
Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham says the government's plans to put Manchester in a Tier 3 #COVID19 lockdown is "flawed and unfair".https://t.co/jBSqvMiQoh pic.twitter.com/qEidEaiwOv
— Sky News (@SkyNews) October 15, 2020
The full text of the joint statement is below.
Today we communicated our clear and unanimous view to the government: it is wrong to place some of the poorest parts of England in a punishing lockdown without proper support for the people and businesses affected.
To do so will result in certain hardship, job losses and business failure. It will cause harm in a different way – to people’s mental health – and is not certain to control the virus.
Last night, the deputy chief medical officer told Greater Manchester leaders that to bring the infection rates down any regional lockdown would require widespread closures way beyond pubs to stand any chance of working and would have to be done in tandem with other neighbouring regions. And, even then, it would not be certain to work.
But here’s the point: the government is not giving city-regions like ours and the Liverpool City Region the necessary financial backing for full lockdowns of that kind. That is why we have unanimously opposed the government’s plans for Tier 3 – they are flawed and unfair.
They are asking us to gamble our residents’ jobs, homes, and businesses – and a large chunk of our economy – on a strategy that their own experts tell them might not work. We would never sign up to that.
While this is not necessarily Greater Manchester’s view, the only thing certain to work, as the DCMO told us last night, is a national lockdown. But the government told us this morning it is unwilling to do that because of the damage it will do to the national economy. And yet that is what they want to impose on the North West.
So that was our conclusion from the No 10 meeting this morning: they are willing to sacrifice jobs and businesses here to try and save them elsewhere. Greater Manchester, the Liverpool City-Region and Lancashire are being set up as the canaries in the coalmine for an experimental regional lockdown strategy as an attempt to prevent the expense of what is truly needed.
The very least they should be offering the people of Greater Manchester who will be affected by these closures is:
- A full and fair 80% furlough for all affected workers;
- 80% income support for people who are self-employed;
- and a proper compensation scheme for businesses.
So far, they have not been prepared to offer that. Imposing damaging regionals lockdowns in this way won’t work. It will level-down the regions and make recovery longer and harder.
To those who say this is all politics, let me remind you that, ten weeks ago, myself, the two deputy mayors and all the leaders become the first to work with the government in accepting regional restrictions and people here have been struggling under them ever since. This is an important moment. Greater Manchester will stand firm. We are fighting back – for fairness and for the health of our people in the broadest sense.
More from LabourList
Assisted dying vote tracker: How does each Labour MP plan to vote on bill?
‘Five myths about Labour’s inheritance tax reforms – busted’
Welsh Labour figures attempt to reassure farmers after protests outside party conference