Is this Labour Party democracy?

March 5, 2010 6:25 pm

Rose in water

By Ian Robathan

A couple of weeks ago, my local labour MP, Bruce George (Walsall South), decided not to stand for election again after being the MP for 36 years. To his credit he sent all local members a 4 page letter explaining his decision and I feel it was genuine and not a resignation to allow a parachute candidate to step in.

So, as I am only 38, this was the first chance I have had to take part in local democracy and see who we will put up for Labour. I appreciate that, because Bruce stood down at short notice, the process to select the shortlist of candidates would have to be curtailed and confirmed by the NEC, and we’ve already had it confirmed it is an all women shortlist, which I have no problems with.

We have yet to be notified officially, but the shortlist as I understand it will be:

Sally Benton, Neena Gill, Sue Hayman, Sandra Samuels and Valerie Vaz.

Three of these names were flagged up in the local party within days of Bruce stepping down Two other prospective candidates visited me, took the time and effort to canvass suport and yet failed to get onto the shortlist.

Is that democracy? Surely we should have had some input into the process, even at the shortlisting stage, and if it was fair how come the names we suspect will be on the list were flagged up so early?

We also have the lack of a real local candidate who could win; Sandra Samuels is from Wolverhampton and on the West Midlands policy forum but has been involved in a lot of local controversy and I think that rules her out.

So what of the choices?

Well today I received two leaflets posted by candidates which were obviously produced before the final shortlist had been decided – and possibly at a substantial cost – which indicates they had already been given the nod that they were on the list. Both have stressed their local credentials and support, but at this stage I fail to be convinced.

I will keep an open mind, each candidate will be receiving an email with questions to be answered and no one should take MY vote as certain until it is cast.

However, I feel woefully let down by the democratic process in the party. We have to renew ourselves as a fully democratic party, above any others. We have to connect back to the grassroots and give ourselves a far bigger say. Control at the centre has to be loosened. We have to have trust in our membership, because renewing the party can only be done from the bottom up.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • News Reynolds: re-elect the Tories and average house prices could be 13 times the average wage

    Reynolds: re-elect the Tories and average house prices could be 13 times the average wage

    Emma Reynolds – Shadow Minister for Housing - will today warn voters that another five years of a Conservative government could be disastrous for Britain’s housing crisis. The fifth instalment of The Choice, the Labour leaderships’ series of speeches over the summer, Reynolds will reveal new figures that show if current trends that have emerged under the Tory government were to continue until 2020, a housing gap the equivalent of three cities the size of Birmingham would open up and the average house […]

    Read more →
  • Comment As the PPC in Iain Duncan Smith’s constituency, Ed has taught me two important lessons

    As the PPC in Iain Duncan Smith’s constituency, Ed has taught me two important lessons

    Ed Miliband has tackled the issue of his perceived image problem. Rather than embarrassingly excuse himself or convince the public he is something he is not, he has embraced his own persona, accepting it in order to extinguish the ongoing media analysis of who he is rather than what he stands for. This move shows courage, political prowess and most of all, it’s set the stage for next year’s election to be about policy rather than personalities. I cannot tell […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Cameron condemned for immigration PR stunt

    Cameron condemned for immigration PR stunt

    Yesterday, David Cameron offered an ominous threat to people who are deemed to be ‘illegal immigrants’, when he said “we will find you and make sure you are sent back to the country you came from.”  Who knew he meant this literally?  This announcement was worrying enough in itself – such a threat demonises immigrants and ignores the many reasons people might be in the UK illegally – but the PM decided to take his intimidating statement one step further. Cameron, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cameron dropped Gove, now Labour must drop his policies

    Cameron dropped Gove, now Labour must drop his policies

    Fireworks, champagne corks popping and rare mashups of Hallelujah and Ode to Joy were heard echoing down the corridors from staffrooms across England and Wales in response to the news that Michael Gove had at long last been sacked as Secretary of State for Education. Forget the unpopularity of his policies, his mishandling of the scandal over suspected attempts to indoctrinate Birmingham’s children to Islamic extremism or his inability to work with anyone from teachers to the Home Secretary – […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour outraised the Tories in 2013, but financial worries still remain

    Labour outraised the Tories in 2013, but financial worries still remain

    The Electoral Commission’s annual report of party finances has been published for 2013, and it turns out that Labour actually raised more money than the Conservatives last year – by almost £8 million. Labour raised £33.4m, while the Tories raised just £25.4m. As George Eaton points out, over at the New Statesman, much of Labour’s advantage comes from short money (the money opposition parties receive from the state). However, this only amounts to £6.9m, meaning Labour still raised roughly an […]

    Read more →