IFS says poorest hit hardest by budget: Labour reaction

August 25, 2010 12:37 pm

By Mark Ferguson / @markfergusonuk

Research from the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) released today indicates that the impact of the recent “austerity budget” will fall hardest on the poorest in society, and that the measures contained in the budget were “regressive”. Labour figures have lined up this morning to lambast the government over the budget, and comment on the findings of the IFS.

UPDATE: Speaking to Sky News, Ed Miliband said that the government has been “exposed” by today’s report:

“They put up VAT to 20% we know it’s an unfair tax that meant they didn’t go ahead with our national insurance change that would have been more progressive and they didn’t tax money, enough money off the banks which would also have been fairer.”

“There are choices you can make and I’m afraid they made the wrong choices and that’s what’s been exposed today.”

“My criticism of this government is they have no plan for economic growth in this country. Indeed, we’re seeing danger signals around the figures on growth and that’s going to be bad for tax receipts, bad for unemployment and bad for the deficit.”

Ed Balls was the first to react this morning, releasing a statement in which he said:

“So much for the Tory-Lib Dem coalition’s promise to be a family friendly government. It is hard to think of any government in the history of our welfare state that has hit children and poor families so heavily and so fast.”

“While Labour’s budgets saw hundreds of thousands of children lifted out of poverty, this Tory-Lib Dem budget will see the poorest families with children lose more than any other group. This report is the final nail in the coffin for George Osborne’s claims to have delivered anything but the most regressive Budget in a generation.”

Shadow work and pensions minister Yvette Cooper responded to the figures saying:

“These figures show the government is pursuing a shocking and unfair attack on children and families. “The Chancellor claimed his Budget didn’t increase child poverty – but only because he deliberately didn’t count cuts in housing benefit, disability benefits and child tax credit that hit families hard.”

“The idea that the poorest families with children should end up being hit hardest is appalling and gives the lie to George Osborne’s claim it was a progressive budget.”

Speaking to Sky News, David Miliband accused George Osborne of “double talk” over the budget, saying:

“It’s a double whammy on the people of Britain because we’re going to be poorer as a result, growth is down, employment down even on the government’s own figures, and we’re going to be a more divided country. That’s not the sort of Britain I want to see….The report today is an absolute torpedo at the claims that were made by George Osborne in the budget. He said he’d be straight talking but in fact in turns out there was double talk not straight talk because you can’t quarrel with the IFS.”

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →