Compass and Progress: A tale of two groupings

March 14, 2011 1:45 pm

By Luke Akehurst / @lukeakehurst

The last week has provided an interesting insight into the contrasting health of Labour’s two highest profile internal groupings, Compass and Progress.

Of course Compass and Progress are not the only organisations with a view on Labour’s future. On the right Labour First overlaps with Progress but brings in a culturally different traditional type of Labour moderate, with particular regional, local government and trade union strengths. To Compass’ left sit the different brands of the Bennite faithful: the LRC, CLPD and Labour Briefing.

But as Compass and Progress are the two organisations that have an equivalent media profile and resource base, let’s look at what’s been happening to them.

The soft-left Compass was already in a rocky place and suffering resignations in the run-up to the general election because of its advocacy of tactical voting for Lib Dems and its preparedness to offer a platform at its events to the Green Party’s Caroline Lucas. These understandably alienated Labour activists from areas like Oxford and Brighton who are fighting the Lib Dems and Greens at a local level, and might otherwise on policy have been enthusiastic Compassites.

The discombobulated state of Compass was made worse during the closing stages of the leadership election when its leading light in Parliament, Jon Cruddas MP announced he was supporting David Miliband, and Compass Chair Neal Lawson appeared to be equidistant between the two Milibands. This contradicted the position taken by Compass’ grassroots members which was support for Ed.

Since Ed’s election Compass does not seem to have come to terms with the new situation where Labour has a Leader who is prepared to listen to and make rational judgements about views from all parts of the Party. Rather than moving to become Ed’s Praetorian Guard they seem stuck in a pattern of behaviour that could best be described as oppositionalism and belief in a betrayal myth. They don’t know how to support a Labour leader. It is too deeply ingrained in their DNA that their role is to criticise and whinge. They made the same error in 2007 – backing a switch to Gordon Brown vocally, and then failing to give him support once he was leader.

Compass’ “blame the leadership” mentality was a great recruitment tool when Labour was in power and doing things like Iraq and public service reform that were unpopular with many activists. But in opposition with a leader who is not seeking a confrontation with the party it is a deeply unattractive proposition. Members, and particularly Labour’s vast intake of predominantly young new members, want to be focussing their ire and fire on the Tories and Lib Dems, not on Labour’s own leadership.

The final nail in Compass’ coffin is its own bizarre decision to learn nothing from the unpopularity of its pre-election flirtation with the Lib Dems. Instead, at a time when Labour members worst fears about the Lib Dems have been proven true by their participation in the coalition, Compass has deepened its engagement with anti-Labour forces by voting to throw open its membership to members of other political parties.

This has understandably created a crisis in the organisation, with most of the leadership of Compass Youth very publicly resigning en masse in protest.

It remains to be seen whether party activists who share Compass’ soft left policy agenda but deplore its oppositionalism and its support for Lib/Lab co-operation will create some kind of new grouping.

Meanwhile, Progress has gone from strength to strength, and is clearly rattling some people on the left, leading to a bizarre and conspiracy theorist denunciation from Tony Benn’s former strategist Jon Lansman.

The disunity on the left that led to rival and mutually hostile slates in the NEC election last year was in stark contrast to the unprecedented organisational co-operation between Progress and Labour First.

Progress has moved on from the delusion that it is a think-tank and its role is to run exclusive policy seminars, and now seems firmly focussed on what it can do best – providing the political education, skills and network to support and encourage Labour modernisers to be as active as possible in the party.

It has shaken off its reputation as a largely metropolitan grouping by holding a series of events in major regional cities across the UK.

Whilst current and recent former Young Labour and Labour Students activists remain an important recruiting ground (and are a partial explanation of the youthfulness and energy of the organisation), Progress’ political school at the NUT’s Stoke Rochford Hall this weekend was notable for the efforts that had been made to bring in a far more diverse group of people, including local councillors who are in the frontline against Eric Pickles’ cuts, and a large number of trade unionists (further outreach to the unions is in the pipeline with a fringe event at Unions 21 this week).

I feared that Progress’ support for David Miliband might mean it went off down a blind alley with Ed as leader. In fact the opposite has been the case, with the speakers at the political school being focussed on how we can get Ed elected as Prime Minister, and not a whisper of refighting the leadership election. The political focus of the event was on generating policy ideas that will help Labour reconnect with the five million voters lost since 1997, with Jim Murphy looking at how we make ourselves economically credible, and Caroline Flint at how we tap into ordinary voters’ aspirations. The previous rather sterile focus on the minutiae of public service reform seems to be gone.

Progress is also making a contribution to regenerating Labour organisationally in a way I have never seen Compass do. You can’t imagine Compass pouring the energy Progress has into trying to increase the number of council candidates Labour runs in the South, or sending canvassing teams to marginal areas like Brighton and Corby or “toehold” areas of the South like Aldershot and Guildford.

I came away from the Progress political school very proud to have had support in my NEC campaign of such a vibrant and open organisation, which is making a very positive and loyal contribution to getting Labour back into power.

The contrast with the shame Compass members must feel about the strange and apparently anti-Labour direction their organisation is going in is very telling.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Freelancing needs a policy agenda of its own

    Freelancing needs a policy agenda of its own

    The self employed are often the ‘most entrepreneurial, go-getting people in Britain’ . That is what Ed Milliband said during his conference speech when he placed a commitment to the self employed and albeit freelance workers at the heart of his election pledges for the general election. One of Labour’s six pledges is to provide equal rights to the self employment. As Ed Mililband noted ‘two out of three don’t have a pension, one in five can’t get a mortgage. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cameron’s pledge to scrap the Human Rights Act shows he’s legally illiterate

    Cameron’s pledge to scrap the Human Rights Act shows he’s legally illiterate

    In a crowded field, there is one issue which can always evoke splenetic outrage in the Daily Mail and the Tory backbenches: the Human Rights Act. And so it came as no surprise that its abolition ‘once and for all’ formed an integral part of David Cameron’s speech to the Tory conference. He had a simple pitch: the UK government is being told what to do, not by its own Courts but by Strasbourg. So we need a British Bill […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Cameron’s Tax Cut is a Tax Con – but it’ll be popular, and highlights Labour’s missed opportunity

    Cameron’s Tax Cut is a Tax Con – but it’ll be popular, and highlights Labour’s missed opportunity

    David Cameron’s conference speech today was well-delivered, punchy and memorable. It had a clear top line to grab the evening news headlines, and his populist tax cuts will be the overwhelming focus of tomorrow’s front pages. This was cheese to Miliband’s chalk. Whilst the Labour leader appeared to lack energy last week, and his headline announcement leaked in advance (and wasn’t sufficiently headline-grabbing to grab headlines), Cameron was surprisingly pumped up, energetic and forceful. He was also doling out policy like […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Dismantling Britain’s despotism

    Dismantling Britain’s despotism

    The fictional town of Dunchester is the scene for a right-wing science-fiction novel by nineteenth century author H. Rider Haggard. It is also the site for a fantasy game used to recruit and train British civil servants. The Tory novel is about radicals trying to block experts and professionals from saving Dunchester from an epidemic of plague. The civil service game allows players to spend £20 million in regenerating a fake town with the same name. Players take the role […]

    Read more →
  • News Video “This is who we resent” – David Cameron lets slip what he actually thinks

    “This is who we resent” – David Cameron lets slip what he actually thinks

    Unfortunate Freudian slip for David Cameron during his Conference speech today: “This party is the trade union for children from the poorest estates and the most chaotic homes; this party is the union for the young woman who wants an apprenticeship; teenagers who want to make something of their lives – this is who we resent.”

    Read more →
7ads6x98y