Is the government listening to women?

November 27, 2011 9:03 am

By Rachel Reeves MP and Rt. Hon Yvette Cooper MP

David Cameron has a problem with women. Since a Number 10 memo admitted that women were increasingly angry with the government, the Prime Minister has promised he’ll get a new advisor to turn things round. But he still doesn’t get it. Women don’t want more spin doctors or family friendly photo-ops, they want the government to stop causing such damage to women’s jobs and family finances. The real test is whether they use the Autumn Statement to change course, to support jobs and growth and to improve women’s lives.

So far the policies from George Osborne and David Cameron have made life much harder for women across the country. Their decisions have flatlined the economy and pushed hundreds of thousands of women out of work.

The facts are sobering. Women’s unemployment, at 1.09 million, is at its highest level since 1988.

Compared to a year ago, the number of young women out of work for more than six months is up by a staggering 114%. These facts are a shocking indictment of this government’s economic policies and spending cuts and tax rises that go too far and too fast.

Ministers also fail to understand how child care has become a vital part of our economic infrastructure, helping parents combine work and family life. Yet deep cuts to child care support and Sure Start are making it much harder particularly for working mums to stay in their jobs.

Family finances are being heavily hit too. The increase in VAT and rising energy bills means it is harder to make ends meet. George Osborne has already taken twice as much from women than men in tax, tax credit and benefit changes. And increases to the state pension age for women in their late fifties make it harder to plan for retirement.

Faced with these assaults from the government, women across the country have told us they want policies that help them juggle work and family life and help to support their family finances that have taken a hit with the biggest squeeze in living standards for thirty years.
So in this week’s Autumn Statement the Chancellor needs to change course. This is his opportunity to try to undo the damage that he and the government have done to families and women’s lives. And the most important thing is to start by getting the economy moving again with support for women’s jobs and family finances too.

That is why Labour has a five point plan – an alternative set of policies, a better way – to get people back to work, help families feeling the squeeze and by getting the economy moving again get the deficit down too.

First, we would create 100,000 jobs for young people and build 25,000 new homes, providing help to the 410,000 young women unemployed. 18 months after the disastrous decision to scrap the Future Jobs Fund, the government have finally announced a scheme to get more young people back to work. But it will help fewer young people into work than Labour’s plan and it looks set to be funded by freezing tax credits for women and families in work, rather than Labour’s proposal to raise funds from a £2 billion tax on bankers’ bonuses.

Second, we would bring forward ‘shovel-ready’ investment projects like new school buildings. While the Tory-led government cancelled Labour’s Building Schools for the Future programme, we say they could get many of those cancelled projects back on track, providing children with fit-for-purpose, decent schools. The government should stick to their promises to protect sure start in order to help people balance their work and family lives.

Third, we would temporarily reverse the Tory-led government’s VAT rise. This would put £450 a year in the pockets of families with children, or £275 for the average pensioner household, making a huge difference to family finances. Women and families struggling with the basics – mortgage, rent, bills, childcare, food and getting to and from work will see their money last longer.

Fourth, we would cut VAT on home improvements to 5% for a year, helping homeowners who otherwise cannot afford repairs to their homes.

And fifth, we would give small firms a national insurance break to take on extra workers, helping women who have been hit by cuts to public sector jobs. It would help the 165,000 women who run small businesses, and the 5 million women who work in them.

On Tuesday the Government have the chance to show they have been listening to women. Without women in work it is much harder to reduce the deficit and get the economy back on track. Ministers need a major rethink in their approach to women and the economy. They need to get serious about the long term future of child care and help to balance work and family life – for the sake of both men and women, and the success of our economy too. And they need to stop hitting women so much harder with every new set of policies and plans. The government must use this chance to start reversing the damage they have caused to women and families and start backing women’s jobs and economic growth for the first time.

  • http://twitter.com/kulgancrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    Come on. Really.  2 Labour women MPs saying that the PM has a problem with women!!!

    • Anonymous

      I just watched Rachel, now on TV ,she’s not very good at answering questions and even hinted at the Union perhaps going on strike  maybe at night time not during the day or 15 minutes, she then said she did not really  mean this, asked then does she back the strike she went off on a tirade but refused to answer the question.

      Come on for  god sake it’s a simple question do you back the strike, for Ms Reeves I’d say no she does not.

  • Jean

    That’s all very interesting, but why isn’t it being said by male labour leaders? Male labour leaders like Ed Miliband and Ed Balls avoid reference to women’s unemployment and make no commitment to ensure that women get equal access to any new jobs and apprenticeships. They collude with a media refusal to present women, even young women, as the typical face of the unemployed. Why do female labour politicians go along with this? Why do you not insist that all Labour MPs talk about female unemployment. You lost the election because women saw labour as out of touch with women. It’s male leaders still are.

  • Anonymous

    George Osborne has already taken twice as much from women than men in tax, tax credit and benefit changes. And increases to the state pension age for women in their late fifties make it harder to plan for retirement.

    In reverse order:

    Women in their fifties may find it harder to plan but frankly this should have been done years ago. If you want equality then you get the bad as well as the good. There was never any real justification (apart from some patronising and sexist guff about them being the weaker sex) for women retiring so much earlier then men when on average they live longer. No wonder pensions are unaffordable.

    As for the rest of it what other Tory changes have hit women harder then men? Who’s about some actual details rather than just retoric?

  • Anonymous

    I realise that the article has to push the 5-point plan but there is a bit of a disconnect between the complaints at the start of the article then pushing a plan that is actually somewhat biased towards male job creation.

    Perhaps the authors know differently but I would have thought house building, infrastructure projects, home improvement works – these industries tend to have a higher proportion of male employees. As a way of generating jobs for women, expanding these industries would not be the natural choice would it?

  • Anonymous

    This is the way to go; I enjoyed reading.

    I think Labour can really build on this.

    Thankyou, Jo

Latest

  • Comment The culture of high risk credit is being exploited by betting shops

    The culture of high risk credit is being exploited by betting shops

    Since the financial crisis, the perfect storm of recession and banks restricting access to credit has led to the rise of payday lenders. Our high streets are slowly deteriorating from the vibrant, diverse places they once were into an abyss of pawnbrokers, payday loan shops and bookies. The three feed off of each other, targeting some of our most deprived areas and perpetuating a cycle of despair driven by the need for extra income. Research carried out by Geofutures found [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should people be asked if they are party supporters when they register to vote?

    Should people be asked if they are party supporters when they register to vote?

    Chris Clark and Rav Seeruthun on a small change that if adopted, would free activists to spend more time on community work Every year at party conferences we hear professional politicians eulogise hard-working party volunteers. And there’s no activity more often evoked than that of ‘knocking on doors’. It’s a common delusion that the purpose of doorstep canvassing is to ‘persuade’ voters. Having taken part in our fair share of Labour canvassing sessions, we’ve both had the dispiriting experience of [...]

    Read more →
  • Europe Featured You can always rely on the Conservatives to ignore the public when it comes to Europe

    You can always rely on the Conservatives to ignore the public when it comes to Europe

    Europe is not often the issue which comes top of people’s concerns on the doorstep. Nor do opinion polls suggest that Europe is a priority for voters when compared to issues like the economy or jobs. But you can always rely on the Conservatives to ignore the public when it comes to Europe. This week saw over a hundred Conservative MPs rebel and vote against their own Queens Speech. They were angry that it hadn’t included a bill which would [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft has been selected by Lewisham Deptford CLP as the party’s candidate for 2015 at a selection meeting this afternoon. Here’s a brief biography: Vicky grew up in the North West in a single parent household, and was the first person in her family to go to university. She has held many positions in the party including Chair of Labour Students, has sat on the National Policy Forum and is currently a local councillor and is Chair of Lewisham [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →