‘Compassionate Conservatism’ – finally it has crashed and burned

January 11, 2012 2:14 pm

As the Con-Dem coalition scrambles to cover up its failing economic policy it has reverted to type. Attempts to chop workplace rights and support for union representatives reveal that the Tories still fear nothing more vehemently than organised labour.

It comes as no surprise that a new assault on unions comes just weeks after the biggest ever strike by public sector workers in UK. The message seems to be don’t talk with them, eliminate them.

If Arthur Conan Doyle were alive today, he would be forced to doff his cap at Tory determination to depict a “demon” in the average workplace rep.  Their wild imaginings of a craven creature preventing “enterprise” from flourishing simply by following procedure and using the photocopier go well beyond anything Mssrs Cumberbatch and Freeman can conjour up on a Sunday night.

But ridiculous as these frothing attacks are, they also remind us of the dangerous ideology of Cameron’s Conservative party.  It matters nothing to them that the government’s own research, supported by no less than the CBI, shows that union reps actually save the nation and employers £1.1 billion per year – that’s ten times more than Jesse Norman MP is seeking to save by his ten minute rule bill clampdown on public sector reps.

Jesse Norman himself is a curious character.  A former investment banker at Barclays,the Eton educated son of a business magnate was given a safe parliamentary haven in 2010 when his industry’s standing was at its lowest public ebb. A proponent of ‘Compassionate Conservatism’ when elected MP for Hereford and South Herefordshire in 2010, his compassion seems rather one-sided.

On Monday Norman relied on fellow travellers, the Telegraph, to call for an end to what he asserts is the taxpayer funding of trade unions ahead of his proposed 10 minute rule bill due to be heard in parliament after PMQs.

Norman trotted out one isolated case – that of Jane Pilgrim – to condemn all trade union reps saying they work for trade unions, not the school, hospital or local authority.

That was error number one, because Norman is conveniently basing his argument on blinkered and selective evidence citing one case and ignoring the thousands of reps that day in day out work to make a difference to their colleagues and their company.

Error number two was Norman’s reliance on a recent report from the Taxpayers’ Alliance (Democracy winces) claiming, surprise, surprise, that unions are bad for business; that’s simply not true.  As stated, BiS itself has produced figures showing the contrary.

And error number three was Norman’s sheer disdain for unions and workers themselves as he cited ‘supposed arguments’ defending the work that reps do. Norman’s response?: “These arguments are of no value at all.”

Well, 6.7 million people in the UK belong to a trade union, and of those some 200,000 are actively engaged in representing their fellow workers.  Whatever Norman may assert, this work is very much valued, and not just by workers.

Government estimates show that the benefits that flow to the UK economy include savings of up to £1.1 billion every year (‘Reps in Action’ published by BIS [then the DTI], the TUC and the CBI). The report shows:

  • Union learning reps providing training and education bring real productivity gains valued at up to £1 billion for companies across the country
  • Union reps help companies and organisations save up to £143 million on recruitment costs by improving workplace relations and supporting employee retention
  • Health and safety reps are crucial in reducing workplace injuries and save up to £371 million annually and up to another £200 million is saved by preventing work-related illnesses
  • Reps also help reduce dismissals saving companies up to £19 million a year while stopping employment tribunals helps save up to £43 million a year

At a time of recession and when cash is tight, is this not exactly the kind of support business – including the cash-strapped public sector trying to swallow 28% cuts – needs, particularly those businesses not in any shape to provide the HR support today’s employment environment requires?

It is these businesses that turn to unions to solve problems before they emerge, or it may be workers in those businesses who need a rep simply because there is nobody else to turn to.

So why is Norman (mis)using parliamentary time (not to mention taxpayers’ money) to call for a restriction on union rights in the public sector? Business is not demanding these restrictions.  It has to be because the Conservative Party, for all its husky drives and hoody hugging, has a deep-rooted and ideological loathing of organised labour. This is one Thatcherite legacy that they cannot – will not – shake off.

If that were not the case, then rational argument would win the day. Over in Germany, companies with more than 200 employees are entitled to a full time rep, and as employee numbers rise extra full timers can be appointed. Germany also has worker representation on supervisory boards helping decide policy, and pay, for the company.

Germany, with its focus on workplace rights, support, investment in education and, training is also one of the most productive economies in the world and leads Europe in industrial and manufacturing production and innovation.  It also has the only falling unemployment rate in the EU.  Not exactly laid low by its progressive approach to trade unions, then.

Perhaps Cameron and his government probably don’t want reminding about Germany. After all before Norman, the poster boy for the government’s anti-union tirade was none other than the MP for Cannock Chase, Aiden Burley.

Burley was thrust into the limelight after pictures emerged of him attending a Nazi-themed stag party in France.

He was eventually sacked from his Cameron-given job as a parliamentary aide to transport secretary Justine Greening at the dog end of last year after a series of increasingly damning revelations, story-changes, and heavy criticism from Jewish organisations. Burley is currently being investigated, along with other party guests, by the French police.

Burley and Norman are pushing a right-wing anti-union agenda. It is anti-democratic and it is a smokescreen for the government’s failing economic programme.

For Britain to compete in the modern globalised economy it needs a motivated, educated and committed workforce; from Jaguar to the NHS, trade unions are a key in delivering that aim. Attempts to water down or erase workplace rights are yet one more blinkered and self-defeating ‘plan’ from this wretched coalition.

Steve Turner is the Director of Executive Policy for Unite

  • Anonymous

    I think you’ve identified the nature of ideology there very well Steve.

    It plays out so frequently and so predictably; the problem is
    there appears to be powerful vested interests out there too
    to influence public perception?

    It’s a myopic vision which bears little relation to the reality
    for most ordinary workers, and what actually happens in
    public services.

    I would suggest-just keep presenting the facts and figures;
    have ordinary members and workers as visible as possible,
    sharing real testimonials and first hand experience.

    This anti public services narrative has to be countered
     by reframing information that is grounded in reality,
    not a heavily biased or politically motivated spin
    which has ulterior motives!
     
    I sometimes wonder whether they have a little shared
    “bible” with a list of “do’s and don’ts.”

    It seems to involve something along the lines of
    “rolling back the welfare state and enlisting volunteers;”
    and some sort of TPA driven agenda.

    The intrinsic  “worth” of public service and a
    “collective workforce” ethic as you say,
    seems grossly undermined, and presented in a distorted way.

    Maybe ultimately they would justify all in terms of
    “saving money?”

    What they forget though is what it takes to create
    high quality services and a highly skilled, motivated and supported
    workforce; sustainability of jobs and roles; meeting the very real needs
    of people in this country?

    I really enjoyed this article- straight to the point
    and reflecting back the reality.

    Thankyou, Jo.

  • Anonymous

    I really think Labour need some stronger arguments on this issue.

    The idea that union reps’ time should be paid for out of union money isn’t unreasonable given that they are working for their members. If their union fees aren’t paying for this, where is it going?

    Please don’t tell me, “If you don’t like it, join a union,” – I work in a small company (<6 people) and if 'the management' do something I don't like, I shout at them until they do it my way.

    • derek

      MonkeyBot5000

      Kingston NHS hospital in South London, employs around 3,700 staff, there are a number of issues that will arise daily “Health and Safety” “Time Keeping” “Disciplinary Procedures” “Pay Mistakes” “Victimisation” “Bullying” “Job description rules” “Parking disputes” “Staff complaints” and many more, all things a trade union rep will be called on to try and help resolve. Time consuming, absolutely, but if you take that service away, it’ll cost hospital millions to police their staff and all the other issues.

      I guess in the workplace, your the union rep(unofficially) and all though your probably aware that your statutory rights are upheld as are the other 5, there’s no reason why you wouldn’t consider joining a trade union to help improve your customary base. 

      • Anonymous

        there’s no reason why you wouldn’t consider joining a trade union to help improve your customary base.

        Everyone except me is a company director. I could unionise the workforce as long as I could convince more than 50% of me to join. :)

        The reason I say Labour need stronger arguments on this is that there are private companies that don’t have unions that also have to deal with those problems.

        It may well be cheaper in the long run for the government to be paying the union reps, but if that rep is paid as a nurse and isn’t working as a nurse then people will see that as us losing a nurse.

        If that rep’s job title was changed to Nursing Trainer or Health & Safety Officer, I think fewer people would have a problem with it because no-one is going to object to our nurses being better trained or our hospitals being safer.

        • derek

          So we agree on the merit and the additional post.

          LoL, 50/50 split. I’ll take the left side please!!!!

  • http://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes Guido Fawkes

    What are union subs for then? Why mention the CBI or the private sector, this has nothing to do with their arrangements. It is about the massive abuse of the system in the public sector. Teachers that don’t teach, nurses that don’t nurse, instead they are political agitators at the public expense. Jane Pilgrim is no isolated case, there are thousands of “Pilgrims” paid not to do the front line work they were hired to do, instead the taxpayer has to hire a second staffer to do their job. It can’t go on.

    • derek

      For Fawkes sake, a political blogger that doesn’t have a clue what trade unions do.

      Well Dugio,  go fetch a bubble for a spirit level and ask about a long stand while your there.

    • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

      Nope, you’re right. People like you need to be dealt with for the lies you spew.

Latest

  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is party politics dying out?

    Is party politics dying out?

    This week has brought the role of party members and activists back to the front pages. That’s rather unusual to be honest – and rightly so, as party members (swivel eyed and otherwise) make up only 1% of the British population. Being a party member is already a niche interest. You are somewhat odd if you’re a party member – sorry to break that to you, but of course I’m odd too (and quite possibly odder than you). What swivel-eyed [...]

    Read more →