Time to act on “sweetheart deals” and tax havens

January 15, 2012 5:07 pm

These are tough times for families and businesses. Bills are going up, jobs are being lost, incomes are being squeezed.

And as Ed Miliband and Ed Balls have made clear, if Labour was in government now we’d be making different choices.

We wouldn’t be cutting spending and raising taxes as far and as fast as David Cameron and George Osborne. Their reckless plan has choked off the recovery and put more people out of work, which means £158billion more borrowing than planned.

And the reality is that this Tory-led government’s failure on the economy means tough times are set to continue.

But when unfair choices are being imposed on people – like cuts to tax credits, or changes to child benefit – everything needs to be done to ensure those that owe tax pay their fair share.

I have been urging ministers to get a grip of the rumbling controversy about supposed sweetheart deals cut by HMRC with some of the world’s biggest businesses and we will continue to raise questions about that.

And today, Ed Miliband has highlighted another vital issue where rising public anger shows more than ever the need for real action now.

UK residents with money abroad are still required to pay UK tax on the income they receive. The biggest problem with making sure they pay that tax is that they often do not declare that they have money stashed abroad.

There are existing rules in place to make sure that HMRC gets information about British resident taxpayers who hide their money abroad within the EU, and importantly in tax havens that are linked to EU members like the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man – the EU Savings Tax Directive.

But we have known for some time that there were major loopholes in these rules:

•         People could disguise their income behind front companies and trusts that mean the tax havens do not have to let HMRC know which British taxpayer is involved.

•         And people who choose to have the money they’ve hidden abroad invested in complex financial products, rather than in simple bank accounts, manage to get round the rules.

As a result the tax haven does not need to provide information to HMRC on income received through these two loopholes.

There is a long slow process going on where the European Union is trying to strengthen these rules – but countries like Italy and Luxembourg are dragging their feet.

Enough is enough.

The government should make getting this sorted at an EU level a priority – not wait until 2013 for progress as the current plans seem to imply.

But they should also get started right away with those tax havens that we are responsible for – the British overseas territories like Jersey – which some experts estimate are costing the UK taxpayer billions in lost tax.

Britain needs to lead the way in Europe by taking action on its own tax havens.

They need to be told enough is enough – these tougher rules are going to apply to you immediately.

The government’s disclosure deal with Switzerland in the summer risked undermining progress in Europe on this issue.  And, as the Office for Budget Responsibility has made clear, the foundations for the government’s claims about how much they would raise as a result are open to question.

In addition, there are serious questions to be answered by the government about whether people who have broken the law will be allowed to get away with criminal activity as a result of the keeping their right to anonymity which was part of that deal.

By taking a lead on the UK’s own tax havens we could send a clear signal to Europe that Britain has not abandoned our leadership role on this issue.

We would start with diplomacy and pressure, as that is what has worked in the past. It’s what we did to get the Crown Dependencies of Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man to comply with aspects of the initial EU Savings and Tax Directive.

But bold leadership means being prepared to legislate if necessary. We must make it plain to the Crown Dependencies that we will expect them to observe the letter and the spirit of the revised EU Savings and Tax Directive, through full exchange of information on both individuals accounts and more complex, ‘packaged’ financial instruments. Only then will we have proper insight into UK residents holdings in the tax havens that exist in our own backyard.

Tax havens only complied with the limited constraints of the original EU STD because of international pressure in which Britain took a leading role. Under Prime Minister Cameron we have stepped back from the vanguard, and worse, appear to be undermining international action on tax avoidance.

Labour is determined to lead on this issue, at home and abroad. In the coming months we will continue the pressure to end offshore tax secrecy, while at home we will scrutinise financial legislation to seek to ensure it does not make it easier for corporations and wealthy non-domiciled individuals to avoid paying their fair share of tax.

Owen Smith is Labour’s shadow exchequer secretary to the Treasury

  • http://www.facebook.com/christhegoth Chris ‘thegoth’ Wilcox

    All you have to do is start the precedent that if you earn the money in The UK you pay tax in The UK NO MATTER WHERE YOU LIVE and you’ll close a major loophole that is abused by the uber-rich.

    And for godots’ sake tax bonuses and directors’ dividends properly.  The Torys are quite happy to allow rank to open a door to tax cop-outs, and it’s down to people like Labour to close said doors and force The Rich to play the game properly.

    • Gsm_london

      So long as if at the same time you get HMRC to clearly explain what is allowed in terms of contact with the UK for an individual to be classed as non resident.

      At the moment HMRC seems to think it can make rules up as it goes along without telling anyone and apply them retrospectively through the courts if necessary.

      If that means absolutely no contact then so beit, but do the honest thing and make the rules clear. If i retire as a tax exile abroad it is only right and proper that the tax rules are transparent and stable.

    • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

      Er? There’s a perfectly good system of tax treaties. Unless you mean the American system of double-taxing citizens, which leads to skilled workers renouncing your citizenship for economic reasons.

      Moreover, it relies VERY much on competence on the part of the tax authorities (which they don’t have), given mistakes can lead to citizens being refused entry to the country. And, er, HMRC need restructuring, badly.

      The rest of the tax system is a mess. Scrap it – give it one year, then a new system will exist. Same base rates, but any and all exemptions will need to be submitted on a site, voted on and then passed by a panel of economists. 90%+ of them will vanish.

      Oh, and unify rates for capital gains and normal income. With ONE tax-free allowance.

      • Anonymous

        Madness.

        A year of utter ancharcy, an undemocratic voting process between unelected economists and finally a ridiculous mish mash of legislations and processes which all uk accountants and finance professionals would be required to learn from scratch costing millions of pounds in training and putting immense pressure on hmrc to correct all the inevitable mistakes and misinterpretations.

        Do you ever come out with any remotely practicable ideas? Why don’t you tell us about cancelling the Olympics again?

        • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

          Of course, the 1%’s little waste of cash has to go ahead and cause billions of damage to the economy. You get a pretty show out of it, never mind how many people could have had their disability benefits paid from that cash. No, the show’s more important.

          And right, because slashing 90% of the exemptions and radically simplifying the system would be more complex. Wait, no, your real problem is you’d probably have to pay a far greater amount of tax than you currently do.

          (I fully expect that like the other right wingers here, you hide your cash anywhere but this country)

          You’re serving the economists and attacking democracy, not me.

          • Anonymous

            I get paid from paye so I don’t self assess or benefit from any tax loopholes. However what your proposing is stupid, costly and practically impossible to implement.

            Alot of what your proposing to scrap are not loopholes at all but sensible allowances that in the Long run help the economy and encourage investment. People invest to make a profit. If you rewrite tax law to make investments unprofitable then people just hoard their wealth, the economy suffers, less jobs get created and tax receipts fall. Your ideas are unworkable populist rubbish designed around short term gain and totally disregarding the consequences.

          • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

            Oh of course, it’s impossible to fix the tax system, there needs to be an ever-more Byzantine system which allows more and more evasion, and needs ever-more staff to audit the same number of accounts.

            The entire point is that sensible proposals (R&D, job creation, etc.) will come back with strong support. Much of the current complex crap which is there only for historical reasons…won’t.

            The SAME BASE RATE. What people are SUPPOSED to be paying. Probably they could be lowered if it works, too, after a year.

            You are simply defending the 1% and the status quo at all costs. You are the one who refuses to see the consequences of allowing continued massive tax fraud, especially by companies.

            If you want the rates – and the tax YOU pay – to go down, compliance rates must rise.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZPXYLRVP4XOIGGDJWAL6HUO7U4 David

            @Newsbot9: Although I know your heart is in the right place, @smcconnell is essentially correct that making radical changes to the tax system is a very dangerous prospect, with an enormous potential for unplanned, knock-on effects.

            However, we could more sensibly enact a law that required that any new exceptions to a tax law must have a “sunset” clause, requiring them to be debated again at a defined point in the future where they can be re-assessed for their appropriateness.  This would help stem the ever growing complexity of the tax system getting out of control, as I agree it currently is.

          • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

            So you want to add another layer of complexity, meaning additional ways to evade tax and making auditing even harder, plus fining more people for getting things wrong!

            No, a from-scratch pruning is quite the opposite of risky.

          • Anonymous

            I agree with  what you say Paye of course is how most of us  pay tax, but to day Bob Diamond on Ten million Bonus we are told it’s lower because of the loses of RBS, we are told three of the worse performning banks in America will be paying out $18 Billion in bonus payments for making loses not profits.

            The problem is these bonus payments are not bonus they are wages being paid as  a bonus.

    • Anonymous

      You mean like Lord Sainsbury a Labour  donor, the problem is people have to believe what your saying before they vote for you, and sadly labour showed us when they agreed Non Dom’s could pay a fee not tax.

      I do not like keep on reminding people that labour did it or labour did not do it, but the sad fact the only thing that has changed with labour is the leader, everything else is the same

    • Anonymous

      What was the last 13 years for then fun

  • Anonymous

    How about starting with ex Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair, and Labour supporter Bernie Ecclestone?  That’s why people don’t trust Labour – many Ministers and supporters were taking advantage of the system as much as anyone.  

  • http://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes Guido Fawkes

    Do you plan to invade Switzerland?

    • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

      No, that’s your answer as always.

      Simply participating in an EU-wide tax treaty is quite sufficient. Oh, and shutting down the UK-controlled tax havens protection.

      • GuyM

        So a bit of economic imperialism is ok with the left eh?

        • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

          Oh yes, of course democratically negotiated treaties to stop illegal acts on the parts of their citizens are “imperialistic”. Wait, no, it’s called “democratic”. And in aid of upholding the existing law of the realm, for that matter.

          Given your frequent references to off-shoring money, I am inclined to believe you have a personal stake in this.

  • Anonymous

    And in the 13 years of Labour government what progress was made in closing down tax evasion?   None.    In fact many of the sort of deals discussed were put together under Labour.

    The growth in the complexity of tax legislation under Brown’s Chancellorship opened more tax loopholes than he closed !!!

    We need to be simplifying our tax system not adding to it.

  • Pingback: What Labour has said on tax havens » Tax Research UK

  • Channel Islander

    What does the “spirit” of the law mean ? - it means ill informed politicians like you can make moral and other judgments which criminalise people’s perfectly lawful and legitimate conduct. Whilst all over the world people are fighting for freedom and the rule of law, labour politicians love the vox pop of beating up third parties which they have no constitutional power over in order to curry public favour.  

     The British government is not “responsible” in any way for Channel Islands tax affairs and has no constitutional right to alter them, end of story.  Your opinion is therefore irrelevant.  The basis of these allegations is always that “experts estimate”  – there remains no evidence whatsoever that any such assertions are true.  The logical extension of this sophistry is that everyone should try their utmost to pay the British government as much  tax as they can and not avail themselves of allowances.  Ludicrous.  And quite firghtening that someone in such a responsible position should demonstrate such lack of genuine understanding.  This is particularly pertinent as London is the worlds largest tax haven, with some of the worlds richest resident non-domiciled persons paying HMRC 50k a year in tax when they earn billions…….why not try sorting out your own rotten apples first !!

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →