Budget 2012 and the Local Finance Bill: the case for redistribution?

March 23, 2012 3:41 pm

Budget 2012: it’s hardly going to down in history as a landmark Budget for local government. No big giveaways and no big hits. You may think that Labour councils would be breathing a collective sigh of relief. Afterall, friends in Manchester will be welcoming the announcement of the City Deal for Greater Manchester, which intends to give new powers, including the ability to ‘earn back’ tax generated by investing in infrastructure to boost local growth. DCLG think this could amount to as much as £30 million a year of tax. These City Deals are being negotiated with eight core cities – six of which are Labour controlled councils*. Good news.

But it’s not the Budget that Labour local authorities are concerned about. It’s the financial reforms that are proposed in the Local Finance Bill. The government’s political principles behind the reforms are intended to make local authorities less reliant on state funding and give them more financial autonomy. But if you turn this on its head, actually what you are look at is moving away from, and reducing the levels of redistribution that takes place. Redistribution is a vital part of the finance system for some Labour authorities.

One of the deals in the Bill is to enable local authorities to retain a proportion of the business rates generated in their area. Although the government states that there will be no overnight winners and losers from this; put in very simple terms, councils will get more money from business rates paid by new business and will get less money should businesses close down or move away from the council area. Whilst you can argue that this gives councils the incentive to encourage local economic growth, we know that it’s not that simple.

Some Labour council areas, like Greater Manchester, will be very positive about the potential for growth, but there are other councils that fear they will lose out. And it is easy to see why some Labour councils have cause for concern. When you look at the government distribution of cuts so far, for example in the Grant Settlement for 2011-12, it is clear that the impact has been very uneven. Councils in the north, metropolitan councils and districts have been hit very hard; the bottom 5th of councils in terms of deprivation had the largest cuts.

The measures in the Finance Bill could have a similar effect. The deals are going to benefit those councils where times are already good and there is a risk that the richest councils remain rich, with the greatest ability to attract business and gain additional resource, and the poorest councils remain poor, with limited ability to invest in economic growth locally. And this brings us back to why redistribution is so important.

The principal factors in redistribution are the level of deprivation in an area and the relationship between the ability to raise finance locally, balanced against the demand for services. That is, those areas that have high deprivation and demand for services and limited ability to raise finance locally benefit from funding through redistribution from more prosperous areas. What this tends to have meant is that it has been Labour authorities that have been in receipt of redistribution. When you look at this deal on business rates in the Bill some Labour authorities could potentially lose out. Particularly in metropolitan centres in the north east and north west where redistribution is needed most.**

Some Labour authorities in these areas, with high deprivation and limited ability to generate new business, could be facing a real problem if the redistributive element of funding is cut. These councils will be carefully considering what this looks like for their position and how they are to move forward.

In the short term, councils need to be aided in finding a path through; innovation and risk taking should be supported. In the longer term however, the Party needs to develop a strong policy approach to local economic growth. Some on the Left have already started to look at this – Labour’s Business for example – but it needs to go further. Crucially, Labour in local government needs to be engaged – the area where Labour have power to take local economic policy forward now.

*Leeds, Liverpool, Newcastle, Nottingham, Manchester and Sheffield.

**Looking at employment figures, for instance, the 2010 English Indices of Deprivation tell us that of the top 20 most deprived areas, 18 of them are in the North East and North West. Of these 18, 17 of them are in Labour local authority areas. Regional Economic Performance Indicators published in May 2011, show that places like the North East and North West, predict that as a percentage of the adult population those expecting to start a business within the next 3 years fall below areas in other parts of the country – particularly London.

Laura Wilkes is a Policy Manager at Local Government Information Unit. She writes here in a personal capacity.

  • GuyM

    Anything that means less redistribution subsidy to prop up public sector non job dependent areas is a good step in the right direction.

    I see no reason why people in my area should be endlessly taxed to allow certain northern councils hide from economic realities.

  • Cllr Richard Livingstone

    Laura

    The problem with your argument is that it doesn’t address the issue of the councils who are amongst those hit hardest by the cuts but are well positioned to make gains from the retention of business rates.

    The 2012/13 settlement marks a 25% real terms cut in its total general revenue account budget that Southwark Council has faced since the General Election.  With further cuts coming down the track it is very difficult for Labour authorities like ours not to support something that enables us to at least cushion the impact of those. 

    Why should the benefits from developments like the Shard not contribute towards addressing the needs of a borough that still has severe deprivation in many areas? 

    These developments only breed resentment in areas of high need if it is not clear what benefits they are bringing to the local communities that they most impact on.

Latest

  • Comment The London primary process is a wasted opportunity to engage more people

    The London primary process is a wasted opportunity to engage more people

    The Labour party has made the mistake of treating the primary election process in London as something to be got out of the way, rather than seeing its potential to get people re-engaged in politics. Both the decision to charge potential Labour supporters £3 to take part in the ballot, and the rushed timetable are mistakes that betray Labour’s fears about genuinely opening up the party to a wider audience. The grassroots are the lifeblood of the party and they […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Katy Clark will run for Scottish Labour deputy leader

    Katy Clark will run for Scottish Labour deputy leader

    Katy Clark, MP for North Ayrshire and Arran, has announced that she will run for deputy leader of the Scottish Labour Party. The position is vacant following Anas Sarwar’s resignation on Thursday night, and the contest will run alongside the race for leader. A timetable for the deputy leadership has yet to be formalised, and Sarwar will remain interim leader until December 13th. Clark has been an MP since 2005, and is seen as a left-winger within the Parliamentary Labour […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland “We didn’t listen” – Jim Murphy launches campaign with apology to the Scottish people

    “We didn’t listen” – Jim Murphy launches campaign with apology to the Scottish people

    Jim Murphy will officially launch his campaign for the Scottish Labour leadership with a speech in Edinburgh today. He will focus on the Party’s failure to listen to the public, leading to subsequent defeats in 2007 and 2011. Murphy will use the experiences from his 100 towns tour, where he spent 100 days going around Scotland holding street meetings to campaign for a No vote this summer, to talk about the appetite for change around the country. “I want to apologise […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Why Miliband’s plans to scrap the Lords should be welcomed

    Why Miliband’s plans to scrap the Lords should be welcomed

    Ed Miliband’s announcement of plans to replace the House of Lords with an elected Senate is welcome on two counts. Firstly, it’s good to see Labour committing once again to reforming the House of Lords after ducking the issue for reasons of low politics earlier in the parliament. Choosing to drive a wedge between the Lib Dems and the Tories on constitutional affairs may well have reaped dividends (not least, the abandonment of the gerrymandering bill), but it was sad […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Let’s meet London’s housing need

    Let’s meet London’s housing need

    Meeting London’s housing need – it sounds like a simple idea, but it hasn’t happened for decades. If there is one aim politicians of all parties should meet over the next 5 years, this must be it. It is the single biggest thing we can do to improve the lives of ordinary Londoners. And with political will, a good plan and leadership, it’s possible. As any Londoner knows, London is in the middle of a desperate housing crisis. Young Londoners […]

    Read more →