Organisation committee report

14th March, 2012 11:45 am

The Organisation Committee of the Labour Party’s National Executive Committee met on 13 March and considered a number of important reports about internal Party democracy.

The key item was an early heads-up from Peter Hain about the direction in which the review of Labour’s policy-making structures initiated as part of “Refounding Labour” is headed.

Key features of the proposals sketched out by Peter were:

• Moving to a 5 year policy-making cycle from the current 3 year one, and away from the “Warwick” style climax to the process.
• More readable, shorter, accessible policy documents for members to comment on.
• These would be circulated each year for party units to make submissions in reaction to, and then each Policy Commission would draft a report with options and recommendations. These reports would be debated at a National Policy Forum (NPF) meeting each summer. The NPF would then send the revised documents to Annual Conference for agreement.
• Party units will be able to submit a limited number of amendments. There will be a “duty to consult” i.e. party units submitting amendments will need to show they have sounded out stakeholders before raising an issue. Issues raised which show clear evidence of community support may be given more weight.
• In the final year of the cycle, Policy Commissions would draw up an overarching document based on the policy documents agreed in previous years. Again this would be shorter than the current style of document.
• Labour’s Policy Programme would consist of the final year documents agreed by the policy commissions, NPF, Joint Policy Committee (JPC) and Annual Conference. This would form the basis of the manifesto signed off by the Clause V meeting between NEC and Shadow Cabinet.
• The role of the JPC will be strengthened. It will commission and agree policy documents, work to increase participation in policy debate, oversee the amendments process and agree options papers to go to Annual Conference.
• Policy Commissions will consider submissions from party units and come to a consensus view on whether to incorporate them into policy documents.
• NPF members not elected to a Policy Commission will now be able to attend one as an observer.
• Annual Conference will get to consider alternative positions, not just one take-it-or-leave it document.
• There will be greater use of technology to facilitate discussion and to feedback to party units about their submissions. NPF members will also be involved in giving feedback. All NPF members will get greater information about the work of the JPC and the Policy Commissions.
• There will be an online audit trail to track what has happened to amendments.
• Greater communication of NPF activity and support for party units to get involved.
• Policy Commissions to look more at current issues via conference calls and online debate.

This all seemed fairly sensible and consistent with members’ calls for a more transparent process.

This was just an initial discussion – further discussion will happen at the NEC, leading to rule changes going to Annual Conference this year.

The Committee also agreed:
• To trigger a further 14 early parliamentary selections (all 3 seats in Brighton & Hove based on the anticipated new boundaries, Carlisle, Redcar, Crewe & Nantwich, Gillingham & Rainham, Milton Keynes N, Reading E, Bristol S, Gloucester, Cannock Chase, Stafford, Tamworth & Staffs).
• A timetable for selecting mayoral candidates where referendums result in a “yes” vote (freeze date for being a member with voting rights of 5 May, short-listing by panels of a mixture of Regional Board and CLP reps on 16 May, OMOV ballot goes out on 25 May, hustings meetings by 10 June, ballot closes on 13 June and results declared on 15 June). The same ballot dates will apply to the NEC and NPF elections and the Police Commissioner selections.
• Labour MPs selected as Mayoral or Police Commissioner candidates will have to resign from the Commons and trigger by-elections.
• Guidelines for reorganising CLPs in January 2013 on the new boundaries.
• Model candidate contracts which involve a commitment to a lot of campaigning!
• Labour Movement for Europe and Labour Finance & Industry Group are to become formal affiliates of the Party.

  • Johndclare

    VERY well-campaigned, Luke.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrea-Parma/578831001 Andrea Parma

    Interesting that Bristol South (where Dawn Primarolo is retiring) is given an early selection. So it can’t be used for sitting MPs left without a seat after boundary reviews (as Labour have few MPs in the South, there won’t be MPs in need in neighbouring areas  anyway).

  • http://twitter.com/RDStalker Rachel Danae Stalker

    Odd that Carlisle is selecting when there is cross-party opposition to the Boundary Commission proposals. If Labour were to get their way, there might be a spare Cumbrian Labour MP looking for a seat!

    Boundary Commission proposals make all Cumbrian seats marginal and set Rory Stewart against Tim Farron. Labour’s proposal makes one ultra-safe Labour seat (the Labour bits of Workington and Copeland), two Labour-leaning marginals (Barrow and Carlisle) and leave Rory and Tim with safe seats.

  • Tony Labour

    What happened to the feedback on Labour Party in Northern Ireland ?

Latest

  • Featured News Miliband announces plans for emergency nursing recruitment drive as part of “NHS Rescue Plan”

    Miliband announces plans for emergency nursing recruitment drive as part of “NHS Rescue Plan”

    Ed Miliband is set to announce Labour’s “NHS Rescue Plan” – starting with an emergency recruitment drive designed to get another 1,000 nurses into training this year. Speaking to student nurses at Manchester Metropolitan University, the Labour leader will say that this 1,000 nurses is the first installment of the 20,000 nurses (and 8.000 doctors) the party would fund thanks to its “time to care” fund. Labour would – on the first day of a Miliband government – ask universities to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured 5 things we learned from Miliband’s Evan Davis interview

    5 things we learned from Miliband’s Evan Davis interview

    Ed Miliband was the third leader to face an Evan Davis grilling tonight. Davis isn’t not as pugnacious as Jeremy Paxman, nor as dogged as Andrew Neill (who I’d like to see interview all of the party leaders), but he’s smart, well prepared and hammers home at points of potential weakness. He’s an incredibly tough interviewer – you’d have to be to do the Today Programme and Newsnight – and that was certainly the case for Miliband tonight, at least in the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland The SNP manifesto is a dangerous throwback to the 80s

    The SNP manifesto is a dangerous throwback to the 80s

    This isn’t the article I expected to write about the SNP manifesto. I was ready to praise Nicola Sturgeon’s political guile for producing a carbon copy of Labour’s programme. After a full week to digest Labour’s offer, I fully expected an identikit policy programme, presented as a ‘hand of friendship’ from the SNP: part of the party’s lethal campaign to minimise the differences between itself and Labour; to prove to Scots that there is nothing to fear from switching to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The Shrewsbury 24 deserve to know what really went on in 1972

    The Shrewsbury 24 deserve to know what really went on in 1972

    In 1972, after an industrial dispute in the Shropshire town of Shrewsbury, 24 men were prosecuted under the ancient 1875 Conspiracy Act. Ever since then, the 24, their family and friends protest their innocence and have tirelessly fought their convictions. It’s become a cause célèbre for the trade union movement. There have long been suspicions of murky political interference in the trial. Many have accused the then Tory Government of orchestrating a show trial.  Yet, time and again, demands for the truth have […]

    Read more →
  • News Weekly Survey: Coalition, campaign and leadership

    Weekly Survey: Coalition, campaign and leadership

      We are now over halfway through the short campaign, and very little movement has been spotted in the polls. We’ve had manifestos, pledges and difficult interviews – but how would you rate Labour’s campaign so far? On current polling, it would seem a hung parliament is the likeliest outcome. If Labour have chance to form a government, and had a choice, what would be your preferred type of government? Finally, Ed Miliband’s personal ratings appear to be on the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit