Osborne’s faith-based economics have worsened Britain’s slump in jobs and demand

April 25, 2012 8:06 pm

The confirmation by the Office of National Statistics this morning that the UK economy has been driven completely off course and into an avoidable second recession is a social disaster for the over one million young people out of work, but it is a political catastrophe for David Cameron and George Osborne.

Taking the reins of an economy growing at 2.1% under Labour, and with falling unemployment in mid-2010, in two years in office they have achieved the exact opposite of their ambitions – presiding over a shrinking economy, and piling up more national debt. The economy has not grown at all since the Comprehensive Spending Review, and borrowing has been projected to rise by £150bn more than forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility in June 2010.

Construction output fell by 3% in the last quarter, as the Chancellor failed to bring forward sufficient levels of capital spending in his March Budget, nor cut VAT for home repairs or maintenance, to boost the building sector. In Scotland, long-term youth unemployment has surged by over 1,000% in the last five years with the toxic brew of the SNP Scottish Government’s cuts and Osbornomics.

Today’s news represents the final nail in the coffin for Osborne’s guiding economic theory of expansionary fiscal contraction. Ignoring the lessons from Japan in the 1990s, in June 2010, he declared that the public sector was crowding out private endeavour, and following his Mais lecture in February that year, that his new economic model would be based on increasing export-led growth, levels of business investment, and higher personal savings.

Early in the Parliament, Tory MPs queued up to advocate a sharp slashing of public investment, and how a flood of private sector jobs would be created thereby. In contrast, stripping out £81bn from public spending over the course of the Parliament, with 88% of the cuts still to be made, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, has depressed consumer and business confidence and spending power, with enormous negative effects on private sector demand.

It is staggering that overall economic demand is forecast to rise in the US by 1.9% this year, but to slump by 0.2% in the UK in 2012. The increase in business investment has failed to materialise as capital and investment allowances have been slashed, and is estimated at a puny 0.7% this year. Now we are told by Osborne the extent of our economic ambitions should be to focus purely on low interest rates, while demand dwindles and jobs are destroyed.

Cameron claimed at PMQs today there were no credible economic voices backing an alternative. Perhaps he hasn’t heard of Adam Posen, the external member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee, who recently contrasted the US recovery where all of the lost output from the 2008-9 recession has been regained, with that in the UK, facing the slowest climb out of a slump since the 1870s. Posen argued one reason for the stronger US growth was that the Obama Administration has not cut public spending nearly as quickly or as deeply as Osborne. As he said in his lecture at the National Institute for Economic and Social Research in March on the divergent paths followed by both economies since the third quarter of 2010:

“This is because the UK economy has been largely stalled since then, while the US continued on its recovery trend. At this point, the US GDP is back to its pre-crisis level, up over 6% from the trough, and had we in the UK continued along our initial recovery path, we would be on course to return to pre-crisis GDP level by third quarter of this year.”

Perhaps the Prime Minister doesn’t know the IMF have argued that without growth there is no credible deficit reduction plan. As Paul Krugman has written in the last few hours, with Osborne’s plans for accelerated cuts for the rest of the Parliament, the “expansionary aspect should already have kicked in; it’s all contraction from here.”

Expect the Tories now to further turn the screw on the poor and the young by arguing for cuts in the minimum wage, further diminution of workers’ rights, and for regional and lower public sector pay. None of these policies would do anything to repair the lost jobs or demand in the economy, and we should be resolute in our opposition to such regressive supply-side measures.

The rise of the Socialists in France shows the appetite for voters in Europe for a credible alternative to the austerity economic model of the centre-right. It is our duty to campaign with passion for that alternative which boosts short-term demand through a temporary cut in VAT, a proper National Insurance exemption scheme for employers taking on young people, new infrastructure projects, and a reversal of the Chancellor’s ruinous tax credit cuts hurting up to two million families.

But there is also a need to ensure our economy works for everyone, by ending the short-term get-rich-quick culture, which has favoured instant profit over long-term investment. Ideas such as a National Investment Bank, and making monetary policy work better to get capital to small and medium-sized businesses would help.

The real shock for the British people about the Tories has not been how shamelessly they have behaved in Government in their relationships with big business, nor how unfair their tax policies have been to ordinary families, women and children, now how out of touch they are with the lives of millions of people, it is their lack of competence on jobs and growth. The Tories have always prided themselves on economic management – with no credible plan to create jobs or demand and this unnecessary recession made in Downing Street by Cameron and Osborne – that reputation is gone for good.

William Bain is the Labour MP for Glasgow North East and Shadow Scotland Office Minister

  • james

    Depends whether you think it would be even worse under Labour. Most economics is faith-based particularly under Labour which is nothing more than a `faith based sect`.

    • treborc1

      faith based sect, oh boy this from a Thatcherite Tory talking about sects.

  • Hamish

    Excellent article, Willie.  Labour needs to look beyond generalisations about jobs and housing and focus on concrete policies such as those you mention regarding VAT and National Insurance.

  • GuyM

    I said some time ago, the UK is screwed economically.

    Everything has been built upon debt, national growth, personal finances, credit card, mortgages… the UK overdosed on debt up to 2008 and now it’s payback time.

    No matter what Labour says there simply isnt the money to do a massive keynesian style investment, as soon as you weaken the deficit package up will go interest rates.

    Look at what happened in France follownig Hollande’s first round win, shares slump, the “rich” make plans to move (French enquiries to central London estate agents are up 19% since the weekend) and it will only get worse if Hollande carries out his campaign pledges.

    Plus all our major EU markets are in a terrible state, so there’s no booming market to sell to. Heavy spending in one financial year to get a temporary growth spurt just transfers further pain for the future.

    If you don’t want to accept that the UK collectively has to get itself off its addiction to debt then you are just playing stupid politics and it will lead to more pain in years to come whatever crap Balls comes out with regarding the retarded “5 point plan “.

    • derek

      Half a world away Guy? one world one globe, three continent’s the America’s, Europe and the Asia’s. the dollar the euro and the yen, a nationalised world health care and the continental infrastructure link up. 

      • GuyM

        Nightmare scenario, world communism by the back door.

        I don’t need the state telling me what to do, nor giving me no option but to accept their services.

        • trotters1957

          Guy M, Labourlist’s Alf Garnett.

          Still here at 1.00 am, your children miss you, Guy. Why not get off here and pay your family some attention?

          Even Alf Garnett talked to his wife and children.

  • Daniel Speight

    Of course revised figures may show we are not in officially a double-dip recession, but it hardly matters. The truth is growth is virtually non-existent and all we see in either direction is decimal points of a percent. This matters as we are looking at growth from an extremely low point of a recession caused by the financial crisis.

    So did Cameron and Osborne’s economic policies fail or did they lie, knowing this was always likely to be the result of their policies. The change in Osborne’s rhetoric about a year before the election points to latter being very possible. Either way the pair have some accounting to do.

  • GuyM

    Ed Balls being ripped to bits by Andrew Neil right now on Daily Politics.

    Anyone who wants to see the complete lack of Labour’s economic policy should watch it.

    • Redshift

      Ed Balls has been totally vindicated by this double dip. He said austerity would shrink demand when we needed it most and choke off the recovery. 

      I know that’s uncomfortable for you Guy, but it’s the truth. 

Latest

  • Comment Reaching new communities

    Reaching new communities

    This article is from Our Labour, Our Communities – a pamphlet of 10 essays by Labour PPCs, published by LabourList in partnership with Lisa Nandy MP. I am proud to be standing as the candidate for my hometown of Hastings & Rye, but I am equally proud to stand as a parliamentary candidate who is also half Chinese and half British. My mother is Chinese Malaysian and came to this country 41 years ago to be a nurse in Hastings and continues to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Cutting Trident will be the price of support in a hung parliament. That’s the news reported from a meeting of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green leaders this week. With Labour’s slim lead and the SNP and Green vote threatening to impact on its share, this is a serious issue. Labour’s policy clearly states, ‘Labour has said that we are committed to a minimum, credible independent nuclear deterrent, delivered through a Continuous At-Sea Deterrent. It would require a clear body […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Lord Ashcroft has told him he shouldn’t have done it in 2010. Lynton Crosby has told him not to do it in 2015. It’s no surprise that David Cameron is trying to wriggle out of televised leader debates during the General Election – even though he has said he is willing to take part “in principle”. Time perhaps to dust off one of Margaret Thatcher’s favourite barbs “He’s frit.” Neil Kinnock tried it in 1992 to try to goad John Major into […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    By Stephen Timms MP and Ian Murray MP The Christmas period reminds us that modern life can be busy, hurried and demanding. The pressures of work, demands of family life and hectic Christmas schedules can prove stretching as we juggle competing demands. Increasingly the need for flexible work is driven by the complex shape of people’s lives; as parents go to work, struggle to make ends meet, perform career roles, take their children to school and activities and try and carve […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    As the start of the long campaign begins today, curbing the amount of money parties can spend between now and May 7th, Labour MP Jon Ashworth has sought to clarify what precautions are being taken to ensure publicly-funded government advisers are not using their time campaigning. Ashworth has sent a letter to senior civil servant Jeremy Heywood, asking him to answer a number of questions about what kind of campaigning activity was permitted and undertaken by special advisers (SpAds) in […]

    Read more →