What a waste of money

April 18, 2012 9:27 am

Those of you who follow me on Twitter will know that I’m spending a few days this week in Strasbourg, as the once a month “Strasbourg session” of the European Parliament takes place. The whole European Parliament decamps to France for a week, leaving behind MEPs offices, the debating chamber and all of the offices of the European Parliament in Brussels to move to, wait for it, exactly the same (give or take) set of offices in Strasbourg. The complex itself is huge, and yet is only used for a fraction of each year.

Ladies and Gentlemen – welcome to one of the world’s great boondoggles…

As a pro-European, Strasbourg is a challenge for me, because it encapsulates something that is fundamentally wrong with Europe as an entity – the power of vested interests (in this case, the French desire to have the Parliament meet on their turf). Few think that heading to Strasbourg once a month is a good idea, and the vast majority of MPs oppose it. Last month they voted 429-184 for a “single seat”. That’s the largest majority yet.

Labour’s MEPs are particularly keen to end the travelling Strasbourg circus. Their leader Glenis Willmott has outlined “three important reasons why we should now stop this farce”:

1. Governments should be seen to practice what they preach. It is a scandal to cause this totally unnecessary carbon footprint. (The University of York have estimated a carbon footprint of an extra 20,268 tonnes of additional carbon dioxide caused by this move.)

2. Governments are asking everyone in the public sector to tighten their belts. (Estimates claim a cost of €206 million on the extra seat.)

3. We only meet here for historic reasons. Strasbourg represented reconciliation between France and Germany, but that generation has more or less disappeared now. We are now the new Enlarged Europe and the significance of the end of Franco-German hostility is now consigned to history text books

Unfortunately MEPs don’t get to decide where they meet. The Strasbourg session was agreed by EU governments as part of a protocol attached to the Treaty of Amsterdam (agreed by John Major as British Prime Minister) and is decided on by the Governments of the EU, not the parliament. Over a million signatures have been collected to call time on Strasbourg, but as yet that’s been to no avail. If moves were made by other EU governments to abolish the seat then France would simply veto. So it stays. The European project has delivered prosperity and unparalleled peace and security for its members. But sometimes the EU institutions are their own worst enemy…

But if the EU were to leave Strasbourg, what would become of the city (whose economy is boosted by the sessions) and the EU complex itself? Willmot has a few suggestions

“there are endless uses for the revamped European Parliament building. It could perhaps be a centre for European Summits making use of its excellent interpretation facilities, or perhaps a new European University. There are a host of ideas. ”

All of which must be better than spending €200m+ a year on moving a whole parliament hundreds of miles, surely?

Look out for more dispatches from Strasbourg on Twitter, and tomorrow on LabourList.

  • Russell

    Perhaps the 420+ MEPs who don’t like meeting in Strasbourg should just stop going? If only  100 or so turned up every month then the whole thing becomes (even more) pointless and something would surely have to be done…

  • treborc1

    Unemployment office, great idea

  • Dave Postles

    It’s inappropriate today, Mark, when we discover that the Kuwaitis are launching an investigation into whether the Kuwaiti government in 2009 paid Blair £27m for ‘advice’ and when Tom Clark, in his column in ‘Society’ in The Guardian, reveals that it was Blair who asked every year for an ‘initiative’ on welfare.  Criticism from Labour about anything is misplaced.

    • geedee0520

       Well – launching an investigation doesn’t mean that they did pay Blair that money etc. But never mind – he is clearly guilty.

      It is absolutely appropriate to raise the issue of EU waste at any point, no matter what else is around.

  • ovaljason

    If you spent time in any other branch of the EU you would find the same grotesque level of waste.

    Having seen what you’ve seen, Mark, why would you think the EU behaves differently in any other area of policy or function?

  • Razvan onstantinescu

    Yes it is an absolute waste of time and money.  Of effort as well, I know an MEP who had a heart attack (literally) yo-yoing between Brussels, Strassbourg and his consituency back in England.  Absurd.

  • Razvan onstantinescu

    Yes it is an absolute waste of time and money.  Of effort as well, I know an MEP who had a heart attack (literally) yo-yoing between Brussels, Strassbourg and his consituency back in England.  Absurd.

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

    Pointing out EU waste is futile. Mark Ferguson makes some good points but acknowledges himself nothing can be done. But its surely time we had a proper debate on the EU itself if only to put to bed this question for a generation. The Labour Party should commit itself to an EU referendum – a simple in or out. It would be populist and might well ensure them victory and end the squabbling for the next twenty years.

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

    Pointing out EU waste is futile. Mark Ferguson makes some good points but acknowledges himself nothing can be done. But its surely time we had a proper debate on the EU itself if only to put to bed this question for a generation. The Labour Party should commit itself to an EU referendum – a simple in or out. It would be populist and might well ensure them victory and end the squabbling for the next twenty years.

  • John_Haylett

    Boondoggle — is Mark a septic or has he caught the Radio 4 disease of believing that opinions expressed by north Americans or in their terminology have greater intrinsic value?

Latest

  • News Iain Duncan-Smith’s Universal Credit failure explained in one simple chart

    Iain Duncan-Smith’s Universal Credit failure explained in one simple chart

    Iain Duncan Smith has been proclaiming the benefits of his Universal Credit scheme today as it gets rolled out to families today. Yet the implementation of this scheme (costing £500 million so far) has been an abject failure. IDS once claimed that one million people would be receiving Universal Credit at this stage. Today he claimed that 40,000 people are receiving it. Yet the latest DWP figures say just 17,850 are getting Universal Credit. Lets see how that looks as […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Labour looks set to back income tax devolution to Scotland

    Labour looks set to back income tax devolution to Scotland

    Yesterday we reported that Alistair Darling has advised against proposals that would see complete powers over income tax be devolved to Scotland. However, it’s emerged today the official Labour line, which looked as though it was going to be that limited powers over income tax should be given to Holyrood, is to support the proposals Darling was warning against. There has also been some opposition to this potential policy from Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls and Gordon Brown, who are said to be […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Young people are ‘the new face of poverty’ – what are politicians doing about it?

    Young people are ‘the new face of poverty’ – what are politicians doing about it?

    It feels as if UK politics repeating a very tired story. A political drama fills newspaper front pages, and everyone accepts that politics is broken. All the while, very immediate problems are plaguing our society – that will, if we do not begin to be address them, have significant impact on future generations. If this kind of bleak proclamation is little too vague,  type ‘young people UK’ into Google, and you’ll see what I mean. Headline articles read ‘Young people […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Polling 10 things that Labour supporters should bear in mind today

    10 things that Labour supporters should bear in mind today

    Yesterday’s two opinion polls showing Labour 5% ahead (and one showing a 4 point lead) – from Lord Ashcroft and Populus – provided a much-needed shot-in-the-arm for party activists and have put the pressure back on David Cameron, who after all is a leader who has just lost two by-elections to UKIP. Labour has not had two consecutive 5% leads like this since the very start of October. The headline figures are: Ashcroft – Lab 32% (+2), Con 27% (-2), […]

    Read more →
  • Featured How can we tackle the “social apartheid” in Britain’s education system?

    How can we tackle the “social apartheid” in Britain’s education system?

    We live a country blighted by a form of “social apartheid”. Strong words. But not mine, and not from the lips of a fellow pro-state school campaigner. No. This was the considered view of Sir Anthony Seldon, outgoing head teacher of Wellington College, one of the country’s most illustrious private schools, observing the education landscape recently from his position at its pinnacle. And he is right. After a decade or more of successive governments talking the talk on fairness, equality […]

    Read more →