You are here: Home » Comment »

What a waste of money

April 18, 2012 9:27 am

Author:

Tags:

Share this Article

Those of you who follow me on Twitter will know that I’m spending a few days this week in Strasbourg, as the once a month “Strasbourg session” of the European Parliament takes place. The whole European Parliament decamps to France for a week, leaving behind MEPs offices, the debating chamber and all of the offices of the European Parliament in Brussels to move to, wait for it, exactly the same (give or take) set of offices in Strasbourg. The complex itself is huge, and yet is only used for a fraction of each year.

Ladies and Gentlemen – welcome to one of the world’s great boondoggles…

As a pro-European, Strasbourg is a challenge for me, because it encapsulates something that is fundamentally wrong with Europe as an entity – the power of vested interests (in this case, the French desire to have the Parliament meet on their turf). Few think that heading to Strasbourg once a month is a good idea, and the vast majority of MPs oppose it. Last month they voted 429-184 for a “single seat”. That’s the largest majority yet.

Labour’s MEPs are particularly keen to end the travelling Strasbourg circus. Their leader Glenis Willmott has outlined “three important reasons why we should now stop this farce”:

1. Governments should be seen to practice what they preach. It is a scandal to cause this totally unnecessary carbon footprint. (The University of York have estimated a carbon footprint of an extra 20,268 tonnes of additional carbon dioxide caused by this move.)

2. Governments are asking everyone in the public sector to tighten their belts. (Estimates claim a cost of €206 million on the extra seat.)

3. We only meet here for historic reasons. Strasbourg represented reconciliation between France and Germany, but that generation has more or less disappeared now. We are now the new Enlarged Europe and the significance of the end of Franco-German hostility is now consigned to history text books

Unfortunately MEPs don’t get to decide where they meet. The Strasbourg session was agreed by EU governments as part of a protocol attached to the Treaty of Amsterdam (agreed by John Major as British Prime Minister) and is decided on by the Governments of the EU, not the parliament. Over a million signatures have been collected to call time on Strasbourg, but as yet that’s been to no avail. If moves were made by other EU governments to abolish the seat then France would simply veto. So it stays. The European project has delivered prosperity and unparalleled peace and security for its members. But sometimes the EU institutions are their own worst enemy…

But if the EU were to leave Strasbourg, what would become of the city (whose economy is boosted by the sessions) and the EU complex itself? Willmot has a few suggestions

“there are endless uses for the revamped European Parliament building. It could perhaps be a centre for European Summits making use of its excellent interpretation facilities, or perhaps a new European University. There are a host of ideas. ”

All of which must be better than spending €200m+ a year on moving a whole parliament hundreds of miles, surely?

Look out for more dispatches from Strasbourg on Twitter, and tomorrow on LabourList.

Related posts:

  1. Strasbourg: One step forward and two steps back
  2. Saatchi? What a waste of money!
  3. Scrapping the NHS IT system in the PBR would be a waste of money – and potentially lives
  4. Food waste: don’t let the supermarkets waste on our behalf
  5. It’s all about the money, money, money
  • Russell

    Perhaps the 420+ MEPs who don’t like meeting in Strasbourg should just stop going? If only  100 or so turned up every month then the whole thing becomes (even more) pointless and something would surely have to be done…

  • treborc1

    Unemployment office, great idea

  • Dave Postles

    It’s inappropriate today, Mark, when we discover that the Kuwaitis are launching an investigation into whether the Kuwaiti government in 2009 paid Blair £27m for ‘advice’ and when Tom Clark, in his column in ‘Society’ in The Guardian, reveals that it was Blair who asked every year for an ‘initiative’ on welfare.  Criticism from Labour about anything is misplaced.

    • geedee0520

       Well – launching an investigation doesn’t mean that they did pay Blair that money etc. But never mind – he is clearly guilty.

      It is absolutely appropriate to raise the issue of EU waste at any point, no matter what else is around.

  • ovaljason

    If you spent time in any other branch of the EU you would find the same grotesque level of waste.

    Having seen what you’ve seen, Mark, why would you think the EU behaves differently in any other area of policy or function?

  • Razvan onstantinescu

    Yes it is an absolute waste of time and money.  Of effort as well, I know an MEP who had a heart attack (literally) yo-yoing between Brussels, Strassbourg and his consituency back in England.  Absurd.

  • Razvan onstantinescu

    Yes it is an absolute waste of time and money.  Of effort as well, I know an MEP who had a heart attack (literally) yo-yoing between Brussels, Strassbourg and his consituency back in England.  Absurd.

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

    Pointing out EU waste is futile. Mark Ferguson makes some good points but acknowledges himself nothing can be done. But its surely time we had a proper debate on the EU itself if only to put to bed this question for a generation. The Labour Party should commit itself to an EU referendum – a simple in or out. It would be populist and might well ensure them victory and end the squabbling for the next twenty years.

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

    Pointing out EU waste is futile. Mark Ferguson makes some good points but acknowledges himself nothing can be done. But its surely time we had a proper debate on the EU itself if only to put to bed this question for a generation. The Labour Party should commit itself to an EU referendum – a simple in or out. It would be populist and might well ensure them victory and end the squabbling for the next twenty years.

  • John_Haylett

    Boondoggle — is Mark a septic or has he caught the Radio 4 disease of believing that opinions expressed by north Americans or in their terminology have greater intrinsic value?

Latest

  • News More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    By Mark Ferguson

    Ed Miliband is addressing Google’s Bug Tent tomorrow, and is expected to attack them over tax avoidance. So the slick Downing Street operation presumably want to get out ahead of that, right? Not quite. Here’s a selection of the headlines from today’s papers: ‘Stop moralising about tax avoidance, PM told’ – Guardian p.23 ‘Tougher tax rules would cost jobs, minister warns’ – Financial Times p.3 ‘Cameron avoids showdown over Google tax row’ – Times p.15 ‘No taxing questions as PM [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    By Harriet Harman

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    By Stefan Stern

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    By Rob Marchant

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →