What a waste of money

18th April, 2012 9:27 am

Those of you who follow me on Twitter will know that I’m spending a few days this week in Strasbourg, as the once a month “Strasbourg session” of the European Parliament takes place. The whole European Parliament decamps to France for a week, leaving behind MEPs offices, the debating chamber and all of the offices of the European Parliament in Brussels to move to, wait for it, exactly the same (give or take) set of offices in Strasbourg. The complex itself is huge, and yet is only used for a fraction of each year.

Ladies and Gentlemen – welcome to one of the world’s great boondoggles…

As a pro-European, Strasbourg is a challenge for me, because it encapsulates something that is fundamentally wrong with Europe as an entity – the power of vested interests (in this case, the French desire to have the Parliament meet on their turf). Few think that heading to Strasbourg once a month is a good idea, and the vast majority of MPs oppose it. Last month they voted 429-184 for a “single seat”. That’s the largest majority yet.

Labour’s MEPs are particularly keen to end the travelling Strasbourg circus. Their leader Glenis Willmott has outlined “three important reasons why we should now stop this farce”:

1. Governments should be seen to practice what they preach. It is a scandal to cause this totally unnecessary carbon footprint. (The University of York have estimated a carbon footprint of an extra 20,268 tonnes of additional carbon dioxide caused by this move.)

2. Governments are asking everyone in the public sector to tighten their belts. (Estimates claim a cost of €206 million on the extra seat.)

3. We only meet here for historic reasons. Strasbourg represented reconciliation between France and Germany, but that generation has more or less disappeared now. We are now the new Enlarged Europe and the significance of the end of Franco-German hostility is now consigned to history text books

Unfortunately MEPs don’t get to decide where they meet. The Strasbourg session was agreed by EU governments as part of a protocol attached to the Treaty of Amsterdam (agreed by John Major as British Prime Minister) and is decided on by the Governments of the EU, not the parliament. Over a million signatures have been collected to call time on Strasbourg, but as yet that’s been to no avail. If moves were made by other EU governments to abolish the seat then France would simply veto. So it stays. The European project has delivered prosperity and unparalleled peace and security for its members. But sometimes the EU institutions are their own worst enemy…

But if the EU were to leave Strasbourg, what would become of the city (whose economy is boosted by the sessions) and the EU complex itself? Willmot has a few suggestions

“there are endless uses for the revamped European Parliament building. It could perhaps be a centre for European Summits making use of its excellent interpretation facilities, or perhaps a new European University. There are a host of ideas. ”

All of which must be better than spending €200m+ a year on moving a whole parliament hundreds of miles, surely?

Look out for more dispatches from Strasbourg on Twitter, and tomorrow on LabourList.

To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]
  • Russell

    Perhaps the 420+ MEPs who don’t like meeting in Strasbourg should just stop going? If only  100 or so turned up every month then the whole thing becomes (even more) pointless and something would surely have to be done…

  • treborc1

    Unemployment office, great idea

  • Dave Postles

    It’s inappropriate today, Mark, when we discover that the Kuwaitis are launching an investigation into whether the Kuwaiti government in 2009 paid Blair £27m for ‘advice’ and when Tom Clark, in his column in ‘Society’ in The Guardian, reveals that it was Blair who asked every year for an ‘initiative’ on welfare.  Criticism from Labour about anything is misplaced.

    • geedee0520

       Well – launching an investigation doesn’t mean that they did pay Blair that money etc. But never mind – he is clearly guilty.

      It is absolutely appropriate to raise the issue of EU waste at any point, no matter what else is around.

  • ovaljason

    If you spent time in any other branch of the EU you would find the same grotesque level of waste.

    Having seen what you’ve seen, Mark, why would you think the EU behaves differently in any other area of policy or function?

  • Razvan onstantinescu

    Yes it is an absolute waste of time and money.  Of effort as well, I know an MEP who had a heart attack (literally) yo-yoing between Brussels, Strassbourg and his consituency back in England.  Absurd.

  • Razvan onstantinescu

    Yes it is an absolute waste of time and money.  Of effort as well, I know an MEP who had a heart attack (literally) yo-yoing between Brussels, Strassbourg and his consituency back in England.  Absurd.

  • Pointing out EU waste is futile. Mark Ferguson makes some good points but acknowledges himself nothing can be done. But its surely time we had a proper debate on the EU itself if only to put to bed this question for a generation. The Labour Party should commit itself to an EU referendum – a simple in or out. It would be populist and might well ensure them victory and end the squabbling for the next twenty years.

  • Pointing out EU waste is futile. Mark Ferguson makes some good points but acknowledges himself nothing can be done. But its surely time we had a proper debate on the EU itself if only to put to bed this question for a generation. The Labour Party should commit itself to an EU referendum – a simple in or out. It would be populist and might well ensure them victory and end the squabbling for the next twenty years.

  • John_Haylett

    Boondoggle — is Mark a septic or has he caught the Radio 4 disease of believing that opinions expressed by north Americans or in their terminology have greater intrinsic value?

Latest

  • Comment Featured Dave Hill: Sadiq must mould the mayoralty into a Labour success story

    Dave Hill: Sadiq must mould the mayoralty into a Labour success story

    Sadiq Khan’s victory in the London Mayor election three weeks ago has been rightly hailed as a triumph for positive campaigning over Crosbyite negativity and a richly symbolic hammering of the privileged Zac Goldsmith by a council estate kid. Now the hard graft of delivering has begun. Khan’s policies on housing, transport, air pollution, community safety and economic growth present separate challenges, but the same political theme unites them – the need to show the capital and the country what […]

    Read more →
  • Europe Featured News Both EU and NATO vital to keep us safe, says Thornberry

    Both EU and NATO vital to keep us safe, says Thornberry

    Emily Thornberry has said that the UK’s membership of the EU is “indispensable” in helping keep Britain safe, following a visit to NATO’s headquarters in Brussels. The Shadow Defence Secretary met with a number of senior NATO officials over two days, and says that it was “repeatedly made clear” that the EU is considered an important ally of the security alliance. “In recent days, we have been told by Leave campaigners that the EU is irrelevant to British security, because […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured The long read: Why Corbyn’s moral clarity could propel him to Number 10

    The long read: Why Corbyn’s moral clarity could propel him to Number 10

    It is accepted wisdom that for a party to be elected in a first past the post two-party system it has to appeal to swing voters, particularly those in marginal seats. As a result the two main parties have vied for the centre-ground. Consequently, in recent decades a large section of the electorate came to see little to choose between them. People have also come to believe that you cannot trust politicians. Distrust increases if politicians clearly behave in ways that are motivated […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Naushabah Khan: We feel pride in our country so let’s use this to tackle Labour’s “Englishness problem”

    Naushabah Khan: We feel pride in our country so let’s use this to tackle Labour’s “Englishness problem”

    The reality of last year’s general election is that Labour’s failure to secure a victory in an England, suffering at the hands of UKIP, ultimately resulted in our defeat. As a parliamentary candidate in Rochester and Strood, for both the general election and by-election, caused by the defection of Mark Reckless to UKIP, I am all too aware of the public mood, that considered us out of touch with their lives and values. Both elections also revealed fascinating notions of nationalism, belonging and identity politics that as a […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Rachel Reeves: Queen’s Speech showed the typical Tory failure on pensions and infrastructure

    Rachel Reeves: Queen’s Speech showed the typical Tory failure on pensions and infrastructure

    Yesterday in Parliament we voted on the Government’s programme of legislation for the year ahead, as set out in the Queen’s Speech. The background to yesterday’s debate about its economic measures is the critical decision our country faces about its relationship with Europe. The evidence I have heard as a member of the Treasury Select Committee has left me more convinced than ever that a vote to leave would scupper any hopes and well-laid plans we might make for our […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit