What a waste of money

April 18, 2012 9:27 am

Those of you who follow me on Twitter will know that I’m spending a few days this week in Strasbourg, as the once a month “Strasbourg session” of the European Parliament takes place. The whole European Parliament decamps to France for a week, leaving behind MEPs offices, the debating chamber and all of the offices of the European Parliament in Brussels to move to, wait for it, exactly the same (give or take) set of offices in Strasbourg. The complex itself is huge, and yet is only used for a fraction of each year.

Ladies and Gentlemen – welcome to one of the world’s great boondoggles…

As a pro-European, Strasbourg is a challenge for me, because it encapsulates something that is fundamentally wrong with Europe as an entity – the power of vested interests (in this case, the French desire to have the Parliament meet on their turf). Few think that heading to Strasbourg once a month is a good idea, and the vast majority of MPs oppose it. Last month they voted 429-184 for a “single seat”. That’s the largest majority yet.

Labour’s MEPs are particularly keen to end the travelling Strasbourg circus. Their leader Glenis Willmott has outlined “three important reasons why we should now stop this farce”:

1. Governments should be seen to practice what they preach. It is a scandal to cause this totally unnecessary carbon footprint. (The University of York have estimated a carbon footprint of an extra 20,268 tonnes of additional carbon dioxide caused by this move.)

2. Governments are asking everyone in the public sector to tighten their belts. (Estimates claim a cost of €206 million on the extra seat.)

3. We only meet here for historic reasons. Strasbourg represented reconciliation between France and Germany, but that generation has more or less disappeared now. We are now the new Enlarged Europe and the significance of the end of Franco-German hostility is now consigned to history text books

Unfortunately MEPs don’t get to decide where they meet. The Strasbourg session was agreed by EU governments as part of a protocol attached to the Treaty of Amsterdam (agreed by John Major as British Prime Minister) and is decided on by the Governments of the EU, not the parliament. Over a million signatures have been collected to call time on Strasbourg, but as yet that’s been to no avail. If moves were made by other EU governments to abolish the seat then France would simply veto. So it stays. The European project has delivered prosperity and unparalleled peace and security for its members. But sometimes the EU institutions are their own worst enemy…

But if the EU were to leave Strasbourg, what would become of the city (whose economy is boosted by the sessions) and the EU complex itself? Willmot has a few suggestions

“there are endless uses for the revamped European Parliament building. It could perhaps be a centre for European Summits making use of its excellent interpretation facilities, or perhaps a new European University. There are a host of ideas. ”

All of which must be better than spending €200m+ a year on moving a whole parliament hundreds of miles, surely?

Look out for more dispatches from Strasbourg on Twitter, and tomorrow on LabourList.

  • Russell

    Perhaps the 420+ MEPs who don’t like meeting in Strasbourg should just stop going? If only  100 or so turned up every month then the whole thing becomes (even more) pointless and something would surely have to be done…

  • treborc1

    Unemployment office, great idea

  • Dave Postles

    It’s inappropriate today, Mark, when we discover that the Kuwaitis are launching an investigation into whether the Kuwaiti government in 2009 paid Blair £27m for ‘advice’ and when Tom Clark, in his column in ‘Society’ in The Guardian, reveals that it was Blair who asked every year for an ‘initiative’ on welfare.  Criticism from Labour about anything is misplaced.

    • geedee0520

       Well – launching an investigation doesn’t mean that they did pay Blair that money etc. But never mind – he is clearly guilty.

      It is absolutely appropriate to raise the issue of EU waste at any point, no matter what else is around.

  • ovaljason

    If you spent time in any other branch of the EU you would find the same grotesque level of waste.

    Having seen what you’ve seen, Mark, why would you think the EU behaves differently in any other area of policy or function?

  • Razvan onstantinescu

    Yes it is an absolute waste of time and money.  Of effort as well, I know an MEP who had a heart attack (literally) yo-yoing between Brussels, Strassbourg and his consituency back in England.  Absurd.

  • Razvan onstantinescu

    Yes it is an absolute waste of time and money.  Of effort as well, I know an MEP who had a heart attack (literally) yo-yoing between Brussels, Strassbourg and his consituency back in England.  Absurd.

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

    Pointing out EU waste is futile. Mark Ferguson makes some good points but acknowledges himself nothing can be done. But its surely time we had a proper debate on the EU itself if only to put to bed this question for a generation. The Labour Party should commit itself to an EU referendum – a simple in or out. It would be populist and might well ensure them victory and end the squabbling for the next twenty years.

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

    Pointing out EU waste is futile. Mark Ferguson makes some good points but acknowledges himself nothing can be done. But its surely time we had a proper debate on the EU itself if only to put to bed this question for a generation. The Labour Party should commit itself to an EU referendum – a simple in or out. It would be populist and might well ensure them victory and end the squabbling for the next twenty years.

  • John_Haylett

    Boondoggle — is Mark a septic or has he caught the Radio 4 disease of believing that opinions expressed by north Americans or in their terminology have greater intrinsic value?

Latest

  • Featured Consensus not conservatism

    Consensus not conservatism

    Four years ago, when I first joined the NPF, I didn’t really know what to expect. I had heard stories of course. That is was a talking shop, a stitch up, an irrelevance. My first experiences were not good. First in Gillingham and then in Wrexham my hopes of having a constructive role to play in the policy formulating process of the Labour Party were comprehensively dashed and abandoned. Then came Birmingham. Things had changed. We had meaningful discussions. We […]

    Read more →
  • News Cameron’s reshuffle unravels in the Sunday papers

    Cameron’s reshuffle unravels in the Sunday papers

    So how have Tory Ministers (and ex-ministers) reacted to the reshuffle. Not entirely well. Here are the selected highlights from today’s papers: Owen Paterson (sacked): Asked Cameron ‘Do you actually want to win the Election?’, and said ‘If you sack me it is a smash in the teeth for the 12 million people who live in the countryside’. Esther McVey (promoted, but only after staging a “sit-in”): “Esther did not mince her words. She told the PM she was not leaving the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We can be hugely proud of our record on LGBT rights – we’ve got more to do

    We can be hugely proud of our record on LGBT rights – we’ve got more to do

    The National Policy Forum have got a full plate today as they begin their final weekend of deliberations before signing off Labour’s policy documents ahead of the manifesto being agreed at national conference. Headline issues like rail renationalisation have dominated the coverage going into this weekend, but there are other less flashy areas where we have some important work to do to finish the job we started in Government. We can be hugely proud of our record on LGBT rights, for me […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour’s big weekend – and re-orientation of what it means to be Labour

    Labour’s big weekend – and re-orientation of what it means to be Labour

    Ed Miliband’s speech to the National Policy Forum this morning was the media centrepiece of this weekend’s activity in Milton Keynes. That of course belies the fact that amendment meetings taking place across this sprawling conference centre are hammering out some of the policy detail and direction that will shape the party’s campaign – and the agenda for a potential Labour government. It was a strong speech. Unashamedly Labour, passionate about the need to tackle exploitation and deliver an offer to […]

    Read more →
  • News Full Text: Ed Miliband’s NPF Speech – A new settlement for a new era

    Full Text: Ed Miliband’s NPF Speech – A new settlement for a new era

    This weekend sees the final meeting of Labour’s National Policy Forum. Here’s the full text of Ed Miliband’s speech: As we meet here at the National Policy Forum, many of our thoughts will also be rightly focussed on two crises overseas.And I want to start by saying something about each of them.The tragic and horrifying end of flight MH17 has shocked people across the world. We mourn the 10 British victims and all those who were lost.These were innocent British people, […]

    Read more →