Queen Elizabeth: Our finest public servant

May 31, 2012 2:10 pm

The Labour Group in the Lords, like the Labour Party as a whole, is made up of both republicans and monarchists.  Personally I am a monarchist – but I was married to a republican and our children have followed in his footsteps – and I will certainly be celebrating the Diamond Jubilee this weekend with great gusto. But whatever our views of the institution, we are united in our admiration and respect for the Queen as our finest public servant.

The world has changed exponentially in the last 60 years, but there has been one constant in the life of our country and the Commonwealth, the Queen who has provided six decades of sustained and dedicated service. One just has to look at the photographs and hear the voice of the young Queen Elizabeth to be aware that she too has changed, as in many ways has her role. But unstinting public service has been at the very core.  Whilst her life will always be far, far removed from most people’s reality, she has striven to get closer to the people that she serves, to better understand their lives.

I know many people in their 80s, including in the Lords, some of whom still make a great contribution to civic life and their communities, but I know of no other 86 year old who has such a punishing schedule, travels so widely and who has given so many years to serve their country.  Some may say that wealth and privilege protect the Queen from the rigors of normality, and undoubtedly that must help, but her patience and fortitude are remarkable. As a human being she must sometimes long to stay in bed rather than dress up and attend yet another function, taking an interest in people who might not be the most scintillating company, attending state occasions when she longs for beans on toast.

As Lord President of the Council and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, I was privileged to meet and talk with the Queen on numerous occasions. She was always extraordinarily well briefed, delightful and unfailingly kind. This view was shared by tenants of the Duchy whose farms I visited and who have a special relationship with her, one of warmth and mutual respect.

One of my finest memories is of a dinner I hosted for the Duke of Lancaster – that is to say, the Queen – and all living former Chancellors of the Duchy of Lancaster. Formal dinners can too often be tedious but this one was enjoyable and full of laughter.

As we can see from the celebrations being prepared, the marking of 60 years of dedication to the people of Britain has fostered a real sense of community and national unity. Public service has become a cause for celebration.

We are all too aware of the falling esteem in which politicians are held and of people’s reluctance to engage in our democratic system, either as activists or voters. Complaints are often made that politicians do not listen or understand the public’s concerns, and that their lives are so distant from those they serve that they cannot provide solutions to their problems.  These usually misguided criticisms and perceptions have harmed the ethos of public service.

Yet the Queen, whose life has not been immune to many challenges and the intrusion of the media, has managed to maintain her distance whilst putting people at their ease and also her privacy and dignity whilst in many ways belonging to the nation. We politicians have much to learn.

So as the Jubilee celebrations unfold, whatever our views of the monarchy, we should raise a glass to the Queen, the finest public servant who has made an exceptional contribution to the life of our country.

Baroness Jan Royall of Blaisdon is Labour’s Leader in the House of Lords. This post originally appeared at the Labour Lords blog.

  • http://www.facebook.com/david.arrowsmith2 David Arrowsmith

    You would expect this craven grovelling in front of the monarchy from a peer and to where New Labour received it’s Prerogative power to send the country to war twice in the last ten years without a mandate and to generally circumvent parliamentary democracy.

  • http://twitter.com/robertsjonathan Jonathan Roberts

    Hear hear.  We’ve organised a street party, 225 tickets sold already (I didn’t realised so many people lived on our street) which is so many we’ve had to beg, steal and borrow more  tables.  My parents in Yorkshire have a similar story to tell.  I’m glad to see so many people are taking the opportunity to have fun, spend time with their community and unite in celebration this weekend.

    Whatever difficulties this country is facing, I’m very proud to be British.  Long Live The Queen.

  • Johndclare

    May I correct one error.  In paragraph 4 you say that you were ‘privileged’ to meet the Queen.
    This is an error; *she* is the one who is privileged.

  • Brumanuensis

    I have absolutely nothing against the Queen and I’m sure she is a very nice lady who performs her duties conscientiously. 

    But she has not had, nor does she have, a hard life. Going round cutting ribbons and hosting formal banquets is not strenuous work and more importantly, she is under no obligation to do this. She could abdicate or announce she is cutting back on her public duties due to old age. It isn’t as if she has to earn a living.

    Equally, I don’t think suggesting politicians could take lessons from her, really helps. The Queen is an apolitical, symbolic figure, who has never had to do – apart from the initial missteps over Diana’s death – anything that might court unpopularity. To her credit, unlike her son, she seems to understand the role of a constitutional monarch, but we should remember that this shields her from criticism by absolving her from the need to say or do anything remotely contentious.

    So I hope she has a nice party, but let’s not go overboard here.

    • AlanGiles

      I am entirely with you here: I admire the Queen, and when you think how many Prime Ministers she has seen come and go, it’s a fantastic achievement. I wish her nothing but well, and I hope she stays alive for many years, just so we don’t have to have somebody worse. In my more aggresive moments I sometimes secretly wish I was Prince Philip so I could say EXACTLY what I thought and get away with it (especially to one or two LL posters!). I shouldn’t think the Queen has had an entirely easy life*

      The Queen has been a voice of sanity and a symbol of stability for decades (she would never abdicate since she has such a strong sense of duty) I remember something very profound she said at the time of the 11th September tragedy. She was speaking at a memorial service for the British victims of that day and she said “Grief is the price we pay for love”.(*)

      But  - BUT – all this sycophantic bowing and scraping by both BBC and ITV (the BBC are even denying us Bargain Hunt on Tuesday and Cash In The Attic, so we can have the whole broiling non stop on TV from morning to late afternoon), the toadying and obsequious newspaper articles and the supermarkets cashing in and festooning everything in  red white and blue – even our local newspaper has been done up in red white and blue for it’s masthead this week). It is all far too over the top.

      As an aside, perhaps it is as well as Tony is back in town that the Queen Mother is no longer with us. I always remember a story (true I am told) that she once caught one of her footmen trying on her jewellery, and she rebuked him with “remember there is only room for one old queen in this place”  :-)

      • KonradBaxter

        “But  - BUT – all this sycophantic bowing and scraping by both BBC and ITV (the BBC are even denying us Bargain Hunt on Tuesday and Cash In The Attic… ),”

        You could stop watching so much TV?

        “the toadying and obsequious newspaper articles ”

        You could stop reading articles which you know will annoy you?

        ” the supermarkets cashing in ”

        Where’s the surprise here?  They do the same for every large national event and for niche ones as well.

        • AlanGiles

          Fair point: for the record Konrad, I watch the two programmes I mention just before and during lunch (cue violins) when you live on your own you  get into a comfortable routine. Some days I have to go out at 1.00 and try to make myself useful. At least I don’t watch Eastenders.

          I buy very few papers, but I hear the press review each morning, my eyes alight on the newspapers when I go to the shops. As for my local paper – well it’s free and comes through my letterbox.

          No surprise about the supermarkets, but when they stoop to putting the British flag on  bottles of French champagne…….

          I do admire the Queen, but I dislike the rococo flattery. Let’s face it most people will treat next week like Xmas – an excuse to party, with a few days off – and why not.

      • treborc1

        As an aside, perhaps it is as well as Tony is back in town that the
        Queen Mother is no longer with us. I always remember a story (true I am
        told) that she once caught one of her footmen trying on her jewellery,
        and she rebuked him with “remember there is only room for one old queen
        in this place”  :-)

        yes but you would have thought she could have remembered her grandson  old charlie boy

    • Hugh

       ”She could abdicate or announce she is cutting back on her public duties due to old age. It isn’t as if she has to earn a living.”

      That’s rather the point. She could abdicate as could Charles, William and so on and spend rest of their lives as the extraordinarily rich, leisured class without the public duties,  and much of the press intrusion. Instead she does the job the majority of people want her to do for her country. I’m also unsure what grounds you have for saying her work isn’t strenuous. How do you know? It’s certainly a lot more strenuous than it would be were she to abdicate.

  • Dave Postles

    ”So as the Jubilee celebrations unfold, whatever our views of the
    monarchy, we should raise a glass to the Queen, the finest public
    servant who has made an exceptional contribution to the life of our
    country.’

    ”The Queen’s Two Bodies’ (Kantorowizc)?  Maybe in the middle ages, but not today.  The person symbolizes and represents the system; don’t like the system, don’t like the person.

  • UKAzeri

    Its important to mix up Queen Elizabeth II with the institution of monarchy  :) ))

    this instituon is hiding behind HER back and once she steps down we will be able to have a proper and full discussion about what what be the most acceptable cultural representation of Britain.

    My family have settled in Britain in the mid 90s and I have never seen so many Brits embracing a truly collective idea and celebrating it! 

  • Philippa Taylor1

    I am very pleased with my recent purchase of a Jubilee Sick bag.

  • http://twitter.com/JP_KC Jack PKC

     I’d rather public servants were chosen by the public thank your very much. If the Queen is so effing marvelous at being the head of state then she should make the role open to elections and let ‘her adoring subjects’ vote her in. I understand that Labour is divided on this issue, but I’d honestly expected us to at least refrain from slobbering over the concept of constitutional entitlement. I’m in no way “united in admiration and respect for the Queen”.

    • ThePurpleBooker

      No because electing the Queen is a waste of time. Are republicans genuinely being stupid or just plain ignorant.

      • GKar

        Republicans like to be asked that’s all: including who the Head of State should be.

  • Bill Lockhart

    I’m thoroughly revelling in the schadenfreude of  reading all these impotent republicans raging against their own futility and irrelevance. There’s no need to tell them that the overwhelming majority simply laugh at them when not ignoring them- they already *know*, as the virtual bile and spittle clearly demonstrate. Bless.

  • MonkeyBot5000

    Finest public servant? I don’t remember her being there when I got appendicitis.

    Whilst she has been benign and appears to have done her best to do a good job, the quality of a temporary head of state doesn’t justify the system that got them there.

    If you truly believe in the monarchy, please try to explain to your children why they (or their children, or their children’s children…) will never be good enough to be head of state. Now matter hard working and talented they are or how incompetent or lazy the Windsor incumbent may be at the time.

    If we have to have a monarch, you couldn’t ask for a better one than the Queen, but hereditary power can’t be justified.

  • http://twitter.com/MatofKilburnia Seditious KilburnMat

    Is this a joke? Millions of real public servants being bullied into poorer conditions if they keep a job at all. People who look after our sick, who help people often in thankless roles and you think Ms. Windsor is our finest public servant? 

    To go from spurting forth what I’m sure are meant to be lofty tales of rubbing shoulders with royalty to then state that democracy is somehow bad because people think politicians don’t understand their lives has broken the ludicrous irony meter. 

    Looks like we need to step up getting rid of the Lords as well. I’m actually a bit ashamed to be in a party with someone who could even contemplate such an anti-equality, anti-merit, pro-prejudice stack of nonsense. Abysmal.

  • ThePurpleBooker

    We had a republic before and it was called the Commonwealth. Look what happen to it.

    • GKar

      Eh? I don’t remember being asked to vote for a President of the Commonwealth? As far as I can remember the Queen was head of the Commonwealth by an accident of birth, no voting required, no questions asked. Are you mental?

  • GKar

    The Queen is a public servant? How will her Majesty’s pension be affected by the Hutton proposals?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZPXYLRVP4XOIGGDJWAL6HUO7U4 David

      In case you haven’t noticed she has continued to work long days on our behalf well into her 80′s.  Her “pension” arrangements are therefore pretty moot.

      • GKar

        Same could be said of Judges or Doctors. And Hutton was gunning for them.

  • Pingback: The contradictions of Labour Royalism |

Latest

  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    The Labour Party have this afternoon suspended the selection process for Falkirk, after concerns were raised about “membership recruitment”. We understand that Ed Miliband was “keen to act swiftly” as the selection process was due to formally begin on Sunday. An officer of the party – yet to be confirmed – will investigate. A Labour spokesperson told us this afternoon: “We have suspended the start of the selection process of the Falkirk parliamentary seat. Concerns have been raised about membership [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Seats and Selections Unions Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    It is interesting to see that the Labour Party is returning to the vexed issue of its parliamentary selection process. The changes may be well and good.  But maybe we should be asking a bigger question – are we  witnessing the end of working class representation in Parliament? When the Labour Party was first founded it was more simple. Then the explicit  aim was to secure working class representation, and specifically organised labour, in Parliament. Inevitably it became more complicated [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    Earlier this week we brought you a decidedly dodgy bar chart from the Tories, but it seems that they’re not the only party in Camden adopting dubious use of bar charts. Step forward Camden Lib Dems, with this classic of the dodgy Lib Dem bar chart genre (courtesy of Theo Blackwell). Even by the pretty shoddy standards of the yellows, this is a corker:   Update: Haringey Lib Dems might want to work on their bar charts  maths too (via [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Modern life is rubbish – We need to put Work and Home at the heart of everything we do

    Modern life is rubbish – We need to put Work and Home at the heart of everything we do

    “Work and home is what One Nation is about – family life, how people live everyday life.” That’s what Jon Cruddas – the man who will in all likelihood write Labour’s next manifesto – told the Guardian the party’s policy review is focused on. And it sounds so simple – doesn’t it? Critics will say it’s too simplistic a definition (and they’d be right – I’m cherry picking here), but it’s also a brilliant example of the distance between most [...]

    Read more →