The curious demise of Francois Bayrou

June 23, 2012 2:08 pm

Eight pm at the close of the second round, and the results are in from the Pyrénées-Atlantiques 2nd.  Nathalie Chabanne, the Socialist Party candidate: 20,090 votes. Francois Bayrou, leader, founder and Presidential standard-bearer for the centrist Democratic Movement: 14,169. That’s like Gordon Brown losing Kirkcaldy. To Sarah Teather.

Where did it all go wrong? Bayrou was born and raised in the constituency. In a hot streak from 1983 to 2007, he won every election he fought in his hometown of Pau, from the local council to the National Assembly. Five years ago, he came within touching distance of a second-placed finish in the first round of the Presidential elections. He was dubbed ‘the Third Man’ of French politics and his new centrist party, the Democratic Movement (“MoDem”, a continuation of an earlier Bayrou creation, the New UDF), looked set to take France by storm.

Bayrou offered the typical centrist cocktail – sound public finances, a measure of social justice, and the need for what he termed the ‘ouverture’ of politics, the destruction of the traditional left-right axis – and, in 2007, French voters found it very congenial indeed. The Parti Socialiste – who hadn’t won a Presidential election since 1988  – looked finished. The task of opposing the right looked to belong to the centre, not a recessional Left. But the financial crisis – and deep-seated opposition  to the reforms of “Sarkozyism” – changed everything. French voters no longer wanted a little from Column A with a little from Column B. They were either for Sarkozyism, or against it.

A resurgent PS made gains across the country in cantonal and mayoral elections, against both the Sarkozyiste UMP and MoDem. Bayrou himself was defeated by the PS in his 2008 bid to become Mayor of Pau: an intimation of political mortality in what used to be his manor. Within a year, MoDem had gone from being the force of tomorrow to a battle for its very survival. The mission for the 2012 election had gone from being ‘break into the top two’ to ‘stem the bleeding’.

In the end, the Presidential election simply confirmed the worst. Bayrou’s vote was almost halved, finishing behind not only Francois Hollande and Nicolas Sarkozy, but the extreme right in the form of Marine Le Pen and the far left in the form of Jean-Luc Mélenchon. He barely scraped a third-placed finish in Pau. Perhaps hoping to leave open the possibility of a future alliance with the Left, perhaps out of genuine opposition to Sarkozy’s attempts to woo Le Pen backers in the second round, Bayrou threw his support behind Hollande. Hollande triumphed, but Bayrou was doomed.

The UMP – which had, for years, stood down its candidate in Pau – were out for Bayrou’s blood. With the PS’s Nathalie Chabanne, a former government official, choosing to remain in the race, Bayrou faced an uphill battle just to finish second.

Bayrou’s defeat means goodbye from him, and goodbye too from MoDem. With the exception of the PS, French political parties exist largely as extensions of their leader’s will. That leaves both the UMP and MoDem facing at best, a period of transition, and at worst, extinction. The new optimism on the Left was summed up by the front-page of the left-leaning daily, Libération, which depicted Francois Hollande in superhero costume, ushering in a new era of Socialist hegemony.

For centrist parties across Europe, the defeat of Bayrou marks a turning of the tide. Bayrou’s third-placed finish in 2007 – at a time when the most-common reaction to a picture of Nick Clegg was ‘here, this Blair impersonator’s a bit rubbish!’ – breathed new life and optimism into centrist circles. The Bayrou triumph, was followed by the German Free Democratic Party’s best-ever result in the 21st Century, and a return to the government after years of opposition. In Britain, ‘the Liberal moment’ ended an eighty-eight year wait from peacetime government. Now, both parties’ ratings are in the basement nationally, and are suffering heavy losses at a local level. For social democratic parties, the weakening of their old centrist opponents would be a cause for celebration, but their replacements are far more sinister. In Germany, outside the corridors of official power, but increasingly prevalent on the streets, the far-right marches. The legislative elections in France marked not just the defeat of MoDem: but the entry into the National Assembly of the Front Nationale.

This Week’s European Talking Points

  • It was the Tweet wot lost it. Former Socialist Presidential candidate and Francois Hollande’s long-time ex Segolene Royal went down to an ignominious defeat in La Rochelle to the independent grassroots candidate, Olivier Falorni. In a scandalous twist, Falorni received an unusual endorsement in the form of a Tweet from Francois Hollande’s current partner, the political journalist Valerie Trierwaller. A comfortable majority for the Socialists in the National Assembly heals all wounds, however, and Hollande may be a little better off for what must surely be the final end for a former political rival.
  • Germany’s buccaneering Pirate Party might be sweeping all before it, gaining seats in regional Parliaments, and likely to be major players nationally after the next election, but their clothing choices have come under fire from parliamentarians. Speaking to the Berlin newspaper BZ, SPD politician Tom Schreiber complained that one Pirate Party politician wore shorts that were “practically underwear”. Schreiber proceeded to lay down a few ground rules for the Pirates: “Please wear long trousers, so that nothing peeks out.”
  • Even with a charismatic new leader, the Dutch Labour Party can’t fix its woes. A new poll shows it trailing both its long-term opponents, the Liberals, and insurgent leftist party, the Socialists, who are neck-and-neck. The Netherlands goes to the polls on September 12th.
  • http://twitter.com/RF_McCarthy Roger McCarthy

     Excellent analysis.

    Paul Mason also looked at the implications of the collapse of the centre here:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17940848

    What is problematic however is our definition of ‘centre’ – both the Lib Dems and the German FDP had effectively become right-wing neoliberal parties well before they entered into coalition with the Tories and the CDU.

    The problem is that our idiot liberal commentariat from St Polly downwards willfully ignored this and continued to spread the lie that the Lib Dems were not just centrist but somehow to the left of Labour.

     

    • http://twitter.com/stephenkb Stephen Bush

      Cheers Roger, and thanks for the Paul Mason link.

      I agree that there are problems in the definition of the European ‘centre;; the mid to late 1980s acceptance of free markets and neoliberal orthodoxy amongst traditional centre parties, coupled with the arrival of Third Way social democrats in the 1990s, meant that the credibility of centre parties became linked with the credibility of markets, while also moving the centre to the right. 
      There’s an added danger, too, to the fact that part of the vote for the likes of Bayrou – less so with the FDP – was always a ‘screw the system’ vote, which is largely going to benefit the extreme right.Thanks, as ever, for reading by the way!

  • Nickywildy

    Rather a weak article from you. Unusually. Modem has neither relevance nor resonance here in France where 2 deputies were elected in the Vendee. The FN did well in Presidential but worse than in 2002. In the legislatives they didn’t do as well as expected. This doesnt mean we can or should ignore them but perhaps the real lesson to be learned is that where socialists are engaged in the life of the community, make alliances and connections with a wide range of people and are not afraid to be socialist yet pragmatic they can succeed.

    • Nickywildy

      Rather a weak article from you. Unusually. Modem has neither relevance nor resonance here in France where 2 deputies were elected in the Vendee. The FN did well in Presidential but worse than in 2002. In the legislatives they didn’t do as well as expected. This doesnt mean we can or should ignore them but perhaps the real lesson to be learned is that where socialists are engaged in the life of the community, make alliances and connections with a wide range of people and are not afraid to be socialist yet pragmatic they can succeed.
      Addendum. Two PS deputies elected in Vendee

      • http://twitter.com/stephenkb Stephen Bush

        Sorry you didn’t enjoy this one as much.  I agree that there is a lot to cheer from the legislatives, but I think that there is an element of ‘screw the system’ to third-party voting that will benefit FN in the long-term. And the success of Marine Le Pen’s detoxification 0f FN is troubling. Not very long ago, we used to claim that the two-round system made FN representation impossible after all.

Latest

  • Comment If Labour is to build One Nation, it must be a safe and equal one for women

    If Labour is to build One Nation, it must be a safe and equal one for women

    Today End Violence Against Women (EVAW) releases a new report auditing the Government’s progress in acting to prevent violence against women and girls. And with the revelations from Operation Yewtree and group exploitation cases set to roll on for many months , we hope the response from Parliament, policy-makers and the media will be unanimous : that prevention must be at the top of the priority list for any government, of any colour, from now on. On that basis, it’s [...]

    Read more →
  • News The theories that will occupy security forces after Woolwich – Media roundup: May 23rd, 2013

    The theories that will occupy security forces after Woolwich – Media roundup: May 23rd, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Woolwich – the theories that will occupy security forces “Counter-terrorism officers and security officials will doubtless fear that Woolwich fits into the category of crime that they can do little to thwart; random, lone-wolf, unsophisticated attacks, conducted by people who are not [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured This week, amid so much fear, hatred and confusion, let us not forget love

    This week, amid so much fear, hatred and confusion, let us not forget love

    Life can come out and shock you. The events of yesterday are unimaginable. The family of the poor victim are in indescribable pain. Those who knew the men who have done these terrible things will also be suffering. They too are victims of this awful crime. Over the next few days and weeks we will see the best and the worst of humanity. As John Lydon once sang, anger is an energy. Well directed anger is healthy. We should be [...]

    Read more →
  • News Ed Miliband statement on Woolwich murder

    Ed Miliband statement on Woolwich murder

    In a statement this evening, Ed Miliband said: “This is a truly appalling murder which will shock the entire country. “All of my thoughts are with the family and friends of the victim. “The British people will be horrified by what has happened in Woolwich. They will be united in believing that this terror on our streets cannot be allowed to stand. “The Labour Party will offer the Government our complete support in establishing the facts of what happened and [...]

    Read more →
  • News Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    With much jubilation, the 3rd reading of the same-sex marriage bill passed the House of Commons last night, carried through on the weight of Labour votes, but how have individual MPs voted on this bill? In the 2nd reading of the equal marriage bill, Labour MP voting totals were: 217 – for 22 – against 14 – non-voters For the third reading 192 – for 14 – against 49 – non-voters —————————————————————- 192 Labour MPs who voted yes on 3rd reading (9 didn’t [...]

    Read more →