Like Thatcher – Ed Miliband is a “Common Ground” politician

October 17, 2012 4:23 pm

Many people are asking, given the austerity drive of this “party of the rich” led government, the effects of which are really going to hammer home come April of next year, whether Ed Miliband can lean to the left when challenging the government now and coming into the next election in 2015?

Whether or not he can, realistically, many commentators now believe he is pitching to the centre-ground; an assumption which has been made after Ed’s focus on “One Nation” during his conference speech earlier this month.

So political wisdom would tell us that Ed clearly sees a gap in the market worth pursuing on the centre, which leads us naturally to ask: where is Cameron situated these days?

Has he got the backs of the Tory left? At a recent event put on by the think tank IPPR, David Skelton of Policy Exchange pointed out that a large part of the so-called class of 2010 (who Cameron presides over) explicitly carry the message of looking to help the poor, those on low-incomes and the blue-collar “strivers”. To paraphrase William Hague, the compassion to reach out to everybody – in a way which characterised Tory One Nationism – is not a bolt-on extra, and exists right at the top of the Conservative party today.

But against this notion, Tim Bale of the University of Sussex, also speaking at the IPPR event, exemplified in his new essay, Whither the Tory Left, the rift between the LibDems and the Tories, that some like Nick Bowles were hoping to avoid, as evidence for the disappearance of the Tories’ left flank – to the extent that the Tories are without anyone to emphasise what unites the coalition parties rather than divides them.

For Bale, Cameron reverted back to (Thatcherite) type after the 2010 economic downturn and the Tory left has never really regained its ground.

So how does Cameron operate around the centre-ground? During the question and answer session at the IPPR Philip Blond, the director of Respublica, explained that the Tories have never won over the centre while pitching to the right. What instead Cameron tries to do today is drag the centre, kicking and screaming, to Thatcherism.

History is not on Cameron’s side here. In trying to spread privilege, as he said in his speech at Tory conference, he is trying to expose the all-important centre point of the electorate to a space it has never tried to occupy. He is not trying to redefine the centre, rather shift it right.

Others take a different view. In light of UKIP gains in popularity, nearing the Liberal Democrats and overtaking them in Wales, Brian Monteith wrote earlier this year that Cameron does not seek to “move this sandbank but sees it as a landing ground to plant his flag.” In other words, the centre for Cameron is the ends, shifting the right towards it will be the means of a majority.

Wiser people than myself, thus, see in Cameron all shades; he is clearly something of a rorschach test. So how is Ed Miliband going to challenge him?

Is One Nation a “land grab”? Is Ed’s pitch to an abandoned conservatism a cynical ploy? I don’t think so. Ed Miliband is practising a set of politics that he has pursued for some time now. He is not playing politics, he is equipped with a noble set of politics that Cameron has been unable to achieve – blamed, in no small part, on the confusion of his brand and the ultimate direction of the Conservative Party.

Once upon a time, civic conservatism was the high ideal of the Conservative Party, as spelled out by David Willetts. But now through the development of conservative (with a small ‘c’) themes, Ed has not simply taken over where the Conservatives were once a force to be reckoned with, but has started to flesh out his brand in areas where the Tories have already failed to deliver.

He has done this by being the Common Ground politician.

How we know Ed isn’t just “land-grabbing” is that the themes he is developing have been long brewing. By talking so movingly about his background during his speech feeds into an empathetic instinct that has been missing in politics for a long time.

As David Clark has recently pointed out, Thatcher, also a common ground politician (hard to imagine in hindsight), used ideas of freedom and individualism to win the support of many traditional Labour voters in the late 1970s. Similarly, Ed brings with him another narrative of social patriotism and egalitarian populism to broaden his appeal in the next election.

The mood music is in full swing, we need solid economic soundings, but Ed is going the right way about winning his masses. Perceived wisdom says you need to woo the centre to win the day, but if Ed can find the common ground, by proving that his, and not Cameron’s, philosophy and vision is substantive, then we can be in a good place to fight the election in 2015.

  • williamtheconker

    I think you’ll find he is Nick BOLES, not Bowles. And surprisingly, for someone whose father was once Director-General of the National Trust, he seems hell-bent on destroying our green and pleasant land by agreeing to industrial development wherever those entrepreneurs want to do it. 
    Ed Miliband’s One Nation toryism is a ‘land-grab’ – but the Tories have a real land-grab in progress.

  • Dave Postles

    ‘By talking so movingly about his background during his speech feeds into
    an empathetic instinct that has been missing in politics for a long
    time.’

    Give over.  Do you really think that his background resonates with the rest of us? 

  • Dave Postles

    ‘By talking so movingly about his background during his speech feeds into
    an empathetic instinct that has been missing in politics for a long
    time.’

    Give over.  Do you really think that his background resonates with the rest of us? 

  • Dave Postles

    ‘By talking so movingly about his background during his speech feeds into
    an empathetic instinct that has been missing in politics for a long
    time.’

    Give over.  Do you really think that his background resonates with the rest of us? 

  • postageincluded

    I wouldn’t want to compare you to a semi-house-trained polecat, Carl, but  Norman Tebbit has been telling the Tories for a year now that Miliband was “tiptoeing onto the Common Ground”, and warning them that they shouldn’t let him get away with it.

    I’m not entirely convinced by this theory (I rather think that winning an election is like writing a best-seller – everyone  can tell you how it was done in the past, but nobody can really tell you how to do it now).  Nevertheless, saying things that the electorate are already thinking can do no harm, and I think that’s what “Ed’s Speech” did, and it’s where Cameron’s  failed

  • Hugh

    He didn’t really talk about his background. Ed’s background: Oxford, TV, policy, Havard, politics. I don’t remember much about that.

Latest

  • News Chris Leslie rules out raising National Insurance to pay for social care

    Chris Leslie rules out raising National Insurance to pay for social care

    The possibility of Labour pledging a specific tax to raise money for NHS spending resurfaced this weekend, with Ed Miliband apparently believing that the NHS is going to be a major issue in 2015. The supposed likely tax rise would be in National Insurance, and this has raised some debate on LabourList this summer, with MP Frank Field supporting the idea, while Andrew Harrop and Adebusuyi Adeyemi have both warned against it. In a revealing interview with Progress magazine, Shadow Chief […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Free School Meals: let’s avoid the sour grapes

    Free School Meals: let’s avoid the sour grapes

    This time last year, the government announced that it would introduce free school meals for all infant school children before the next election. The policy had been endorsed by the School Food Plan commissioned by Gove. It was being championed by the Lib Dems and brought forward so it could be implemented before the 2015 election in what appeared to be a pre-conference deal between the coalition partners. This week 1.5million children in infant schools in England, including my six year […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Weekly survey: Crime commissioners, Douglas Carswell and Labour defections

    Weekly survey: Crime commissioners, Douglas Carswell and Labour defections

    The role of Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) has been in the news lately, with the low turnout at the recent West Midlands by-election and the Rotherham abuse scandal becoming focussed on the refusal to quit by the South Yorkshire PCC Shaun Wright. LabourList reported this weekend that Labour are planning to abolish PCCs after the election next year. Should the role be discontinued? Or is there just a better way of making them work? The defection of Douglas Carswell […]

    Read more →
  • Comment It shouldn’t cost so much to be a candidate

    It shouldn’t cost so much to be a candidate

    I love the Labour party. I enjoy canvassing, I pay my subs, go to the various fundraising dinners and vote in National Executive Committee (NEC) elections. I, like many, hate the constant barrage of ‘please donate’ emails and fear the dreaded fundraising call. And if I feel like that, imagine the dread felt by a candidate when they receive such a call. Don’t believe that happens? Hard to believe as it is, on more than one occasion now I have […]

    Read more →
  • News Jim Murphy resumes “100 streets” referendum tour after nationalist abuse

    Jim Murphy resumes “100 streets” referendum tour after nationalist abuse

    Jim Murphy is resuming his soapbox street meetings tour of Scotland tomorrow, after suspending it last week in the face of increasing co-ordinated abuse by supporters of independence. These protests at Murphy’s open-air meetings came to the attention of the media (and the police) when the Shadow Defence Secretary was hit with eggs last week. In a blog for the Spectator this weekend, Murphy explains how the organised groups go beyond the “normal cut and thrust” of politics that the meetings […]

    Read more →