Today could have been Fare Deal Day…

October 7, 2012 3:22 pm

You might think that there’s nothing particularly special about October 7th.  There are no festivals, no public holidays, nothing of particular note at all.  But this year October 7th is a very special day, because today is Fare Deal Day.

Except, of course, it isn’t.  Had Ken Livingstone won the mayoral election fares across the tube, tram and Overground network would have been slashed by 7%.  On the buses the cut would have been 10%.  It was estimated that the average fare payer would save £1,000 over the four years of the mayoral term.

But Ken didn’t win, and the fares won’t be coming down.  During the election Boris Johnson made a vague pledge to “bear down on fares”.  Yet despite repeated questioning by the London Assembly since his re-election he has been unable to enlighten us as to what this means for fare payers.

Over on his London blog, the Guardian’s Dave Hill has set out how high fares are disadvantaging London and Londoners.  Fares here compare unfavourably with most other major world cities.  Yet the current mayor just doesn’t seem to care.

A major part of Ed Miliband’s conference speech focussed on the need to cut the cost of living through lower fares and cheaper fuel.  If there was a Labour mayor in City Hall rather than a Tory mayor this is exactly what we would be doing now.

The powers of the Mayor of London are relatively limited, but Labour’s manifesto for the London elections demonstrated how creative thinking could deliver workable policies that go beyond the statutory powers of the mayor’s office. Beyond the headline pledge of the Fare Deal, the manifesto set out a raft of policies which would have put money back into the pockets of ordinary Londoners.

First there was a bold pledge to establish an energy co-operative using the buying power of Transport for London to purchase cheap fuel and sell it back to Londoners at a discount.  Then there was the childcare pledge which would have offered grants interest-free loans to cover the upfront costs of childcare in a city with the highest childcare costs in the world.  A London-wide lettings agency would have dealt with some of the rip-off fees charged by commercial lettings agents.  And last but not least a London EMA, which would have helped young people stay in education.

There was no such vision in Boris Johnson’s manifesto, which offered nothing to help ordinary Londoners with the rising cost of living here.  Even the fairly modest promises Johnson made are beginning to unravel as he revealed to the London Assembly last month that one of his headline pledges to maintain police numbers would be “difficult” to fulfil.

That’s not to say that Boris Johnson lacks imagination.  His madcap scheme to build an airport on top of a bird sanctuary and a sunken ship full of unexploded World War II bombs in the Thames Estuary is a testament to the mayor’s mental artistry.  But here in the real world Londoners are crying out for some practical help with the ever-rising cost of living.

Tom Copley is a member of the London Assembly

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    So where would the money come from to pay for the fare cut?

    It might be fair for the fare payers, is it fair for those stepping in to subsidise their fares?

  • JoeDM

    Yet another fine example of  the Cloud-cuckoo land politics of the Labour left.

    • leslie48

      Yes -we the public- have   subsidised the city Banks with billions of tax payer’s money and meanwhile back at the ranch billions of UK tax is ‘ leaking away’ to offshore tax havens like Monaco and Luxenbourg  pocketed by fat cats and rich corporates. To say nothing of all those self-employed avoiding or evading tax especially here in the rich South East. How could we possibly reduce fares in London?

    • leslie48

      Yes -we the public- have   subsidised the city Banks with billions of tax payer’s money and meanwhile back at the ranch billions of UK tax is ‘ leaking away’ to offshore tax havens like Monaco and Luxenbourg  pocketed by fat cats and rich corporates. To say nothing of all those self-employed avoiding or evading tax especially here in the rich South East. How could we possibly reduce fares in London?

    • leslie48

      Yes -we the public- have   subsidised the city Banks with billions of tax payer’s money and meanwhile back at the ranch billions of UK tax is ‘ leaking away’ to offshore tax havens like Monaco and Luxenbourg  pocketed by fat cats and rich corporates. To say nothing of all those self-employed avoiding or evading tax especially here in the rich South East. How could we possibly reduce fares in London?

    • leslie48

      Yes -we the public- have   subsidised the city Banks with billions of tax payer’s money and meanwhile back at the ranch billions of UK tax is ‘ leaking away’ to offshore tax havens like Monaco and Luxenbourg  pocketed by fat cats and rich corporates. To say nothing of all those self-employed avoiding or evading tax especially here in the rich South East. How could we possibly reduce fares in London?

  • leslie48

    Its so important to keep reminding Londoners of these things as the small London Media village including the Evening Standard pin up worship of Johnson is getting so excessive. The most expensive fares in the world , soaring rents for low incomers, rich foreigners rushing to London to   buy up our UK  property , lack of starter homes, segregated social  class education, rising predatory crime spurred on by less youth opportunities… and so on. I would hope anyone outside of the M25 would see Mr B Johnson as the NeoLiberal throwback he is; unfortunately the Tory Tabloids are reaching beyond his patch

  • AlanGiles

    And one of the reasons Livingstone lost, was because he got a good kicking from many of his own side, with all the “open letters” and soul-searching articles, one or two of them written by LL contributors.

    I always said, and will repeat, KL is not my favourite politician, by a long way, but he would have been far better for poorer Londoners than B Johnson, though I doubt that Marchant, Hodges, Akehurst et al would agree. Those gentlemen seemed to feel a Johnson win was a price worth paying.

    • Dave Postles

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbO2_077ixs

  • Pingback: Today could have been Fare Deal Day… | Tom Copley AM - Labour London Assembly Member

  • Chilbaldi

    You miss the fact that the new airport is a popular idea amongst the public, and a better long term solution than Heathrow expansion. Labour would do better to get on board with it.

    As an aside, what are your views on last week’s evening standard article about Will Straw and his wannabe cronies?

    • AlanGiles

      I think for a lot of people, the IDEA of an airport on an island on the Thames is a romantic one, but I doubt the practicalities: for example, even today in our smokeless zones, you can still get heavy mists coming from nowhere, which would result in diversions. In building such an airport there would be a great deal of damage done to wildlife, with many habitats being destroyed. The RSPB have raised concerns over using Cliffe, for example.

      I think probably extending Stanstead would be more viable – the damage has already been done there to some extent.

      I don’t know about Will Straw and his wannabe cronies TBH – usually Straw pere’ bores the life out of me, I don’t much care for the junior one,  for ssimilar reasons, but I’d be interested to hear more about this – is there a link somewhere?.

      During conference season (ALL of them!) I minimize my news import – Cash In The Attic and Bargain Hunt, not to mention Antiques Road Trip make far more interesting viewing!

      • Chilbaldi
        • AlanGiles

           Thanks for the link.

          It seems to be the same few names always whisked up the totem pole. Surprised Jessica Asato didn’t get a name-check too!

          • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

            They seem to be fully formed representatives of the Oxbridge metropolitan elite.

            Wouldn’t it be nice if people such as these expressed their solidarity with ordinary people by refraining from the pursuit of public office until the Labour Party addresses the institutional prejudice against the non-Oxbridge majority.

          • Chilbaldi

            The comments on the standard article are refreshing – at least most of the London public agree.

    • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

      “ a better long term solution ”

      The best long term solution would be to halt all airport expansions. Unless, that is, you’re keen to enjoy the business unfriendly consequences of global warming.

      A study from the Climate Vulnerability Monitor (written by more than 50 scientists, economists and policy experts, and commissioned by 20 governments) reports that climate change caused by global warming is slowing down world economic output by 1.6 percent a year and will lead to a doubling of costs in the next two decades.

Latest

  • Featured Becoming a Living Wage City – an ambition worth having

    Becoming a Living Wage City – an ambition worth having

    A cleaner met me on the corridor the other day as I was leaving the office and gave me a huge hug. “Thank you, City Mayor,” she told me “that’s been the best news for years.” After I had recovered from my embarrassment, I realised what she was talking about. Salford had just introduced the full Living Wage – becoming the first local authority in Greater Manchester to implement a full Living Wage of £7.45 for every member of staff [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    In four weeks time the Chancellor will announce the results of the 2015 spending Review. There won’t be many winners but some will have lost more than others. Political commentators and discussion forums will pass judgement and public sector managers will, yet again, pick through the debris, making do and mending from what ever they can salvage. Before we get overtaken by the detail we should reflect on the bigger picture. What ever the chancellor says on June 26th it [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment A call for action at the G8

    A call for action at the G8

    In less than a month’s time, the UK hosts the G8 Summit. With hunger, tax, trade and transparency all on the agenda, the UK has a unique opportunity to show global leadership on these issues. The scale of hunger is devastating. There is enough food in the world for everyone, yet 1 billion people still go hungry. 2.3 million children every year die from malnutrition – to put that in perspective, that is around 16,000 children every day. Or one [...]

    Read more →
  • News TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run “The TUC along with its international equivalent – the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) – is calling on UEFA to address the appalling treatment of workers and players in Qatar and [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    The Labour Party spends a great deal of time beating itself up over its performance in Southern England. We know it simply isn’t good enough, but we can’t seem to put our finger on why exactly that’s the case. Is it demographics? No. Culture? Perhaps. Lack of basic party organisation in some areas? It’s certainly a factor. But whilst we’re flagellating ourselves over our inability to perform south of the Watford gap (outside of London), we should remember that the [...]

    Read more →