Venezuelans show the way: There is an alternative to austerity

October 9, 2012 4:32 pm

Hat tip to the Venezuelan Electoral Commission for demonstrating beyond doubt that their electronic voting system worked perfectly and in the process giving a lesson in democracy in action to many advanced societies. The CNE delivered a free, fair and completely transparent election. I was privileged to join politicians from a wide political spectrum including Latin American & Spanish Conservatives, internationally recognised academics, representatives of civic society and journalists from many countries across the world as an observer of an almost flawless election and to witness the proceedings at first hand.

In response to those antagonists who claim the election was rigged  I would point them in the direction of none other than Juan Carlos Caldera, a deputy in the National Assembly, newspaper columnist and the senior representative of Henrique Capriles the defeated opposition candidate. Caldera has told visiting parliamentarians and foreign political commentators including myself that while he felt President Chavez was making excessive use of his incumbency for electoral advantage he had “absolutely no doubt that every ballot cast would be respected and honestly tallied to give an accurate result of the intention of the voters.”

To give some background to the uninitiated and at the risk of being labelled a political anorak, the history is that back in 1998 Venezuela passed a law to bring about the total automation of the voting process including the scrutiny and counting of votes in an effort to  impose a free fair and transparent system under the auspices of the independent Venezuelan Electoral Commission, the CNE, which has its own budget, independent management board and a election supervisory force with its own personnel.

The automated system that we saw in action during these Presidential Election has been refined  to incorporate fingerprinting for the first time. The new automated voting machines identify voters’ fingerprints, validates their identities and unlocks the voting machine. The electronic heart of the voting system that allowed the results to be declared accurately so soon after the close of the ballot is housed in an extremely ‘resilient’ earthquake proof building, protected by many layers of physical and electronic security in the centre of Caracas, which I and other international observers also visited.

I was present in the Venezuelan election centre in Caracas with the world’s press, representatives of the political parties and International Observers at the official announcement by CNE President by the redoubtable Tibisay Lucena Ramirez that Hugo Chavez had indeed won an historic fourth term. Although the tension was palpable, the emotion in the room was nothing compared to the celebrations we could hear outside as excited supporters of the PSUV celebrated with fireworks flags and dancing in the streets in a uniquely Latin American style.

In the hours leading up to the close of the polls it was clear there had been a huge turnout. In fact fourteen and a half million Venezuelans voted, or over 80% of the electorate. We visited some of the polling stations in downtown Caracas  en route to the count which stayed open while everyone who was queuing cast their vote, even though the polls officially closed at 6pm local time. As  I witnessed the unprecedented lines of poor people – some old and infirm – but all in good humour, waiting patiently to cast their vote in the heat of the midday sun, I felt quite emotional – but was in no doubt that Chavez, the undisputed champion of the poor and dispossessed, was going to win and win convincingly.

In the hours before the declaration the rumour mill was fuelled by speculation from bogus exit polls published on the internet in the western broadcast media  and by false reports of tanks on the streets led to a suggestion – even by some UK media that Chavez – had in fact lost . Perhaps there were also concerns that Chavez was facing his toughest opponent yet in Henriques Capriles who enjoyed the support of big business as well as almost every national newspaper and commercial TV and radio station, and tacit U.S support to boot. He ran a well funded and slick PR campaign outspending Chavez by three to one had set nerves on edge.

The election result was not just historic for Venezuela or Latin America. Chavez won in 22 out of 24 states including Miranda where Capriles is Governor.  Overall, Chavez won 54% of the vote compared to 44% for Capriles. Chavez was the first of a wave of democratically elected socially progressive centre-left leaders in Latin America. Defeat would have been a disaster for the centre-left in the region, a much coveted scalp for US neo-cons and the repercussions would have been felt across the globe by working people.

Western critics of Chavez some on the left who point to his alliances with states that have dubious records on human rights should look to the long list of despotic regimes that Britain and other western democracies have and continue to support and sell arms to. Many critics are all too willing to forget his substantial achievements for the poorest sections of society in Venezuela.  Progressive social policies which address the ongoing needs of Venezuela’s poor majority have set the pace under Chavez. For example in the past year alone 250,000 new social houses have been built, state pensions made available for all and the minimum wage increased by 30%.  Infant mortality has gone down dramatically from 20 in a 1000 to 13 in a 1000. Unemployment has gone down too from 14.5% to 7.6% on the back of economic growth of 6% that most governments would give their eye teeth for. Let us not forget that and that the number of Venezuelans in extreme poverty has dropped from 23.4% to 8.5%.

Chavez and his Bolivian socialist revolution have made possible huge advancements in the prospects of the poor that to some extent explains the undying loyalty of ordinary Venezuelans to Chavez. In a world ruled by elites where empathy is in short supply poorer Venezuelans identify passionately with Chavez and he with them. There is no denying that Venezuela has its challenges including violent crime, corruption and do not underestimate the destabilising effect of the the unremitting hostility of the United States

With the sound of celebratory fireworks still reverberating and illuminating the night sky of Caracas a day after the election it is the poor people of Venezuela that can savour Hugo  Chavez ‘s victory as one that offers them hope of a better future for themselves their families and their country. Reflecting on the result of what is a deeply significant fourth term for Hugo Chavez and the enactment of his pledge to resist neoliberalism there is no doubt that the people of Venezuela have shown the way to a wider audience of left leaning politicians the world over that there is a popular alternative to austerity. I feel privileged to have witnessed it.

Grahame Morris is Labour MP for Easington and Chair of Labour Friends of Venezuela

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

  • charles.ward

    Amnesty International don’t have quite so rosy a view of the state of democracy in Venezuela.  There is more to a functioning democracy than counting votes accurately.

    • aracataca

      Face up. You might not like it but the Venezuelans clearly want Chavez as their President. Next door in Colombia you get a bullet in the head for being a Trade Unionist or  arguing for social democracy. If we are going to be critical of human rights abuses let’s do it for right and left wing regimes alike.

      • Hugh

         Yes, quite right. I utterly condemn the appalling human rights abuses in Colombia.

        Your turn.

  • Brumanuensis

    I don’t trust electronic voting systems of any ilk, whether used in Ohio or Caracas. I certainly wouldn’t put it past Chavez to resort to fraud, as Charles Ward has noted.

    That said, I do think Chavez continues to enjoy majority popular support, rather like Putin in Russia, which doesn’t automatically mean that electoral malpractice is non-existent.

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      There is wide suspicion that the “systems” for keeping your vote secret are flawed or have some secret code to reveal to the authorities how you voted. I think this is possible with computer software, but it is not something I know much about.  After all, your identity, address and fingerprint identify the individual, and the vote is tagged with that information.  The electronic voting system is administered by the Ministry of the Interior, the same Ministry which runs the Internal Security Vigilance department, which is known to be pro-Chávez.  It must be a matter of total credulity for the observers not to investigate this widely held suspicion.

      My sister knows a number of Venezuelan forced ex-patriates.  I cannot vouch personally for their stories (one is blinded in one eye from a police interrogation, that much is obvious with ocular scarring), but they are consistent.  They have all lost their vote due to being forced ex-patriates, but are also clear that even if they return, they would not vote for fear of being tracked down.

      There is no need for him to cheat on the vote.  He simply allows rumours and suspicion to ensure that many who might vote against him dares not to do so, particularly if they are already on some database of the Ministry of the Interior or have made public statements.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    The visiting observers, who were far from natural Chavistas, said the voting system was exemplary.

    I think some people find it hard to understand how Chavez continues to maintain popularity but the regime has made many advances – and the evidence is that it is the poor who are prepared to stand by him, which I think should cause us to question some of the negativity emerging from the US in particular

    The elites and middle class have never been pro Chavez, but there are active democratic opposition movements and their views are not suppressed in the way Putin suppresses his opponents

    • Hugh

      As Brumanuensis notes above, popular support has no bearing on whether he’s also guilty of human rights abuses. And if you handicap the opposition beforehand by arrests and censorship, it does not make it a fair election just because you then count the votes correctly.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    It is “Bolivarian”, not “Bolivian”.  I would hope that someone who has gone to the trouble of Chairing the Labour Friends of Venezuela has some knowledge of South American politics and knows the difference.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=715486331 Alex Otley

      Clearly just a typo.

Latest

  • Comment Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Monday saw the first day of Committee on the Same Sex Marriage Bill, where it became clear after a three hour debate on how to distinguish Same Sex Marriage from so called “traditional” marriage that opposition to this bill has not gone away. Despite a huge defeat on Second Reading, opponents reheated and repeated their earlier speeches, in part because their arguments rely on belief and prejudice not evidence or fact. So we sat until 11pm debating conscience clauses, Registrars [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Well that was a bad PMQs for Ed Miliband – the second in a row. Perhaps he hasn’t gotten back into his stride after such a long period without the weekly Wednesday joust, but whatever it is, Miliband isn’t hitting his marks at PMQs. Meanwhile Cameron – who has been jousting with world leaders this week – seemed far more o top of his game than we’ve been used to seeing him lately. Alas the problem for Miliband was that [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Last week it was revealed that the government discussed secret plans to hike interest on pre-existing student loans, meaning that anyone with a student loan will be expected to pay far more than expected. Today, the Prime Minister was asked about this – he spoke for nearly a minute but wouldn’t answer the question. What does he have to hide? How much more does he expect graduates to pay?

    Read more →
  • Comment Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Across the industrial north, it is striking how old pit villages and industrial towns are proving far less willing to embrace renewable energy than the noisier, more polluting fossil fuels and industries which shaped their identity. Energy companies are getting a nasty shock after mistakenly believing that these communities would not bat an eyelid at a few wind turbines on the surrounding hills because they had been content to make huge slag heaps part of the landscape in decades past. [...]

    Read more →
  • News Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this (and much more) in your inbox. You can sign up here. Put reckless bankers in jail Britain’s banking bosses should face jail if their decisions force fresh bailouts, the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards says today. The commission’s hotly anticipated report urges the Chancellor, George Osborne, to oversee the [...]

    Read more →