How does Wales fit into One Nation?

November 19, 2012 5:12 pm

Modern Britain is unique: a nation of nations. Wales, Scotland, England and Northern Ireland are proud and distinct parts of our United Kingdom, each with their own traditions and culture, heritage and history, accents, dialects and even languages. But as much as there are things that divide and distinguish these parts of our Kingdom, there are as many, perhaps more, that bind us together, that also make us One Nation.

Common values, cherished institutions and unifying experience – fair play, the NHS or our families’ involvement in the social and economic tumult of the 20th Century, and the wars that scarred it – form a shared, British identity which is tolerant and inclusive, and embraced by the majority of people who live in these isles.

That common British identity is always under challenge and constantly undergoing change: ours is not a country or a culture that likes to stand still. Immigration and globalisation have changed both the face of Britain and our place within the World. Devolution, to Wales and to Scotland, has dramatically altered the nature of our domestic politics, increasing local democracy and accountability in those countries and opening up important debates about the future of The Union or the evolution of English patriotism and new structures that might reflect it.

In Labour we are not frightened of such challenging debate. That is why we have championed the cause of devolution for over a century, and why we delivered it for Wales and Scotland. We welcome it as a sign of the strength of our democracy. And we welcome, too, the positive, proud and outward looking patriotism which has flourished in Wales and Scotland alongside the development of devolution – and which has not descended, as some had feared, into chauvinism or xenophobia.

Nor do we fear that devolution must lead to separation – neither for Wales, nor, indeed, for Scotland. Because in Labour, unlike the Conservatives or Plaid Cymru or the SNP, we hope and believe that we understand modern Britain and the values and identities that bind our people and our countries together. We understand that in modern Britain, most Welshmen and women feel proudly Welsh and proudly British without doubt or fear of contradiction. Similarly, in Scotland, Scottish belonging and British identity sit comfortably, side- by-side, for so many who reject and resent nationalists’ demand that they chose an exclusive allegiance.

These identities ebb and flow, of course, and many of us will feel Scottish or Welsh first and foremost (especially when there’s a rugby or a football involved), but those that wholly reject their identity as part of a bigger Britain are few and far between. Yes, people in Wales and Scotland will have felt an extra stab of pride when watching their countrymen and women excelling at this year’s Olympic and Paralympic Games, but very few will not have felt equally delighted to see Mo Farrah or David Weir break the tape for Great Britain.

That’s, in part, what Ed Miliband meant when he called for a One Nation approach to modern Britain. An approach that respects devolution and the distinctions which it reflects and responds to, but which also recognises the greater strength of our people when we pull together; across classes and countries, faiths and nations.

But respecting devolution does not simply mean defending the status quo. Labour must be bold in responding to and shaping the modern politics of identity, and our commitment to rebuild and strengthen democracy in Britain may well demand further changes to the devolution settlement. In Wales, that will almost certainly mean expanded fiscal autonomy: borrowing powers and Barnett reform. While in Scotland, our party is also listening hard to the Scottish people and leading a debate about how a modern Scotland should realistically relate to the rest of the UK.

In England, too, the question of national identity and the proud patriotism of the English will not recede, nor should we want it to. And one of our future challanges is to reflect its presence in the breast of Englishmen in the structures of the state that serves them. I believe that this, in part, means decentralising our state, to more powerful seats of local government, but it will also require changes at Westminster, which reflect the quasi- federal reality of our modern state. Yet those changes should not weaken our resolve to defend against the break-up of a British state, against those that seek to divide our people, those who insist we cannot prosper in harmony or that a British identity can only erode, and never enhance, those of the constituent countries of Britain.

We will make that stand because we believe that the British people are always stronger when they stand together, especially in the hard economic times and the competitive, global World in which we find ourselves today. Our economy is stronger when Britain pulls together, and our society too. That means collaboration and real respect between the governments in different parts of the UK but it also means a Government in Westminster acting in the interests of all of the people of Britain – not just the vested interest of a few.

The Tory-led coalition has shown that it cannot and will not act in the interests of the many. Tax cuts for millionaires paid for by pensioners, and the prospect of increased inequality through regional pay: those  are the hallmarks of the Coalition which seeks to divide our country between public and private, north and south, privilege and ‘the plebs’.

In Wales, through Carwyn Jones and his Government, Labour is making different choices: investing in jobs for young people, mitigating the police cuts with extra Community Support Officers, working with business to kick start our economy. These policies are delivering a stronger Wales. And that’s what Labour wants to see: A strong Wales, within a strong Great Britain, not the dawinian division of Cameron’s ‘sink-or-swim’ Britain. One Nation Labour will rebuild our economy, reduce inequality and respect devolution. That’s our ambition, we can deliver it together.

Owen Smith is the Shadow Secretary of State for Wales

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • franwhi

    Owen, I can’t speak for Wales but you have a misplaced and idealised view of Labour’s role in Scotland. They are not listening to the Scottish peole as well as they should since most of us in Scotland want devo-max but no one in the party will stand behind that proposition even though it represents the democratic aspiration of the overwhelming number of Scots. Unfortunately the party in Scotland would rather ally itself in the Better Together campaign with the Tory led coalition who as you quite rightly say “cannot and will not act in the interests of the many.”

    As for the idea that wanting more powers of self-determination means choosing an “exclusive allegiance” – I don’t understand that idea. As a Scot I want more powers for my country’s government but like most of my country’s citizens I can desire that and still have a whole range of alliegances to particular people, places and traditions. Political identity is only one part of the story of a person’s identity and only professional politicians find it difficult to acknowledge this. If Scotland or Wales had self-government tomorrow in what way would that diminish a person’s past and present affiliations, heritage, shared experiences and values ? Being outward looking in your values comes from having informed attitudes about the world around you and there’s not much your elected representatives – whether in London, Edinburgh or Cardiff can do about that – There are people with little Englander attitudes everywhere in the UK and surprisingly many of them are in England – so where is the correlation between wanting more powers and narrow chauvinistic nationalism ?

  • http://www.facebook.com/gaf.young Gareth Young

    No proud Englishman should be happy with anything less than an English parliament and government.

  • http://www.englishstandard.org/ Wyrdtimes

    How does England fit into “one nation”? When the English have neither recognition or representation? Ed Miliband saying he’s proud to be English (and British obviously) isn’t good enough – the English deserve the same level of national representation that the other home nations get. We deserve similar levels of funding and services too. But even now not one of the establishment parties can even be honest enough to mention the E word when talking about specifically English matters.

  • th43

    Owen, you fail to mention the West Lothian Question.

    Is this because Labour’s answer to the question continues to be “don’t ask it”?

    You do however continue to push for regionalisation in England, despite it being soundly rejected.

    Is this because Labour’s policy to English governance continues to be “don’t listen”?

Latest

  • Comment Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Cutting Trident will be the price of support in a hung parliament. That’s the news reported from a meeting of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green leaders this week. With Labour’s slim lead and the SNP and Green vote threatening to impact on its share, this is a serious issue. Labour’s policy clearly states, ‘Labour has said that we are committed to a minimum, credible independent nuclear deterrent, delivered through a Continuous At-Sea Deterrent. It would require a clear body […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Lord Ashcroft has told him he shouldn’t have done it in 2010. Lynton Crosby has told him not to do it in 2015. It’s no surprise that David Cameron is trying to wriggle out of televised leader debates during the General Election – even though he has said he is willing to take part “in principle”. Time perhaps to dust off one of Margaret Thatcher’s favourite barbs “He’s frit.” Neil Kinnock tried it in 1992 to try to goad John Major into […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    By Stephen Timms MP and Ian Murray MP The Christmas period reminds us that modern life can be busy, hurried and demanding. The pressures of work, demands of family life and hectic Christmas schedules can prove stretching as we juggle competing demands. Increasingly the need for flexible work is driven by the complex shape of people’s lives; as parents go to work, struggle to make ends meet, perform career roles, take their children to school and activities and try and carve […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    As the start of the long campaign begins today, curbing the amount of money parties can spend between now and May 7th, Labour MP Jon Ashworth has sought to clarify what precautions are being taken to ensure publicly-funded government advisers are not using their time campaigning. Ashworth has sent a letter to senior civil servant Jeremy Heywood, asking him to answer a number of questions about what kind of campaigning activity was permitted and undertaken by special advisers (SpAds) in […]

    Read more →
  • News Berger asks Twitter to do more to stop use of racist words

    Berger asks Twitter to do more to stop use of racist words

    Luciana Berger, Shadow Minister for Public Health, has called on Twitter to do more the stop racist terms being used on the site. Berger has herself faced a large amount of anti-semitic abuse on the site, and in October Garron Helm  was jailed for sending her a torrent of anti-semitic messages. Berger told the Telegraph (£): “At the height of the abuse, the police said I was the subject of 2,500 hate messages in the space of three days using […]

    Read more →