Thatcher worship offers diminishing returns for Ed

November 19, 2012 3:45 pm

British politics is so tribal that it still has novelty value to say anything positive about a leader of another party – and doubly so when that person happens to be Margaret Thatcher.

Ed Miliband is set to do just that in a Radio four profile about his leadership tonight entitled: ‘What Does Ed Miliband Really Think?’ As Mark posted this morning, Ed is set to say of La Thatch:

“She was a conviction politician and I think conviction really matters. I think that in the 1970s, it was a similar moment, and that is the biggest parallel. It was a similar moment in the sense that a sense of the old order was crumbling and it wasn’t 100 per cent clear what was going to replace it…”

To be fair to Ed he seems to draw the comparison narrowly, admiring her style rather than her policies:

“The challenge of the future is who can rise to the scale of challenge that the country faces and who can create a project for how this country’s going to be run that is genuinely going to make our economy work, not just for a few people but much more widely.”

It’s become something of a rights-of-passage for Labour leaders to draw favourable comparisons with Margaret Thatcher in a bid to assert their suitability to follow her into Number Ten.

Tony Blair first hit upon the idea of praising her as a way of helping court the right-wing press, while the predictable anger from within the party and unions helped portray him to floating voters as a ‘different’ kind of Labour leader.

Gordon Brown then bent his knee to the Iron Lady, inviting her to tea at Downing Street and posed with her on the steps outside. He even offered to give her a state funeral (not at the same meeting, it is worth pointing out).

Now it is Ed Miliband’s turn.

There are two main reasons why the Thatcher comparison is deemed to have some value. The first, and most obvious, is that rather a lot of people voted for her in 1979, 1983 and 1987 and it would be nice if they instead voted Labour. Drawing comparisons with their heroine is thought to be smart politics, offering voters a rhetorical bridge to walk across.

The second reason is that Thatcher is invariably described as a ‘conviction politician’ and a ‘strong leader’. Qualities most leaders would want others to say they possessed. Yes, she was both, but she was also cruel, reckless and divisive. If he must draw parallels with Conservative figures for definition, then Ed would be better off sticking with the tradition of One Nation leaders like Disraeli and MacMillan.

In fact, the drawbacks of Maggie-love now outweigh their benefits.

Making comparisons with Thatcher’s strength and conviction implies there are no Labour figures for whom the same epithets equally apply. That clearly is not the case (although it is a moot point whether a comparison with Blair or Brown would generate even more controversy).

Finally, to have actually voted for Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister you need to be at least 42 years old. The law of diminishing returns surely means that Thatcher has less and less cache every time her name is invoked. Daring when Blair did it, the trick now seems perfunctory.

Rather than continuing the dubious tradition of Labour leaders genuflecting before this false idol, the challenge for Ed is to eschew comparisons with her style and actually emulate her record by coming up with a defining set of policies that will ratchet British politics in a new direction and set the terms of political debate for a generation.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001116515833 Michael Carey

    I think this misses the point of Ed making the comparison. The way I read it was that Thatcher was a ground-shifting politician in a way that no PM has been since, just like Ed would like to be- shifting the ground *away* from the Thatcherite settlement.

  • Serbitar

    Thatcher is very elderly, impaired and frail these days… so Ed had better arrange to genuflect to the Blue Baroness and enjoy the customary associated photo opportunity as soon as possible… if you see what I mean… just like former “Labour” leaders Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, who, rumour has it, were the Lady’s own illegitimate political sons (and couple of right bleeding ones they were at that)!

    What that makes Ed Miliband is anybody’s guess.

    (My guess would be a patsy.)

  • Dave Postles

    Is there some competition on 19 November for who can utter the most garbage? First, we have Cameron with nonsense about judicial reviews, now Miliband on obduracy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1369047172 David Clayton

    Thatcher supporting is not avery bright move if you want Labour to do well in the North of England or Scotland. The gormless metropolitan elite dominating the party demonstrate their ineptitude in following this path. What is the point of a ‘one nation’ Thatcher worshipping Labour Party? Too daft to laugh at.

  • uglyfatbloke

    Conviction? There’s a lot of politicians who should have convictions….for dodgy wars and stealing money for a start..

    Ed’s just eager to get a cheery word in the Daily Mail and this is one of the easy ways of going about it. He might also try attacking poor people and foreigners, promising to throw money at Trident, persecuting cannabis, confusing the EU with the ECHR and complaining about them,…and of course voicing his support for keeping the house of Lords as a retirement home for failed politicians and for preventing a democratic electoral system.

  • David B

    I take it as a realisation that she was right!

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘redistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘redistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    I have a bad feeling and hope very much I’m wrong in my suspicions. (I am often wrong. Just over a year ago I honestly felt that some in Labour would jump at a chance of joining a national government. Maybe the scare that Progress got from the unions was enough to change a few minds. Who knows? It could just be I’m not a very trustful person.)

    Today it must be very tempting to Labour’s leaders that as sections of the Tories drag Cameron further to the right they see that they could take a sidestep also to the right and occupy the ‘centre’ ground being deserted by the government. As tempting as this is it would be a terrible mistake on Ed Miliband’s part.

    Cameron and Clegg claimed the mantle of Blair along with David Miliband, but David lost the leadership contest because the membership didn’t want another Blair. It was a cry to get back to some principled politics that has been missing for so long. Sure Labour could replace the Tories on the centre-right if Cameron caves into his rebels, but remember Cameron couldn’t win a majority on that platform.

    Ed should have a long look at PASOK and learn some lessons from the Greeks on when it’s the right time to part from past economic solutions.

Latest

  • Comment Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Cutting Trident will be the price of support in a hung parliament. That’s the news reported from a meeting of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green leaders this week. With Labour’s slim lead and the SNP and Green vote threatening to impact on its share, this is a serious issue. Labour’s policy clearly states, ‘Labour has said that we are committed to a minimum, credible independent nuclear deterrent, delivered through a Continuous At-Sea Deterrent. It would require a clear body […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Lord Ashcroft has told him he shouldn’t have done it in 2010. Lynton Crosby has told him not to do it in 2015. It’s no surprise that David Cameron is trying to wriggle out of televised leader debates during the General Election – even though he has said he is willing to take part “in principle”. Time perhaps to dust off one of Margaret Thatcher’s favourite barbs “He’s frit.” Neil Kinnock tried it in 1992 to try to goad John Major into […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    By Stephen Timms MP and Ian Murray MP The Christmas period reminds us that modern life can be busy, hurried and demanding. The pressures of work, demands of family life and hectic Christmas schedules can prove stretching as we juggle competing demands. Increasingly the need for flexible work is driven by the complex shape of people’s lives; as parents go to work, struggle to make ends meet, perform career roles, take their children to school and activities and try and carve […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    As the start of the long campaign begins today, curbing the amount of money parties can spend between now and May 7th, Labour MP Jon Ashworth has sought to clarify what precautions are being taken to ensure publicly-funded government advisers are not using their time campaigning. Ashworth has sent a letter to senior civil servant Jeremy Heywood, asking him to answer a number of questions about what kind of campaigning activity was permitted and undertaken by special advisers (SpAds) in […]

    Read more →
  • News Berger asks Twitter to do more to stop use of racist words

    Berger asks Twitter to do more to stop use of racist words

    Luciana Berger, Shadow Minister for Public Health, has called on Twitter to do more the stop racist terms being used on the site. Berger has herself faced a large amount of anti-semitic abuse on the site, and in October Garron Helm  was jailed for sending her a torrent of anti-semitic messages. Berger told the Telegraph (£): “At the height of the abuse, the police said I was the subject of 2,500 hate messages in the space of three days using […]

    Read more →