Thatcher worship offers diminishing returns for Ed

November 19, 2012 3:45 pm

British politics is so tribal that it still has novelty value to say anything positive about a leader of another party – and doubly so when that person happens to be Margaret Thatcher.

Ed Miliband is set to do just that in a Radio four profile about his leadership tonight entitled: ‘What Does Ed Miliband Really Think?’ As Mark posted this morning, Ed is set to say of La Thatch:

“She was a conviction politician and I think conviction really matters. I think that in the 1970s, it was a similar moment, and that is the biggest parallel. It was a similar moment in the sense that a sense of the old order was crumbling and it wasn’t 100 per cent clear what was going to replace it…”

To be fair to Ed he seems to draw the comparison narrowly, admiring her style rather than her policies:

“The challenge of the future is who can rise to the scale of challenge that the country faces and who can create a project for how this country’s going to be run that is genuinely going to make our economy work, not just for a few people but much more widely.”

It’s become something of a rights-of-passage for Labour leaders to draw favourable comparisons with Margaret Thatcher in a bid to assert their suitability to follow her into Number Ten.

Tony Blair first hit upon the idea of praising her as a way of helping court the right-wing press, while the predictable anger from within the party and unions helped portray him to floating voters as a ‘different’ kind of Labour leader.

Gordon Brown then bent his knee to the Iron Lady, inviting her to tea at Downing Street and posed with her on the steps outside. He even offered to give her a state funeral (not at the same meeting, it is worth pointing out).

Now it is Ed Miliband’s turn.

There are two main reasons why the Thatcher comparison is deemed to have some value. The first, and most obvious, is that rather a lot of people voted for her in 1979, 1983 and 1987 and it would be nice if they instead voted Labour. Drawing comparisons with their heroine is thought to be smart politics, offering voters a rhetorical bridge to walk across.

The second reason is that Thatcher is invariably described as a ‘conviction politician’ and a ‘strong leader’. Qualities most leaders would want others to say they possessed. Yes, she was both, but she was also cruel, reckless and divisive. If he must draw parallels with Conservative figures for definition, then Ed would be better off sticking with the tradition of One Nation leaders like Disraeli and MacMillan.

In fact, the drawbacks of Maggie-love now outweigh their benefits.

Making comparisons with Thatcher’s strength and conviction implies there are no Labour figures for whom the same epithets equally apply. That clearly is not the case (although it is a moot point whether a comparison with Blair or Brown would generate even more controversy).

Finally, to have actually voted for Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister you need to be at least 42 years old. The law of diminishing returns surely means that Thatcher has less and less cache every time her name is invoked. Daring when Blair did it, the trick now seems perfunctory.

Rather than continuing the dubious tradition of Labour leaders genuflecting before this false idol, the challenge for Ed is to eschew comparisons with her style and actually emulate her record by coming up with a defining set of policies that will ratchet British politics in a new direction and set the terms of political debate for a generation.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001116515833 Michael Carey

    I think this misses the point of Ed making the comparison. The way I read it was that Thatcher was a ground-shifting politician in a way that no PM has been since, just like Ed would like to be- shifting the ground *away* from the Thatcherite settlement.

  • Serbitar

    Thatcher is very elderly, impaired and frail these days… so Ed had better arrange to genuflect to the Blue Baroness and enjoy the customary associated photo opportunity as soon as possible… if you see what I mean… just like former “Labour” leaders Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, who, rumour has it, were the Lady’s own illegitimate political sons (and couple of right bleeding ones they were at that)!

    What that makes Ed Miliband is anybody’s guess.

    (My guess would be a patsy.)

  • Dave Postles

    Is there some competition on 19 November for who can utter the most garbage? First, we have Cameron with nonsense about judicial reviews, now Miliband on obduracy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1369047172 David Clayton

    Thatcher supporting is not avery bright move if you want Labour to do well in the North of England or Scotland. The gormless metropolitan elite dominating the party demonstrate their ineptitude in following this path. What is the point of a ‘one nation’ Thatcher worshipping Labour Party? Too daft to laugh at.

  • uglyfatbloke

    Conviction? There’s a lot of politicians who should have convictions….for dodgy wars and stealing money for a start..

    Ed’s just eager to get a cheery word in the Daily Mail and this is one of the easy ways of going about it. He might also try attacking poor people and foreigners, promising to throw money at Trident, persecuting cannabis, confusing the EU with the ECHR and complaining about them,…and of course voicing his support for keeping the house of Lords as a retirement home for failed politicians and for preventing a democratic electoral system.

  • David B

    I take it as a realisation that she was right!

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘redistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘redistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    I have a bad feeling and hope very much I’m wrong in my suspicions. (I am often wrong. Just over a year ago I honestly felt that some in Labour would jump at a chance of joining a national government. Maybe the scare that Progress got from the unions was enough to change a few minds. Who knows? It could just be I’m not a very trustful person.)

    Today it must be very tempting to Labour’s leaders that as sections of the Tories drag Cameron further to the right they see that they could take a sidestep also to the right and occupy the ‘centre’ ground being deserted by the government. As tempting as this is it would be a terrible mistake on Ed Miliband’s part.

    Cameron and Clegg claimed the mantle of Blair along with David Miliband, but David lost the leadership contest because the membership didn’t want another Blair. It was a cry to get back to some principled politics that has been missing for so long. Sure Labour could replace the Tories on the centre-right if Cameron caves into his rebels, but remember Cameron couldn’t win a majority on that platform.

    Ed should have a long look at PASOK and learn some lessons from the Greeks on when it’s the right time to part from past economic solutions.

Latest

  • News Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Labour have spoken out about complaints that Fiona Woolf QC, head of the public inquiry into historical sex abuse, has links with Leon Brittan. Brittan was the home secretary at the time when the dossier about alleged pedophiles went missing. And Woolf, who is also Lord Mayor of London, admitted yesterday that since 2008 she had dinner with Brittan and his family on five separate occasions but she has said she has “no close association” with him. A number of Labour MPs […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    Here we are again. Another week, another Wednesday, and another wrangle between Cameron and Miliband about the NHS. This is getting a bit old. Cameron attempted to get Miliband on the back foot – he kicked off PMQs by posing questions to the Labour leader about the Welsh NHS. Rather predictably, the rest of PMQs descended into the two party leaders arguing about who can be more trusted with the NHS. But, there was something a little more sinister about […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    A couple of weeks ago saw the UK elect for the first time a UKIP MP – Douglas Carswell, with a huge majority of 12,000 votes. UKIP made enormous strides in the safe Labour seat of Heywood & Middleton as well, reducing the Labour majority from 5,971 to 617. This rise in the ‘acceptable’ far right should be a cause of concern not just to the Tories but also to us. It is clear from these results there is no […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    The result in Heywood and Middleton may have shocked some people, but not all. Some warned this could happen after UKIP took or seriously challenged safe council seats in the north, topped the national vote at the Euros, and polled strongly in Labour areas. Their highest average share of the vote in the 2014 elections came in Labour areas like Rotherham, Mansfield and Hartlepool. We’re told if we campaign on the “issues” people will come back to Labour. This fails […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Last night Young Labour voted on whether or not to come out in support of the free education demonstration set to take place on the 19th November. Reports suggest, they voted against the motion. This result could easily be interpreted as another sign that the argument against tuition fees is dead in the water. In reality, it tells us that opposite is true. The very fact that this was a topic for discussion at Young Labour’s national committee, that there […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y