Thatcher worship offers diminishing returns for Ed

November 19, 2012 3:45 pm

British politics is so tribal that it still has novelty value to say anything positive about a leader of another party – and doubly so when that person happens to be Margaret Thatcher.

Ed Miliband is set to do just that in a Radio four profile about his leadership tonight entitled: ‘What Does Ed Miliband Really Think?’ As Mark posted this morning, Ed is set to say of La Thatch:

“She was a conviction politician and I think conviction really matters. I think that in the 1970s, it was a similar moment, and that is the biggest parallel. It was a similar moment in the sense that a sense of the old order was crumbling and it wasn’t 100 per cent clear what was going to replace it…”

To be fair to Ed he seems to draw the comparison narrowly, admiring her style rather than her policies:

“The challenge of the future is who can rise to the scale of challenge that the country faces and who can create a project for how this country’s going to be run that is genuinely going to make our economy work, not just for a few people but much more widely.”

It’s become something of a rights-of-passage for Labour leaders to draw favourable comparisons with Margaret Thatcher in a bid to assert their suitability to follow her into Number Ten.

Tony Blair first hit upon the idea of praising her as a way of helping court the right-wing press, while the predictable anger from within the party and unions helped portray him to floating voters as a ‘different’ kind of Labour leader.

Gordon Brown then bent his knee to the Iron Lady, inviting her to tea at Downing Street and posed with her on the steps outside. He even offered to give her a state funeral (not at the same meeting, it is worth pointing out).

Now it is Ed Miliband’s turn.

There are two main reasons why the Thatcher comparison is deemed to have some value. The first, and most obvious, is that rather a lot of people voted for her in 1979, 1983 and 1987 and it would be nice if they instead voted Labour. Drawing comparisons with their heroine is thought to be smart politics, offering voters a rhetorical bridge to walk across.

The second reason is that Thatcher is invariably described as a ‘conviction politician’ and a ‘strong leader’. Qualities most leaders would want others to say they possessed. Yes, she was both, but she was also cruel, reckless and divisive. If he must draw parallels with Conservative figures for definition, then Ed would be better off sticking with the tradition of One Nation leaders like Disraeli and MacMillan.

In fact, the drawbacks of Maggie-love now outweigh their benefits.

Making comparisons with Thatcher’s strength and conviction implies there are no Labour figures for whom the same epithets equally apply. That clearly is not the case (although it is a moot point whether a comparison with Blair or Brown would generate even more controversy).

Finally, to have actually voted for Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister you need to be at least 42 years old. The law of diminishing returns surely means that Thatcher has less and less cache every time her name is invoked. Daring when Blair did it, the trick now seems perfunctory.

Rather than continuing the dubious tradition of Labour leaders genuflecting before this false idol, the challenge for Ed is to eschew comparisons with her style and actually emulate her record by coming up with a defining set of policies that will ratchet British politics in a new direction and set the terms of political debate for a generation.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001116515833 Michael Carey

    I think this misses the point of Ed making the comparison. The way I read it was that Thatcher was a ground-shifting politician in a way that no PM has been since, just like Ed would like to be- shifting the ground *away* from the Thatcherite settlement.

  • Serbitar

    Thatcher is very elderly, impaired and frail these days… so Ed had better arrange to genuflect to the Blue Baroness and enjoy the customary associated photo opportunity as soon as possible… if you see what I mean… just like former “Labour” leaders Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, who, rumour has it, were the Lady’s own illegitimate political sons (and couple of right bleeding ones they were at that)!

    What that makes Ed Miliband is anybody’s guess.

    (My guess would be a patsy.)

  • Dave Postles

    Is there some competition on 19 November for who can utter the most garbage? First, we have Cameron with nonsense about judicial reviews, now Miliband on obduracy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1369047172 David Clayton

    Thatcher supporting is not avery bright move if you want Labour to do well in the North of England or Scotland. The gormless metropolitan elite dominating the party demonstrate their ineptitude in following this path. What is the point of a ‘one nation’ Thatcher worshipping Labour Party? Too daft to laugh at.

  • uglyfatbloke

    Conviction? There’s a lot of politicians who should have convictions….for dodgy wars and stealing money for a start..

    Ed’s just eager to get a cheery word in the Daily Mail and this is one of the easy ways of going about it. He might also try attacking poor people and foreigners, promising to throw money at Trident, persecuting cannabis, confusing the EU with the ECHR and complaining about them,…and of course voicing his support for keeping the house of Lords as a retirement home for failed politicians and for preventing a democratic electoral system.

  • David B

    I take it as a realisation that she was right!

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘redistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘redistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    Well said Kevin. I suspect this latest Ed Miliband’s idea came from the same bag carrier who thought ‘predistribution’ would sound good.

  • Daniel Speight

    I have a bad feeling and hope very much I’m wrong in my suspicions. (I am often wrong. Just over a year ago I honestly felt that some in Labour would jump at a chance of joining a national government. Maybe the scare that Progress got from the unions was enough to change a few minds. Who knows? It could just be I’m not a very trustful person.)

    Today it must be very tempting to Labour’s leaders that as sections of the Tories drag Cameron further to the right they see that they could take a sidestep also to the right and occupy the ‘centre’ ground being deserted by the government. As tempting as this is it would be a terrible mistake on Ed Miliband’s part.

    Cameron and Clegg claimed the mantle of Blair along with David Miliband, but David lost the leadership contest because the membership didn’t want another Blair. It was a cry to get back to some principled politics that has been missing for so long. Sure Labour could replace the Tories on the centre-right if Cameron caves into his rebels, but remember Cameron couldn’t win a majority on that platform.

    Ed should have a long look at PASOK and learn some lessons from the Greeks on when it’s the right time to part from past economic solutions.

Latest

  • Featured 5 thing I’ve learned at Tory conference (so far)

    5 thing I’ve learned at Tory conference (so far)

    I’m almost 24 hours in to my first Tory conference, which is a strange experience for a Labour-supporting blogger. It’s a little like being a Cold War era spy (blending into the background, nodding a lot at things you don’t understand), except the Tory Party know I’m here and I’m wearing a big name badge that says “LabourList”. Here are five things I’ve learned so far: 1. Cheery resignation: If last week’s Labour conference was a bit flat, this week’s […]

    Read more →
  • Featured How the Labour leadership misunderstand two of their biggest problems

    How the Labour leadership misunderstand two of their biggest problems

    Even before Ed Miliband entered the stage last Tuesday afternoon to give his conference speech, a few of us knew there would be no big surprise. A source close to the leader had earlier told a group of assembled journalists and activists that they wanted to focus on the “big six” national goals, not a surprise that would grab all the attention. Understandably, the assembled audience came out disappointed. The media, who needed a fresh story since the six goals […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Affordable housing not fox hunting

    Affordable housing not fox hunting

    Attending my first Labour Conference as a Parliamentary Candidate (PPC) was always going to be an interesting experience. And whilst Conference was rightly focusing on the strategy to win our all important key seats in seven months time, both the fringe events and policy announcements showed that there is now a clear policy platform to allow us to take our One Nation Labour Party to the doorsteps of even the most challenging seats. Having been selected for a ‘safe’ Tory […]

    Read more →
  • News TSSA union members vote to keep poitical fund

    TSSA union members vote to keep poitical fund

    Members of the Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association (TSSA) trade union have voted to keep their political fund, which goes towards campaigning for policies to help their members, as well as reaffirming their links to the Labour Party. Unions have been required to ballot members on whether they want to keep their political fund every ten years ever since the Tories brought through the legislation in the 1980s – and since then there have been no high profile cases of members voting […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour and the rise of the machines

    Labour and the rise of the machines

    Technology is already transforming our homes in ways we could not have dreamed of only a few years ago, and these same technologies are altering how we work and interact. The impact of the automation of jobs and mechanisation has created increasing uncertainty surrounding the employment prospects of white-collar workers previously immune to such problems. At conference, Ed Balls was right to say that “across the developed world, rapid technological change is replacing traditional skilled jobs too – in banking […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y