Some things George Osborne has said about the AAA credit rating

December 14, 2012 10:09 am

It looks increasingly likely that Britain will lose its AAA credit rating, with Standard & Poor’s putting Britain’s credit rating on negative outlook. When asked about this yesterday, George Osborne said “It wouldn’t be a good thing. But it’s one test, alongside others” – but that’s not what he’s said in the past.

Here are some things that George Osborne has said about the UK’s credit rating in the past:

1. When Britain was first put on negative outlook by Standard and Poor’s in 2009 George Osborne (then in opposition) called for an early general election:

“It’s now clear that Britain’s economic reputation is on the line at the next general election, another reason for bringing the date forward and having that election now… For the first time since these ratings began in 1978, the outlook for British debt has been downgraded from stable to negative.”

2. In May last year George Osborne claimed that moving off negative outlook proved that Britain had “economic stability”:

“Our credit rating had been put on negative watch. Now, however, thanks to the policies of this coalition Government, Britain has economic stability again.”

3. George Osborne has said safeguarding the rating was his “first benchmark” and a “measure of success”. He has also warned that a credit rating downgrade would be “humiliating” and that it is “absolutely essential” that Britain does not have one:

“Our first benchmark is to cut the deficit more quickly to safeguard Britain’s credit rating. I know that we are taking a political gamble to set this up as a measure of success. Protecting the credit rating will not be easy… The pace of fiscal consolidation will be co-ordinated with monetary policy. And we will protect Britain’s credit rating and international reputation.” - 2 February 2010

“I have argued it with my opponents in difficult economic times, when I warned them last autumn that the cupboard was bare and the discretionary borrowing had to stop – and now Britain faces the humiliating possibility of losing its international credit rating.” – 11 August 2009

“Of course the British government needs to be able to get its debt away, and by the way it’s not just in the City, you need to get it away around the world and that’s where a lot of international investors in British, in gilts, and indeed, as I’ve talked about actually in the Times today, you know, one of the things I’m very keen on doing, and that’s putting it mildly, is to preserve Britain’s international credit rating. You know it’s absolutely essential we don’t have the downgrade that hangs over the country at the moment.” – 8 October 2009

“What investor is going to come to the UK when they fear a downgrade of our credit-rating and a collapse of confidence?” – 27 February 2010

This is all going to look pretty embarrassing if/when Britain loses the AAA rating…

  • http://www.facebook.com/jim.crowder2 Jim Crowder

    So, are you in favour of trying to keep it, or do you believe that it doesn’t matter?

    • aracataca

      Well Boy George, Lord Snooty and friends certainly don’t think it matters.

    • Dave Postles

      Your question is meaningless as a downgrade is almost inevitable in 2013.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Daniel-Smith/516168738 Daniel Smith

    More heads than Cerberus with a headache.

  • Jeremy_Preece

    The UK AAA credit rating, we were told, was the whole justification
    for the extreme austerity and for carrying out a whole raft of policies that
    would normally be considered unacceptable. It was for the preservation of the
    credit rating that the national debt had to be brought down as priority one and
    it was also why the on-going deficit had to be reduced and eliminated by
    cutting to the bone and beyond.

    To coolly state that it is not such a big deal after all, when his own austerity policy has failed so badly by the standards he set himself is just indefensible. It bankrupts this government’s whole credibility. It leaves Osborne and Cameron hanging on the very rope that they created.

    Am I surprised at this double standard? No. We have repeated been told that there is no money, and so in this state of national emergency we must accept things that would never normally even be considered. In short, services have to be cut, the public sector destroyed and the poorest especially have to be squeezed dry.

    Then when Cameron wants to wreck the NHS there the £30 billion cost is no object, the hare-brained PCC position and half-baked elections are fine to throw away the odd £100 million. We don’t need the money of the very rich (Tories and their pals) and so give them a rebate, and of course the cock-ups like the rail franchising may cost another £100 million or more. Bit of course if it is a Tory pet project then somehow that is all fine and dandy.

    This government deserves to be annihilated. The big fly in the ointment is that Labour is still only 10 or so points ahead mid-term. With this kind of performance we should be 20 to 25 points ahead.
    Labour has a long way to go, and it must do it as this government contains most
    of the seeds of its own destruction.

    • aracataca

      Great post JP my thoughts exactly.

    • aracataca

      Great post JP my thoughts exactly.

    • aracataca

      Great post JP my thoughts exactly.

    • aracataca

      Great post JP my thoughts exactly.

    • aracataca

      Great post JP my thoughts exactly.

    • aracataca

      Great post JP my thoughts exactly.

  • Jeremy_Preece

    The UK AAA credit rating, we were told, was the whole justification
    for the extreme austerity and for carrying out a whole raft of policies that
    would normally be considered unacceptable. It was for the preservation of the
    credit rating that the national debt had to be brought down as priority one and
    it was also why the on-going deficit had to be reduced and eliminated by
    cutting to the bone and beyond.

    To coolly state that it is not such a big deal after all, when his own austerity policy has failed so badly by the standards he set himself is just indefensible. It bankrupts this government’s whole credibility. It leaves Osborne and Cameron hanging on the very rope that they created.

    Am I surprised at this double standard? No. We have repeated been told that there is no money, and so in this state of national emergency we must accept things that would never normally even be considered. In short, services have to be cut, the public sector destroyed and the poorest especially have to be squeezed dry.

    Then when Cameron wants to wreck the NHS there the £30 billion cost is no object, the hare-brained PCC position and half-baked elections are fine to throw away the odd £100 million. We don’t need the money of the very rich (Tories and their pals) and so give them a rebate, and of course the cock-ups like the rail franchising may cost another £100 million or more. Bit of course if it is a Tory pet project then somehow that is all fine and dandy.

    This government deserves to be annihilated. The big fly in the ointment is that Labour is still only 10 or so points ahead mid-term. With this kind of performance we should be 20 to 25 points ahead.
    Labour has a long way to go, and it must do it as this government contains most
    of the seeds of its own destruction.

  • aracataca

    The loss of the AAA credit rating is definitely going to happen- no question.Borrowing is rising again because the economy is contracting not growing. However, Lord Snooty and co couldn’t care less because its Christmas every day for their tax avoiding mates. Unless this lot change course and focus exclusively on growth the rest of us will all be up the creek without a paddle come 2015.

  • Pingback: Cameron’s trouble with basic economics | Labour Mag

Latest

  • Featured Is the Labour Party campaigning hard enough for the European elections?

    Is the Labour Party campaigning hard enough for the European elections?

    In a week that supposedly signalled an end of the Cost of Living Crisis as wages begin to rise faster than inflation, Ed Miliband and Ed Balls will feel vindicated to learn that as far as LabourList readers are concerned, at least, it’s not over yet. An overwhelming 94% of those who responded to our survey this week believe the Cost of Living Crisis continues. That will certainly give new strategist David Axelrod something to work with, if activists are convinced […]

    Read more →
  • News Anyone for an Easter (Cl)Egg?

    Anyone for an Easter (Cl)Egg?

    The Mirror today have a story about a Labour attack on Nick Clegg – a chocolate “Easter Clegg”. It’s ‘completely hollow, melts under pressure and leaves bad taste in mouth”. The box also contains a “free mug”. Here’s a photo: Seemingly the Easter Clegg is “100% Authentically Conservative” and should be stored in David Cameron’s pocket. Meanwhile, both The Sun and The Telegraph claim this morning that Miliband would be happy to appoint Nick Clegg as Deputy PM in the event […]

    Read more →
  • News Ed Miliband’s Easter Message

    Ed Miliband’s Easter Message

    Here’s Ed Miliband’s Easter Message – touching on his recent trip to the Holy Land, and the work Christians do in their communities across Britain: “As Christians across Great Britain and the rest of the world gather to celebrate the most important event in the Christian faith, I would like to wish you all a happy Easter. “It was a privilege for me to visit the Holy Land in the lead up to Easter this year. I will be thinking […]

    Read more →
  • Comment UKIP’s attitude to accountability should worry us all

    UKIP’s attitude to accountability should worry us all

    UKIP’s reaction to the allegations over the use of the party’s EU funding has been telling. It tells us that they are not yet ready to take the step up from a being an assortment of oddballs and cranks to a serious political party. After The Times ran their front page on Tuesday, UKIP’s immediate reaction was to denounce the paper as a mouthpiece for the establishment, rather than bother to refute what they felt was incorrect about the article. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured In praise of Simon Danczuk

    In praise of Simon Danczuk

    Simon Danczuk has led the front pages this week with his explosive account of how an MP could hide a lifetime of abusing children. The Westminster reaction to his Cyril Smith allegations? Embarrassed coughs. Good on Simon for having the courage to speak his mind. Since his 2010 election, itself a feat of endurance, he’s demonstrated a forensic mind and a canny eye for a story. He represents a diminishing Westminster breed, a ‘character’ who speaks with an authentic voice […]

    Read more →