Cheap, nasty politics – how the Bedroom Tax will affect people who are far from “scroungers”

February 11, 2013 12:55 pm

In recent days the ‘bedroom tax’ has shot up the political agenda. The Sunday People, displaying the very best of tabloid campaigning journalism, has relentlessly exposed both the unfairness and the failures of this policy in the last few weeks. Meanwhile Ed Miliband has rightly been on the offensive at PMQs while Labour MPs have continued to raise it in Parliamentary debates – in the most recent of which disgracefully no Tory or Lib Dem backbench MP could be bothered to show up.

While I don’t represent one of the top ten worst hit cities, but I do represent a constituency which already too often shows up in deprivation statistics. In Leicester we are now coming to realise the full extent of how this ‘bedroom tax’ will hit us.

People in Leicester South will lose an average of £12 a week for under-occupation by one bedroom, and £22 a week for under-occupation by two or more bedrooms. In Leicester city as a whole, 2,182 council city properties will be affected by the bedroom tax. And across Leicester South 642 of those households will lose up to £22 a week. This is before we take into account those living in housing association accommodation.

One of my constituents contacted me about how the ‘bedroom tax’ will affect her and her husband. She is severely disabled following an accident at work and requires a 24 hour morphine drip, while her husband is both her full-time carer and has a full-time job of his own. He sleeps in a separate bedroom so he can get enough sleep for work. The bungalow they live in has been specially adapted to suit her needs, and they’ve lived there for over 20 years. Now, as a direct consequence of the government’s ‘bedroom tax’, they are now faced with the ‘choice’ of leaving their home because they can’t afford to live there and somehow finding the extra money. These people aren’t ‘scroungers’ as some politicians would have you believe.

The government’s shameful ‘bedroom tax’ will see hundreds of families across my constituency suffer like this and every week at my advice surgery I’m confronted with more and more heartbreaking stories of the impact of this policy.

In response as a local MP I’m determined to do all I can to support people in the face of these cuts, though I’m under no illusions about the true extent of the effect of these changes. Nevertheless I’ve pulled together local agencies, charities and voluntary organisations to see what support we can offer people collectively. We’re also working closely with a local credit union Clockwise, helping them reach out deeper into the community. This is on top of the work we’re doing with local Unite members and the wider community to help support the food banks throughout Leicester city.

For those struggling to find work in this current economic climate, the double whammy of benefits cuts and unemployment will hit them hard. In my Leicester South constituency alone, the Work Programme has proved to be a shambles. Of the 2,110 people referred to the Work Programme between June 2011 and May 2012, only 70 of them had a job outcome – a mere 3.3%. In fact, far from declining, long-term unemployment is on the rise. In Leicester city, 85 young people were unemployed for over 18 months in January 2012; by December 2012, this figure had increased by 215, with a total of 300 long-term unemployed youth in the city.

In the Freeman ward of my constituency, one of the Leicester wards which will be worst affected by Tory cuts and ‘bedroom tax’, working with voluntary groups we’re creating a ‘Jobs Club’. The ‘Saffron Jobs Club’ will provide employment advice, training and skills to those seeking work. Again I don’t for one moment think this will go anywhere near to solving our unemployment problem – for that we need a proper national plan for growth – but at least locally we are trying to do something albeit small.

Over the next few weeks I will be working with local churches and other faith groups also to see what further coordinated support can be offered to those hit by this double whammy of local cuts and unemployment.

I’ve no idea if all this counts as the community organising that is so in vogue on Labour blogs these days, I just know there are many of us in our local community who feel we can’t just stand by and do nothing.

This ‘bedroom tax’ hits just as Cameron and Osborne will hand 8,000 millionaires an average tax cut of over £107,000 per year, amounting to a tax cut of over £2,000 a week. What an insult. The Lib Dems have said the ‘bedroom tax’ is driven by the need to control the public finances even though its actually going to cost us more in the long run as families are driven into the high priced private sectors and thousands of pounds are sucked from the local economy. But we know the motivation of the Tories. We have a Chancellor more interested in ‘dividing lines’ than budget lines. He’s wants to position the Tory Party against those on benefits who he dismisses as people who stay in bed in the morning. This ‘bedroom tax’ policy isn’t about fairness, it’s about cheap, nasty politics.

Jonathan Ashworth is the Labour MP for Leicester South

  • http://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    After just engaging with Jon on twitter he is too unwell as the poor chap is coming down with Man Flu. Perhaps when he feels better he can clarify whether the £107k tax cut is for millionaires, or those earning over £1m PA. Get well soon Jon. #Leicester needs you.

    • Jeremy_Preece

      I am sure that it is the latter – those paid (I won’t say earned) over £1 million per year.

  • http://www.facebook.com/andrew.staden Andrew Staden

    You are wholly wrong. The bedroom tax is not nasty, it is vicious. I have been a staunch Tory for over forty years. Not any more.

  • Jeremy_Preece

    Jon. I am pleased to hear a Labour MP explicity explain that people on benefits are not scroungers.
    This is a trend that I would love to see rise up and drown out the prejudice that is swamping this country. There are so many thousands of example of how miserable the lives of vulnerable ordinary poeple have been made by this nasty government.

  • Norman

    The problem the British people see is The Labour Government offering no alternative to the Condems demolition of the working class on issues of Welfare Education NHS and the list goes on. You are failing the British people don’t think for one minute you will walk the Next Election.

    People may choose a diffrent way this country is run. Look around the world the danger signs are smack in our faces. I’ve supported the party all my life. It’s time you stood up for the working class again

  • JoeDM

    Since when did a spending cut become a tax?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Carolyn-Clapham/100001123928050 mousegran

    But why still no mention of the fact that 90 000 pensioners will be affected by this?

  • Pingback: Cheap, nasty politics – how the Bedroom Tax will affect people who are far from “scroungers” | NO2BEDROOM TAX

  • kb32904

    The ‘bedroom tax’ or under-occupation penalty to give it its proper name, is just one of the changes awaiting many in April.

    Alongside the below inflation uprating, which is effectively a cut given that inflation is running at 2.7% with food expected to increase it further, is the changes to council tax benefit. Many councils intend charging those on the lowest incomes anything up to £600 per year yet there has been precious little publicity about this. How on earth will someone on £71pw JSA have enough money left after food & essential outgoings to pay towards council tax ? There will be court cases up & down the land of councils getting liability orders for non-payment of council tax. Bailiffs will then be instructed & ultimately the claimant will be imprisoned for non-payment of CT.

    Thanks for your article Jonathan – here’s hoping we hear many more Labour MPs sticking up for the poorest in our society – its shameful that in this rich country of ours that the poorest are targeted again & again under this spiteful government.

Latest

  • News Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Labour have spoken out about complaints that Fiona Woolf QC, head of the public inquiry into historical sex abuse, has links with Leon Brittan. Brittan was the home secretary at the time when the dossier about alleged pedophiles went missing. And Woolf, who is also Lord Mayor of London, admitted yesterday that since 2008 she had dinner with Brittan and his family on five separate occasions but she has said she has “no close association” with him. A number of Labour MPs […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    Here we are again. Another week, another Wednesday, and another wrangle between Cameron and Miliband about the NHS. This is getting a bit old. Cameron attempted to get Miliband on the back foot – he kicked off PMQs by posing questions to the Labour leader about the Welsh NHS. Rather predictably, the rest of PMQs descended into the two party leaders arguing about who can be more trusted with the NHS. But, there was something a little more sinister about […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    A couple of weeks ago saw the UK elect for the first time a UKIP MP – Douglas Carswell, with a huge majority of 12,000 votes. UKIP made enormous strides in the safe Labour seat of Heywood & Middleton as well, reducing the Labour majority from 5,971 to 617. This rise in the ‘acceptable’ far right should be a cause of concern not just to the Tories but also to us. It is clear from these results there is no […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    The result in Heywood and Middleton may have shocked some people, but not all. Some warned this could happen after UKIP took or seriously challenged safe council seats in the north, topped the national vote at the Euros, and polled strongly in Labour areas. Their highest average share of the vote in the 2014 elections came in Labour areas like Rotherham, Mansfield and Hartlepool. We’re told if we campaign on the “issues” people will come back to Labour. This fails […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Last night Young Labour voted on whether or not to come out in support of the free education demonstration set to take place on the 19th November. Reports suggest, they voted against the motion. This result could easily be interpreted as another sign that the argument against tuition fees is dead in the water. In reality, it tells us that opposite is true. The very fact that this was a topic for discussion at Young Labour’s national committee, that there […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y