PMQs Verdict: Is anyone surprised by David Cameron’s scripted flippancy?

February 27, 2013 2:35 pm

Author:

Tags:

Share this Article

Sometimes an entire PMQs is summed up by one excuse. Occasionally that’s because there has been a superb point made, or a slice of rapier-like wit has clearly won the day. But more often it’s because the whole session was a bit dull, with the exception of one slightly less dull thing. Today was very much of the latter.

Most of the comment in the Westminster/media bubble has been about Ed Miliband’s less than tactful response (“scraping the barrel”) when asked about Anthony Seldon’s recent hatchet job on Ed Balls. What Miliband obviously meant was that pulling out newspaper or magazine columns to attack Labour was “scraping the barrel” – but it evidently came across as an attack on the Staggers, regardless of intention. Fortunately they’ve taken it in good humour.

That Cameron would stoop to quoting an open letter/attack piece from a magazine with the history of the New Statesman should have come as no surprise to seasoned PMQs observers. After all this is someone who has previously quoted Luke Bozier and referenced Matt Zarb-Cousin’s tweets at PMQs. No quote is too small for the Prime Minister…

Yet this week the most engaging sections of the “debate” were with backbenchers. Not the back and forth between Cameron and his colleagues (those questions were deathly dull, and featured the word “Eastleigh” as if sampled on a loop), but those with the Labour backbenchers. Alas none of them thought to deviate away from their scripted questions to ask why David Cameron was sat next to the homophobic Welsh secretary, but there were poigniant questions on the Bedroom Tax and the disabled, culminating in perhaps the most inaccurate statement Cameron has ever made at PMQS (a heck of an achievement):

“This government always puts disabled people first” 

If only that were true Mr Cameron, but unlike your scripted remarks bashing Ed Balls, that was presumably a slip of the tongue, because the evidence points towards the disabled being disproportionately hit. Shame on you. Perhaps next week instead of boning up on the latest columns in lefty magazines, or the latest tweets from Labour researchers, you might want to read up on the impact your government’s cuts are having on the disabled…

  • http://twitter.com/citizen_colin Colin McCulloch

    Well said, Mark.

  • Monkey_Bach

    Cameron is so evasive, answering every question fielded by Miliband with a question of his own, perhaps Prime Minister’s Questions ought to be renamed Leader of the Opposition’s Questions. Eeek.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I think the New Statesman’s constant negativity is ‘bottom of the barrel’ – Hodges writes for them, and the Seldon article from a public school head who we shouldn’t allow within a million miles of the party was another anti-Labour hatchet job. I’m planning to cancel my subscription if it continues

    • John Ruddy

      Have you already cancelled your subscription? Hodges resigned – as an occiasional blogger, not a regular columnist – in October 2011 when they didnt run a piece that was critical of Ed Miliband.
      I think the Seldon article was helpful, in that it showed out out-of-touch that side of the party is.

    • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

      I know they have terrible circulation problems and wondered who actually paid for it. Now I know.

  • http://twitter.com/Ceilidhann Kayleigh Anne

    It was pretty bottom of the barrel for Cameron to reference yet another tired “Blairite attacks key Brown aide” piece (it’d be like quoting Dan Hodges – pointless, predictable and not particularly effective given that Ed’s polling higher than Cameron), but seeing so many people say Ed should apologise to New Statesman was just sad.

    • David B

      Why should Cameron not comment on a newspaper piece regardless of the newspaper. After all it is in the public domain. Should Ed Miliband be stop from quoting, say, The Mail because it does not support Labour. More importantly Ed tried to be cleaver and completely messed up and Cameron slapped him down, just as Ed would have done if the roles were reversed. That is what PMQ is all about, and has been for some time.

  • Hamish Dewar

    Why does Labour go along with this charade?

    “Question number 1, Mr Speaker.”

    “I have had meetngs with colleages and others this morning and apart from my duties in this House, I will have further such meetings this afternoon.”
    Followed by rhetorical questions and non-answers.
    PMQs contribute nothing to the governance of this country.

  • Daniel Speight

    Funny how nobody quotes Luke Bozier anymore. What happened to all his mates? Fear of guilt by association I guess. Oh well, we will just have to wait until Hodges get caught up to something naughty.

Latest

  • News Labour to reduce energy bills by improving home insulation

    Labour to reduce energy bills by improving home insulation

    The Sun (£) have reported today that Caroline Flint, Shadow Energy Secretary, is set to reveal new plans to improve ageing homes by insulating roofs, walls and windows – in turn meaning that people have to use less energy. Following on from Ed Miliband’s announcement that a next Labour government will freeze energy bills, this upgrade in insulation will help people across the UK to reduce their energy bills and could potentially have a positive impact in terms of the environment. […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Whatever happened to Jobs and Growth?

    Whatever happened to Jobs and Growth?

    I wasn’t going to write about the Ed Balls speech today. The pre-briefed announcements had left me underwhelmed, and one in particular – freezing child benefit – had left me furious. Spending is clearly going to be constrained over the next Parliament, and difficult decisions will need to be made. But what sense is there in balancing the books off the backs of children, many of whom weren’t even born during the financial crisis that has caused such hardship. Are […]

    Read more →
  • News One Nation Labour – for the communities of coast and country too

    One Nation Labour – for the communities of coast and country too

    The first fringe of the LabourList tent Conference 2014 was hosted by Labour: Coast & Country this sunny lunchtime. Over 100 delegates, including local activists, PPCs, MPs, and MEPs gathered to consider the question of how the Party’s policy review will deliver One Nation for coast and country. Hywel Lloyd, one of the founding members of Labour: Coast & Country opened proceedings with a reminder to everyone that LCC had been established to represent the voice of all those who […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour will look to reach out to Scottish Yes voters

    Labour will look to reach out to Scottish Yes voters

    Labour are going to focus on reaching out to disillusioned traditional Labour supporters who voted Yes in the Scottish referendum. Three of the four local authorities where a majority supported independence are Labour-controlled, and a large proportion of those who backed Labour in 2010 opted for a Yes vote last week. Shadow Scottish Secretary Margaret Curran said there were many “understandable reasons” for people choosing to support Yes, and that Labour would be making a concerted effort to connect with […]

    Read more →
  • Comment No Westminster stitch-up on power devolution

    No Westminster stitch-up on power devolution

    This post is written by Alison McGovern MP and Stephen Twigg MP The most powerful argument in the Scottish referendum campaign came from Labour’s Gordon Brown: “We don’t want freedom from England. We want freedom from poverty.” And the power of this argument rests on the fact that it’s true for all of us. Not just in Scotland, but in each and every town and city in the UK. It’s not the tyranny of Westminster that’s the problem. It’s the […]

    Read more →