PMQs Verdict: Is anyone surprised by David Cameron’s scripted flippancy?

27th February, 2013 2:35 pm

Sometimes an entire PMQs is summed up by one excuse. Occasionally that’s because there has been a superb point made, or a slice of rapier-like wit has clearly won the day. But more often it’s because the whole session was a bit dull, with the exception of one slightly less dull thing. Today was very much of the latter.

Most of the comment in the Westminster/media bubble has been about Ed Miliband’s less than tactful response (“scraping the barrel”) when asked about Anthony Seldon’s recent hatchet job on Ed Balls. What Miliband obviously meant was that pulling out newspaper or magazine columns to attack Labour was “scraping the barrel” – but it evidently came across as an attack on the Staggers, regardless of intention. Fortunately they’ve taken it in good humour.

That Cameron would stoop to quoting an open letter/attack piece from a magazine with the history of the New Statesman should have come as no surprise to seasoned PMQs observers. After all this is someone who has previously quoted Luke Bozier and referenced Matt Zarb-Cousin’s tweets at PMQs. No quote is too small for the Prime Minister…

Yet this week the most engaging sections of the “debate” were with backbenchers. Not the back and forth between Cameron and his colleagues (those questions were deathly dull, and featured the word “Eastleigh” as if sampled on a loop), but those with the Labour backbenchers. Alas none of them thought to deviate away from their scripted questions to ask why David Cameron was sat next to the homophobic Welsh secretary, but there were poigniant questions on the Bedroom Tax and the disabled, culminating in perhaps the most inaccurate statement Cameron has ever made at PMQS (a heck of an achievement):

“This government always puts disabled people first” 

If only that were true Mr Cameron, but unlike your scripted remarks bashing Ed Balls, that was presumably a slip of the tongue, because the evidence points towards the disabled being disproportionately hit. Shame on you. Perhaps next week instead of boning up on the latest columns in lefty magazines, or the latest tweets from Labour researchers, you might want to read up on the impact your government’s cuts are having on the disabled…

  • http://twitter.com/citizen_colin Colin McCulloch

    Well said, Mark.

  • Monkey_Bach

    Cameron is so evasive, answering every question fielded by Miliband with a question of his own, perhaps Prime Minister’s Questions ought to be renamed Leader of the Opposition’s Questions. Eeek.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I think the New Statesman’s constant negativity is ‘bottom of the barrel’ – Hodges writes for them, and the Seldon article from a public school head who we shouldn’t allow within a million miles of the party was another anti-Labour hatchet job. I’m planning to cancel my subscription if it continues

    • John Ruddy

      Have you already cancelled your subscription? Hodges resigned – as an occiasional blogger, not a regular columnist – in October 2011 when they didnt run a piece that was critical of Ed Miliband.
      I think the Seldon article was helpful, in that it showed out out-of-touch that side of the party is.

    • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

      I know they have terrible circulation problems and wondered who actually paid for it. Now I know.

  • http://twitter.com/Ceilidhann Kayleigh Anne

    It was pretty bottom of the barrel for Cameron to reference yet another tired “Blairite attacks key Brown aide” piece (it’d be like quoting Dan Hodges – pointless, predictable and not particularly effective given that Ed’s polling higher than Cameron), but seeing so many people say Ed should apologise to New Statesman was just sad.

    • David B

      Why should Cameron not comment on a newspaper piece regardless of the newspaper. After all it is in the public domain. Should Ed Miliband be stop from quoting, say, The Mail because it does not support Labour. More importantly Ed tried to be cleaver and completely messed up and Cameron slapped him down, just as Ed would have done if the roles were reversed. That is what PMQ is all about, and has been for some time.

  • Hamish Dewar

    Why does Labour go along with this charade?

    “Question number 1, Mr Speaker.”

    “I have had meetngs with colleages and others this morning and apart from my duties in this House, I will have further such meetings this afternoon.”
    Followed by rhetorical questions and non-answers.
    PMQs contribute nothing to the governance of this country.

  • Daniel Speight

    Funny how nobody quotes Luke Bozier anymore. What happened to all his mates? Fear of guilt by association I guess. Oh well, we will just have to wait until Hodges get caught up to something naughty.

Latest

  • Comment Last week we got a preview of how another Tory government would behave

    Last week we got a preview of how another Tory government would behave

    Last week in the House of Commons we got a preview of how another Tory government would behave if they got the chance. On the last day of the Parliament before the General Election, the government sneaked in an extra piece of business – a plot to oust a Speaker many of them hate. They lost the vote. They were hoping Labour members would have left Westminster to go campaigning and they hadn’t banked on Tory and Lib Dems rebelling. […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Polling Is Clegg on his way out? Another poll shows him trailing to Labour in Sheffield Hallam

    Is Clegg on his way out? Another poll shows him trailing to Labour in Sheffield Hallam

    Yet more constituency research shows that there is a very real chance that Nick Clegg could lose his seat to Labour in May. Lord Ashcroft’s latest batch of Lib Dem marginals polling shows that Labour’s Oliver Coppard currently holds a two point lead over the Deputy PM. This follows a previous Ashcroft poll in the seat, which gave Labour a lead of three, and an earthquake poll from Survation last month which saw Labour 10 whole points ahead. The latest […]

    Read more →
  • News “We have an epidemic of zero hours contracts in our country”: read the full text of Miliband’s speech

    “We have an epidemic of zero hours contracts in our country”: read the full text of Miliband’s speech

    Thank you for being here with us today. It is great to be here at David Brown. A brilliant company offering high skill, high value jobs, with good apprenticeships. I look forward to your questions, but let me briefly tell you today about the kind of country I want to build. We need to be a country that rewards hard work again, whoever you are. If people work all the hours God sends, I think they should be able to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment How the Tories have spent five years wasting money

    How the Tories have spent five years wasting money

    Reducing the cost of government has been a mantra from the Coalition. Before the last election Cameron lambasted Labour for being “shockingly casual about public money and how it’s spent” and said “we will expect to be judged on a clear basis: if you’re taking people’s hard-earned money away from them you’d better be able to show that you’re spending it on what people want and that you can get better value for that money than they could.” But in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Zeroed out – time for stronger action on zero-hours contracts?

    Zeroed out – time for stronger action on zero-hours contracts?

    Secure and well-paid work is the basis for thriving communities, and the basis for a successful economy. But, a year on since I published my independent review into zero-hours contracts for the Labour Party, there is evidence of a new surge across the economy. Official statistics show that there are now 1.8 million zero-hours contracts in the UK. There has been an increase of nearly 20 per cent in the number of people on a zero-hours contract in the past […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit