PMQs Verdict: Is anyone surprised by David Cameron’s scripted flippancy?

February 27, 2013 2:35 pm

Author:

Tags:

Share this Article

Sometimes an entire PMQs is summed up by one excuse. Occasionally that’s because there has been a superb point made, or a slice of rapier-like wit has clearly won the day. But more often it’s because the whole session was a bit dull, with the exception of one slightly less dull thing. Today was very much of the latter.

Most of the comment in the Westminster/media bubble has been about Ed Miliband’s less than tactful response (“scraping the barrel”) when asked about Anthony Seldon’s recent hatchet job on Ed Balls. What Miliband obviously meant was that pulling out newspaper or magazine columns to attack Labour was “scraping the barrel” – but it evidently came across as an attack on the Staggers, regardless of intention. Fortunately they’ve taken it in good humour.

That Cameron would stoop to quoting an open letter/attack piece from a magazine with the history of the New Statesman should have come as no surprise to seasoned PMQs observers. After all this is someone who has previously quoted Luke Bozier and referenced Matt Zarb-Cousin’s tweets at PMQs. No quote is too small for the Prime Minister…

Yet this week the most engaging sections of the “debate” were with backbenchers. Not the back and forth between Cameron and his colleagues (those questions were deathly dull, and featured the word “Eastleigh” as if sampled on a loop), but those with the Labour backbenchers. Alas none of them thought to deviate away from their scripted questions to ask why David Cameron was sat next to the homophobic Welsh secretary, but there were poigniant questions on the Bedroom Tax and the disabled, culminating in perhaps the most inaccurate statement Cameron has ever made at PMQS (a heck of an achievement):

“This government always puts disabled people first” 

If only that were true Mr Cameron, but unlike your scripted remarks bashing Ed Balls, that was presumably a slip of the tongue, because the evidence points towards the disabled being disproportionately hit. Shame on you. Perhaps next week instead of boning up on the latest columns in lefty magazines, or the latest tweets from Labour researchers, you might want to read up on the impact your government’s cuts are having on the disabled…

  • http://twitter.com/citizen_colin Colin McCulloch

    Well said, Mark.

  • Monkey_Bach

    Cameron is so evasive, answering every question fielded by Miliband with a question of his own, perhaps Prime Minister’s Questions ought to be renamed Leader of the Opposition’s Questions. Eeek.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I think the New Statesman’s constant negativity is ‘bottom of the barrel’ – Hodges writes for them, and the Seldon article from a public school head who we shouldn’t allow within a million miles of the party was another anti-Labour hatchet job. I’m planning to cancel my subscription if it continues

    • John Ruddy

      Have you already cancelled your subscription? Hodges resigned – as an occiasional blogger, not a regular columnist – in October 2011 when they didnt run a piece that was critical of Ed Miliband.
      I think the Seldon article was helpful, in that it showed out out-of-touch that side of the party is.

    • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

      I know they have terrible circulation problems and wondered who actually paid for it. Now I know.

  • http://twitter.com/Ceilidhann Kayleigh Anne

    It was pretty bottom of the barrel for Cameron to reference yet another tired “Blairite attacks key Brown aide” piece (it’d be like quoting Dan Hodges – pointless, predictable and not particularly effective given that Ed’s polling higher than Cameron), but seeing so many people say Ed should apologise to New Statesman was just sad.

    • David B

      Why should Cameron not comment on a newspaper piece regardless of the newspaper. After all it is in the public domain. Should Ed Miliband be stop from quoting, say, The Mail because it does not support Labour. More importantly Ed tried to be cleaver and completely messed up and Cameron slapped him down, just as Ed would have done if the roles were reversed. That is what PMQ is all about, and has been for some time.

  • Hamish Dewar

    Why does Labour go along with this charade?

    “Question number 1, Mr Speaker.”

    “I have had meetngs with colleages and others this morning and apart from my duties in this House, I will have further such meetings this afternoon.”
    Followed by rhetorical questions and non-answers.
    PMQs contribute nothing to the governance of this country.

  • Daniel Speight

    Funny how nobody quotes Luke Bozier anymore. What happened to all his mates? Fear of guilt by association I guess. Oh well, we will just have to wait until Hodges get caught up to something naughty.

Latest

  • Comment Labour’s Lessons from a Sikh Wedding Season

    Labour’s Lessons from a Sikh Wedding Season

    There’s been a fair bit written about the Sikh community in the nationals in the last few days in relation to Cameron’s political appointments to the Lords and some criticism for Labour for not having any representation from the 700,000 strong Sikh community in its Westminster ranks. Personally I don’t think there’s anything to gain in attacking Cameron for making more diverse appointments, even if the guy may not be as entrenched in the Sikh community as was claimed and […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Where does Labour really stand on a “Health Tax”?

    Where does Labour really stand on a “Health Tax”?

    The front page of today’s FT suggests that the Labour leadership is considering a “Health Tax” as a means of paying for the NHS, reporting(£): “Ed Miliband is to put the NHS at the centre of Labour’s election campaign and is considering an earmarked “health tax” or exempting the health service from deficit reduction to prove that he can deliver a better service. Mr Miliband believes the NHS is rising up the list of voters’ concerns but wants to offer […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Miliband calls for “overarching inquiry into child abuse” – and repeats call for Shaun Wright to step down

    Miliband calls for “overarching inquiry into child abuse” – and repeats call for Shaun Wright to step down

    Ed Miliband has released a statement this morning on the Rotherham child abuse scandal, in which he re-iterates calls for Shaun Wright to resign as South Yorkshire PCC. However, Miliband has gone further today, calling for an “overarching inquiry into child abuse” to examine what went wrong not just in Rotherham, but “in different institutions, in different parts of the country and stretching across different decades”. Here’s the statement in full: This week’s report into the child abuse scandal in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment If a young person’s opinion falls into the political sphere, does it make a sound?

    If a young person’s opinion falls into the political sphere, does it make a sound?

    There’s a lot of talk around the Party at the moment about ‘Generation Y.’ I suppose I fit into that category, although I don’t think I’ve ever used it to describe myself. Gen Y or whatever, what’s become clear to me over the years is that I’m one of the weirder ones. I’ve worked since the age of 16, doing jobs from working behind a pharmacy counter to fundraising in a call centre to translating for a construction company. I’ve […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Why rural areas need free buses

    Why rural areas need free buses

    To have a fully functioning society, bus services in rural areas should be free of charge. For young people seeking employment, education or entertainment, the unwell needing to visit and be visited in hospitals or the elderly wanting to break the loneliness of isolation, public transport is essential. If governments don’t want to spend money on services in rural areas, they should at least provide the means for people who live there to get to them in urban areas. Regular […]

    Read more →