Sarah Teather votes against Equal Marriage – despite her website proclaiming support for it

February 5, 2013 8:15 pm

Unlike the vast majority of Lib Dems, Sarah Teather voted against Equal Marriage this evening, and has set out her reasoning here. Clearly as far as the Brent Central MP is concerned, the “liberal” thing to do nowadays is to stop people from getting married…

However, Teather’s position on this is particularly confusing (and embarrassing) when considering her shared website with Brent Lib Dens had, until earlier this evening,  a large advert proclaiming that Teather and Brent Lib Dems were “taking PRIDE in delivering Equal Marriage”. The image appears to have been attached to a post from January 25th that no longer appears on the site, but which said Equal Marriage would: “strengthen the important tradition of marriage in our society, ensuring it remains a vibrant institution well into the 21st century and beyond”.

Fortunately, her local paper The Brent and Kilburn Times took the following screengrab:

sarahteatherhypocrite

 

 

 

Sarah Teather will need an army of Lib Dem volunteers to have even a remote chance of saving  her seat. On this showing, she’ll be on her own…

  • http://twitter.com/Ceilidhann Kayleigh Anne

    I’ve seen several Lib Dem students online proclaiming that they will never campaign for Teather and certainly won’t be doing so in 2015. I know she’s been on a desperate dash to compensate for her time as a government minister by rebelling against the government but this wasn’t the best time for her to do that.

    • Chilbaldi

      she’s always struck me as a bit of a confused, walking joke.

    • http://twitter.com/AndyUpNorth Andrew Gray

      Several Lib Dem students are hardly going to cost her an election. After all, it’s up to the public to decide, not activists in any party who can’t respect colleagues views!

  • Brumanuensis

    “Once the concept of marriage has become established in social consciousness as an entirely private matter about love and commitment alone, without any link to family, I fear that it will accelerate changes already occurring that makes family life more unstable. (I should add, that I also suspect it will make marriage ultimately seem irrelevant. After all, how long before gay people begin to say, as many straight couples of my own generation have begun to say, “if marriage is just about love, why would I need a piece of paper to prove it?”)”

    I didn’t realise Teather assessed the value of her own marriage with reference to other couples’ marriages.

  • Pingback: Nowt so queer as MPs « A Burdz Eye View

  • RC

    I’m really disappointed with Sarah’s decision and I feel it has undermined all of the equal rights campaigning she says she has ‘devoted’ her time to over the years. I don’t understand her argument, surely she should be campaigning for the importance of marriage and the positive role it plays in our society, rather than opposing equal marriage. If, in her opinion, marriage is so important for the stability of family life, why isn’t she encouraging same-sex parents to marry? This just shows her true colours and that deep down she doesn’t believe in real equality.

  • http://www.robertsharp.co.uk Robert

    What is the cynical, Occam’s Razor explanation for this about-face? Are a large number of her constituents against it?

  • kb32904

    A LibDem saying one thing then doing the opposite – surely not…….!

  • http://www.facebook.com/timmymc Tim McLoughlin

    This follows her previous campaigning against tuition fees. That was previously the “hardest” decision she had to make. How many more will there be before she is rightfully kicked out?

  • Andrew Evans

    It’s Lib Dem policy – hence the web site. It was a free vote – so she voted with her conscience. Not sure what the problem is?

  • aracataca

    Yet another Fib Dem who has earned the accolade of ‘being beneath contempt’.

  • Pingback: The political lemons are damaging our politics « John Clarke

Latest

  • Comment Englishness, identity and social justice

    Englishness, identity and social justice

    Democracy and social justice are inseparable. Any socialist knows that. It’s why we saw the expansion of the pillars of social justice – free education, health, social security – following the expansion of universal suffrage. It’s why Labour is a Democratic Socialist party. It’s why it needs to be the party of English and British democratic reform. Yet, the impression it has given over the last few days is that democratic change is something to be quarantined, decontaminated and then […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Laying the Foundations for a Labour Century

    Laying the Foundations for a Labour Century

    This post is written by Liz Kendall MP and John Woodcock MP Britain stands at a crossroads. Scotland rejected separation, but the large numbers of traditionally Labour supporters voting Yes has highlighted an undercurrent of deep dissatisfaction that is reflected across the United Kingdom. One future path would see our country seeking to reject and counter the forces of change that are deeply unsettling many communities and threatening our established place in the world. The other would embrace change as […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Call for a People’s Campaign

    Call for a People’s Campaign

    We find ourselves at a crossroads. The path of our country and the character of our democracy will be shaped afresh in the coming months, for good or ill. Up and down the country, people’s energies are rousing — from Glasgow to Clacton, from London streets to Cornish hamlets. Their patience grows ever shorter. Most feel no one is listening to them. No one is talking their language, or offering them much change they can believe in. Is this really […]

    Read more →
  • Comment It’s incontestable – we need change in England

    It’s incontestable – we need change in England

    After a dreadful summer, the Scottish Independence referendum –and the developments that followed it – have again illustrated David Cameron’s inept political judgment. From the single question on the Scottish ballot, to the woefully inadequate Edinburgh agreement, Alex Salmond was lucky to have found a British Prime Minister who, in the words of Peter Oborne, has proven to be so infamously ‘indolent, inattentive…and out of touch.’ Campaigning in the central belt during the final weeks of the referendum campaign the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Bold and unique – a role for local government in our modern state

    Bold and unique – a role for local government in our modern state

    As we talk about our country’s constitution in the coming months, the starting point is what powers the Scottish Parliament should have. And whilst devolution for other nations and regions is also a central part of the wider debate, it is a chance for us to be clear about what powers local government should be able to exercise in the future too. I appreciate that, as the councillor in charge of housing in Islington, this argument might sound a bit […]

    Read more →