Harman’s plan to force Murdoch to sell a newspaper – Media roundup: June 13th, 2013

13th June, 2013 9:59 am

Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this (and much more) in your inbox. You can sign up here.

Harman’s plan to force Murdoch to sell a newspaper

Harriet Harman will use a speech on Thursday to suggest limiting the share of the newspaper market one person is allowed to own to below the “damaging” 30% mark, in what will be seen as a direct and renewed attack on Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch’s News International, which owns The Sun, The Sun on Sunday, The Times and The Sunday Times, controls around 37% of the market in the UK. Harman will say that a new limit, between 20% an 30%, should also include obligations on a media owner such as editorial independence, independent governance and promoting plurality in other ways. And she will suggest that a cap on newspaper market share should be accompanied by owners being limited to a 15% cap across the media as whole – including broadcast and online. For News International to comply with a 30% cap, Murdoch would likely have to sell one or more of his newspapers such as The Sun or The Times. – HuffPo

Cable to act on “zero hours” contracts?

Employers face action to stop them exploiting workers with controversial “zero-hours” job contracts. The Business Secretary Vince Cable will today announce a review of the controversial contracts which offer people work but with no guaranteed hours, regular pay or job security. More than 200,000 workers in Britain are now on zero-hour deals, which are especially popular with fast food chains and high street stores. Some people like the contracts because they give them flexibility – but many find they are prevented from getting a second job or end up with no work even though they are contracted to be available for a set number of hours a week. Mr Cable said the Department for Business will now look at ways of making sure the contracts are not abused by firms. –  Mirror

Other highlights

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    “Harman’s plan”

    Reminds me of New Labour’s pre’97 plan to limit cross-media ownership – forgotten about after Blair scuttled half-way round the world in ’95 to to prostrate himself before Murdoch.

    And of course, Harriet occupied many senior positions between ’97 and 2010 but chose to keep quite on the matter of media ownership.

    Chinese proverb: Experience keeps an expensive school but fools will learn in no other.

    Yes, I was a fool and took New Labour at face value prior to ’97 so won’t be duped by promises made by the same team in the run-up to 2015.

    • JohnPReid

      Yes that was labours plan pre 97′ then by 97 , they’d dropped it, because the elections they promised to do that ,like 92 we lost, I’m not happy we dropped it, Blair had to do everything he could to try to win, it’s history, not nice but labour dropped that idea pre 97′ to win,

      • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

        Not quite sure what your point is – are you suggesting that Harriet should also drop her proposal?

        • JohnPReid

          No not at all, just saying Blair got rid of the plan as he was desperate to try to woo,the Murdoch press,not happy with that, but it’s history

          • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

            But surely, it follows from your previous comment – the plan re media ownership was dropped in ’97 because Labour lost in ’92 when it was included.

            Therefore, wouldn’t you advise dropping it again to avoid losing in 2015?

          • JohnPReid

            Fortunately not, the press destroyed us in 92′ they tried too in 2010′, but the power of the press has gone,they couldn’t even win It for Cameron 3 years ago,

          • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

            Ok, I get you now. So it’ll be down to Blue State Digital to get Labour’s message out – they can be very effective, providing Labour has has the right message.

  • charles.ward

    I’m glad Harriet Harman is proposing this, it shows the Labour Party gives the proposal the seriousness it deserves.

  • charles.ward

    If you have a media cap of 15% across TV, radio, print and online wouldn’t that require the breakup of the BBC?

  • MonkeyBot5000

    The limit should be one paper, not a percentage of the market.

    • charles.ward

      I would say that the daily papers don’t really compete with the Sunday’s and the broadsheet market is pretty separate from the tabloids. So one paper in each of the four combinations would be fair. Oh look, that’s exactly what Murdoch owns.

      • MonkeyBot5000

        And I would say the competition is irrelevant. It’s the number of papers that give him too much power and make our politicians scared of him.

        1 paper in which push your political agenda in anonymous leader articles.
        1 paper in which to plug your TV/film empire under the guise of “reviews”.

        And no paid positions/columns for politicians. Sorry, Boris.

  • Steve Stubbs

    Ah, that means then the dismemberment of the BBC which owns more media than all the other owners put together. And about time…

Latest

  • Comment Featured Why I introduced the Assisted Dying Bill

    Why I introduced the Assisted Dying Bill

    My main reason for introducing the Assisted Dying Bill is simple. It’s a straightforward question of choice and dignity: with appropriate, strong safeguards, terminally ill adults of sound mind should be legally allowed to choose to have assistance to end their own lives. I value life, and I do understand that some people believe very deeply that ending one’s own life is always wrong. Nevertheless, the depth and sincerity of their belief should not mean that they deny choice to […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Leadership candidates slam Cameron for inaction over refugee crisis

    Leadership candidates slam Cameron for inaction over refugee crisis

    The Labour leadership candidates have this morning weighed in on the refugee crisis, in which it’s estimated over 2,500 people have died since the start of this year. Yesterday, David Cameron made the following statement, in which he claimed the following: “We have taken a number of genuine asylum seekers from Syrian refugee camps and we keep that under review, but we think the most important thing is to try to bring peace and stability to that part of the world. I […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured It will take heart and head to win again

    It will take heart and head to win again

    When I joined the Labour Party in 1979, age 17, I had no idea that for the next 18 years, Labour would be in opposition to a Tory government. As a young activist, I seemed to be on a different demo every week. Thatcher was in power and there was no shortage of worthwhile causes. Marches for jobs, marches against the cuts, Anti-apartheid, the Anti-Nazi League, women against violence against women,… It was a long list. I was full of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We have the money to make Labour a movement – we can’t lose this moment

    We have the money to make Labour a movement – we can’t lose this moment

    Jessie J may have tried to argue it’s not about the money, money, money, but anyone facing a well-funded opposition at an election knows all too well the difference it makes. One aspect of the leadership contest yet to be fully discussed is the cash that it has generated for Labour. The combination of the volume of people paying the supporters rate, the increase in membership and the levy paid by leadership candidates means a serious amount of money will […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Leadership matters

    Leadership matters

    This week has really shown up the petty squabbling in the Labour leadership contest for what it is – inward looking and small. Because when it matters, the Labour Party has united around the issue of giving much needed asylum to refugees. Our differences may seem big – and sometimes they are . They do matter. But the gulf of difference between the way the whole of the Labour Party has reacted to what is needed and the nasty, small […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit