Harman’s plan to force Murdoch to sell a newspaper – Media roundup: June 13th, 2013

June 13, 2013 9:59 am

Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this (and much more) in your inbox. You can sign up here.

Harman’s plan to force Murdoch to sell a newspaper

Harriet Harman will use a speech on Thursday to suggest limiting the share of the newspaper market one person is allowed to own to below the “damaging” 30% mark, in what will be seen as a direct and renewed attack on Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch’s News International, which owns The Sun, The Sun on Sunday, The Times and The Sunday Times, controls around 37% of the market in the UK. Harman will say that a new limit, between 20% an 30%, should also include obligations on a media owner such as editorial independence, independent governance and promoting plurality in other ways. And she will suggest that a cap on newspaper market share should be accompanied by owners being limited to a 15% cap across the media as whole – including broadcast and online. For News International to comply with a 30% cap, Murdoch would likely have to sell one or more of his newspapers such as The Sun or The Times. – HuffPo

Cable to act on “zero hours” contracts?

Employers face action to stop them exploiting workers with controversial “zero-hours” job contracts. The Business Secretary Vince Cable will today announce a review of the controversial contracts which offer people work but with no guaranteed hours, regular pay or job security. More than 200,000 workers in Britain are now on zero-hour deals, which are especially popular with fast food chains and high street stores. Some people like the contracts because they give them flexibility – but many find they are prevented from getting a second job or end up with no work even though they are contracted to be available for a set number of hours a week. Mr Cable said the Department for Business will now look at ways of making sure the contracts are not abused by firms. –  Mirror

Other highlights

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    “Harman’s plan”

    Reminds me of New Labour’s pre’97 plan to limit cross-media ownership – forgotten about after Blair scuttled half-way round the world in ’95 to to prostrate himself before Murdoch.

    And of course, Harriet occupied many senior positions between ’97 and 2010 but chose to keep quite on the matter of media ownership.

    Chinese proverb: Experience keeps an expensive school but fools will learn in no other.

    Yes, I was a fool and took New Labour at face value prior to ’97 so won’t be duped by promises made by the same team in the run-up to 2015.

    • JohnPReid

      Yes that was labours plan pre 97′ then by 97 , they’d dropped it, because the elections they promised to do that ,like 92 we lost, I’m not happy we dropped it, Blair had to do everything he could to try to win, it’s history, not nice but labour dropped that idea pre 97′ to win,

      • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

        Not quite sure what your point is – are you suggesting that Harriet should also drop her proposal?

        • JohnPReid

          No not at all, just saying Blair got rid of the plan as he was desperate to try to woo,the Murdoch press,not happy with that, but it’s history

          • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

            But surely, it follows from your previous comment – the plan re media ownership was dropped in ’97 because Labour lost in ’92 when it was included.

            Therefore, wouldn’t you advise dropping it again to avoid losing in 2015?

          • JohnPReid

            Fortunately not, the press destroyed us in 92′ they tried too in 2010′, but the power of the press has gone,they couldn’t even win It for Cameron 3 years ago,

          • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

            Ok, I get you now. So it’ll be down to Blue State Digital to get Labour’s message out – they can be very effective, providing Labour has has the right message.

  • charles.ward

    I’m glad Harriet Harman is proposing this, it shows the Labour Party gives the proposal the seriousness it deserves.

  • charles.ward

    If you have a media cap of 15% across TV, radio, print and online wouldn’t that require the breakup of the BBC?

  • MonkeyBot5000

    The limit should be one paper, not a percentage of the market.

    • charles.ward

      I would say that the daily papers don’t really compete with the Sunday’s and the broadsheet market is pretty separate from the tabloids. So one paper in each of the four combinations would be fair. Oh look, that’s exactly what Murdoch owns.

      • MonkeyBot5000

        And I would say the competition is irrelevant. It’s the number of papers that give him too much power and make our politicians scared of him.

        1 paper in which push your political agenda in anonymous leader articles.
        1 paper in which to plug your TV/film empire under the guise of “reviews”.

        And no paid positions/columns for politicians. Sorry, Boris.

Latest

  • Comment The Living Wage has to be more than a photo op

    The Living Wage has to be more than a photo op

    The referendum on Scottish independence casts its shadow over every aspect of Scottish public life these days. This is understandable, the debate on whether Scotland should remain in Union with partners in England, Northern Ireland and Wales is a huge one, but the way it pervades every matter at Holyrood is doing a disservice to the people of Scotland. Yesterday I led a debate on behalf on Scottish Labour in support of the living wage, and specifically on extending it […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Who made my clothes?

    Who made my clothes?

    By Stella Creasy MP and Alison McGovern MP It’s been a long four years in opposition, and each year we’ve seen the country decline further for the lack of a Labour Government. But whether speaking up about legal loan sharks, the misuse of zero hours contracts or promoting the economic case for the living wage, we both believe that there are campaigns worth fighting, even if, from opposition, progress is many times harder, and very much slower. That’s why we […]

    Read more →
  • Featured 5 things Labour’s new rapid-rebuttal team need to get right

    5 things Labour’s new rapid-rebuttal team need to get right

    Yesterday’s story of a new Labour media management team, seemingly in the mould of Alastair Campbell’s famously effective rapid-response unit, and headed by Michael Dugher, should be welcome news to us all. A well-run operation can make a huge difference, and in an election as close as 2015 looks set to be, that difference could be Miliband or Cameron in Number 10. But for it to be truly helpful, it needs to get some things right. 1. Be rapid This may sound […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should politicians do God?

    Should politicians do God?

    Easter is traditionally a time when Christians reflect on their faith, and there is no reason why politicians shouldn’t do so too. But this year David Cameron forsook his usual Easter message for a much stronger and more personal foray into the religious arena. He urged Britain to be more confident of its status as a Christian country; he spoke of the strength of his own faith; he said that we should be “frankly more evangelical about the faith that […]

    Read more →
  • News Iraq Inquiry report possibly delayed until after election

    Iraq Inquiry report possibly delayed until after election

    We reported recently that the Chilcot Report is now not due to be published until 2015, causing worries among Labour strategists that it could harm the Party’s chances at the general election. However, according to the Mail today, its release date could now be held back until after polling day next year. The article states: “Whitehall sources suggest that with an election due in May 2015, it will be deemed too politically difficult to publish it until after voters have […]

    Read more →