Why did Boris sneak off to San Francisco? And why did the Taxpayer pick up the tab?

June 7, 2013 3:55 pm

An interesting development over at City Hall – where questions have been raised over Boris Johnson’s trip to San Francisco in February this year.

The Mayor’s own expenses record reveals that he claimed £4000 back from the taxpayer for the return flight and one night stay in America back in February, and the form submitted by the Mayor claimed that the cost was justified by “Negotiations for a major investment in London”.

However there are no details anywhere of the visit, and the Mayor’s office are refusing to comment on the trip.

Labour’s Len Duvall, who uncovered the expense claim, has a few searching claims for the Mayor:

“We need to know what Boris has spent over £4,000 of taxpayers’ money on. He flew to San Francisco for one night back in February, Londoners have a right to know why he has spent such a large amount of our money. If it’s for a big investment into London, why didn’t he get his trip paid for as part of the deal? I know Boris has previously called £250,000 ‘chicken feed’, but £4,000 is a lot of money to ordinary people and we need to know what it’s been spent on. “If this trip really was for a secret negotiation, why didn’t City Hall pay for it up front rather than the Mayor having to claim it back on expenses. They must have known that this information would be published on the Mayor’s website, surely they can’t be that incompetent?”

Why did you sneak off to San Francisco Boris? What were you up to? And why all the secrecy?

  • David Battley

    “Sneaking” “Secrecy” “£4,000″

    Strong words, carefully made to maximise disgust over a relatively modest line item in City Hall accounts, but be careful how much political capital you attach to this, in case it relates to the following story:

    Headline article: “Boris Johnson: I am delighted London has made the final shortlist for the 2018 Gay Games”

    The article continues:

    “The cities shortlisted alongside London are Paris and Limerick. The announcement was made via a video message from the Federation of Gay Games in San Francisco on Saturday.

    “The London 2018 Committee submitted their bid earlier this year [at the end of January].”

    Source: PinkNews

  • markfergusonuk

    If that’s what it was for, why did Boris pay for it himself and claim is back? And why won’t his office say what the expense was?

  • http://www.myspace.com/jamescameron1 Orphadeus

    The timing does not relate to the gay games: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2013/06/01/boris-johnson-i-am-delighted-london-has-made-the-final-shortlist-for-the-2018-gay-games/

    Whether relevant, the timing appears closer to:

    (EMAILWIRE.COM, February 19, 2013 ) San Francisco, CA — Only half a year after Louise Mensch announced that she would be quitting British politics in order to focus on her family, the former MP for Corby and East Northamptonshire has now decided to throw everyone a curve-ball and launch a fashion website.
    http://www.emailwire.com/release/114482-New-Fashion-Website-Launched-by-Louise-Mensch-reports-Making-Websites-Simple.html

    • David Battley

      Are you sure? The bid to host was kicked off at the end of January, and the bid was submitted at the end of February. It seems to me that the mayor of London could quite conceivably seek a meeting with the San Francisco-based committee during that window. As Mark says, it is more interesting to understand why he would NOT want to publicise that, particularly during a period when gay rights (specifically, marriage) have been in the headlines.

      Perhaps it is simply because “brand Boris” does not want to be too closely aligned to Cameron on this topic at the moment, particularly given the Prime Minister’s current poll ratings, and so strengthening Boris’ pro-equality credentials (which are already fairly strong, at the end of the day) was considered secondary to political expediency of not antagonising the Tory faithful.

      It is definitely interesting political mischief to ask about this: I simply think Mark took the wrong line to try and find an angle that it might be inappropriate, given the singular lack of evidence and downside for being shown up as wrong if push comes to shove.

  • markfergusonuk

    That’s London…you can clearly see Tower Bridge in the background

    • http://www.myspace.com/jamescameron1 Orphadeus

      My mistake. Well spotted, its the San Fransisco 49ers Cheerleaders with Boris in London.

  • rwendland

    BorisWatch have more on this – Sir Edward Lister (Chief of Staff) and Isabel Dedring (Deputy Mayor for Transport) also went. They don’t know what the trip was about exactly, though likely transport related.

    Fun thing is that Isabel Dedring flew for £375.79 return, while the two men flew for £4,105.95 each return. Hmmm. I know who I’m most impressed with!.

    http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2013/06/08/if-youre-going-to-san-francisco/

  • Debbie Kendall

    If he’s negotiating for a major Investment in London, they should be paying. NOT the taxpayer.

  • Pingback: If You’re Going To San Francisco…. | Boris Watch()

Latest

  • News Latest London Mayor poll shows rise in support for Khan and Hodge, but Jowell still leads

    Latest London Mayor poll shows rise in support for Khan and Hodge, but Jowell still leads

    New polling for the London Mayoral race shows Tessa Jowell is still the most popular candidate among Labour supporters in London – and has even more support among Londoners as a whole. The retiring Dulwich and Norwood MP comes top of potential Labour candidates with 26%, no change from last month. When including non-Labour supporters, this figure rises to 28%. However, Shadow London minister Sadiq Khan has seen a boost in his support, rising eight points to 19%. This appears to have […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There’s no point criticising Stuart Broad without looking at the real issue at hand

    There’s no point criticising Stuart Broad without looking at the real issue at hand

    The ill-judged Twitter comments of England cricketer Stuart Broad tell us less about him and more about society’s need to focus on the issues that really matter. Given my openly stated wish to not just raise the minimum wage, as Labour has pledged to do, but to go further and implement the Living Wage, you may expect to hear me criticising the fast bowler. Well, I won’t be. His comment was certainly not his smartest move: “I’ve heard if you […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The values of our NHS should be at the heart of our economy

    The values of our NHS should be at the heart of our economy

    So we’re now within 100 days of the General Election. I bet most people outside the Westminster bubble won’t see it in those terms, or care, for that matter. In fact, they are probably already fed up with the constant TV coverage about it. For many people, ‘100 days’ simply means three more pay cheques where their basic outgoings exceed what they’re bringing in. It means three more calls to a payday lender to bridge the difference. It might even […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Kinnock calls for an end to “sniping from behind” following Milburn and Hutton comments

    Kinnock calls for an end to “sniping from behind” following Milburn and Hutton comments

    Lord Neil Kinnock has waded into the debate over Labour’s policy offer ahead of the general election and called for an end to internal fights within the party. He said was reluctant to enter into the current conversation but following interventions from people such as Tony Blair and Alan Milburn, Kinnock said their criticisms of Labour’s current strategy were ““so great that it requires a response”. This comes after Milburn along with John Hutton openly criticised Labour’s policy on the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Politicians who recognise that Cameron is wrong on immigration must have the conviction to say so

    Politicians who recognise that Cameron is wrong on immigration must have the conviction to say so

    On Tuesday, David Cameron said Britain would be a “better, stronger country” with fewer migrants. So, if you’re a migrant, sorry about that. I guess it’s off to the ferry terminal for you (that includes you too, Dad). I’m actually a little confused as to the acceptable discourse around migration. Apparently it’s totally ok, even welcome, for the Prime Minister to blithely observe that fewer migrants would be good for the country. But when Mark Reckless says UKIP would ask EU migrants to […]

    Read more →