Will the IFS criticise the way Tories measure living standards?

Yesterday during the Budget, George Osborne claimed that living standards are up from 2010 standards. Job done, he seemed to suggest.

pounds in_hand money coins wage

However, the way the Government have calculated this is based on a measure called the Real Household Disposable Income (RHDI) – which the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) have criticised use of by the government in the past.

Back in 2013 following the Autumn Statement Paul Johnson from the IFS pinpointed the trouble with measuring living standards in this way:

“It is collected as an input to the national accounts, not as something with which to measure living standards. As a series it behaves quite differently both since 2008 and over long periods of time to other series measuring living standards. It includes some income which does not accrue to the household sector at all. And its actual construction is opaque. It tells us something about household incomes but it should certainly not be used in isolation to measure how they are changing.” (emphasis ours)

The Tories now claim that the IFS now accept the RDHI as a valid measure. The IFS will make its statement on the Budget later this afternoon, so we’ll what they say about this – and if they’ve had a sudden change of heart, it’ll be interesting to see why.

Either way, yesterday Johnson said earlier Osborne would have to make “unprecedented” spending cuts to meet his public spending plans – so the Chancellor may not like what the IFS has to say this afternoon.

More from LabourList

DONATE HERE

Do you value LabourList’s coverage? We need your support.

Our independent journalists have been on the ground during this local and by-election campaign, which marks the first key electoral test of Keir Starmer’s government. 

We’ve been out and about with Labour activists and candidates across the country from Bristol to Hull, and will soon be heading to Cambridgeshire and Lancashire – as well as Runcorn and Helsby. We’ve also polled readers for their views on the campaign.

LabourList relies on donations from readers like you to continue its fair, fast, reliable and well-informed news and analysis. We don’t have party funding or billionaire owners. 

If you value what we do, set up a regular donation today.

DONATE HERE